thecel
narrow-orbits brachy-skull ogre
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 23,306
- Reputation
- 48,412
If the average dick is 5.5 inches long like those cope studies say, there should be more or less the same number of guys with 7-inchers as there are 4-inch dicklets (because 4 and 7 are the same distance away from the mean in a normal distribution). This seems completely absurd because everyone knows many guys whose cocks exceed 7" but know no one (or very few men) whose cocks are just 4 inches long.
In online communities you frequently see guys claiming 7"+, very few guys claiming average, and zero guys reporting shorter than 5 inches. This can somewhat be explained by the fact that dickmoggers are more proud of their sizes and are thus more likely to share their measurements.
However, things stop adding up once you examine deeper. The subreddit r/BigDickProblems (251k) has over 5 times the subscribers that r/SmallDickProblems (49.1k) has. One would expect the small dick subreddit to have more members because dickcels have more significant problems.
Furthermore, the average dick size posted in r/SmallDickProblems seems to be between 4.5" and 5.5", so the average “small dick” is just 0.5 inches under average. On the other hand, the typical “big dicks” in r/BigDickProblems range from 7.5 inches up to 9 inches and sometimes bigger, so the average “big dick” is 2.5"+ bigger than average. Clearly it’s heavily skewed towards the big dicks.
Given the vast genetic variation that exists in Internet communities—there’re many 6'4"+ heightmoggers as well as sub-5'7" manlets posting on Reddit—it makes sense to observe a wide range of reported penis sizes that mirrors the IRL size distribution. Yet the statistical average is typically the minimum number to get posted.
Yes big-dick-havers are more eager to boast about their sizes on the Internet, but the discrepancy is so large that pride and shame aren’t adequate explanations. The modern web is not only full of boastful ego-narcs but is also inhabited by a massive population of depressed doomers. You’d think you’d see a substantial number of these doomercels venting online about having small dicks, but you don’t see this at all. What you actually find is astounding.
These blackpilled Internet dwellers have big penises despite being below average in every other physical trait. They post—in blackpilled sites and non-blackpilled sites—that they have it really hard in life because they’re short, ugly, ethnic, non-NT, disabled etc. When they mention penis size, they’re almost always over 6 inches.
Even in the most blackpilled and incelmaxed caves of the Internet, statistically exceptionally-sized dicks are the norm. In Incels.is of all places, a site made for males with extremely below-average genetics, 7"+ dicks are common and 4-to-5-inchers are rare.
According to CalcSD, 6.33 inches is in the 90th percentile—top 10%. Now consider the fact that incel forum members comprise the bottom 10% of male genetics. How is it possible that almost all the bottom-10% men have dicks that’re bigger than the top 10% according to the stats? It can’t be true.
Common cope responses to what I just said:
“Big dick pride; small dick shame.” — First of all, tons of people on the Internet have no shame. Second, having bad genetics is nothing to be ashamed of in incel communities. Incel forum members don’t hesitate to declare how subhuman they are; users have signatures along the lines of “5'2" currycel saving up for LeFort”. So why wouldn’t they post their small dick sizes?
“Self-resorted sizes are measured wrong” — Perhaps by like a centimeter. Measuring incorrectly can only get you so far; it’s not like you can measure a 5-inch dick wrong and get 7 inches. The dramatic difference between self-reported and statistical sizes means that most guys are measuring from their anuses if incorrect measurement is the explanation for the discrepancy.
Penis size studies are false.
Stop coping.
In online communities you frequently see guys claiming 7"+, very few guys claiming average, and zero guys reporting shorter than 5 inches. This can somewhat be explained by the fact that dickmoggers are more proud of their sizes and are thus more likely to share their measurements.
However, things stop adding up once you examine deeper. The subreddit r/BigDickProblems (251k) has over 5 times the subscribers that r/SmallDickProblems (49.1k) has. One would expect the small dick subreddit to have more members because dickcels have more significant problems.
Furthermore, the average dick size posted in r/SmallDickProblems seems to be between 4.5" and 5.5", so the average “small dick” is just 0.5 inches under average. On the other hand, the typical “big dicks” in r/BigDickProblems range from 7.5 inches up to 9 inches and sometimes bigger, so the average “big dick” is 2.5"+ bigger than average. Clearly it’s heavily skewed towards the big dicks.
Given the vast genetic variation that exists in Internet communities—there’re many 6'4"+ heightmoggers as well as sub-5'7" manlets posting on Reddit—it makes sense to observe a wide range of reported penis sizes that mirrors the IRL size distribution. Yet the statistical average is typically the minimum number to get posted.
Yes big-dick-havers are more eager to boast about their sizes on the Internet, but the discrepancy is so large that pride and shame aren’t adequate explanations. The modern web is not only full of boastful ego-narcs but is also inhabited by a massive population of depressed doomers. You’d think you’d see a substantial number of these doomercels venting online about having small dicks, but you don’t see this at all. What you actually find is astounding.
These blackpilled Internet dwellers have big penises despite being below average in every other physical trait. They post—in blackpilled sites and non-blackpilled sites—that they have it really hard in life because they’re short, ugly, ethnic, non-NT, disabled etc. When they mention penis size, they’re almost always over 6 inches.
Even in the most blackpilled and incelmaxed caves of the Internet, statistically exceptionally-sized dicks are the norm. In Incels.is of all places, a site made for males with extremely below-average genetics, 7"+ dicks are common and 4-to-5-inchers are rare.
According to CalcSD, 6.33 inches is in the 90th percentile—top 10%. Now consider the fact that incel forum members comprise the bottom 10% of male genetics. How is it possible that almost all the bottom-10% men have dicks that’re bigger than the top 10% according to the stats? It can’t be true.
Common cope responses to what I just said:
- muh people lie on the Internet
- muh small-dick-havers are too ashamed to share their dick sizes
- muh people measure wrong
“Big dick pride; small dick shame.” — First of all, tons of people on the Internet have no shame. Second, having bad genetics is nothing to be ashamed of in incel communities. Incel forum members don’t hesitate to declare how subhuman they are; users have signatures along the lines of “5'2" currycel saving up for LeFort”. So why wouldn’t they post their small dick sizes?
“Self-resorted sizes are measured wrong” — Perhaps by like a centimeter. Measuring incorrectly can only get you so far; it’s not like you can measure a 5-inch dick wrong and get 7 inches. The dramatic difference between self-reported and statistical sizes means that most guys are measuring from their anuses if incorrect measurement is the explanation for the discrepancy.
Penis size studies are false.
Stop coping.
Last edited:
more proof the average Zoomer dick size is 7.5″+
