Average Jewish penis size

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Seriously? Idk. I want to try
@Gengar Would I receive any warning or ban directly?

Put it in a spoiler. I don’t think dicks are inherently gay, just depends on the context (if you jerk off then yeah that’s gay).

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

no wonder they crave power so hard

how can they COPE

View attachment 4100887

Thought this was gonna be one of those “Jews are the biggest” kind of cope thread but yeah I saw a study and it was just in the 5 inch range like every other race.

 

[kazama]

Put it in a spoiler. I don’t think dicks are inherently gay, just depends on the context (if you jerk off then yeah that’s gay).

Im gonna leave that guy. But answer me something
7 inches girth in the head ???
Another thing, can the foreskin (that cover) add size either in length or girth?
Just it bruh, I trust more in u than Google tbh

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Im gonna leave that guy. But answer me something
7 inches girth in the head ???
Another thing, can the foreskin (that cover) add size either in length or girth?
Just it bruh, I trust more in u than Google tbh

No foreskin is never counted. You’ve got 7 inch glans? Is that what you’re saying?

 

[Deleted member 208062]

Just lol at people finding jewish forum members to make fun of because they hate the elite

 

[kazama]

No foreskin is never counted

Wdym? Like, an uncircumcised penis would lose some size if it underwent surgery?

You’ve got 7 inch glans? Is that what you’re saying?

No, that guy said he was 7x6.5 and then told me he had 7 inches in his head??? In girth???
Tf bro, that would be like. 2cm more than the middle of the penis lol, a bomb?

 

[User28823]

LOOKS LIKE I REALLY GOT SOME PEOPLE RILED UP OVER THIS THREAD.

SEEMS THAT THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT JEWISH POPULATION ON .ORG

SMALL DICK JEWCUCKS IN SHAMBLES IT SEEMS.

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

Wdym? Like, an uncircumcised penis would lose some size if it underwent surgery?

No, when measuring a penis we don’t measure the foreskin, it’s just the erect penis from pubic bone to tip.

No, that guy said he was 7x6.5 and then told me he had 7 inches in his head??? In girth???
Tf bro, that would be like. 2cm more than the middle of the penis lol, a bomb?

It’s possible but it’s very likely not natural. Nowadays thanks to surgery and PE, guys can have insane sizes.

 

[kazama]

No, when measuring a penis we don’t measure the foreskin, it’s just the erect penis from pubic bone to tip.

Not even girth? Yeah, Idk. In theory, a normal foreskin goes down below the glans, if it goes up it would be a lot, right?

It’s possible but it’s very likely not natural. Nowadays thanks to surgery and PE, guys can have insane sizes.

+ Larp and niggas increase the world average to 8x8 inches lol

 

[Deleted member 110192]

DNR
I'll still rape u, and I'll rape any Jew, and I'll rape anyone U SHIT
@Copercel Im going to become a cannibal like any native who lived in this SHIT

Cannibals are high T asf if we’re being honest

Become one

 

[Ghoulish]

Sahih Muslim 977 a
Ibn Buraida reported on the authority of his father that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:

I forbade you to visit graves, but you may now visit them; I forbade you to eat the flesh of sacrificial animals after three days, but you way now keep it as along as you feel inclined; and I forbade you nabidh except in a water-skin, you may drink it from all kinds of water-skins, but you must not drink anything intoxicating

Completely forgot u sent this, again, this is another abrogation.

In the very early days of Islam, the practice of visiting graves was forbidden. The reason was preventative. The pagan Arabs (Jahiliyyah) were deeply immersed in excessive, idolatrous mourning and worship at gravesites. To sever the new Muslim community completely from these polytheistic practices, a temporary prohibition was instituted

Once Tawhid (monotheism) was firmly established in the hearts of the believers, the prohibition was lifted. Visiting graves was then encouraged to serve a new, positive purpose: as a reminder of death, the afterlife, and to pray for mercy for the deceased. The evil (shirk) was always evil and remains evil. The ruling changed to allow a new good (remembrance of the Hereafter) once the community was strong enough to avoid the old evil.

I forbade you to eat the flesh of sacrificial animals after three days

This was initially mandated as a form of charity and generosity, to ensure that the meat of the sacrificed animal was distributed widely to the poor and needy within a short time, rather than being hoarded by the wealthy.

Later, when the Muslim community became more established and financially stable, this restriction was eased. The underlying good—charity and sharing—remained, but the compulsory method was relaxed. People could now be trusted to manage their provisions charitably without a strict time limit. The good (charity) remained good. The specific law was relaxed as circumstances changed.

and I forbade you nabidh except in a water-skin, you may drink it from all kinds of water-skins, but you must not drink anything intoxicating

Nabidh is a mild drink made by soaking dates or raisins in water. It ferments slowly. The initial prohibition against storing it in certain containers (like gourds or sealed pots) was because these containers accelerated the fermentation process, making it likely to become intoxicating (Khamr) quickly.


The final part of the statement makes the eternal principle crystal clear: "but you must not drink anything intoxicating."

• The evil (Khamr/intoxication) was, is, and will always be absolutely forbidden. Its nature never changed.
• The initial ruling was a preventative measure to block all avenues (sadd al-dhara'i) leading to the evil of intoxication.
• The later ruling provided clarity: the issue isn't the container itself, but the intoxicating effect. If a drink becomes intoxicating, it is forbidden regardless of the container. If it doesn't, it is permissible.

 

[Noesis]

Completely forgot u sent this, again, this is another abrogation.

In the very early days of Islam, the practice of visiting graves was forbidden. The reason was preventative. The pagan Arabs (Jahiliyyah) were deeply immersed in excessive, idolatrous mourning and worship at gravesites. To sever the new Muslim community completely from these polytheistic practices, a temporary prohibition was instituted

Once Tawhid (monotheism) was firmly established in the hearts of the believers, the prohibition was lifted. Visiting graves was then encouraged to serve a new, positive purpose: as a reminder of death, the afterlife, and to pray for mercy for the deceased. The evil (shirk) was always evil and remains evil. The ruling changed to allow a new good (remembrance of the Hereafter) once the community was strong enough to avoid the old evil.

This was initially mandated as a form of charity and generosity, to ensure that the meat of the sacrificed animal was distributed widely to the poor and needy within a short time, rather than being hoarded by the wealthy.

Later, when the Muslim community became more established and financially stable, this restriction was eased. The underlying good—charity and sharing—remained, but the compulsory method was relaxed. People could now be trusted to manage their provisions charitably without a strict time limit. The good (charity) remained good. The specific law was relaxed as circumstances changed.

Nabidh is a mild drink made by soaking dates or raisins in water. It ferments slowly. The initial prohibition against storing it in certain containers (like gourds or sealed pots) was because these containers accelerated the fermentation process, making it likely to become intoxicating (Khamr) quickly.


The final part of the statement makes the eternal principle crystal clear: "but you must not drink anything intoxicating."

• The evil (Khamr/intoxication) was, is, and will always be absolutely forbidden. Its nature never changed.
• The initial ruling was a preventative measure to block all avenues (sadd al-dhara'i) leading to the evil of intoxication.
• The later ruling provided clarity: the issue isn't the container itself, but the intoxicating effect. If a drink becomes intoxicating, it is forbidden regardless of the container. If it doesn't, it is permissible.

Nice explanation but what does that prove, if something was haram it means it was evil to do if it became halal it means it's now permissable

 

[User28823]

Completely forgot u sent this, again, this is another abrogation.

In the very early days of Islam, the practice of visiting graves was forbidden. The reason was preventative. The pagan Arabs (Jahiliyyah) were deeply immersed in excessive, idolatrous mourning and worship at gravesites. To sever the new Muslim community completely from these polytheistic practices, a temporary prohibition was instituted

Once Tawhid (monotheism) was firmly established in the hearts of the believers, the prohibition was lifted. Visiting graves was then encouraged to serve a new, positive purpose: as a reminder of death, the afterlife, and to pray for mercy for the deceased. The evil (shirk) was always evil and remains evil. The ruling changed to allow a new good (remembrance of the Hereafter) once the community was strong enough to avoid the old evil.

This was initially mandated as a form of charity and generosity, to ensure that the meat of the sacrificed animal was distributed widely to the poor and needy within a short time, rather than being hoarded by the wealthy.

Later, when the Muslim community became more established and financially stable, this restriction was eased. The underlying good—charity and sharing—remained, but the compulsory method was relaxed. People could now be trusted to manage their provisions charitably without a strict time limit. The good (charity) remained good. The specific law was relaxed as circumstances changed.

Nabidh is a mild drink made by soaking dates or raisins in water. It ferments slowly. The initial prohibition against storing it in certain containers (like gourds or sealed pots) was because these containers accelerated the fermentation process, making it likely to become intoxicating (Khamr) quickly.


The final part of the statement makes the eternal principle crystal clear: "but you must not drink anything intoxicating."

• The evil (Khamr/intoxication) was, is, and will always be absolutely forbidden. Its nature never changed.
• The initial ruling was a preventative measure to block all avenues (sadd al-dhara'i) leading to the evil of intoxication.
• The later ruling provided clarity: the issue isn't the container itself, but the intoxicating effect. If a drink becomes intoxicating, it is forbidden regardless of the container. If it doesn't, it is permissible.

Nigga thinks he’s Stephen king na I ain’t feel like reading a book today fam maybe another day

 

[Ghoulish]

Nigga thinks he’s Stephen king na I ain’t feel like reading a book today fam maybe another day

It isn’t for you to read, retard

The guy I sent it to read it all.

 

[Ghoulish]

Nice explanation but what does that prove, if something was haram it means it was evil to do if it became halal it means it's now permissable

You are treating the legal terms "halal" and "haram" as perfect synonyms for the universal, metaphysical concepts of "good" and "evil." In Islamic theology, this is an oversimplification.

Here’s the crucial distinction:

• Al-Halal (The Permissible): An action which Allah has permitted. There is reward for performing it if done with good intention, but no sin for leaving it.
• Al-Haram (The Prohibited): An action which Allah has forbidden. There is sin for committing it.
• Al-Khayr (Good): That which is inherently beneficial, virtuous, and aligned with the purpose of creation.
• Al-Sharr (Evil): That which is inherently harmful, corrupting, and opposed to the purpose of creation.

Was the act of walking to a grave inherently evil? No. The prohibition was a fence to protect the community from the real, inherent evil: falling into the idolatrous practices (shirk) they had just left. The action itself was neutral; its potential consequence was catastrophic.

Once the fence of pure monotheism was strong, the neutral action (visiting) could now be used for an inherent good: remembering death and praying for mercy. The evil (shirk) was always and forever evil. The ruling on the neutral action changed.

 

[Deleted member 234348]

no wonder they crave power so hard

how can they COPE

View attachment 4100887

Still bigger than arab dicks

 

[User28823]

Still bigger than arab dicks

arabs jews..... both subhuman dickcels