Average location of phenotypes in Europe

Alexanderr

Alexanderr

Admin
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Posts
21,630
Reputation
43,447
1656543828739


Purely out of interest, where do you draw the line as to who's white and who isn't?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Patriot, Beetlejuice, Deleted member 18244 and 2 others
Im faelid let me cope in peace
 
eskimo is white for me
 
Sdfgsdgdgdsf   Copy
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Patriot, Moggie, Beetlejuice and 5 others
1656544316727
Here is the definitive ethnic Map
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr
sadly the map is made up
but i think drawing a line is retarded since race varies from person to person, some countries just have more whites
 
sadly the map is made up
but i think drawing a line is retarded since race varies from person to person, some countries just have more whites
I mainly made the thread just to show how ambiguous the term white is. There is no clear-cut description that is unanimously agreed upon. This actually goes for a lot of race categorizations.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Oberyn
BC839B61 14FB 417B BDB8 A3F23BCC5FE8
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 22284, Oberyn, Deprived and 1 other person
Tydal and Trønder looks like every Norwegian I see every day lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr
I mainly made the thread just to show how ambiguous the term white is. There is no clear-cut description that is unanimously agreed upon. This actually goes for a lot of race categorizations.
both black and white are ambiguous in that sense
black supposedly means every sub saharan african, but it doesnt make much sense
west africans are vastly different from khoi san ppl, from east africans and from nilotics
but you can clearly tell whites apart
the lines only start to get blurry if you consider west asians and south asians
the thing is that those groups are basically a mix of blacks and whites
arabs are a mix of caucasians, indo europeans, and the thing that makes them brown is admixture with africans from the horn of africa
with indians its the same, mixed with the aboriginals/onge of the indian subcontinent
so in the end you have blacks, whites and a mix of them
i think there should be one single factor that determines whiteness - does your skin actually look white
if it looks brown or darker then youre not white
this filters out all browner arabs and curries, but includes some north indians and turks/arabs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Oberyn
Tydal and Trønder looks like every Norwegian I see every day lmao
Yeah, most Dutchmen look like slight variations of the West-Nordic and North-Atlantic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TUSSELEIF
What makes the people right outside those borders not white?
I view the term white as a synonim for European. Everyone on the map is a member of the Caucasoid race, but I’d make a distinction between Europeans and Middle Easterns, Central Asians.

And whites have further subcategories, I would say those are West European, Central European, Southern European (Meds) , North European and Eastern European (Slavs). They are a mix of genetic, cultural, historical and religious boundaries
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr
i think there should be one single factor that determines whiteness - does your skin actually look white
if it looks brown or darker then youre not white
this filters out all browner arabs and curries, but includes some north indians and turks/arabs
So Koreans are white? Nice.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16371
So Koreans are white? Nice.
i was talking about more questionable cases, i mentioned west and south asians
koreans are easily identifiable as mongoloid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deprived
north balts are literally as white as you can get
and that image of their supposed pheno is fake
Jfl for thinking they’re white
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
West and Central Anatolia
Southern Spain and Gibraltar
 
both black and white are ambiguous in that sense
black supposedly means every sub saharan african, but it doesnt make much sense
west africans are vastly different from khoi san ppl, from east africans and from nilotics
True.
but you can clearly tell whites apart
I wouldn't say so, using this thread as an exemplar. People can unanimously agree on those phenotypes in West and Northern Europe being irrefutably ''white'' but once you start approaching the edges the lines get blurry and you see dispute.
the lines only start to get blurry if you consider west asians and south asians
the thing is that those groups are basically a mix of blacks and whites
arabs are a mix of caucasians, indo europeans, and the thing that makes them brown is admixture with africans from the horn of africa
with indians its the same, mixed with the aboriginals/onge of the indian subcontinent
so in the end you have blacks, whites and a mix of them
I think this is a huge oversimplification especially when the terms white and black are ambiguous and not clear-cut.
i think there should be one single factor that determines whiteness - does your skin actually look white
if it looks brown or darker then youre not white
this filters out all browner arabs and curries, but includes some north indians and turks/arabs
And includes a lot of East Asians that would invariably look ''white'' by those standards, even more so than a lot of Europeans. Though we both know they are not. But even then, it's up to each individual to determine where they draw the line between white but tan, and brown.

Making that criterion just as subjective & ambiguous.
 
So Koreans are white? Nice.
Koreans don’t even have white skin. They just avoid the sun and tanning to look whiter but they are swarthier than whites
 
True.

I wouldn't say so, using this thread as an exemplar. People can unanimously agree on those phenotypes in West and Northern Europe being irrefutably ''white'' but once you start approaching the edges the lines get blurry and you see dispute.

I think this is a huge oversimplification especially when the terms white and black are ambiguous and not clear-cut.
rly the terms exist to recognize the ends of the spectrum
so you have way to differentiate between clearly white and clearly black people
its the same as regular old colors
what you classify as red or orange can get blurry, but at the end of the day red is most of the time clearly different from orange
And includes a lot of East Asians that would invariably look ''white'' by those standards, even more so than a lot of Europeans. Though we both know they are not. But even then, it's up to each individual to determine where they draw the line between white but tan, and brown.

Making that criterion just as subjective & ambiguous.
i know, i thought about saying asians arent included but thought its obvious enough
nobody questions whether pale skinned asians are white or not, ppl question if a turk or north indian is white or not
sure, brown is still a subjective idea, but at least here you can use deciding factors like whether the person is european or not, or if he's muslim/hindu/jewish or not
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
Eyes anything but brown = white.
 
Purely out of interest, where do you draw the line as to who's white and who isn't?
C12C0838 1607 4C9A 9382 4328673ADDB5

Only blue is white
Meds and Slavs for obvious reasons are nonwhite
Highlanders and Irish are not part of western civilization
Neither are nordics, which wouldn’t traditionally be considered white but ig honorary whites now?

France Poland and a few countries have significant white populations but I wouldn’t count them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
View attachment 1758118
Only blue is white
Meds and Slavs for obvious reasons are nonwhite
Highlanders and Irish are not part of western civilization
Neither are nordics, which wouldn’t traditionally be considered white but ig honorary whites now?

France Poland and a few countries have significant white populations but I wouldn’t count them
who cares about what that idiot thinks?
anglos are less white than many europeans
 
who cares about what that idiot thinks?
anglos are less white than many europeans
Because of admixture after imperialism I’m talking about the original race
 
Because of admixture after imperialism I’m talking about the original race
that irrelevant
scandinavians and north baltics have always been whiter
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940 and Erik-Jón
View attachment 1758118
Only blue is white
Meds and Slavs for obvious reasons are nonwhite
Highlanders and Irish are not part of western civilization
Neither are nordics, which wouldn’t traditionally be considered white but ig honorary whites now?

France Poland and a few countries have significant white populations but I wouldn’t count them
Wait some I’m not white damnnnn, what’s a swarthy complexion?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: incel194012940

Similar threads

S
Replies
6
Views
86
Unhuman
Unhuman
rape
Replies
5
Views
144
handsomegrapist
handsomegrapist
D
Replies
29
Views
163
FutureSlayer
FutureSlayer
PrinceLuenLeoncur
Replies
21
Views
473
EthiopianMaxxer
EthiopianMaxxer
6ft4
Replies
158
Views
2K
infini
infini

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top