Alexanderr
Admin
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Posts
- 21,630
- Reputation
- 43,447
Purely out of interest, where do you draw the line as to who's white and who isn't?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
View attachment 1758049
Purely out of interest, where do you draw the line as to who's white and who isn't?
Why do you consider the Dinaro Mediterranean white but not the Paleo Sardinian or the Paleo Mediterranean?
the snozzerWhy do you consider the Dinaro Mediterranean white but not the Paleo Sardinian or the Paleo Mediterranean?
Why'd you consider the Libyan white but not the Caucasid (far right) or the Proto-Iranian (bottom right) white?View attachment 1758058Here is the definitive ethnic Map
north balts are literally as white as you can getView attachment 1758058Here is the definitive ethnic Map
I mainly made the thread just to show how ambiguous the term white is. There is no clear-cut description that is unanimously agreed upon. This actually goes for a lot of race categorizations.sadly the map is made up
but i think drawing a line is retarded since race varies from person to person, some countries just have more whites
Only northern europe and eastern is white.View attachment 1758049
Purely out of interest, where do you draw the line as to who's white and who isn't?
What makes the people right outside those borders not white?
both black and white are ambiguous in that senseI mainly made the thread just to show how ambiguous the term white is. There is no clear-cut description that is unanimously agreed upon. This actually goes for a lot of race categorizations.
Yeah, most Dutchmen look like slight variations of the West-Nordic and North-Atlantic.Tydal and Trønder looks like every Norwegian I see every day lmao
I view the term white as a synonim for European. Everyone on the map is a member of the Caucasoid race, but I’d make a distinction between Europeans and Middle Easterns, Central Asians.What makes the people right outside those borders not white?
So Koreans are white? Nice.i think there should be one single factor that determines whiteness - does your skin actually look white
if it looks brown or darker then youre not white
this filters out all browner arabs and curries, but includes some north indians and turks/arabs
i was talking about more questionable cases, i mentioned west and south asiansSo Koreans are white? Nice.
Jfl for thinking they’re whitenorth balts are literally as white as you can get
and that image of their supposed pheno is fake
if theyre not white then nobody isJfl for thinking they’re white
Lmao what noif theyre not white then nobody is
they have the least amount of nonwhite dna
Looks like average people in Michigan
Everyone outside USA is technically an ArabLooks like average people in Michigan
Everyone outside USA is technically an Arab
True.both black and white are ambiguous in that sense
black supposedly means every sub saharan african, but it doesnt make much sense
west africans are vastly different from khoi san ppl, from east africans and from nilotics
I wouldn't say so, using this thread as an exemplar. People can unanimously agree on those phenotypes in West and Northern Europe being irrefutably ''white'' but once you start approaching the edges the lines get blurry and you see dispute.but you can clearly tell whites apart
I think this is a huge oversimplification especially when the terms white and black are ambiguous and not clear-cut.the lines only start to get blurry if you consider west asians and south asians
the thing is that those groups are basically a mix of blacks and whites
arabs are a mix of caucasians, indo europeans, and the thing that makes them brown is admixture with africans from the horn of africa
with indians its the same, mixed with the aboriginals/onge of the indian subcontinent
so in the end you have blacks, whites and a mix of them
And includes a lot of East Asians that would invariably look ''white'' by those standards, even more so than a lot of Europeans. Though we both know they are not. But even then, it's up to each individual to determine where they draw the line between white but tan, and brown.i think there should be one single factor that determines whiteness - does your skin actually look white
if it looks brown or darker then youre not white
this filters out all browner arabs and curries, but includes some north indians and turks/arabs
This is trueEveryone outside USA is technically an Arab
Koreans don’t even have white skin. They just avoid the sun and tanning to look whiter but they are swarthier than whitesSo Koreans are white? Nice.
View attachment 1758049
Purely out of interest, where do you draw the line as to who's white and who isn't?
Hmm, I’m Icelandic what does that mean lol
rly the terms exist to recognize the ends of the spectrumTrue.
I wouldn't say so, using this thread as an exemplar. People can unanimously agree on those phenotypes in West and Northern Europe being irrefutably ''white'' but once you start approaching the edges the lines get blurry and you see dispute.
I think this is a huge oversimplification especially when the terms white and black are ambiguous and not clear-cut.
i know, i thought about saying asians arent included but thought its obvious enoughAnd includes a lot of East Asians that would invariably look ''white'' by those standards, even more so than a lot of Europeans. Though we both know they are not. But even then, it's up to each individual to determine where they draw the line between white but tan, and brown.
Making that criterion just as subjective & ambiguous.
You included a slavshit chink
AccidentYou included a slavshit chink
chink my assYou included a slavshit chink
it means youre a moggerHmm, I’m Icelandic what does that mean lol
What’s yamnya?it means youre a mogger
utterly over for this ethnic cuckEyes anything but brown = white.
a proto indo european cultureWhat’s yamnya?
He's ginger, that creature isn't even human.
Purely out of interest, where do you draw the line as to who's white and who isn't?
who cares about what that idiot thinks?View attachment 1758118
Only blue is white
Meds and Slavs for obvious reasons are nonwhite
Highlanders and Irish are not part of western civilization
Neither are nordics, which wouldn’t traditionally be considered white but ig honorary whites now?
France Poland and a few countries have significant white populations but I wouldn’t count them
Because of admixture after imperialism I’m talking about the original racewho cares about what that idiot thinks?
anglos are less white than many europeans
that irrelevantBecause of admixture after imperialism I’m talking about the original race
Wait some I’m not white damnnnn, what’s a swarthy complexion?View attachment 1758118
Only blue is white
Meds and Slavs for obvious reasons are nonwhite
Highlanders and Irish are not part of western civilization
Neither are nordics, which wouldn’t traditionally be considered white but ig honorary whites now?
France Poland and a few countries have significant white populations but I wouldn’t count them