BonesAndHarmony
Taking a break from the autism
- Joined
- May 29, 2019
- Posts
- 2,017
- Reputation
- 3,505
Attraction Inequality and the Dating Economy
The future of Western civilization may need brave new institutions and brave new ways for men and women to fruitfully relate to each other.
quillette.com
But while the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing.
LOL. This basically means that if we were to quantify how unfair the dating scene for the average man is, it would be as unfair as Apartheid in South Africa! Still, protesting for equal rights for Blacks is seen as noble, protesting for eqaul dating prospects for men is mysogynistic. What a clown world.On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average—think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war—think South Africa).
Monogamy itself is weaker, as divorce becomes easier and even married people often report encountering “dead bedrooms” in which one or both spouses feel no obligation to give a partner who they do not regard as sufficiently attractive access to sexual experiences.
Meaning women are becoming bigger whores by the day.Religious belief is in constant decline, and with it declines the belief in the dignity of celibacy or the importance of anything other than hedonism (sexual or otherwise).
The jungle law is back and it will certainly get worse. I predict disastrous events once the Blackpill will be common sense. There are studies that suggest that unfair mating systems cause a rise in murdering between men. So maybe we will see more ERs in the future. Misogyny will be upgraded to a threat as big as racism. It's ogre.The result of these cultural changes is that the highly unequal social structures of the prehistoric savanna homo sapiens are reasserting themselves, and with them the dissatisfactions of the unattractive “sexually underprivileged” majority are coming back. It is ironic that the progressives who cheer on the decline of religion and the weakening of “outdated” institutions like monogamy are actually acting as the ultimate reactionaries, returning us to the oldest and most barbaric, unequal animal social structures that have ever existed. In this case it is the conservatives who are cheering for the progressive ideal of “sexual income redistribution” through a novel invention: monogamy.
Last edited: