beauty is not subjective

[pashanimair]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

 

[pashanimair]

@slothful @2vi_ls @BeanCelll @aviar @Draak77

 

[kenibba]

water

 

[MtnLord]

Did read, nice post man

 

[pajjeetslayer]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

Just write essays about the most water topics and get free reps theory

 

[elkkkk]

Kind of water atp but obviously true, normies are aware of this deep down too but could never be real to themselves,
for most people its going to be more convenient to lie to themselves instead of accepting the harsh truth.

 

[slothful]

I completely agree

I always have to teach people that beauty is not a subjective thing. Someone clearly ugly isn't beautiful just because "God created them" or "all humans are beautiful"

 

[Hide]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

Beauty is only subjective once you're chadlite+

 

[IraniancelV2]

Nice rep farm, pashi

 

[BigBallsLarry]

i both agree and disagree.

i agree on the biological part, but it's more complicated than that.

attractiveness IS rooted in evolutionary biology, but that attractiveness needs to also be based on biology (meaning getting horny, love at first sight etc.)

so that means people can still like someone's niche side. they can like someone's personality and more.

sure being attracted to someone is based purely on what's already proven to work biologically, but there are still preferences

for example, even though of course I'm biologically gonna be attracted to high E breedable women, id still rather skinny alt girls.

 

[Resistance.]

Mirin Thread

 

[Resistance.]

i both agree and disagree.

i agree on the biological part, but it's more complicated than that.

attractiveness IS rooted in evolutionary biology, but that attractiveness needs to also be based on biology (meaning getting horny, love at first sight etc.)

so that means people can still like someone's niche side. they can like someone's personality and more.

sure being attracted to someone is based purely on what's already proven to work biologically, but there are still preferences

for example, even though of course I'm biologically gonna be attracted to high E breedable women, id still rather skinny alt girls.

 

[pashanimair]

@MogsGymMaxx @Thief @grilldaddy❤️ @wojak @Jué

 

[NorthPontidsMog]

beauty is objective but attraction is NOT. there is a lot of people who would fuck anything

 

[The Grinch]

No way!!!!

 

[pashanimair]

i both agree and disagree.

i agree on the biological part, but it's more complicated than that.

attractiveness IS rooted in evolutionary biology, but that attractiveness needs to also be based on biology (meaning getting horny, love at first sight etc.)

so that means people can still like someone's niche side. they can like someone's personality and more.

sure being attracted to someone is based purely on what's already proven to work biologically, but there are still preferences

for example, even though of course I'm biologically gonna be attracted to high E breedable women, id still rather skinny alt girls.

Preferences don’t exist outside of biology, they exist within it, you liking skinny alt girls doesn’t cancel out the evolutionary framework, it just operates as a sub variation, at the end of the day you’re still wired to respond to the same universal signals, youth fertility symmetry and health markers, that’s why even your niche taste is only possible if the base biological boxes are already checked, personality style subculture aesthetics they can add flavor but they can’t rewrite the code, nobody gets to escape the brutal foundation of attraction, the system allows for small variations but the core laws never bend, thinking otherwise is just comforting yourself with a softer illusion

 

[Daddy's Home]

Brothers from the same parents btw..

 

[ShowerCelling]

Drowning - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ICXCLuvr]

Water is not dry

 

[BigBallsLarry]

Brothers from the same parents btw..

View attachment 4100481

i might beat masters ass if we have to wait for longer..

 

[CorinthianLOX]

water

 

[jgrey080]

The only subjective part is small preference like aesthetic, fashion Etc. most of it is objective

 

[TrueSub𝟑]

 

[BrutalMogger]

it is, i am a low ltn so i can see the beatuy in ltbs

 

[Daddy's Home]

all the time beauty is subjective

The same species by the way..

 

[2vi_ls]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

This is very true, saying beauty is subjective is just mega cope, and probably trying to make up for something

 

[StellaFanboy]

Wide face, hunter eyes, symmetry, prominent cheekbones and good jawline = developed like they should.


Its that easy. There is a natural way humans should look if they are successful hunters and get a lot of meat and organs for good development, otherwise you will have an underdeveloped face and some health issues possibly along with that.

 

[VeryFuglyNiyguhs]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

Most people agree on who is attractive and who is not.

 

[StellaFanboy]

Human brain knows if someone is attractive within a few seconds, and it knows that a developed face is attractive, doesnt matter what you consciously want to believe, your body is already wired to do and know stuff without your input. You can try to force yourself to like girls with underdeveloped features and wrinkly skin, but you wont succeed in that, cause attraction is not about what you want, but what your body wants and is predetermined to want for specific reasons.

 

[pashanimair]

@Snoofy @𝑳𝒆𝒐. @ahavik @Racepill @Ralix

 

[Noesis]

Objective elements form a subjective opinion

 

[pashanimair]

Objective elements form a subjective opinion

objective elements shape attraction, subjective opinions are just minor variations, the core rules are biology, everything else is secondary

 

[FramePillGymMaxx]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

Beauty is objective, but attraction in subjective up to a certain point

 

[Noesis]

objective elements shape attraction, subjective opinions are just minor variations, the core rules are biology, everything else is secondary

Not really because if you compare two good looking men not 100% of people would agree one of them is the better looking and it's not attraction either.

 

[pashanimair]

Not really because if you compare two good looking men not 100% of people would agree one of them is the better looking and it's not attraction either.

true, not everyone agrees on minor differences, but that doesnt change the universal foundation. Everyone still responds to the same biological markers, the disagreement is only about small variations, the core rules never lie

 

[Noesis]

true, not everyone agrees on minor differences, but that doesnt change the universal foundation. Everyone still responds to the same biological markers, the disagreement is only about small variations, the core rules never lie

Yes I agree to this I think appeal (not necessarily attraction) and beauty are different. The example I mentioned, people would choose differently because one is more appealing to them than the other. So it's technically not really beauty that everyone is after. In my opinion you have to believe in God to know what's objective and what's not. If you're Muslim for example a beard is beautiful because God says so but it's not appealing to us humans

 

[turkcelfatcel]

well then how would you explain some women preffering prettyboys and some preffering chads

 

[pashanimair]

Yes I agree to this I think appeal (not necessarily attraction) and beauty are different. The example I mentioned, people would choose differently because one is more appealing to them than the other. So it's technically not really beauty that everyone is after. In my opinion you have to believe in God to know what's objective and what's not. If you're Muslim for example a beard is beautiful because God says so but it's not appealing to us humans

Muslims know that beards don't suit them, and They know it doesn't look good, they do it because it's circumcision This isn't an example of objective beauty, but i understand what you mean np

 

[pashanimair]

well then how would you explain some women preffering prettyboys and some preffering chads

Preferences for prettyboys or chads don’t make beauty subjective, they just reflect which objective traits each woman values more, the core markers youth, symmetry, health, fertility are universal, everything else is minor variation, attraction isn’t a matter of opinion, it’s biology following unchanging rules

 

[turkcelfatcel]

Preferences for prettyboys or chads don’t make beauty subjective, they just reflect which objective traits each woman values more, the core markers youth, symmetry, health, fertility are universal, everything else is minor variation, attraction isn’t a matter of opinion, it’s biology following unchanging rules

so that means its subjective
i feel like its 70% objective and 30% subjective

 

[Racepill]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

Put this threads in my favorite boiii

 

[turkcelfatcel]

so that means its subjective
i feel like its 70% objective and 30% subjective

why are u jfling me nigger

 

[lepo2317]

Biggest lie ever. In 0.1 second you can judge if a woman is beautiful or not. Same for women. They judge you in nanoseconds. Only guys who have no options are coping with "muh, that whale is cool" because they can't fuck models.

 

[Montenigger]

Did read, nice post man

Say that again...

 

[ahavik]

There’s a cliche we hear all the time beauty is subjective what’s beautiful to you may not be beautiful to me.
It sounds nice, it gives everyone hope. But the scientific reality crushes this romantic theory without mercy.
Attractiveness is rooted not in individual preference, but in evolutionary biology.
The human brain is hardwired to reward signals that increase survival and reproductive success.
Facial symmetry, clear skin, certain all of these are biological markers of fitness.
Studies show that across cultures, geographies, and even historical periods, there is a high level of agreement in attractiveness ratings.
The universal preference for symmetrical faces proves it’s not a cultural construct but an evolutionary reflex.
Likewise, men across the globe consistently prefer women with a low waist to hip ratio, these findings completely dismantle the myth of subjectivity.
Of course, there are small variations. One person may call a face stunning while another just says average.
But this doesn’t mean beauty is subjective. The core criteria of attraction are universal the differences are nothing more than minor variations.
90% of people are drawn to the same faces and the same bodies.
Pretending otherwise is just self delusion. beauty is subjective is nothing but a comforting fairy tale society tells to soften the brutal edge of biology



@BigBallsLarry @Gomez @selfascender @barambo @elkkkk

i agree i think

 

[Snoofy]

I agree that 70 percent is objective but I’d say 30 percent is subjective

 

[iblamexyz]

Just write essays about the most water topics and get free reps theory

made laugh out loud ngl

 

[pajjeetslayer]

made laugh out loud ngl

Am I that funny