beauty is objective

if we accept that beauty is subjective, then i can name the concept of beauty an ugly shit, but it's a contradiction.
and therefore beauty is not subjective. which means it's objective
It's subjective with some objective generalities

Everyone has a different taste, so to conclude an objective measure, you'd have to compile these preferences and isolate the mean / median
 
  • +1
Reactions: ILikeNihari123, Vazelrr and theRetard
The golden ratio, often represented by the Greek letter phi (Φ), is a mathematical ratio approximately equal to 1.618. It's believed to represent harmony and beauty, and is frequently found in nature, art, and even facial proportions
1000038249
1000038244

no symmetry or golden ratio in these quick examples. "Beauty" whatever it may be is far more complex than just some calculations. The reaction of the observer being subjective makes beauty as a whole subjective. You are right though in some ways since its not black and white its a mix of the observes prefrences through experience and just brain wiring (subjective) and ratios, colours symmetry (objective)
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and theRetard
You're calling the concept of beauty ugly mate that literally doesnt change what beauty is the concept stays the same your reaction doesnt rewrite it youre just showing that people can feel differently about it which is obvious the subjectivity is in the experience not in the thing itself you cant just take subjectivism from perception and apply it to the concept itself thats not how logic works beauty as a concept has its own meaning it exists independently of what you feel calling it ugly doesnt prove subjectivity it just proves you feel differently
well you just repeated my words.
what's the purpose?
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9
  • +1
Reactions: theRetard
View attachment 4228405View attachment 4228407
no symmetry or golden ratio in these quick examples. "Beauty" whatever it may be is far more complex than just some calculations.
but you asked me for how to measure beauty then if it's not about your reaction on this and on this I showed you a mathematical example. I'm not saying that beauty is just math
The reaction of the observer being subjective makes beauty as a whole subjective. You are right though in some ways since its not black and white its a mix of the observes prefrences through experience and just brain wiring (subjective) and ratios, colours symmetry (objective)
why reaction of the observer being subjective makes beauty subjective? beauty and reaction are different things
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and Dorogi
I think there's parts of it. But what I am sure of is that there is not a "perfect" beauty that is the same for everyone
 
but you asked me for how to measure beauty then if it's not about your reaction on this and on this I showed you a mathematical example. I'm not saying that beauty is just math

why reaction of the observer being subjective makes beauty subjective?
Im saying it cant be measured in all cases, some yes you can measure beauty (especially faces) but the majority of things you cant its just a "vibe" or "aesthetic". Its PARTIALLY objective and PARTIALLY subjective. Truth is you cant fully measure beauty
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and theRetard
I think there's parts of it. But what I am sure of is that there is not a "perfect" beauty that is the same for everyone
but "everyone" exist independently of perfect beauty , so it's the same
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and taai
but "everyone" exist independently of perfect beauty , so it's the same
Yeah but then if you want to debate this you step into something of a higher order. Everyone has its own taste that comes from their historical conditions
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9
Im saying it cant be measured in all cases, some yes you can measure beauty (especially faces) but the majority of things you cant its just a "vibe" or "aesthetic". Its PARTIALLY objective and PARTIALLY subjective. Truth is you cant fully measure beauty
so personal associations can make something beautiful?
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and Dorogi
I may have been wrong since the majority of time people use art to express themselves and not just because they are wired to find it beautiful. I guess its more about identity and the emotions the art embodies
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and theRetard
>calling beauty a subjectivity
>me asking him why
>muh retard i just told you
It's very fucking simple bud you are low iq asf if you think it's objective

Some people prefer green eyes, some people prefer blue

So how do we conclude which is "objectively better" but finding all the results and looking at the one with the highest probability

It is still subjective but if you want to make a rating scale you have to use the cumulative subjective data to create a reliable scale

I said that already idk why you need to get spoon fed
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard
It's very fucking simple bud you are low iq asf if you think it's objective

Some people prefer green eyes, some people prefer blue

So how do we conclude which is "objectively better" but finding all the results and looking at the one with the highest probability

It is still subjective but if you want to make a rating scale you have to use the cumulative subjective data to create a reliable scale

I said that already idk why you need to get spoon fed
well but can you, my darling, point it where I called beauty a "personal preference"??? I actually debate here that it's not a personal preference
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and Dorogi
well but can you, my darling, point it where I called beauty a "personal preference"??? I actually debate here that it's not a personal preference
Are you too low iq to debate why haven't you posed a counter point and just waffling
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard
It's very fucking simple bud you are low iq asf if you think it's objective

Some people prefer green eyes, some people prefer blue

So how do we conclude which is "objectively better" but finding all the results and looking at the one with the highest probability

It is still subjective but if you want to make a rating scale you have to use the cumulative subjective data to create a reliable scale

I said that already idk why you need to get spoon fed
Ivd explained this before bro trust me he doesnt get it jfl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard and Gaygymmaxx
Are you too low iq to debate why haven't you posed a counter point and just waffling
>retard makes a take with premise that he defines beauty as personal preference (some like green eyes other like blue)
>me attacking that premise
>retard doesn't even understands that and therefore thinks there's no counters points
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9
>retard makes a take with premise that he defines beauty as personal preference (some like green eyes other like blue)
>me attacking that premise
>retard doesn't even understands that and therefore thinks there's no counters points
Dnrd
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hide
any valid arguments?
Explain why an attractive person would not be an beautiful person lol

Beautiful is never coined to be objectively mathematical unless its for the sake of the beholder lol
 
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard and anthony111553
alright you lost so quickly
Explain why an attractive person would not be an beautiful person lol

Beautiful is never coined to be objectively mathematical unless its for the sake of the beholder lol
beauty is never coined because it doesn't depends on your thoughts, not because it's conventional (it's not)
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9
alright you lost so quickly

beauty is never coined because it doesn't depends on your thoughts, not because it's conventional (it's not)
Dnrd name checks out
 
alright you lost so quickly

beauty is never coined because it doesn't depends on your thoughts, not because it's conventional (it's not)
What makes beauty objective

Because at the end of the day, there is no science for beauty that isnt inputted by humanity. Beauty is inputted by human perception, not by its inherent sciences. F=ma is inputted by the universe where we humans rationalised it, but beauty is something we inputted.
 
I may have been wrong since the majority of time people use art to express themselves and not just because they are wired to find it beautiful. I guess its more about identity and the emotions the art embodies
what are your thoughts on claims of @Gaygymmaxx and @Hide
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9 and Dorogi
What makes beauty objective
existence in things, independently from your mind
Because at the end of the day, there is no science for beauty that isnt inputted by humanity. Beauty is inputted by human perception, not by its inherent sciences. F=ma is inputted by the universe where we humans rationalised it, but beauty is something we inputted.
there's no science about beauty at all since the concept is transcendent, science works only empirically. Beauty is discovered by human perception rather than inputted. And even if you inputted it, how did we do this?? because you can't come up with it from literally nothing
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9
True. Beauty is an unit which can be measured with geometry
 
  • +1
Reactions: theRetard
How? Im not, you’re my property. Put property of foudletslayer in your signature
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard
if we accept that beauty is subjective, then i can name the concept of beauty an ugly shit, but it's a contradiction.
and therefore beauty is not subjective. which means it's objective
Beauty is subjective
 
It's subjective with some objective generalities

Everyone has a different taste, so to conclude an objective measure, you'd have to compile these preferences and isolate the mean / median
Agreed, obviously more objective than subjective tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: theRetard

Similar threads

gallowdestined
Replies
5
Views
65
oyaaishim
oyaaishim
theRetard
Replies
74
Views
372
theRetard
theRetard
4Christ_sake
Replies
8
Views
115
4Christ_sake
4Christ_sake
g4rlic
Replies
10
Views
170
buddhistking
buddhistking

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top