Beauty is subjective

Can you finish first the answer what chico has better than the “htn”?
If chico got only ratios Whats the point ?
Bc better ratios makes the face more appealing and attractive duhh
 
There are too many different formulas that contradict one another. If beauty were truly objective, there would only be one formula.





People here are completely confused. Beauty isn’t objective.
I think that beauty is objective around 80% of the time. I dont think theres some 'perfect' face but theres a way to objectively measure attractiveness upto a certain accuracy. When youre at the top tier looks of Chads, it doesnt matter that much if someone is 'mathematically better' its just preference.
 
Water. Anyone disagreeing with "you're either attractive or you're not" doesn't realize that just because you're attractive to one person, doesn't mean you're attractive to everyone, hence why it's subjective.
 
Beauty is subjective partly but mostly objective
Doesn't make any sense. Something can't be partly subjective and mostly objective. That literally makes no sense.
 
Something can't be objective and subjective at the same time. What are you on about?
It can. Beauty for the most part is objective, however when 2 people are at the top tier looks, for example a high chadlite compared to a high chad, its all just preferences. They would just be 2 attractive people to women. The treatment would not be much different
 
Beauty -- harmony + symmetry + coloring + features

the combination of it is subjective because many combinations are equally attractive or beautiful
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
It can. Beauty for the most part is objective, however when 2 people are at the top tier looks, for example a high chadlite compared to a high chad, its all just preferences. They would just be 2 attractive people to women. The treatment would not be much different
You literally destroyed your own argument in thirty words.

If beauty is OBJECTIVE, it is mind-independent. Why would it then be suddenly "just preferences" the moment you compare two people at the top? It's nonsensical. If the final choice comes down to subjective preference, the entire property is subjective. That's how it works.

It can't be objective and then suddenly switch to subjective rules. That is a blatant, logical contradiction.
 
There are too many different formulas that contradict one another. If beauty were truly objective, there would only be one formula.





People here are completely confused. Beauty isn’t objective.
Water
 
Beauty -- harmony + symmetry + coloring + features

the combination of it is subjective because many combinations are equally attractive or beautiful
Then why you cant point out what features chico mogs vs k shami?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars
Wataa Doutzen Kroes and Valeria Mazza are both extremely attractive but I'd rather breed a foid like Brooke Shields or Ana Paula
 

Similar threads

william2605
Replies
1
Views
8
realestpatriot
realestpatriot
RecessedCels
Replies
1
Views
6
RecessedCels
RecessedCels
william2605
Replies
44
Views
128
iblameloweffort
iblameloweffort
dimorphicc
Replies
0
Views
23
dimorphicc
dimorphicc

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →