Beauty isnt objective

miriniqontiktok

miriniqontiktok

Cursed by neurodivergency
Joined
Feb 7, 2026
Posts
842
Reputation
600
Title
 
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: brotato78 and XIX
yeah explain your point instead of just making an empty statement you fucking retard
 
  • JFL
Reactions: chudcell999 and Lamos
Cope
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: brotato78, Stalker, Lamos and 1 other person
stacy will subjectively assess your face as subhuman
 
its 80% objective 20% subjective

lets stop the cope and falsehoods yeah?

its 2026
 
  • +1
Reactions: fearoffoids2.0
yeah explain your point instead of just making an empty statement you fucking retard
First of all Beauty doesn’t exist without humans to perceive it, without humans to perceive it there is no beauty as beauty is based of human perception, so per definition it is subjective, an example of something objective is gravity, it exists regardless of perception. So for looks to be objective there would need to be 1. 100% agreement on whats attractive 2. Looks would need to exist out of perception. Is it true that some ratios are proven to be widely viewed as more attractive like ESR and FWHR forexample? Yes but thats called an consensus
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: iamnotaracist and XIX
It isn't objective for everyone, but it's objective for the majority

There's always going to be outliers, exceptions don't disprove a rule

There's a reason the actors that are considered the most good looking by the vast majority of people fall very high on any objective rating scale
 
First of all Beauty doesn’t exist without humans to perceive it, without humans to perceive it there is no beauty as beauty is based of human perception, so per definition it is subjective, an example of something objective is gravity, it exists regardless of perception. So for looks to be objective there would need to be 1. 100% agreement on whats attractive 2. Looks would need to exist out of perception. Is it true that some ratios are proven to be widely viewed as more attractive like ESR and FWHR forexample? Yes but thats called an consensus
yeah its inter-subjective, theres no reason to state the obvious
 
  • +1
Reactions: miriniqontiktok
its 80% objective 20%

It isn't objective for everyone, but it's objective for the majority

There's always going to be outliers, exceptions don't disprove a rule

There's a reason the actors that are considered the most good looking by the vast majority of people fall very high on any objective rating scale
if its objective it must be for everyone😭!

You are showing you dont understand the word
 
yeah its inter-subjective, theres no reason to state the obvious
You would think so but people claim its objective all the time
 
Beauty is but attraction isn’t yk
If you’re beautiful she’s attracted to you. Simple as that, these girls say they aren’t attracted to these good looking men online because it would hurt their ego
 
  • +1
Reactions: Banana ★ 🍌
Read the long text i wrote it explains what i mean well
Looks is broad.
It is Universally Agreed that Facial Harmony, Dimorphism, Leaness/Angularity, and Miscellaneous Features are considered Sexually Attractive. Relationship and Marital Attractive however is subjective as puts things like Phenotype, archatype, and ratio variables that are affected by age and culture which are subjective.
 

Similar threads

william2605
Replies
44
Views
257
iblameloweffort
iblameloweffort
william2605
Replies
1
Views
29
realestpatriot
realestpatriot
william2605
Replies
27
Views
164
ICL
ICL
Bitchwhipper2
Replies
0
Views
15
Bitchwhipper2
Bitchwhipper2
Futanari
Replies
9
Views
211
KellSS
K

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →