beauty truly is subjective

[hax]

what people don't understand is that beauty is truly subjective, but only once you’re already above a certain level looks wise.
below that level, beauty will always be harsh and objective, where you’re either attractive or you aren’t.

the subjectivity only appears within the top tier: blue vs hazel eyes, blond vs dark hair, curly vs straight hair, just different styles of chads recolored.
that’s where personal preference matters.

 

[Nexom]

So... appeal?

 

[hax]

So... appeal?

@Chico vs @Jordan

 

[areayes]

what people don't understand is that beauty is truly subjective, but only once you’re already above a certain level looks wise.
below that level, beauty will always be harsh and objective, where you’re either attractive or you aren’t.

the subjectivity only appears within the top tier: blue vs hazel eyes, blond vs dark hair, curly vs straight hair, just different styles of chads recolored.
that’s where personal preference matters.

Cope

 

[natelma0]

what people don't understand is that beauty is truly subjective, but only once you’re already above a certain level looks wise.
below that level, beauty will always be harsh and objective, where you’re either attractive or you aren’t.

the subjectivity only appears within the top tier: blue vs hazel eyes, blond vs dark hair, curly vs straight hair, just different styles of chads recolored.
that’s where personal preference matters.

beauty is objective, attraction subjective

 

[hax]

beauty is objective, attraction subjective

isn't beauty based on attraction?

 

[natelma0]

isn't beauty based on attraction?

yes but it's a "all tortoises are turtles, but not all turtles are tortoises" situation, attraction is based off of beauty but beauty alone is diff than attraction