Being a male let alone an incel is full of contradictions

[Deleted member 17997]

Unless you're born with elite genes, you're going to have a horrible time.

> Men with shit genes should kill themselves
> Then men with the next better tier of genes are now the new shit gene owners

> Manlets should kill themselves
> Then 6' becomes the new manlet

etc. etc.

A chad or even normie cannot exist unless he has lots of men underneath him who have a shitty life.

It's like being alive as man guarantees a shitty existence with pain, anxiety and always contemplating suicide.

 

[Zer0/∞]

I should be aborted tbh for being so non NT.

 

[Deleted member 17763]

At least we’re not one of the species where the male sometimes gets eaten by the female after sex

 

[Deleted member 18436]

At least we’re not one of the species where the male sometimes gets eaten by the female after sex

at least you get to nut.

 

[Deleted member 18494]

Brutal man-pill

 

[Deleted member 17791]

That's not how things work. Women aren't attracted to the rarity of a trait. They are attracted to specific ratios. The ideal chin to philtrum ratio is 2.3-2.5, deviating from that will be falo no matter how rare or common it is.

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

That's not how things work. Women aren't attracted to the rarity of a trait. They are attracted to specific ratios. The ideal chin to philtrum ratio is 2.3-2.5, deviating from that will be falo no matter how rare or common it is.

loads of male models are miles outside this range - stop coping with ratios.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

loads of male models are miles outside this range - stop coping with ratios.

Having a 3 ratio chin like Opry is still better than 1 chinlet but It's still aesthetically inferior.

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

Having a 3 ratio chin like Opry is still better than 1 chinlet but It's still aesthetically inferior.

a ratio of 1 should be considered a disability, I have one of the worst chins here and im getting genio for it and my ratio is still 2.2-2.3, I want to add like 6mm to my chin

 

[Deleted member 17763]

That's not how things work. Women aren't attracted to the rarity of a trait. They are attracted to specific ratios. The ideal chin to philtrum ratio is 2.3-2.5, deviating from that will be falo no matter how rare or common it is.

Potato potatoe, it’s not rare to have one good ratio but it is very rare for a male to have enough good ratios/features in total to be attractive to women. And what’s seen as attractive by women most certainly is based on rarity, that’s just how sexual selection works in humans and many other animals. It’s quite feasible for Chad to impregnate lots of women so that’s what women have evolved to desire

 

[Deleted member 15827]

I should be aborted tbh for being so non NT.
View attachment 1635071

You are very cute

 

[Deleted member 17997]

That's not how things work. Women aren't attracted to the rarity of a trait. They are attracted to specific ratios. The ideal chin to philtrum ratio is 2.3-2.5, deviating from that will be falo no matter how rare or common it is.

Maybe you're right, that makes sense to me. But I feel women will always want the guy who's better looking. Its just really fucked rn because so many people have deformities from nutrition, breathing issues due to environmental stuff causing allergies etc.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Take acid and Buddha max don't be afraid our redeemer will be born soon and bring an end to this hell

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Potato potatoe, it’s not rare to have one good ratio but it is very rare for a male to have enough good ratios/features in total to be attractive to women. And what’s seen as attractive by women most certainly is based on rarity, that’s just how sexual selection works in humans and many other animals. It’s quite feasible for Chad to impregnate lots of women so that’s what women have evolved to desire

If everyone had perfectly or near perfect ratios. Literally no one would be incel.

Look at Rice countries like like South Korea, Japan and Taiwan (not country) They have birth rates of around 1. Meanwhile Western countries are around 1.5. In both societies, muh foids are liberated and don't need to marrymaxx to survive.

If rarity of a trait is what defines it's attractiveness, then both societies would have near identical birth rates but they don't. Rice are more likely to have recessed maxilas and chins and thearfore are not going to slay even if 6psl chad is nonexistent.

 

[Deleted member 17308]

Last thread before roping?

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Maybe you're right, that makes sense to me. But I feel women will always want the guy who's better looking. Its just really fucked rn because so many people have deformities from nutrition, breathing issues due to environmental stuff causing allergies etc.

You're right that women will choose the better looking guy but that is a set standard and not effected by rarity.

If half you face is just chin, and you have a onehead. You will look retarded and will be mogged to death by even blackops2cel.

 

[Deleted member 17997]

You're right that women will choose the better looking guy but that is a set standard and not effected by rarity.

If half you face is just chin, and you have a onehead. You will look retarded and will be mogged to death by even blackops2cel.

Im not saying your wrong, you have fully changed my view on this subject as it makes objective sense. But to play the other side:

How come men find all women attractive, but women don't find all men attractive. Perhaps men wouldn't find lower tier women attractive if they had access to giga Stacy's with giant boobs. Maybe its a similar mechanism playing out here?

 

[Deleted member 17763]

If everyone had perfectly or near perfect ratios. Literally no one would be incel.

Look at Rice countries like like South Korea, Japan and Taiwan (not country) They have birth rates of around 1. Meanwhile Western countries are around 1.5. In both societies, muh foids are liberated and don't need to marrymaxx to survive.

If rarity of a trait is what defines it's attractiveness, then both societies would have near identical birth rates but they don't. Rice are more likely to have recessed maxilas and chins and thearfore are not going to slay even if 6psl chad is nonexistent.

There’s so many other factors that you and I both don’t understand going on in this example though.

You're right that women will choose the better looking guy but that is a set standard and not effected by rarity.

It absolutely is affected by rarity it’s just that evolution doesn’t happen overnight

 

[Deleted member 17763]

How come men find all women attractive, but women don't find all men attractive.

Because women selecting men is based on rarity and he’s incorrect. While men selecting women is not at least not to the same extent

 

[Deleted member 17997]

Because women selecting men is based on rarity and he’s incorrect. While men selecting women is not at least not to the same extent

If a Stacy was transported to a country full of recessed incels, I cant see her fucking any of them though

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Im not saying your wrong, you have fully changed my view on this subject as it makes objective sense. But to play the other side:

How come men find all women attractive, but women don't find all men attractive. Perhaps men wouldn't find lower tier women attractive if they had access to giga Stacy's with giant boobs. Maybe its a similar mechanism playing out here?

Men can cum multiple times a day. Women have to spend 9 months before giving birth.

Women don't have the option to just fuck around Because they can only ever reproduce a small number of times. Men can theoretically reproduce literally thousands of times.

 

[Deleted member 17763]

If a Stacy was transported to a country full of recessed incels, I cant see her fucking any of them though

Yeah because evolution doesn’t happen overnight let alone during one persons lifespan. But if everyone got uglier or if everyone got better looking we would evolve and eventually end up with a similar scenario to the one we have now

 

[Deleted member 17791]

There’s so many other factors that you and I both don’t understand going on in this example though.


It absolutely is affected by rarity it’s just that evolution doesn’t happen overnight

just assert that you're correct with no arguments theory.

 

[Deleted member 17997]

Men can cum multiple times a day. Women have to spend 9 months before giving birth.

Women don't have the option to just fuck around Because they can only ever reproduce a small number of times. Men can theoretically reproduce literally thousands of times.

But birth control exists, therefore in the modern day they can and they do with a large group of men. Its not like a woman just fucks one Chad

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Why did u angry reacr

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Yeah because evolution doesn’t happen overnight let alone during one persons lifespan. But if everyone got uglier or if everyone got better looking we would evolve and eventually end up with a similar scenario to the one we have now

Just wait millions of years for the population to change standards to win the argument theory.

They wouldn't be humans anymore you nut case and your argument doesn't even support your position that women are attracted to a trait because of how rare it is. You're literally making points that prove me correct, thank you.

 

[Deleted member 17997]

Why did u angry reacr

I have no idea man

 

[Deleted member 17763]

just assert that you're correct with no arguments theory.

You literally just restated my argument:

Women don't have the option to just fuck around Because they can only ever reproduce a small number of times. Men can theoretically reproduce literally thousands of times.

This is exactly why women are generally attracted to the most attractive men and therefore it is based off rarity

 

[Deleted member 17791]

But birth control exists, therefore in the modern day they can and they do with a large group of men. Its not like a woman just fucks one Chad

They have casual sex with chad tho.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

I have no idea man

I'm on acid and your post is very true . Sickly fucking society I hate it

 

[6.5PSL]

You're right and this will always be the case. Men will always be extremely horny and combined with the Internet this will make women easily control the dating market. So, they can select men more carefully and we can evolve as a species as disgusting short men die alone! Yikes!

 

[Deleted member 17997]

They have casual sex with chad tho.

So they will fuck around a lot, just with good looking males. So I think the fact that they don't fuck ugly men isn't based on pregnancy rather its based on the pleasure aspect. Then again maybe they would want to be impregnated by those "potential" men, instead of incels etc.

Maybe men also just like Stacy a lot of the time but cope and settle with women who are lower. Its like how you will eat anything if hungry. If a man had a choice of any woman he wouldn't choose an ugly woman unless she was very motherly or something, same way women choose betabuxxers.

 

[juste]

being a human is worse

 

[Deleted member 17791]

You literally just restated my argument:



This is exactly why women are generally attracted to the most attractive men and therefore it is based off rarity

Then why do ugly countries have less kids than better looking countries when quality of life is equivalent?

Muh there are too many variables to say anything.

You absolute loon. Women are not attracted to looks with absurd proportions.

 

[Deleted member 17763]

Just wait millions of years for the population to change standards to win the argument theory.

They wouldn't be humans anymore you nut case and your argument doesn't even support your position that women are attracted to a trait because of how rare it is. You're literally making points that prove me correct, thank you.

people randomly getting way uglier overnight isn’t a realistic circumstance that has ever occurred to our species nor is it one that likely ever will occur. Also evolution doesn’t take a million years either jfl. You’re not even attempting to argue in good faith anymore I’m getting the impression you’re just not intelligent

 

[Deleted member 17763]

Then why do ugly countries have less kids than better looking countries when quality of life is equivalent?

Muh there are too many variables to say anything.

You absolute loon. Women are not attracted to looks with absurd proportions.

I’m not arguing that women are attracted to looks with absurd proportions I’m arguing that having enough proportions within the normal range aka good features to be attractive to a lot of women is rare

 

[Deleted member 17791]

people randomly getting way uglier overnight isn’t a realistic circumstance that has ever occurred to our species nor is it one that likely ever will occur. Also evolution doesn’t take a million years either jfl. You’re not even attempting to argue in good faith anymore I’m getting the impression you’re just not intelligent

Keep moving the goalpost retard.

At first your argument was "women are attracted to a trait depending how rare it is"

Now it is "what women consider ideal is determined by thousands of generations of evolution"

 

[Deleted member 17763]

Keep moving the goalpost retard.

At first your argument was "women are attracted to a trait depending how rare it is"

Now it is "what women consider ideal is determined by thousands of generations of evolution"

Nope I never said that this is the very first thing I said:

it’s not rare to have one good ratio but it is very rare for a male to have enough good ratios/features in total to be attractive to women.

Over for your memory

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I’m not arguing that women are attracted to looks with absurd proportions I’m arguing that having enough proportions within the normal range aka good features to be attractive to a lot of women is rare

Potato potatoe, it’s not rare to have one good ratio but it is very rare for a male to have enough good ratios/features in total to be attractive to women. And what’s seen as attractive by women most certainly is based on rarity, that’s just how sexual selection works in humans and many other animals. It’s quite feasible for Chad to impregnate lots of women so that’s what women have evolved to desire

"I’m arguing that having enough proportions within the normal range aka good features to be attractive to a lot of women is rare"

"what’s seen as attractive by women most certainly is based on rarity"

 

[Deleted member 17763]

"I’m arguing that having enough proportions within the normal range aka good features to be attractive to a lot of women is rare"

"what’s seen as attractive by women most certainly is based on rarity"

Yes which is obviously completely different than saying this:

"women are attracted to a trait depending how rare it is"

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Yes which is obviously completely different than saying this:

You literally just restated my argument:



This is exactly why women are generally attracted to the most attractive men and therefore it is based off rarity

it is based off rarity

That is your argument, @PearlHandledDeck . Attractiveness is baed of rarity. You said that. But now you're denying your own words.

 

[Deleted member 14077]

at least you get to nut.

Atleast you get to keep custody a little while before divorce

 

[Deleted member 17763]

That is your argument, @PearlHandledDeck . Attractiveness is baed of rarity. You said that. But now you're denying your own words.

I’m denying that I said what determines whether one trait is attractive is based off rarity

I’m arguing that it’s rare for most or all of someone’s traits to be attractive, not for one specific trait which is what you keep saying

You’re a dumb fuck with 0 reading comprehension capabilities, get ignored

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Nope I never said that this is the very first thing I said:

Over for your memory

Over for my memory?

Pick of The emperor from star wars saying ironic. Images won't work, fucking site, just imagine it.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I’m denying that I said what determines whether one trait is attractive is based off rarity

I’m arguing that it’s rare for most or all of someone’s traits to be attractive, not for one specific trait which is what you keep saying

You’re a dumb fuck with 0 reading comprehension capabilities, get ignored

Ignored