Being a Prettyboy is ideal.

Chadeep

Chadeep

Mumbai Slum Dweller
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
42,073
Reputation
114,154
Images 4
Images 5
Images 7
Images 8
Images 6
Images 9
Images 10
Images 12
Images 13

Prime young women who look like this are attracted to prettyboys mostly. As a masc guy you only get tranny abominations. Maher's gf for example.
Images 14

Ideal looks for prime women appeal.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deprived, litaz, Deleted member 16990 and 22 others
Being good looking is ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ascending2Tyrone, Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 16990 and 13 others
Prettyboys age badly, masculinity is timeless
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, EverythingMattersCel and Deleted member 13158
  • +1
Reactions: GandyIsNormie, Toth's thot and Chadeep
It over for you cuz manlet. Pretty boy on top and can easily become masculine. Can’t say the opposite
Pretty boy and masc are on a scale tbh. It's not black and white, you can't expect leo to be as masc as someone like henry cavil. But you aren't wrong in that they can try to be masc. But they will never look as masc as someone like cavil
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep
@Kekee You prettyboypilled me tbh. But being a prettyboy comes with a constant fear of gay men hitting on you sometimes sexually assaulting you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent and Kekee
@Kekee You prettyboypilled me tbh. But being a prettyboy comes with a constant fear of gay men hitting on you sometimes sexually assaulting you.
you don't have to be a prettyboy to have that fear. Just be a manlet :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, EverythingMattersCel, Kekee and 1 other person
View attachment 1481745View attachment 1481746View attachment 1481747View attachment 1481748View attachment 1481749View attachment 1481750View attachment 1481751View attachment 1481752View attachment 1481753
Prime young women who look like this are attracted to prettyboys mostly. As a masc guy you only get tranny abominations. Maher's gf for example.
View attachment 1481754
Ideal looks for prime women appeal.
Is the smile line extending beyond the boundary of the lips a new filter?
 
I used to agree but seeing a certain someone's tinder results has thrown all prettyboy copes into the bin, dom+masc mogs so hard it's not even funny
@brbbrah @Latebloomer10 :feelswhy:

girls want to look at prettyboys, maybe get fucked by them and let's be honest barely any of them look as good irl as their pics
girls want to get fucked by proper handsome masc+dom girls, can even run be a nice guy but look masc+dom on them

looking robust is everything - masculine, high t, light stubble, good soft features - maesthetic
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Ugh..
Reactions: litaz, Daniel Plainview, FreakkForLife and 15 others
I used to agree but seeing a certain someone's tinder results has thrown all prettyboy copes into the bin, dom+masc mogs so hard it's not even funny
@brbbrah @Latebloomer10 :feelswhy:

girls want to look at prettyboys, maybe get fucked by them and let's be honest barely any of them look as good irl as their pics
girls want to get fucked by proper handsome masc+dom girls, can even run be a nice guy but look masc+dom on them

looking robust is everything - masculine, high t, light stubble, good soft features - maesthetic
most high IQ user strikes again.

Women think prettyboys are pretty. Prettyboys are like works of art work, you just stare at them and they have media halo. But when alcohol starts getting thrown in, none of that matters. Women want to be railed by masc
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, PrinceLuenLeoncur, EverythingMattersCel and 9 others
Prettyboy just means that you're young. Cavill, Hemsworth, Momoa were prettyboys in their late teens and early 20s. So yes, looking young is ideal
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 40574, Deprived, Daniel Plainview and 7 others
^^Masc copers above me


Too many brown eyes foids you posted OP. Ain't nobody tryna see that
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, AscendingHero, Deleted member 9003 and 1 other person
Lifefuel for @Chad1212 because he looks like the guy in the OP.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chad69
Prettyboy just means that you're young. Cavill, Hemsworth, Momoa were prettyboys in their late teens and early 20s. So yes, looking young is ideal
Nah not really.
Momoa, Cavill and hemsworth were never pretty boys. They always looked too masc for that.
They were always maethwtic. Cavill maybe a robust pretty boy but Momoa never.
Brad Pitt is and example for someone who was pretty boy, then robust pretty boy and then maeshetic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, FreakkForLife and AscendingHero
Nah not really.
Momoa, Cavill and hemsworth were never pretty boys. They always looked too masc for that.
They were always maethwtic. Cavill maybe a robust pretty boy but Momoa never.
Brad Pitt is and example for someone who was pretty boy, then robust pretty boy and then maeshetic
They were prettyboys
1641540721987
1641540762157
1641540780063
1641540938289
1641540806804
1641540830415
1641540966955


Every good looking man was a prettyboy in his youth. "Masc" is a cope created by ugly men
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deprived, Daniel Plainview, geezcel and 6 others
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, FreakkForLife, AscendingHero and 1 other person
Maybe they pass as robust pretty boys but not as regular pretty boys.
Their skull structure is too masculine for being a regular pretty boy.
We have a different concept on what's a prettyboy. What you call "regular prettyboy" is probably a HTN with a haircut that covers half of his face. And what you call "robust prettyboy" is a young chad. In my opinion a prettyboy is a good looking guy that looks 16-23 yo.

All good looking prettybos have a dimorphic, balanced and forward grown bone structure. Being a prettyboy (looking young) is more about having no facial hair, NW0, good eyebrows and lashes and healthy skin and lips.


1641545948249
1641546197304
unnamed-1-gif.368205
1641546070196
1641546168750
1641546077691
1641546144099
1641546434257
1641546541915
1641546406677
1641546478901
1641546518529
1641546365182



All these prettyboys have a much more dimorphic bone structure (not only bone structure, also features like thick eyebrows) than the average man but still have that prettyboyish look because of what I mentioned. And this is what prime women want.

TLDR: Being a prettyboy is ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deprived, Daniel Plainview, PrinceLuenLeoncur and 6 others
@Kekee You prettyboypilled me tbh. But being a prettyboy comes with a constant fear of gay men hitting on you sometimes sexually assaulting you.
most gay guys like masc men
 
@Kekee You prettyboypilled me tbh. But being a prettyboy comes with a constant fear of gay men hitting on you sometimes sexually assaulting you.
nigga what? you a weak nigga if you scared of getting sexually assaulted by a MAN
 
View attachment 1481754
Ideal looks for prime women appeal.
I'm not entirely sure why this guy is considered super good looking and is simped for in 2022, I am a non-overbite+some softmaxxes away from looking like him. Dont think he's over 5.5 psl but he has massive appeal.
 
manu rios cut his hair and he gained 10 years
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 14478 and PubertyMaxxer
tall pretty boy with good frame is unmoggable
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Ascending2Tyrone, Daniel Plainview, EverythingMattersCel and 5 others
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview and Ryan
Most pretty boy models you see are above 6ft. If you’re talking irl pretty boys, then yeah they’re shorter on average.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview and Ryan
We have a different concept on what's a prettyboy. What you call "regular prettyboy" is probably a HTN with a haircut that covers half of his face
No. What I call a pretty boy is someone with a face type similar to prime Chico:

good collagen and hair, good soft features (lips, eyebrows etc), above average but not impressive facial bone structure and which is also important:
having non masculine traits like high set eyebrows, not a tall square chin, not a big browridge etc.


In my opinion a prettyboy is a good looking guy that looks 16-23 yo.
And I disagree on that.
Because you make it sound like every young Chadlite/chad is a pretty boy.
But that’s just not true.
Look at this guy for example and compare him to young Justin Bieber:
2E346212 B31E 4BC2 8FC5 592D53AAD1A5
582B78C7 A182 42B1 B9C8 20B67BA7278C

Both are good looking and both are young but still the left guy makes Bieber look like a lesbian.
According to you the left guy must also be a pretty boy and that doesn’t make any sense because he looks much much more masculine than Bieber despite not being older.
The reason for this is that he just has more dimorphic traits like the low set brows, warrior skull, wide neck, hooded eyes etc.

Then the next mistake you make is you forget that normal pretty boys age like milk whereas robust prettyboy and especially measthetic Chads age better.

The prime of apretty boy is in his Teenage and early adult years.
The prime of an maesthetic chad is in his adult years.

Just compare current Chico to current Cavill.
Even though Cavill is much older he still looks much better because he has the dimorphic bones which are needed to age good whereas Chico relied on his youthful boyish look which is mainly cause by good collagen and hair (both traits which decline pretty fast for the majority of men)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, AscendingHero, Deleted member 9003 and 3 others
No. What I call a pretty boy is someone with a face type similar to prime Chico:

good collagen and hair, good soft features (lips, eyebrows etc), above average but not impressive facial bone structure and which is also important:
having non masculine traits like high set eyebrows, not a tall square chin, not a big browridge etc.



And I disagree on that.
Because you make it sound like every young Chadlite/chad is a pretty boy.
But that’s just not true.
Look at this guy for example and compare him to young Justin Bieber:
View attachment 1481973View attachment 1481974
Both are good looking and both are young but still the left guy makes Bieber look like a lesbian.
According to you the left guy must also be a pretty boy and that doesn’t make any sense because he looks much much more masculine than Bieber despite not being older.
The reason for this is that he just has more dimorphic traits like the low set brows, warrior skull, wide neck, hooded eyes etc.

Then the next mistake you make is you forget that normal pretty boys age like milk whereas robust prettyboy and especially measthetic Chads age better.

The prime of apretty boy is in his Teenage and early adult years.
The prime of an maesthetic chad is in his adult years.

Just compare current Chico to current Cavill.
Even though Cavill is much older he still looks much better because he has the dimorphic bones which are needed to age good whereas Chico relied on his youthful boyish look which is mainly cause by good collagen and hair (both traits which decline pretty fast for the majority of men)
How about being pretty boy in your teenage/young adult years and being maesthetic from adult and beyond. That is peak mogger perfection imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, AscendingHero and Deleted member 9003
How about being pretty boy in your teenage/young adult years and being maesthetic from adult and beyond. That is peak mogger perfection imo.
This is ultra rare.
Brad Pitt and maybe Matt bomer would be good examples for that
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
Prettyboy just means that you're young. Cavill, Hemsworth, Momoa were prettyboys in their late teens and early 20s. So yes, looking young is ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15305
We have a different concept on what's a prettyboy. What you call "regular prettyboy" is probably a HTN with a haircut that covers half of his face. And what you call "robust prettyboy" is a young chad. In my opinion a prettyboy is a good looking guy that looks 16-23 yo.

All good looking prettybos have a dimorphic, balanced and forward grown bone structure. Being a prettyboy (looking young) is more about having no facial hair, NW0, good eyebrows and lashes and healthy skin and lips.


View attachment 1481934View attachment 1481942
unnamed-1-gif.368205
View attachment 1481937View attachment 1481941View attachment 1481938View attachment 1481940View attachment 1481947View attachment 1481951View attachment 1481946View attachment 1481948View attachment 1481950View attachment 1481944


All these prettyboys have a much more dimorphic bone structure (not only bone structure, also features like thick eyebrows) than the average man but still have that prettyboyish look because of what I mentioned. And this is what prime women want.

TLDR: Being a prettyboy is ideal
Incredibly based post

Prettyboy = young version of Chad
 
  • +1
Reactions: EverythingMattersCel and Deleted member 15305
In the current age, yes, pretty boys are just better. Women generally are kind of disgusted with highly masculine men in general now. That is, a very bulky blue collar lumberjack type dude used to carry lots of value to women but it is dropped significantly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EverythingMattersCel, IThinkImAboutToROPE, Chadeep and 1 other person
Masc chads are just prettyboys who got more masculine with age..
This is why being a prettyboy is ideal bcuz with age they can get masculine nd have a broad appeal while masc guys just get too masculine with age nd look like ogres
 
  • +1
Reactions: EverythingMattersCel, xanny and IThinkImAboutToROPE
good collagen and hair, good soft features (lips, eyebrows etc)
This and having no facial hair is what makes someone looks young aka prettyboy (if good looking).
above average but not impressive facial bone structure and which is also important:
An impressive bone structure is a forward grown, balanced and dimorphic skull, and not having a deformed tier skull like Valuev.
having non masculine traits like high set eyebrows, not a tall square chin, not a big browridge etc.
1641551517045
1641551388532

They have all these features but still are prettyboys.
And I disagree on that.
Because you make it sound like every young Chadlite/chad is a pretty boy.
But that’s just not true.
Look at this guy for example and compare him to young Justin Bieber:
View attachment 1481973View attachment 1481974
Both are good looking and both are young but still the left guy makes Bieber look like a lesbian.
According to you the left guy must also be a pretty boy and that doesn’t make any sense because he looks much much more masculine than Bieber despite not being older.
The reason for this is that he just has more dimorphic traits like the low set brows, warrior skull, wide neck, hooded eyes etc.
Yes, every GOOD LOOKING 16-23 yo guy is a prettyboy.

Bieber is 5 PSL in that pic and is the best example of what you call "regular prettyboy" (HTN haloed by hair). The one on the left is not good looking (4.75 PSL). To be honest he is as feminine as Bieber.

His lower third is above average , but his undimorphic shit eye area makes him look like a feminine lonely abused dog.

1. Bad IPD: In both women and men it looks bad

2. Bad PFL: It makes him look cuckish and uncompetitive. PFL lenght is correlated with prenatal testosterone.

1641554398351


1641554522152




He also has a high round forehead and a small midface (not talking about midface ratio) compared to his other thirds (female trait)

3. Bad eyeshape angularity: This is what makes him look like he has zero friends. Round shaped eyes are a death sentence on men.
Men should have rectangle shaped eyes.

1641556128259
1641556904173



4. Receding eyebrows: Low testosterone trait


5. He doesn't have low set eyebrows and hooded eyes: He's squinting



He also has a high round forehead and a small midface (not talking about midface ratio) compared to his other thirds (female trait). And let's not talk about his unathletic sloped shoulders.




1641556365835


1641556404322
1641556715954

1641558869819


This cuck looks like the left morph of every chart. Epitome of neotenous man. Let's compare him to a real "masculine" man.


1641556910502


Eriksen looks like the DOM morph of the chart. Everything about him is dimorphic (except forehead shape). The guy you posted looks like a soyboy next to him. Eriksen looks older so let's compare him to a "prettyboy".

1641557696169
1641558030236
1641559270526
1641557993540
1641556916581




You may not believe it but he gets brutally dimorphicmogged and aestheticmogged feature by feature by these "prettyboys".

What makes him look "masculine" (ugly) is having no hair which is an unhealthy feature (this is what I mean when I say masc=ugly)


What I'm trying to say with this autistic essay is:

- Prettyboy = Young chad/chadlite that has healthy features signaling youth and peak fertility. This is why the most fertile women prefer them.


-Masc = Most users use it as a cope that means a man is old or ugly. But it means a chad/chadlite that has got older (facial hair, NW, slightly worse skin quality...).

- Everyone else is just not good looking

Then the next mistake you make is you forget that normal pretty boys age like milk whereas robust prettyboy and especially measthetic Chads age better.

The prime of apretty boy is in his Teenage and early adult years.
The prime of an maesthetic chad is in his adult years.

Just compare current Chico to current Cavill.
Even though Cavill is much older he still looks much better because he has the dimorphic bones which are needed to age good whereas Chico relied on his youthful boyish look which is mainly cause by good collagen and hair (both traits which decline pretty fast for the majority of men)

I partially disagree with this. "Normal prettyboys" is a wrong term used to describe a HTN. Instead of calling HTNs "normal prettyboys" call them HTNs. So they'll obviously look worse older and peak in their 16-20 because they were never good looking to begin with (there are exceptions). The "maesthetic chads" or the "robust prettyboys" will age better because they were good looking (unlike the "normal prettyboys").

The reason of Chico's descension is facial hair, NW and worse eye area (I don't know what's the reason of this but if you compare his eye area in his prime and now you can see a big difference, and this is the biggest cause of his descension) and not bones.



1641561949143
1641562034938

Both prettyboys. As you can see the reason of aging is not bones, but other factors.





1641562194844
1641562203602

In Chico's case the beard shadow and his eye area descended him.


Incredibly based post

Prettyboy = young version of Chad
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer
I used to agree but seeing a certain someone's tinder results has thrown all prettyboy copes into the bin, dom+masc mogs so hard it's not even funny
@brbbrah @Latebloomer10 :feelswhy:

girls want to look at prettyboys, maybe get fucked by them and let's be honest barely any of them look as good irl as their pics
girls want to get fucked by proper handsome masc+dom girls, can even run be a nice guy but look masc+dom on them

looking robust is everything - masculine, high t, light stubble, good soft features - maesthetic
Pretty boys mog irl
 
Pretty boy will just last 5-6 years. After that your collagen is gonna take a piss. 25 years old is literally like 30 years old.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EverythingMattersCel
1641551517045-png.1482016
1641551388532-png.1482012

They have all these features but still are prettyboys.
The right face is a morph so it doesn’t count and Zach Cox is an exception. He is the only pretty boy I have seen so far with a chin like that and in general he isn’t referred as a pretty boy but instead as a robust pretty boy if not already a maesthetic chad by most users here because of his masculine bone structure.
Yes, every GOOD LOOKING 16-23 yo guy is a prettyboy.
no exactly that is not the case.
Channing Tatum for example was/is always good looking but he never was a pretty boy.
66367CB0 B16B 4503 8839 65C702F6EA59

Bieber is 5 PSL in that pic and is the best example of what you call "regular prettyboy" (HTN haloed by hair).
Bieber is a Chadlite and I don’t get why you listed him in your post before as an example for pretty boys per your definition which are only chadlites and Chads and now you call him HTN.

But yes he is a perfect example for a pretty boy.
The one on the left is not good looking (4.75 PSL). To be honest he is as feminine as Bieber.
he is above average looking.
And jfl at calling him as feminine looking as Bieber. But anyways I should have picked a better example. Just compare young Channing Tatum with Bieber then and my point still stands.
His lower third is above average , but his undimorphic shit eye area makes him look like a feminine lonely abused dog.
His eye area is dimorphic. You don’t need Perfect hunter eyes in order to have dimorphic eyes. His browridge is large, his eyebrows low set and his upper eyelids hooded
2. Bad PFL: It makes him look cuckish and uncompetitive. PFL lenght is correlated with prenatal testosterone.

1641554398351-png.1482032
i highly doubt that this is true.
PFL is mainly caused by Eyeball size and with that genetic.
And a wide PFL is equally attractive in men and women. The only difference is that in men a higher PFL/PFH ratio is more attractive (horizontal wide, vertically narrow eyes)
There are tons of men with bad PFL but other high prenatal T features.
He also has a high round forehead and a small midface (not talking about midface ratio) compared to his other thirds (female trait)
his forehead is neither high nor round.
It’s square and proportional low to the rest of his face.
He has a buzzcut and light blond hair so it isn’t that visible.
5. He doesn't have low set eyebrows and hooded eyes: He's squinting
Maybe. But you can’t say that for sure and it doesn’t matter anyways because there are guys who look like him and have low set eyebrows and hooded eyes. He is just an example
And let's not talk about his unathletic sloped shoulders.
jfl at this cope. You can’t even see his shoulders on this picture. What you describe as sloped are his traps and they always are shaped like that.
This cuck looks like the left morph of every chart. Epitome of neotenous man. Let's compare him to a real "masculine" man.
You are coping.
While I agree that he doesn’t look that masculine he definitely also doesn’t look like a cuck.
As said above I should have picked young Channing Tatum as example because he looks masc and is a chad.
1641556910502-png.1482085


Eriksen looks like the DOM morph of the chart. Everything about him is dimorphic (except forehead shape). The guy you posted looks like a soyboy next to him. Eriksen looks older so let's compare him to a "prettyboy".
yes Eriksen looks more masc but he is also a 7+PSL god, has a stubble and is much older here than the guy I posted. So not a really fair comparison.
1641557696169-png.1482093
1641558030236-png.1482096
1641559270526-png.1482127
1641557993540-png.1482095
1641556916581-png.1482086




You may not believe it but he gets brutally dimorphicmogged and aestheticmogged feature by feature by these "prettyboys".
The guy next to Chico who’s name I forgot has literally a warrior skull which is an ultra masculine trait. He isn’t a pretty boy. He looks like a typical jock chad.
The guy in black and white looks more maesthetic to me.
Bomer was a prettyboy who transitioned into a measthetic chad.
And with the last guy I can’t really tell that easily because he looks so exotic. But I guess he also fits pretty boy or robust pretty boy.

Do they look more masc? No. Atleast not the real pretty boys out of them.
Chico doesn’t look more masc. He looks in fact much more boyish in comparison to a young masc chad (I don’t use the one from before anymore because he was a bad example):
7DF31213 0B04 4746 93BF B0588DD50865
D111C045 64FA 44C6 A19D 6D3831424F61

While he looks aesthetically better (which is no surprise since he is higher in PSL) he also looks less masculine.
And now here an example of a young maesthtic chad next to Chico:
B8759A3B 6C08 495E B3EB 200F35CB64F1
F89BA596 E224 4765 9CFC D64F15637B1E

The difference is obv. And yes I know the left guy has already slightly stubble but that because of his pheno and without the stubble he still wouldn’t be a pretty boy.
What I'm trying to say with this autistic essay is:

- Prettyboy = Young chad/chadlite that has healthy features signaling youth and peak fertility. This is why the most fertile women prefer them.


-Masc = Most users use it as a cope that means a man is old or ugly. But it means a chad/chadlite that has got older (facial hair, NW, slightly worse skin quality...).

- Everyone else is just not good looking
this is what I debunked with the maethetic chad next to Chico Right before.
The "maesthetic chads" or the "robust prettyboys" will age better because they were good looking (unlike the "normal prettyboys").
no they age better because they had the masculine skull type and facial bones a normal pretty boys hasn’t.
Bones are the least important part to be a pretty boy. This is why they decline so bad.
Just compare Cavills skull with Chico’s or of any other pretty boy and tell me again that they are the same.
The reason of Chico's descension is facial hair, NW and worse eye area (I don't know what's the reason of this but if you compare his eye area in his prime and now you can see a big difference, and this is the biggest cause of his descension) and not bones.
The NW isn’t that much of a problem, it can be frauded with haircuts. The facial hair yes but he could laser it and still wouldn’t look the same he did before.
And what you mean with the eyes isn’t really clear to me. Of corse eyes look worse when you age but as a pretty boy it’s even more visible because they don’t Have really deep set eyes and not ideal bone support around his eyes.

His main aging factor is his collagen and facial fat melting caused by weak bone support:
C5746285 5600 4449 8D49 5791BDA66913



TLDR:
Pretty boy has great soft features and above average but not overall masculine bone structure or facial traits

Maestheic has great soft features with way above average and masculine bone structure + masculine facial traits.

Masc chad has weak soft features with way above average and masculine bone structure + masculine facial traits.

The borders between the stages aren’t always really clear.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 15305 and Deleted member 14266
Nah, I mean prettyboy are the ideal for young woman, but I look like a fucking ogre and that did not stop me from slaying
 
this thread must be the most stupid shit ever
being a mascthetic chad is ideal at any age evertything else is cope
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, germanlooks and Xangsane
The right face is a morph so it doesn’t count and Zach Cox is an exception. He is the only pretty boy I have seen so far with a chin like that and in general he isn’t referred as a pretty boy but instead as a robust pretty boy if not already a maesthetic chad by most users here because of his masculine bone structure.

no exactly that is not the case.
Channing Tatum for example was/is always good looking but he never was a pretty boy.
View attachment 1482308

Bieber is a Chadlite and I don’t get why you listed him in your post before as an example for pretty boys per your definition which are only chadlites and Chads and now you call him HTN.

But yes he is a perfect example for a pretty boy.

he is above average looking.
And jfl at calling him as feminine looking as Bieber. But anyways I should have picked a better example. Just compare young Channing Tatum with Bieber then and my point still stands.

His eye area is dimorphic. You don’t need Perfect hunter eyes in order to have dimorphic eyes. His browridge is large, his eyebrows low set and his upper eyelids hooded

i highly doubt that this is true.
PFL is mainly caused by Eyeball size and with that genetic.
And a wide PFL is equally attractive in men and women. The only difference is that in men a higher PFL/PFH ratio is more attractive (horizontal wide, vertically narrow eyes)
There are tons of men with bad PFL but other high prenatal T features.

his forehead is neither high nor round.
It’s square and proportional low to the rest of his face.
He has a buzzcut and light blond hair so it isn’t that visible.

Maybe. But you can’t say that for sure and it doesn’t matter anyways because there are guys who look like him and have low set eyebrows and hooded eyes. He is just an example

jfl at this cope. You can’t even see his shoulders on this picture. What you describe as sloped are his traps and they always are shaped like that.

You are coping.
While I agree that he doesn’t look that masculine he definitely also doesn’t look like a cuck.
As said above I should have picked young Channing Tatum as example because he looks masc and is a chad.

yes Eriksen looks more masc but he is also a 7+PSL god, has a stubble and is much older here than the guy I posted. So not a really fair comparison.

The guy next to Chico who’s name I forgot has literally a warrior skull which is an ultra masculine trait. He isn’t a pretty boy. He looks like a typical jock chad.
The guy in black and white looks more maesthetic to me.
Bomer was a prettyboy who transitioned into a measthetic chad.
And with the last guy I can’t really tell that easily because he looks so exotic. But I guess he also fits pretty boy or robust pretty boy.

Do they look more masc? No. Atleast not the real pretty boys out of them.
Chico doesn’t look more masc. He looks in fact much more boyish in comparison to a young masc chad (I don’t use the one from before anymore because he was a bad example):
View attachment 1482361View attachment 1482436
While he looks aesthetically better (which is no surprise since he is higher in PSL) he also looks less masculine.
And now here an example of a young maesthtic chad next to Chico:
View attachment 1482448View attachment 1482449
The difference is obv. And yes I know the left guy has already slightly stubble but that because of his pheno and without the stubble he still wouldn’t be a pretty boy.

this is what I debunked with the maethetic chad next to Chico Right before.

no they age better because they had the masculine skull type and facial bones a normal pretty boys hasn’t.
Bones are the least important part to be a pretty boy. This is why they decline so bad.
Just compare Cavills skull with Chico’s or of any other pretty boy and tell me again that they are the same.

The NW isn’t that much of a problem, it can be frauded with haircuts. The facial hair yes but he could laser it and still wouldn’t look the same he did before.
And what you mean with the eyes isn’t really clear to me. Of corse eyes look worse when you age but as a pretty boy it’s even more visible because they don’t Have really deep set eyes and not ideal bone support around his eyes.

His main aging factor is his collagen and facial fat melting caused by weak bone support:
View attachment 1482471


TLDR:
Pretty boy has great soft features and above average but not overall masculine bone structure or facial traits

Maestheic has great soft features with way above average and masculine bone structure + masculine facial traits.

Masc chad has weak soft features with way above average and masculine bone structure + masculine facial traits.

The borders between the stages aren’t always really clear.
Still disagree with you because I have other concept on what's a prettyboy and I don't like using terms as "maesthetic" "robust prettyboy" etc.

I may do an elaborate reply in some days, I don't have time now
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
Am I one? I think you've seen me.
not super prettyboy like i am, leaning prettyboy rather then masthetic
glasses falio u hard
i got a babyface from mk677 and i got 2x more ioi's from foids @ school today
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
not super prettyboy like i am, leaning prettyboy rather then masthetic
glasses falio u hard
i got a babyface from mk677 and i got 2x more ioi's from foids @ school today
what sorts of foids?
I know; I'm looking into contacts.
 

Similar threads

Algernon
Replies
1
Views
81
A_H0T_Wombat
A
truekazak2839
Replies
14
Views
171
VRTGO
VRTGO

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top