being good looking isnt intrinsically valuable

[Aiwass]

its only valuable if it makes u better

u arent better than someone because u are better looking

u are only better because u are better, looks are completely valueless if not bringing u benefit

 

[Aiwass]

@Saint Casanova

 

[Saint Casanova]

its only valuable if it makes u better

u arent better than someone because u are better looking

u are only better because u are better, looks are completely valueless if not bringing u benefit

What makes someone better ?

 

[zygosmasher]

crazy how you still havent deleted your account

 

[Grievous]

Water

 

[Grievous]

this can be applied to almost anything tho

 

[EmperorVon]

No it does make someone better, good looking people are on average more athletic and higher iq than uglier people despite the myth spread by nerds, because good genes often come in a bundle

 

[NoaA99]

No shit Sherlock, outside of this vacuum, concepts like value don’t even exist. They’re entirely imposed.

 

[Saint Casanova]

No it does make someone better, good looking people are on average more athletic and higher iq than uglier people despite the myth spread by nerds, because good genes often come in a bundle

No they have a lower iq. Better athletes, yes

 

[Deleted member 74528]

nigga nothing is valuable if it doesnt benefit u wtf

 

[EmperorVon]

No they have a lower iq. Better athletes, yes

No that’s a myth, they are on average slightly higher iq typically

 

[EmperorVon]

No shit Sherlock, outside of this vacuum, concepts like value don’t even exist. They’re entirely imposed.

Value exists in the real world too what are you talking about

 

[Aiwass]

What makes someone better ?

more powerful, more enjoyable life

Water

people always think they are superior/inferior just due to looks

No it does make someone better, good looking people are on average more athletic and higher iq than uglier people despite the myth spread by nerds, because good genes often come in a bundle

u are a retard

 

[Grievous]

No it does make someone better, good looking people are on average more athletic and higher iq than uglier people despite the myth spread by nerds, because good genes often come in a bundle

hes not saying a good looking person isnt better then a ugly one
Hes saying a ugly person isnt worse then a slightly less ugly person
Since there both ugly

Its like a 5'4 and a 5'3 1/2 guy
OP js tried wording it complicating to sound smart even tho its water

 

[EmperorVon]

more powerful, more enjoyable life

people always think they are superior/inferior just due to looks

u are a retard

Prove me wrong neg rep faggot, Lana Del Ray will never touch your micropenis

 

[EmperorVon]

hes not saying a good looking person isnt better then a ugly one
Hes saying a ugly person isnt worse then a slightly less ugly person
Since there both ugly

Its like a 5'4 and a 5'3 1/2 guy
OP js tried wording it complicating to sound smart even tho its water

Is that his point? Well the slightly better looking person is still better, 70% is better than 67% etc

 

[Aiwass]

hes not saying a good looking person isnt better then a ugly one
Hes saying a ugly person isnt worse then a slightly less ugly person
Since there both ugly

Its like a 5'4 and a 5'3 1/2 guy
OP js tried wording it complicating to sound smart even tho its water

no im not retard

im saying looks arent an intrinsic good, they only have value if they benefit u

 

[Deleted member 74528]

people always think they are superior/inferior just due to looks

well obv as theyre treated better since birth mostly being goodlooking is mostly valuable in many aspects u make friends easier and u are gonna be having the easier route than the one who doesnt look so good considering u dont have a double digit iq even then itll be easier in the start

 

[EmperorVon]

no im not retard

im saying looks arent an intrinsic good, they only have value if they benefit u

 

[Aiwass]

Prove me wrong neg rep faggot, Lana Del Ray will never touch your micropenis

u are just averaging everything

this is an individualistic opinion

 

[Aiwass]

well obv as theyre treated better since birth mostly being goodlooking is mostly valuable in many aspects u make friends easier and u are gonna be having the easier route than the one who doesnt look so good considering u dont have a double digit iq even then itll be easier in the start

holy shit another dumbass cant comprehend my post

 

[Grievous]

no im not retard

im saying looks arent an intrinsic good, they only have value if they benefit u

and they will benefit u if ur good looking
Therefore a ugly person isnt better then a slightly less ugly one
Unless ur suggesting looks dont matter at all which would be even more retarded

 

[EmperorVon]

u are just averaging everything

this is an individualistic opinion

There is no individualism in a collectivist world

 

[Deleted member 74528]

no im not retard

im saying looks arent an intrinsic good, they only have value if they benefit u

looks almost always value u in most cases

 

[Deleted member 74528]

holy shit another dumbass cant comprehend my post

muh dumbass nigga thats what u made it sound like u are a retard if 4 different people who dont even know each other comprehended your post in the same way but u mean it some other way its obvious u cant phrase it or youre js retarded

 

[NoaA99]

Value exists in the real world too what are you talking about

Outside human perception, there is no real good or bad.
Humans assign meaning to them. It needs a social context, as it doesn’t exist in isolation.

 

[Aiwass]

and they will benefit u if ur good looking
Therefore a ugly person isnt better then a slightly less ugly one
Unless ur suggesting looks dont matter at all which would be even more retarded

im saying a good looking person and an ugly person are equally good if their lives are equally as good

looks are only beneficial if they serve a greater good

 

[Aiwass]

muh dumbass nigga thats what u made it sound like u are a retard if 4 different people who dont even know each other comprehended your post in the same way but u mean it some other way its obvious u cant phrase it or youre js retarded

its so simple

 

[Grievous]

im saying a good looking person and an ugly person are equally good if their lives are equally as good

Im actually laughing right now
Out of the 2 options u somehow came up with a even worse one

 

[Grievous]

im saying a good looking person and an ugly person are equally good if their lives are equally as good

looks are only beneficial if they serve a greater good

@Starborn
Equally as good if they are equally as good

 

[Aiwass]

Im actually laughing right now
Out of the 2 options u somehow came up with a even worse one

explain how im wrong

 

[Aiwass]

@Starborn
Equally as good if they are equally as good

thats not what i said

 

[Deleted member 74528]

im saying a good looking person and an ugly person are equally good if their lives are equally as good

looks are only beneficial if they serve a greater good

this is a theoretical case a good looking person and the not good looking person is not gonna be having the same equally good life irl mostly if it is theyd be outliers as the peoples first impression is on the basis of looks and looks always benefit people theyre treated better
if u are ugly since birth u wouldve had it hard since elementary school maybe a lil bit easier but as u go to middle school the kids would get cruel and kids are cruel asl when it comes to looks

 

[Aiwass]

and they will benefit u if ur good looking
Therefore a ugly person isnt better then a slightly less ugly one
Unless ur suggesting looks dont matter at all which would be even more retarded

holy fucking low iq

 

[zinsa]

thats not what i said

u just gave urself a verify mark on how stuuupid u are

 

[Aiwass]

this is a theoretical case a good looking person and the not good looking person is not gonna be having the same equally good life irl mostly if it is theyd be outliers as the peoples first impression is on the basis of looks and looks always benefit people theyre treated better
if u are ugly since birth u wouldve had it hard since elementary school maybe a lil bit easier but as u go to middle school the kids would get cruel and kids are cruel asl when it comes to looks

this thread was made because @Saint Casanova was saying how aristocrats were inbred and ugly and i wanted to explain how thats irrelevant

 

[Grievous]

this isnt even worth replying to

Ur either a really good rage baiter or just a genuine dumbass

 

[Aiwass]

u just gave urself a verify mark on how stuuupid u are

are equally good if their lives are equally as good

Equally as good if they are equally as good

not the same, retard

 

[zinsa]

this isnt even worth replying to

Ur either a really good rage baiter or just a genuine dumbass

hes a ragebaiter

https://looksmax.org/threads/i-only-rep-the-forum-greats.1816629/

 

[Saint Casanova]

this thread was made because @Saint Casanova was saying how aristocrats were inbred and ugly and i wanted to explain how thats irrelevant

You didn’t even reply to my question

 

[Deleted member 291046]

its only valuable if it makes u better

u arent better than someone because u are better looking

u are only better because u are better, looks are completely valueless if not bringing u benefit

It depends. Looks are directly correlated to strength, vitality, health, & fertility. Does this not make you a more successful & valuable person in the eyes of the beholder?

 

[Aiwass]

this isnt even worth replying to

Ur either a really good rage baiter or just a genuine dumbass

ur just completely retarded and somehow managed to butcher a kindergarten-tier belief

 

[Deleted member 74528]

this thread was made because @Saint Casanova was saying how aristocrats were inbred and ugly and i wanted to explain how thats irrelevant

it is true that aristocrats were inbred u could js search habsburg jaw and their diets werent good they were ugly but they were rich but if they looked better they wouldve gotten more benefits obv

 

[Deleted member 291046]

It depends. Looks are directly correlated to strength, vitality, health, & fertility. Does this not make you a more successful & valuable person in the eyes of the beholder?

Was arguing with a redditcel about this. He ended up agreeing with me JFL

 

[pfl]

No they have a lower iq. Better athletes, yes

Cope harder

 

[fxckz]

This sounds exactly like something a ugly nigger would say

 

[Aiwass]

It depends. Looks are directly correlated to strength, vitality, health, & fertility. Does this not make you a more successful & valuable person in the eyes of the beholder?

just because they are correlated doesnt mean it will result in a certain outcome

 

[Aiwass]

This sounds exactly like something a ugly son of a bitch would say

i never said looks arent important

im saying they arent intrinsically good

 

[Deleted member 74528]

now if u compare a ugly aristocrat to a good looking peasant thats not fair and it doesnt come under the case u js made up about being equally as good if their lives are good as the aristocrat has a better life because of money but has a worse diet at the time

 

[Deleted member 291046]

just because they are correlated doesnt mean it will result in a certain outcome

Obviously correlation doesn't equate to causation. But at a certain point you really have to think for yourself.