being good looking isnt intrinsically valuable

[Aiwass]

now if u compare a ugly aristocrat to a good looking peasant thats not fair and it doesnt come under the case u js made up about being equally as good if their lives are good as the aristocrat has a better life because of money but has a worse diet at the time

that is fair and it does compare

the aristocrat lives a better life so hes better

 

[Grievous]

ur just completely retarded and somehow managed to butcher an kindergarten tier belief

Not being able to communicate kindergarten beliefs to multiple people suggests ur communication is the problem not the people

 

[Aiwass]

i think everyone above doesnt know what intrinsic means, tbh

 

[Aiwass]

Not being able to communicate kindergarten beliefs to multiple people suggests ur communication is the problem not the people

i communicated it fine, i think u just dont know what intrinsic means or something

You didn’t even reply to my question

i did

 

[Saint Casanova]

Cope harder

Fugly cracker

 

[Deleted member 74528]

that is fair and it does compare

the aristocrat lives a better life so hes better

its not fair lmfao u js said a condition of having equally good lives after saying that how are u gonna compare a aristocrat who has generational wealth to a peasant who has to work thats not a fair comparision nor does it satisfy what u said before
if u compare a good looking aristocrat to a not good looking aristocrat obv the goodlooking one gets more benefits thats the condition thatll satisfy youre case as they had a equally good life but the better looking one would get a better life because of his looks

 

[zinsa]

Not being able to communicate kindergarten beliefs to multiple people suggests ur communication is the problem not the people

hes just a pure ragebaiter hes landing in my ignore list soon

 

[ForSKJ]

its only valuable if it makes u better

u arent better than someone because u are better looking

u are only better because u are better, looks are completely valueless if not bringing u benefit

Your perceived value is greater than someone you look better than, which is why mogging is beneficial

shameless interaction bait

 

[Aiwass]

its not fair lmfao u js said a condition of having equally good lives after saying that how are u gonna compare a aristocrat who has generational wealth to a peasant who has to work thats not a fair comparision nor does it satisfy what u said before
if u compare a good looking aristocrat to a not good looking aristocrat obv the goodlooking one gets more benefits thats the condition thatll satisfy youre case as they had a equally good life but the better looking one would get a better life because of his looks

reread the thread and think for one second

 

[Aiwass]

Your perceived value is greater than someone you look better than, which is why mogging is beneficial

shameless interaction bait

perceived value isnt intrinsically good either

 

[Aiwass]

looks are an instrumental good

 

[Deleted member 74528]

reread the thread and think for one second

nigga u make no fucking sense youre taking a fucking aristocrat whose not good looking that cancels the point of your whole fucking thread "intrinsically" wealth isnt intrinsic nor is looks but you kept changing your goals and argument what are u even tryna argue about with a aristocrat as a example wealth and looks are instrumental

 

[Deleted member 74528]

looks are an instrumental good

SO IS THE WEALTH YOURE COMPARING W NIGGA

 

[Aiwass]

SO IS THE WEALTH YOURE COMPARING W NIGGA

im not comparing with wealth i know thats instrumental im comparing it with life quality

a good looking peasant will have a much worse life quality so he is worse

power isnt instrumental, either

 

[Deleted member 74528]

im not comparing with wealth i know thats instrumental im comparing it with life quality

a good looking peasant will have a much worse life quality so he is worse

power isnt instrumental, either

exactly buddy looks arent intrinsic but they do affect life quality i cant bother arguing ill js use gpt

 

[ForSKJ]

perceived value isnt intrinsically good either

you fucking muppet begging for interaction, perceived value is the definition of being intrinsically good due to natural selection and the likelihood of finding a mate.

 

[Weallascend]

more powerful, more enjoyable life

people always think they are superior/inferior just due to looks

u are a retard

Looks gives power, it gives good backup from others so it brings confidence, looks makes u superior in the eyes of the others. All superiority comes from the other's perception. Superiority isn't objective, it comes from what ppl think and it translates into real life.

YOU are a retard.
But anyways I understand what u mean, like anyone as an individual can success in life without looks but it is indeniable that looks is the greatest lever and way to success