"Beneficial" racial mixing

its against our nature to breed with unknown and strange "territories"/peoples.
that is literally the nature of prehistorical agricultural fags when tehy had to watch out for the troublemakers in their tribe and whatnot, warrior cultures like the greeks and romans didnt care who they conquered and took in, they literally conquered the whole of europe without caring for muh strange and muh unkown peoples, it literally says in their codes and laws that a roman citizen, was someone who accepted the roman law and had to do a ritual or smt like that, modernity is falling back into the prehistorical longhouse ruled by feministic agricultural thinking and its fucking sad
 
"Beneficial" racial mixing
DNR

EXTREMELY LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER | Item ...
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: loseratgenes and Sycophant
Everybody already knows this about mixed race people, obviously full whites will always be superior
according to what, what whites are u even talking abt, before rome most whites were literally in agricultural settings, like ireland before they they were conquered by the english, "full whites" omfg u people are more tribalistic then the niggers in actual tribes in the bumfucks of congo
 
Your studies also focus on short term social friction and logistical gaps in medical registries, my points focus on the long term survival of the species.

You're worried about 'mismatched' heart attack genes, yet you ignore that inbreeding depression. Citing 'identity stress' and 'marrow match' statistics as if they are genetic defects. If you cared to look into the studies in the footnotes, the author themselves gave disclaimers about registry gaps and environment difference

You're looking at a 100 year snapshot of social issues. I'm looking at the 300,000 year blueprint of human success. Nature doesn't care about your purity aesthetics etc it cares about resilience if you move the conversation to something cultural then there's a common ground. Otherwise your thread is nothing more race supremacist banter narratives
idc if u are pro mixing or anti mixing but in the greater picture culture is a more artful and better expression of peoples then race, i feel like when a culture starts making the colour of their skin a ideal, they are in a decadent state, and as u said, nature in the end will not care if ur skin is white brown yellow and black, it hits peoples the same, the only ones who can rise above is the ones whos cultures are better then the rest, the romans and greeks were literally the best example of this, the reason rome ancestry is so common bc they couldnt care who they conquered they had a higher cultural/moral justification of it, the greeks did this in a way where if u accepted the greek traditions and whatnot u could be a greek citizen, i hate tehse stagnant, race idealists, who with their loud mouths and dream ideas, pollute goycial media, i hate dreamers in general, which is why i could never respect such talkers and actors like hitler, moussolini even tho he was basically larping as a imperial roman leader, did far a better job of enriching peoples then hitler did
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
keep larping whatev ur larping nigga, u have never read anything on whatev u have in ur avi, u barely know the origin of symbols, u fucking hermit, u bug, u trend following frog, i wish death on u and anything u post forward means absolute zero, i can literally tell from the nature of ur acc u are a actual hermit with the physiogmy of a actual frog
 
  • JFL
Reactions: GoyLite and Throw_Away
Your studies also focus on short term social friction and logistical gaps in medical registries, my points focus on the long term survival of the species.

You're worried about 'mismatched' heart attack genes, yet you ignore that inbreeding depression. Citing 'identity stress' and 'marrow match' statistics as if they are genetic defects. If you cared to look into the studies in the footnotes, the author themselves gave disclaimers about registry gaps and environment difference

You're looking at a 100 year snapshot of social issues. I'm looking at the 300,000 year blueprint of human success. Nature doesn't care about your purity aesthetics etc it cares about resilience if you move the conversation to something cultural then there's a common ground. Otherwise your thread is nothing more race supremacist banter narratives
Image removebg preview 2
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
that is literally the nature of prehistorical agricultural fags when tehy had to watch out for the troublemakers in their tribe and whatnot, warrior cultures like the greeks and romans didnt care who they conquered and took in, they literally conquered the whole of europe without caring for muh strange and muh unkown peoples, it literally says in their codes and laws that a roman citizen, was someone who accepted the roman law and had to do a ritual or smt like that, modernity is falling back into the prehistorical longhouse ruled by feministic agricultural thinking and its fucking sad
They conquered because they were the genetically superior ones.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: alurmo
Introduction:
Everything you read below is NOT MY WORDS. All information is taken from a video by "Midgard Asylum" (Russian guy).

Well, let's begin.

View attachment 5060866

"And what if there are more bloodlines? I have Gypsies, Jews, French, Austrians, Magyars, Russians...
who isn't there..."

View attachment 5060869

" - There are a lot of bastards these days. My whole family is like that.

-Natalia, bastard means not born legitimately.

-Thanks for the correction. It was my mistake. I meant to say mixed-race. "


View attachment 5060880

"And look at the Germans... racial purity. Ugly to the point of disgust.
There's a common saying: "If you see a beautiful woman in Germany, she's definitely not German.""

View attachment 5060886

"Mixed bloods are not only different in beauty, but they are also more mentally developed."

I wonder where they get their great knowledge about mixed race. Generally, these individuals, and others, seriously believe that mixing will improve the gene pool. Although they're unlikely to know the word "gene pool." Well, generally speaking, it's "improvement."

And in our already unhealthy world, interbreeding is presented through the media as something normal. But in terms of offspring, it's not normal; it's very risky. But nature doesn't obey the media. Okay, let's get going.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14600054/

View attachment 5060915
A study conducted by Richard Udry, which selected a random, nationally representative sample of adolescents from the United States in 1994-95, included paper questionnaires completed by approximately 80,000 adolescents.

View attachment 5060917

Table 2 shows that people of mixed race had generally higher rates of health and behavioral problems. Specific health problems were assessed by whether they occurred frequently or every day of the previous month. Compared to whites and blacks, people of mixed race experienced health problems on average one and a half times more often.

View attachment 5060924

Table 3 compares various racial combinations with their single-race counterparts in terms of health and behavioral outcomes. The overall picture is presented in Table 2 and Table 3. That is, regardless of racial mix, there is an overall increase in health and behavioral problems among mixed-race adolescents.

By the way, the comments about this study are interesting, but it shouldn't be considered the truth, just a theory.

View attachment 5060933

The author notes that the most common explanation for their finding, also reported by others using non-random samples, is that stress related to identity conflict or the struggle with identity formation is the culprit. However, they also note that there is no evidence for this relationship. Indeed, it is difficult to believe that struggles with identity formation are responsible for the widespread increase in health and behavioral problems among mixed-race adolescents. How does struggles with identity formation lead to a higher incidence of skin problems? A widespread increase in health problems should be assessed through all these basic physiological control structures, in which the brain and the autonomic nervous system (ANS) are particularly relevant. As the figure below shows, the ANS is involved in autonomic regulation of organs. And its abnormalities can easily be found behind Udry's data.

View attachment 5060940

ANS abnormalities are associated with behavioral problems such as excessive aggression, headaches, and various health issues. Furthermore, damage to certain parts of the brain in rats increases the likelihood of cocaine or stimulant addiction. And something similar undoubtedly applies to humans. Furthermore, a number of brain pathologies are characteristic of both depression and drug addiction. And substance use is more common in the mentally ill. Therefore, to the extent that racial mixing increases the likelihood of suboptimal genetic correlation patterns, one might expect this to negatively impact physiological control at the organismal level. This could well explain Udry's data.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1692?utm_source=chatgpt.com
View attachment 5060949

Variants of the gene ALOXSAP (also known as FLAP) encoding arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase activating protein are known to be associated with risk of myocardial infarction'. Here we show that a haplotype (HapK) spanning the LTA4H gene encoding leukotriene A4 hydrolase, a protein in the same biochemical pathway as ALOXSAP, confers modest risk of myocardial infarction in an Icelandic cohort. Measurements of leukotriene B4 (LTB4) production suggest that this risk is mediated through upregulation of the leukotriene pathway.

Three cohorts from the United States also show that Hapk confers a modest relative risk (1.16) in European Americans, but it confers a threefold larger risk in African Americans.

About 27% of the European American controls carried at least one copy of HapK, as compared with only 6% of African American controls. Our analyses indicate that HapK is very rare in Africa and that its occurrence in African Americans is due to European admixture. Interactions with other genetic or environmental risk factors that are more common in African Americans are likely to account for the greater relative risk conferred by HapK in this group.



Now let's translate this into simple language.

The ALOX5AP gene (and its variations) → increases the risk of heart attack.

HapK(LTA4H) - which covers the LTH4H gene → reduces this risk.


This gene and this haplotype are predominantly found in whites, as described in the Icelandic group and three groups from the United States. This means that whites have a gene that increases the risk of heart attack, but also a protective haplotype that reduces this risk. In the second group, consisting of white Americans, this risk-protection genetic combination was found in 27%. But in blacks, it was only 6%, four and a half times less common. And those were from European admixture.



View attachment 5060983



"In theory, the observed association of myocardial infarction with HapK could be the result of an association with a causal variant located in the neighborhood of LTA4H but outside the LD block. Such a situation might explain the high relative risk observed in the recently admixed African Americans, potentially boosted by strong admixture-derived LD, and the modest relative risk in the nonadmixed groups of European…"



This means that a child resulting from the interbreeding of a white and black parent can inherit the ALOX5AP gene from the white parent, which increases the risk of heart attack, without inheriting the protective haplogene HapK. This creates an imbalance. So, yes, mixed-race individuals, specifically mulattoes, have a much higher risk of heart attack. So they'll have to be much more mindful of their motor. Well, they can thank their mom and dad for that.



https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health

View attachment 5060991



-Caucasian and Vietnamese-Caucasian individuals concludes that biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.

The study by researchers at the Asian American Center on Disparities Research at the University of California, Davis, was reported Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association in Boston.

"Up to 2.4 percent of the U.S. population self-identifies as mixed race, and most of these individuals describe themselves as biracial," said Nolan Zane, a professor of psychology and Asian American studies at UC Davis. "We cannot underestimate the importance of understanding the social, psychological and experiential differences that may increase the likelihood of psychological disorders among this fast-growing segment of the population."

Zane and his co-investigator, UC Davis psychology graduate student Lauren Berger, found that 34 percent of biracial individuals in a national survey had been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse, versus 17 percent of monoracial individuals. The higher rate held up even after the researchers controlled for differences between the groups in age, gender and life stress, among other factors.



https://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/18/sports/baseball-rod-carew-s-daughter-dies.html



View attachment 5061001



Here's an interesting article from the New York Times archive.



For seven months, 18-year-old Michelle Carew battled against leukemia. Her doctors said she needed a bone-marrow transplant. There were 70,000 volunteers, but none had marrow to match hers.Yesterday, she died at Children's Hospital of Orange County in Orange, Calif. Dr. Mitchell Cairo, her oncologist, said that the direct cause of death was cardiac and respiratory failure. At her bedside was her father, Rod, the Hall of Fame baseball player; her mother, Marilynn, and other family members.All we did," her father said in an emotional news conference, "is we told her we love her, that we're all here, and I just told her to have a safe journey."When she was diagnosed with leukemia, her doctor said she would probably not survive without a transplant from a donor with matching bone marrow. The marrow of her two sisters and her parents was incompatible, and of the 1.9 million people registered with the National Blood Donor Program, not one had marrow to match hers. When a marrow donor could not be found, doctors performed an umbilical-cord blood transplant March 22. One obstacle to finding a matching donor was her mixed ethnic background. Her father is black, with West Indian and Panamanian roots. Her mother is white, with Russian-Jewish roots. In addition, only 5 percent of registered donors are black…"



https://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993362,00.html (The link doesn't open)

View attachment 5061014



It started out as an average April day, but as Dermot Tatlow drove home, he received a call that would lead to a global campaign to save his son's life. When he heard the bad news, he knew immediately what his family was up against. "I pulled over and took a deep breath," Tatlow says. "We thought we were out of the woods." Tatlow's 44-year-old son, Devan, had relapsed. After 17 months without needing any treatment, a routine biopsy showed Devan's cancer had returned. "Our worst fears were realized," says Tatlow.

Devan would need a marrow transplant. The Bone-marrow cell

prospect of going through chemotherapy for a second time and needing a transplant is daunting to anyone, but it's especially harrowing if — like Devan — you're of mixed race.

Multiracial patients often have an incredibly hard time finding life-saving marrow matches. When Devan, whose father is Caucasian and mother is part Indian, was first diagnosed with leukemia, his family did a search of the international marrow registry that contains over 14 million donors and came up empty. "We knew there was nothing out there for him," Tatlow says.

Compared to organ transplants, bone marrow donations need to be even more genetically similar to their recipients. Though there are exceptions, the vast

majority of successful matches take place between donors and patients of the same ethnic background. Since all the immune system's cells come from bone marrow, a transplant essentially introduces a new immune system to a person. Without genetic similarity between the donor and the patient, the new white blood cells will attack the host body. In an organ transplant, the body can reject the organ, but with marrow, the new immune system can reject the whole body.

To find a marrow match for anyone is hard. Even within one's own family, the chances of finding one are only about 30%. According to the World Donor Marrow Association, while two out of three Caucasians find a match, the chances of a patient from another ethnic background can be as low as one in four. Despite rapid improvements in marrow registries around the world, the global registry is still disproportionately represented by the U.S., U.K. and Germany — all predominantly Caucasian countries. For a multiracial person, the chances are usually even worse.

Athena Mari Asklipiadis, the founder of the California-based Mixed Marrow, one of the only outreach groups devoted to recruiting mixed race donors, says "the numbers are quite staggering ... People compare it to winning the lottery."

It's difficult to ascertain the exact chances of finding a match for a mixed race person because the different combinations have different success rates, and the U.S.-based National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), which has about eight million donors in its registry, does not have statistics on the success rates of mixed race patients.

But Asklipiadis maintains the rates are lower — much lower. "God forbid I need a match, because I'm a very rare combination," Asklipiadis says of her mixed Japanese, Italian, Armenian, Egyptian and Greek background.



And one more article

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyl...nor-for-oneyearold-with-leukemia-9087356.html

View attachment 5061036



The Martini family were immediately tested to see if they were suitable. Their marrow was checked to see how many proteins on the surface of their blood cells matched. This is called human leucocyte antigen matching. There are more than 8,500 known antigen characteristics that can occur in millions of combinations, according to Delete Blood Cancer UK. "There was a one in four chance that the children would be compatible but they weren't. It's a dark art," says Yaser. "The difficulty is that at least nine antigens must match and Margot has one that's unusual. If it's a decent match there's a five per cent chance of her dying. If not it can rise to 30 per cent. We want to give her the best possible chance. I haven't been on Google to check what happens next because as soon as you do that you find out horrors. It's not hard resisting. I don't have time and there's no point."

Genealogy has contributed to Margot's rare antigens. Yaser is half-Syrian, a quarter Siamese and a quarter Scottish. He grew up in Roehampton. He has a "funny name but is a south London boy". Vicki, who is from Wolverhampton and met Yaser boarding an easyJet flight to Nice, is half-English, half New Zealander. Yaser says: "As the world increasingly becomes a melting pot donors become more difficult to find."



A study of preterm birth and stillbirth among monoracial and multiracial couples shows an interesting result.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2867623/

View attachment 5061052

View attachment 5061055



The analysis included approximately 1.6 million live births and 1749 stillbirths. In the unadjusted model, compared with two white parents, black/black and black/white couples had a significantly higher risk of fetal death. When all demographic, social, biological, genetic, congenital, and procedural risk factors except gestational age and birth weight were included, the odds ratios (OR) were all still significant.

Black/black couples had the highest level of risk (OR 2.11, CI 1.77-2.51), followed by black mother/white father couples (OR 2.01, CI 1.16-3.48), and white mother/black father couples (OR 1.84, CI 1.33-2.54).

Virtually all of the higher risk of fetal death was explainable by higher rates of low birth weight and prematurity.



So, gentlemen, by having a child with a black partner, you increase the risk of stillbirth for the latter.


(The link to the study is broken and redirects to another website. So I'll show some screenshots.)

View attachment 5061064

View attachment 5061066



Hormones are produced differently in different races. For example, whites generally have higher cortisol levels, but lower levels of norepinephrine and adrenaline. This difference in hormone production in mixed-race couples can impact their offspring by causing hormonal imbalance. This can easily lead to hormonal depression, which is dangerous and can even lead to suicide. And here we again recall the research from the mid-1990s.



View attachment 5061071



It states that mixed Caucasians and Asians exhibit an increased risk of suicide. They also experience more frequent paranoia. However, the study itself doesn't mention hormones.



Regarding their mental development, that's not true either.

Reading an excerpt from Richard Lynn's book "Racial Differences in Intelligence" Evolutionary Analysis

View attachment 5061102
View attachment 5061104

12. Intelligence indicators of African-European hybrids

We will now examine studies of the intelligence of African-European hybrids. The genetic theory of racial differences predicts that the IQ of interracial hybrids should fall approximately midway between Europeans and Africans. To test this prediction, we have summarized the results of studies of African-European racial hybrids in Table 4.12.

View attachment 5061107

Row 1 presents results from Brazil, showing that hybrids known as "brown" have scores intermediate between Europeans and Africans. Row 2 presents the results of a study in Germany (Eyferth, 1961), which showed that the IQ of African-European hybrid children was 94, compared to 100 for European children. The average IQ of African-European hybrids was 96.5, but this has been reduced in the table to 94 to account for the long-term increase in IQ since standardization. Row 3 gives data from South Africa for Europeans, Africans, and Coloureds, who are largely African-European hybrids. The Coloureds' IQ (83) was exactly midway between Europeans (100) and Africans (65). Row 4 gives the results of a more recent study in South Africa,
conducted approximately sixty years later, this study found an IQ of 86 for a sample of people of color, compared to 100 for Europeans. Africans were not included in this study, but the IQ of 86 for people of color was significantly higher than that of purebred Africans in South Africa. Row 5 gives the results of a subsequent study in South Africa, which yielded an IQ of 80 for people of color.
Rows 6-9 give four results for hybrids in the United States. Row 6 gives the results of the Minnesota Interracial Adoption Study; the resulting IQ estimate for hybrids is midway between those of African Americans and Europeans.
The sample sizes are very small, but the results are informative because all three groups were raised by European adoptive parents, precluding any reasonable environmental interpretation of the differences. Row 7 presents further data from the United States, again indicating that hybrids have IQ scores intermediate between Europeans and African Americans (the results of this study were presented by Loehlin, Lindzey, and Spuhler, 1975). Row 8 presents the results of another study from the United States. Its authors divided African Americans into dark-skinned and less dark-skinned individuals and showed that relatively light-skinned African Americans, which was taken as an indicator of hybridization with Europeans, had an IQ of 92—an average value between Europeans and Africans. The final result presented in row 9 shows that hybrids of African Americans with Europeans have an IQ of 97, again falling between African Americans and Europeans.

And what do we see from Richard Lynn's book? Mulattoes are somewhere in the middle between white and black. Relative to a black parent, in terms of offspring, this represents progress. But relative to a white parent, this represents regression.


Regarding beauty, it's certainly a subjective matter. These people have different tastes, but if we look at the definition, one of the qualities of beauty is a harmonious combination of an object's aspects. And here, the mixed ones aren't ahead of the curve.

By the way, Asians have a rather unusual attitude toward racial beauty. I'll read something from a Japanese forum now.(I didn't find the link)
View attachment 5061161
I hate that I'm Japanese.
Why are all Asian men so ugly?
Asian faces look like ugly yellow monkeys with short hair.
Why is that?
Small eyes, low noses, short limbs, thin bodies, yellow skin, black eyes, black hair.
The only Asian woman I like is Nozomi Sasaki, but even she is ugly compared to white women.
I know it's unnatural to compare, but don't they look like yellow monkeys hiding it with hairstyles, plastic surgery, and makeup?
I have no interest in Asians.
Honestly, I hate that I myself am Asian.
I think I understand how Michael Jackson felt.
If you're white, the world considers you beautiful, and you don't face discrimination.
Blonde hair and blue eyes are beautiful colors.
It's true that many Westerners look mature and grown-up.
That's the standard for whites. Sure, some are fat, but if you lose weight, it works out. Even in old age, their bone structure is good, so they don't become ugly like Asians. Life is easy. Being white and having perfect looks — I think that's the best.
What I hate the most are world-famous Hollywood stars.
Because whites are simply beautiful.
Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise, Leonardo DiCaprio, Hugh Jackman, Colin Farrell, Christian Bale, Alain Delon.
Madonna, Cameron Diaz, Charlize Theron, Kate Winslet, Marilyn Monroe.
I've agonized over wanting to get plastic surgery to look like a white person.
You can change your gender, but you can't change your race.
That's what frustrates me the most.
Should I hate my ancestors?

The Japanese seem like an intelligent nation, but they don't admire people of mixed race. They're the most beautiful (sarcasm)!
The internet often showcases more or less successful combinations of mixed beauty. However, such successful combinations, relative to the standard, are far fewer. But they put the best on display, just like at an exhibition back then, the standard and more numerous product isn't as successful. Not the most beautiful, not the smartest, not the healthiest. Things aren't going well here at all, and donation is a "scourge of God" for them. Our esteemed lovers of exotica know better than anyone. They generally think that choosing a black partner is their choice (which is actually not the case).

Once upon a time, there lived a man named Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi. The son of an Austro-Hungarian ambassador and a Japanese aristocrat. So, he was of mixed descent. Philosopher, writer, politician. He was once a Freemason of the Humanitas Lodge. In 2002, the European Union established the Coudenhove-Kalergi Commemorative Medal, awarded in Münster to individuals and organizations for strengthening European unity. This medal was received by Merkel, who so warmly welcomes migrants and despises Germans. This woman clearly strengthens Europe. Coudenhove once wrote a book called "Practical Idealism." Where wrote his vision of the future regarding mixed ones.

"The Eurasian-Negroid Future race, externally similar to the ancient Egyptian, the diversity of peoples with a will Replace diversity of personalities."
Basically, he wanted a future of total interbreeding. Well, the idea was picked up, but it favors whites. More specifically, the idea of a white woman and a black man. And this idea is pushed through films, music videos, advertising, even educational brochures. Organizations like "Paideia," led by the infamous Barbara Specter, champion this idea. A woman, over her reproductive lifespan, averaged from 18 to 45 years, assuming each pregnancy is single and she takes a year off, can produce 12 to 14 children. So, every exotic woman hasn't given birth to an average of 13 white children. Well, every woman will give birth to that many, at least 5 to 7. And in reality, in some white countries, this could prove fatal for whites in the future. Oh well, at least she'll give birth to a couple of mulattoes. Even if the risk of illness is increased. And the neighboring migrants already have six, and the white population is once again declining. The neoliberals are delighted; Uncle Coudenhove's Kalergi plan is being implemented. Well, let them think it's entirely their choice. After all, they're the smartest among us, just like those at the beginning of the story. In short, we're fucked.

P.S.
Children, starting at three months, prefer faces of their own race.
Research has, of course, been conducted on this topic.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2566511/

Well, apparently, children are smarter than "exotic lovers," because their minds aren't tainted by tolerant attitudes, and they can't be accused of racism. Whether a child stays close to nature or becomes tolerant is entirely in the hands of their parents.

In short, guys, spread this information to prevent the development of the Jewish disease


@CorinthianLOX @Hernan @InanimatePragmatist @FlotPSL @Be_ConfidentBro
when i see u showing "results" of a chart that concludes the average iq of an african being 71 in some cases, i stopped reading. The only thing which is true in this thread would be the bone marrow doner question, which out of the entire population here's the likelyhood of u getting a cancer that would require a bone marrow transfer
  • Leukemia: roughly 1–2% lifetime risk
  • Multiple myeloma: under 1%
  • Hodgkin lymphoma: under 0.3%
Pretty unlikely to get aswell more unlikely for it to happen to a younger person, etc.
mixing useless facts with blatant racist lies isnt the high iq post u thought it was. Nobody needs to lie to make black people look bad, just watch the news.
 
  • +1
Reactions: VohnnyBoy
They conquered because they were the genetically superior ones.
@Jason Voorhees
i wanna reckon how much they were actually genetically superior even tho they were considered too short to conquer the northern european area
this argument of genetic superiority is flawed, in and thorouoghly flawed, like some shit out of a 20th century race guide book
nonetheless im gonna talk abt this
there is absolute 0 evidence of them having a genetic superiority over the people they conquered and after all, this is literally just european vs european wars in ancient times, rome was literally a open melting pot dude, they also werent even physically superior to their slaves, i doubt u have read tacitus's book on germania during that time period but he literally noted that those areas were physically superior to romans, wouldnt that make them genetically superior to? then how the fuck did rome conquer teh celts and western germania then?
ur talking urself into a fucking trap boyo
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
@Jason Voorhees
i wanna reckon how much they were actually genetically superior even tho they were considered too short to conquer the northern european area
this argument of genetic superiority is flawed, in and thorouoghly flawed, like some shit out of a 20th century race guide book
nonetheless im gonna talk abt this
there is absolute 0 evidence of them having a genetic superiority over the people they conquered and after all, this is literally just european vs european wars in ancient times, rome was literally a open melting pot dude, they also werent even physically superior to their slaves, i doubt u have read tacitus's book on germania during that time period but he literally noted that those areas were physically superior to romans, wouldnt that make them genetically superior to? then how the fuck did rome conquer teh celts and western germania then?
ur talking urself into a fucking trap boyo
There's not much point arguing with these people tbh. I didn't reply to the other guy because I know it's like talking to a wall. You need nothing short of a miracle to change their views irs futile.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alurmo
I'm not against or supporting race mixing. I m just against bullshit and hyperbole, the way OP is interpreting these studies and using them to build a narrative to convince people here is dishonest. I bet 99% of the ones that repped and calling it BOTB tier haven't even read any of the source material and just went with it because it confirms their bias.

I even said if you want to preserve white features and your culture and for that reason don't want racemixxing just say that. It's a valid preferenc. But trying to put a scientific spin on it by misinterpreting footnotes and ignoring biological trade offs is just amusing. Reading OP it might seem intergalactic genetic distances between us,
when the reality is that a single troop of chimpanzees in a forest has more genetic diversity than the entire human race combined. Humans are very bottlenecked species.

1000194669
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Aox Ofwar, alurmo and imontheloose
I'm not against or supporting race mixing. I m just against bullshit and hyperbole, the way OP is interpreting these studies and using them to build a narrative to convince people here is dishonest. I bet 99% of the ones that repped and calling it BOTB tier haven't even read any of the source material and just went with it because it confirms their bias.

I even said if you want to preserve white features and your culture and for that reason don't want racemixxing just say that. It's a valid preferenc. But trying to put a scientific spin on it by misinterpreting footnotes and ignoring biological trade offs is just amusing. Reading OP it might seem intergalactic genetic distances between us,
when the reality is that a single troop of chimpanzees in a forest has more genetic diversity than the entire human race combined. Humans are very bottlenecked species.

View attachment 5065313
@Throw_Away @alurmo @Divineincel @Aox Ofwar
 
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel
I'm not against or supporting race mixing. I m just against bullshit and hyperbole, the way OP is interpreting these studies and using them to build a narrative to convince people here is dishonest. I bet 99% of the ones that repped and calling it BOTB tier haven't even read any of the source material and just went with it because it confirms their bias.

I even said if you want to preserve white features and your culture and for that reason don't want racemixxing just say that. It's a valid preferenc. But trying to put a scientific spin on it by misinterpreting footnotes and ignoring biological trade offs is just amusing. Reading OP it might seem intergalactic genetic distances between us,
when the reality is that a single troop of chimpanzees in a forest has more genetic diversity than the entire human race combined. Humans are very bottlenecked species.

View attachment 5065313
I didn’t read OP. Obviously racial preference and preservation isn’t some science. I don’t want Albanians to touch cupcakes because I dislike them and their culture; to me it’s a lesser culture. It’s not some science..
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
@Jason Voorhees
i wanna reckon how much they were actually genetically superior even tho they were considered too short to conquer the northern european area
this argument of genetic superiority is flawed, in and thorouoghly flawed, like some shit out of a 20th century race guide book
nonetheless im gonna talk abt this
there is absolute 0 evidence of them having a genetic superiority over the people they conquered and after all, this is literally just european vs european wars in ancient times, rome was literally a open melting pot dude, they also werent even physically superior to their slaves, i doubt u have read tacitus's book on germania during that time period but he literally noted that those areas were physically superior to romans, wouldnt that make them genetically superior to? then how the fuck did rome conquer teh celts and western germania then?
ur talking urself into a fucking trap boyo
earlier intelligence, germanics werent civilized, romans were and used strategy. they generally suffered little grand defeat besides teutoburg forest.
 
I didn’t read OP. Obviously racial preference and preservation isn’t some science. I don’t want Albanians to touch cupcakes because I dislike them and their culture; to me it’s a lesser culture. It’s not some science..
Yes. And that is valid preference. You don't like shitskins because you don't like how they look and don't like their culture so you don't want to racemixxing. Valid It's not about 'nuking the gene pool,' 80 IQ averages, or heart attack genes.

As long as you are honest enough to not make it seem like trying to save the species from a genetic 'step back' and just a guy who wants to keep his neighborhood looking a certain way that is fine.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: imontheloose
Yes. And that is valid preference. You don't like shitskins because you don't like how they look and don't like their culture so you don't want to racemixxing. Valid It's not about 'nuking the gene pool,' 80 IQ averages, or heart attack genes.

As long as you are honest enough to not make it seem like trying to save the species from a genetic 'step back' and just a guy who wants to keep his neighborhood looking a certain way that is fine.
im sure no one genuinely thinks foreign races r born w some parasitic gene that ends lives. the reality is they like their home culture n dislike others; they havent the ability to say "i hate shitskins bc they nuke my culture" so they say "biology proves that shitskins are evil". the latter is scientific nonsense.

in other words, i dont want this as the new english
1778798953222894
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
I'm not against or supporting race mixing. I m just against bullshit and hyperbole, the way OP is interpreting these studies and using them to build a narrative to convince people here is dishonest. I bet 99% of the ones that repped and calling it BOTB tier haven't even read any of the source material and just went with it because it confirms their bias.

I even said if you want to preserve white features and your culture and for that reason don't want racemixxing just say that. It's a valid preferenc. But trying to put a scientific spin on it by misinterpreting footnotes and ignoring biological trade offs is just amusing. Reading OP it might seem intergalactic genetic distances between us,
when the reality is that a single troop of chimpanzees in a forest has more genetic diversity than the entire human race combined. Humans are very bottlenecked species.

View attachment 5065313
mirin that u actually have a study to back this up, in this world, there is no race in its modern interpretation, only cultures of lower and higher order, culture comes before race, since europe is even today in a constant change as it is being "invaded" by questionable cultures, so there can be no solidified race, bc what even classifies white, or black, as there are in them many cultures and such, i wouldnt really group a greek with a nordic person, or a italian with a german, as well as that , those "invaders" who are now in europes grandchildren and such will eventually take in the european culture and whatnot, so a new race of sorts will likely come from this, as in the african american diasphora, african americans dont even welcome africans when they come to their country, if a nigerian fella would go to america and go to a african american school he will be bullied, bc they are from different cultures, africans are still tribalistic to the highest degree, the european formerly individual is now talking abt its peoples froma standpoint of "we", and "us" when he has no honours, no achievements, no vigour, or not even a fraction of will the people he talks abt has, but ofc creatign a higher culture in modernity is like trying to grow a tree without water, the political sphere is full of actors and pretenders, who are full of vices and such, no real politicians like moussolini who remind us of the romanitas vitalism, only people whos idol was a man living in a enclosed dream(hitler)m no wonder tehse hermits go to social media to dream abt a europe they would find tolerable
all the while other cultures are progressing, such a sad fate for what was once great
 
Introduction:
Everything you read below is NOT MY WORDS. All information is taken from a video by "Midgard Asylum" (Russian guy).

Well, let's begin.

View attachment 5060866

"And what if there are more bloodlines? I have Gypsies, Jews, French, Austrians, Magyars, Russians...
who isn't there..."

View attachment 5060869

" - There are a lot of bastards these days. My whole family is like that.

-Natalia, bastard means not born legitimately.

-Thanks for the correction. It was my mistake. I meant to say mixed-race. "


View attachment 5060880

"And look at the Germans... racial purity. Ugly to the point of disgust.
There's a common saying: "If you see a beautiful woman in Germany, she's definitely not German.""

View attachment 5060886

"Mixed bloods are not only different in beauty, but they are also more mentally developed."

I wonder where they get their great knowledge about mixed race. Generally, these individuals, and others, seriously believe that mixing will improve the gene pool. Although they're unlikely to know the word "gene pool." Well, generally speaking, it's "improvement."

And in our already unhealthy world, interbreeding is presented through the media as something normal. But in terms of offspring, it's not normal; it's very risky. But nature doesn't obey the media. Okay, let's get going.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14600054/

View attachment 5060915
A study conducted by Richard Udry, which selected a random, nationally representative sample of adolescents from the United States in 1994-95, included paper questionnaires completed by approximately 80,000 adolescents.

View attachment 5060917

Table 2 shows that people of mixed race had generally higher rates of health and behavioral problems. Specific health problems were assessed by whether they occurred frequently or every day of the previous month. Compared to whites and blacks, people of mixed race experienced health problems on average one and a half times more often.

View attachment 5060924

Table 3 compares various racial combinations with their single-race counterparts in terms of health and behavioral outcomes. The overall picture is presented in Table 2 and Table 3. That is, regardless of racial mix, there is an overall increase in health and behavioral problems among mixed-race adolescents.

By the way, the comments about this study are interesting, but it shouldn't be considered the truth, just a theory.

View attachment 5060933

The author notes that the most common explanation for their finding, also reported by others using non-random samples, is that stress related to identity conflict or the struggle with identity formation is the culprit. However, they also note that there is no evidence for this relationship. Indeed, it is difficult to believe that struggles with identity formation are responsible for the widespread increase in health and behavioral problems among mixed-race adolescents. How does struggles with identity formation lead to a higher incidence of skin problems? A widespread increase in health problems should be assessed through all these basic physiological control structures, in which the brain and the autonomic nervous system (ANS) are particularly relevant. As the figure below shows, the ANS is involved in autonomic regulation of organs. And its abnormalities can easily be found behind Udry's data.

View attachment 5060940

ANS abnormalities are associated with behavioral problems such as excessive aggression, headaches, and various health issues. Furthermore, damage to certain parts of the brain in rats increases the likelihood of cocaine or stimulant addiction. And something similar undoubtedly applies to humans. Furthermore, a number of brain pathologies are characteristic of both depression and drug addiction. And substance use is more common in the mentally ill. Therefore, to the extent that racial mixing increases the likelihood of suboptimal genetic correlation patterns, one might expect this to negatively impact physiological control at the organismal level. This could well explain Udry's data.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1692?utm_source=chatgpt.com
View attachment 5060949

Variants of the gene ALOXSAP (also known as FLAP) encoding arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase activating protein are known to be associated with risk of myocardial infarction'. Here we show that a haplotype (HapK) spanning the LTA4H gene encoding leukotriene A4 hydrolase, a protein in the same biochemical pathway as ALOXSAP, confers modest risk of myocardial infarction in an Icelandic cohort. Measurements of leukotriene B4 (LTB4) production suggest that this risk is mediated through upregulation of the leukotriene pathway.

Three cohorts from the United States also show that Hapk confers a modest relative risk (1.16) in European Americans, but it confers a threefold larger risk in African Americans.

About 27% of the European American controls carried at least one copy of HapK, as compared with only 6% of African American controls. Our analyses indicate that HapK is very rare in Africa and that its occurrence in African Americans is due to European admixture. Interactions with other genetic or environmental risk factors that are more common in African Americans are likely to account for the greater relative risk conferred by HapK in this group.



Now let's translate this into simple language.

The ALOX5AP gene (and its variations) → increases the risk of heart attack.

HapK(LTA4H) - which covers the LTH4H gene → reduces this risk.


This gene and this haplotype are predominantly found in whites, as described in the Icelandic group and three groups from the United States. This means that whites have a gene that increases the risk of heart attack, but also a protective haplotype that reduces this risk. In the second group, consisting of white Americans, this risk-protection genetic combination was found in 27%. But in blacks, it was only 6%, four and a half times less common. And those were from European admixture.



View attachment 5060983



"In theory, the observed association of myocardial infarction with HapK could be the result of an association with a causal variant located in the neighborhood of LTA4H but outside the LD block. Such a situation might explain the high relative risk observed in the recently admixed African Americans, potentially boosted by strong admixture-derived LD, and the modest relative risk in the nonadmixed groups of European…"



This means that a child resulting from the interbreeding of a white and black parent can inherit the ALOX5AP gene from the white parent, which increases the risk of heart attack, without inheriting the protective haplogene HapK. This creates an imbalance. So, yes, mixed-race individuals, specifically mulattoes, have a much higher risk of heart attack. So they'll have to be much more mindful of their motor. Well, they can thank their mom and dad for that.



https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health

View attachment 5060991



-Caucasian and Vietnamese-Caucasian individuals concludes that biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.

The study by researchers at the Asian American Center on Disparities Research at the University of California, Davis, was reported Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association in Boston.

"Up to 2.4 percent of the U.S. population self-identifies as mixed race, and most of these individuals describe themselves as biracial," said Nolan Zane, a professor of psychology and Asian American studies at UC Davis. "We cannot underestimate the importance of understanding the social, psychological and experiential differences that may increase the likelihood of psychological disorders among this fast-growing segment of the population."

Zane and his co-investigator, UC Davis psychology graduate student Lauren Berger, found that 34 percent of biracial individuals in a national survey had been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse, versus 17 percent of monoracial individuals. The higher rate held up even after the researchers controlled for differences between the groups in age, gender and life stress, among other factors.



https://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/18/sports/baseball-rod-carew-s-daughter-dies.html



View attachment 5061001



Here's an interesting article from the New York Times archive.



For seven months, 18-year-old Michelle Carew battled against leukemia. Her doctors said she needed a bone-marrow transplant. There were 70,000 volunteers, but none had marrow to match hers.Yesterday, she died at Children's Hospital of Orange County in Orange, Calif. Dr. Mitchell Cairo, her oncologist, said that the direct cause of death was cardiac and respiratory failure. At her bedside was her father, Rod, the Hall of Fame baseball player; her mother, Marilynn, and other family members.All we did," her father said in an emotional news conference, "is we told her we love her, that we're all here, and I just told her to have a safe journey."When she was diagnosed with leukemia, her doctor said she would probably not survive without a transplant from a donor with matching bone marrow. The marrow of her two sisters and her parents was incompatible, and of the 1.9 million people registered with the National Blood Donor Program, not one had marrow to match hers. When a marrow donor could not be found, doctors performed an umbilical-cord blood transplant March 22. One obstacle to finding a matching donor was her mixed ethnic background. Her father is black, with West Indian and Panamanian roots. Her mother is white, with Russian-Jewish roots. In addition, only 5 percent of registered donors are black…"



https://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993362,00.html (The link doesn't open)

View attachment 5061014



It started out as an average April day, but as Dermot Tatlow drove home, he received a call that would lead to a global campaign to save his son's life. When he heard the bad news, he knew immediately what his family was up against. "I pulled over and took a deep breath," Tatlow says. "We thought we were out of the woods." Tatlow's 44-year-old son, Devan, had relapsed. After 17 months without needing any treatment, a routine biopsy showed Devan's cancer had returned. "Our worst fears were realized," says Tatlow.

Devan would need a marrow transplant. The Bone-marrow cell

prospect of going through chemotherapy for a second time and needing a transplant is daunting to anyone, but it's especially harrowing if — like Devan — you're of mixed race.

Multiracial patients often have an incredibly hard time finding life-saving marrow matches. When Devan, whose father is Caucasian and mother is part Indian, was first diagnosed with leukemia, his family did a search of the international marrow registry that contains over 14 million donors and came up empty. "We knew there was nothing out there for him," Tatlow says.

Compared to organ transplants, bone marrow donations need to be even more genetically similar to their recipients. Though there are exceptions, the vast

majority of successful matches take place between donors and patients of the same ethnic background. Since all the immune system's cells come from bone marrow, a transplant essentially introduces a new immune system to a person. Without genetic similarity between the donor and the patient, the new white blood cells will attack the host body. In an organ transplant, the body can reject the organ, but with marrow, the new immune system can reject the whole body.

To find a marrow match for anyone is hard. Even within one's own family, the chances of finding one are only about 30%. According to the World Donor Marrow Association, while two out of three Caucasians find a match, the chances of a patient from another ethnic background can be as low as one in four. Despite rapid improvements in marrow registries around the world, the global registry is still disproportionately represented by the U.S., U.K. and Germany — all predominantly Caucasian countries. For a multiracial person, the chances are usually even worse.

Athena Mari Asklipiadis, the founder of the California-based Mixed Marrow, one of the only outreach groups devoted to recruiting mixed race donors, says "the numbers are quite staggering ... People compare it to winning the lottery."

It's difficult to ascertain the exact chances of finding a match for a mixed race person because the different combinations have different success rates, and the U.S.-based National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), which has about eight million donors in its registry, does not have statistics on the success rates of mixed race patients.

But Asklipiadis maintains the rates are lower — much lower. "God forbid I need a match, because I'm a very rare combination," Asklipiadis says of her mixed Japanese, Italian, Armenian, Egyptian and Greek background.



And one more article

https://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyl...nor-for-oneyearold-with-leukemia-9087356.html

View attachment 5061036



The Martini family were immediately tested to see if they were suitable. Their marrow was checked to see how many proteins on the surface of their blood cells matched. This is called human leucocyte antigen matching. There are more than 8,500 known antigen characteristics that can occur in millions of combinations, according to Delete Blood Cancer UK. "There was a one in four chance that the children would be compatible but they weren't. It's a dark art," says Yaser. "The difficulty is that at least nine antigens must match and Margot has one that's unusual. If it's a decent match there's a five per cent chance of her dying. If not it can rise to 30 per cent. We want to give her the best possible chance. I haven't been on Google to check what happens next because as soon as you do that you find out horrors. It's not hard resisting. I don't have time and there's no point."

Genealogy has contributed to Margot's rare antigens. Yaser is half-Syrian, a quarter Siamese and a quarter Scottish. He grew up in Roehampton. He has a "funny name but is a south London boy". Vicki, who is from Wolverhampton and met Yaser boarding an easyJet flight to Nice, is half-English, half New Zealander. Yaser says: "As the world increasingly becomes a melting pot donors become more difficult to find."



A study of preterm birth and stillbirth among monoracial and multiracial couples shows an interesting result.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2867623/

View attachment 5061052

View attachment 5061055



The analysis included approximately 1.6 million live births and 1749 stillbirths. In the unadjusted model, compared with two white parents, black/black and black/white couples had a significantly higher risk of fetal death. When all demographic, social, biological, genetic, congenital, and procedural risk factors except gestational age and birth weight were included, the odds ratios (OR) were all still significant.

Black/black couples had the highest level of risk (OR 2.11, CI 1.77-2.51), followed by black mother/white father couples (OR 2.01, CI 1.16-3.48), and white mother/black father couples (OR 1.84, CI 1.33-2.54).

Virtually all of the higher risk of fetal death was explainable by higher rates of low birth weight and prematurity.



So, gentlemen, by having a child with a black partner, you increase the risk of stillbirth for the latter.


(The link to the study is broken and redirects to another website. So I'll show some screenshots.)

View attachment 5061064

View attachment 5061066



Hormones are produced differently in different races. For example, whites generally have higher cortisol levels, but lower levels of norepinephrine and adrenaline. This difference in hormone production in mixed-race couples can impact their offspring by causing hormonal imbalance. This can easily lead to hormonal depression, which is dangerous and can even lead to suicide. And here we again recall the research from the mid-1990s.



View attachment 5061071



It states that mixed Caucasians and Asians exhibit an increased risk of suicide. They also experience more frequent paranoia. However, the study itself doesn't mention hormones.



Regarding their mental development, that's not true either.

Reading an excerpt from Richard Lynn's book "Racial Differences in Intelligence" Evolutionary Analysis

View attachment 5061102
View attachment 5061104

12. Intelligence indicators of African-European hybrids

We will now examine studies of the intelligence of African-European hybrids. The genetic theory of racial differences predicts that the IQ of interracial hybrids should fall approximately midway between Europeans and Africans. To test this prediction, we have summarized the results of studies of African-European racial hybrids in Table 4.12.

View attachment 5061107

Row 1 presents results from Brazil, showing that hybrids known as "brown" have scores intermediate between Europeans and Africans. Row 2 presents the results of a study in Germany (Eyferth, 1961), which showed that the IQ of African-European hybrid children was 94, compared to 100 for European children. The average IQ of African-European hybrids was 96.5, but this has been reduced in the table to 94 to account for the long-term increase in IQ since standardization. Row 3 gives data from South Africa for Europeans, Africans, and Coloureds, who are largely African-European hybrids. The Coloureds' IQ (83) was exactly midway between Europeans (100) and Africans (65). Row 4 gives the results of a more recent study in South Africa,
conducted approximately sixty years later, this study found an IQ of 86 for a sample of people of color, compared to 100 for Europeans. Africans were not included in this study, but the IQ of 86 for people of color was significantly higher than that of purebred Africans in South Africa. Row 5 gives the results of a subsequent study in South Africa, which yielded an IQ of 80 for people of color.
Rows 6-9 give four results for hybrids in the United States. Row 6 gives the results of the Minnesota Interracial Adoption Study; the resulting IQ estimate for hybrids is midway between those of African Americans and Europeans.
The sample sizes are very small, but the results are informative because all three groups were raised by European adoptive parents, precluding any reasonable environmental interpretation of the differences. Row 7 presents further data from the United States, again indicating that hybrids have IQ scores intermediate between Europeans and African Americans (the results of this study were presented by Loehlin, Lindzey, and Spuhler, 1975). Row 8 presents the results of another study from the United States. Its authors divided African Americans into dark-skinned and less dark-skinned individuals and showed that relatively light-skinned African Americans, which was taken as an indicator of hybridization with Europeans, had an IQ of 92—an average value between Europeans and Africans. The final result presented in row 9 shows that hybrids of African Americans with Europeans have an IQ of 97, again falling between African Americans and Europeans.

And what do we see from Richard Lynn's book? Mulattoes are somewhere in the middle between white and black. Relative to a black parent, in terms of offspring, this represents progress. But relative to a white parent, this represents regression.


Regarding beauty, it's certainly a subjective matter. These people have different tastes, but if we look at the definition, one of the qualities of beauty is a harmonious combination of an object's aspects. And here, the mixed ones aren't ahead of the curve.

By the way, Asians have a rather unusual attitude toward racial beauty. I'll read something from a Japanese forum now.(I didn't find the link)
View attachment 5061161
I hate that I'm Japanese.
Why are all Asian men so ugly?
Asian faces look like ugly yellow monkeys with short hair.
Why is that?
Small eyes, low noses, short limbs, thin bodies, yellow skin, black eyes, black hair.
The only Asian woman I like is Nozomi Sasaki, but even she is ugly compared to white women.
I know it's unnatural to compare, but don't they look like yellow monkeys hiding it with hairstyles, plastic surgery, and makeup?
I have no interest in Asians.
Honestly, I hate that I myself am Asian.
I think I understand how Michael Jackson felt.
If you're white, the world considers you beautiful, and you don't face discrimination.
Blonde hair and blue eyes are beautiful colors.
It's true that many Westerners look mature and grown-up.
That's the standard for whites. Sure, some are fat, but if you lose weight, it works out. Even in old age, their bone structure is good, so they don't become ugly like Asians. Life is easy. Being white and having perfect looks — I think that's the best.
What I hate the most are world-famous Hollywood stars.
Because whites are simply beautiful.
Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise, Leonardo DiCaprio, Hugh Jackman, Colin Farrell, Christian Bale, Alain Delon.
Madonna, Cameron Diaz, Charlize Theron, Kate Winslet, Marilyn Monroe.
I've agonized over wanting to get plastic surgery to look like a white person.
You can change your gender, but you can't change your race.
That's what frustrates me the most.
Should I hate my ancestors?

The Japanese seem like an intelligent nation, but they don't admire people of mixed race. They're the most beautiful (sarcasm)!
The internet often showcases more or less successful combinations of mixed beauty. However, such successful combinations, relative to the standard, are far fewer. But they put the best on display, just like at an exhibition back then, the standard and more numerous product isn't as successful. Not the most beautiful, not the smartest, not the healthiest. Things aren't going well here at all, and donation is a "scourge of God" for them. Our esteemed lovers of exotica know better than anyone. They generally think that choosing a black partner is their choice (which is actually not the case).

Once upon a time, there lived a man named Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi. The son of an Austro-Hungarian ambassador and a Japanese aristocrat. So, he was of mixed descent. Philosopher, writer, politician. He was once a Freemason of the Humanitas Lodge. In 2002, the European Union established the Coudenhove-Kalergi Commemorative Medal, awarded in Münster to individuals and organizations for strengthening European unity. This medal was received by Merkel, who so warmly welcomes migrants and despises Germans. This woman clearly strengthens Europe. Coudenhove once wrote a book called "Practical Idealism." Where wrote his vision of the future regarding mixed ones.

"The Eurasian-Negroid Future race, externally similar to the ancient Egyptian, the diversity of peoples with a will Replace diversity of personalities."
Basically, he wanted a future of total interbreeding. Well, the idea was picked up, but it favors whites. More specifically, the idea of a white woman and a black man. And this idea is pushed through films, music videos, advertising, even educational brochures. Organizations like "Paideia," led by the infamous Barbara Specter, champion this idea. A woman, over her reproductive lifespan, averaged from 18 to 45 years, assuming each pregnancy is single and she takes a year off, can produce 12 to 14 children. So, every exotic woman hasn't given birth to an average of 13 white children. Well, every woman will give birth to that many, at least 5 to 7. And in reality, in some white countries, this could prove fatal for whites in the future. Oh well, at least she'll give birth to a couple of mulattoes. Even if the risk of illness is increased. And the neighboring migrants already have six, and the white population is once again declining. The neoliberals are delighted; Uncle Coudenhove's Kalergi plan is being implemented. Well, let them think it's entirely their choice. After all, they're the smartest among us, just like those at the beginning of the story. In short, we're fucked.

P.S.
Children, starting at three months, prefer faces of their own race.
Research has, of course, been conducted on this topic.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2566511/

Well, apparently, children are smarter than "exotic lovers," because their minds aren't tainted by tolerant attitudes, and they can't be accused of racism. Whether a child stays close to nature or becomes tolerant is entirely in the hands of their parents.

In short, guys, spread this information to prevent the development of the Jewish disease


@CorinthianLOX @Hernan @InanimatePragmatist @FlotPSL @Be_ConfidentBro
Dnr but mirin the effort
 
DNR, get mogged by the supreme meeks (Mixed race btw)
 

Attachments

  • Jeremy_Meeks_Mug_Shot.jpg
    Jeremy_Meeks_Mug_Shot.jpg
    70.5 KB · Views: 0

Similar threads

notJohanL
Replies
1
Views
60
james_2006
james_2006
Misanthrope
Replies
15
Views
112
Centurion_Hunter
Centurion_Hunter
Petsmart
Replies
65
Views
542
Smirk221
S
sanguine
Replies
1
Views
55
Clav's Baseball Cup
C

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Roara
  • 143
  • turneywest
  • prise
  • GoyLite
  • Miami
  • 16OO
  • aelimaeli
  • Johan
  • loseratgenes
  • xX_ovrb4itstrtd_Xx
  • user223
  • Aleph_
  • Noun
  • raidens
Back
Top