lol no the wehrmact and ss nazislop hierarchy was built on ideological obedience, not on what aristocrats really should be (a class of superior beings that see the society as their servants, rather than serving to some retarded nation or ideology lol)
billionaires are oligarchs, thats not aristocracy
The SS was literally a project to rebuild and recreate an aristocracy what are you talking abt
I just explained how its not an oligarchy
thats not what aristocracy means
you js said they use military to do shit, aka bought military. thats oligarchy by definition
They're intertwined with the military, that's what aristocracy is by definition lol.
they didn't descend from conquerors but bought military. neither they fight in wars.
You didn't need to have conquered or fought in battles to be part of the aristocracy; also a lot of CEOs and businessmen are former military. Most of the defense contractors are run by former military. It is indeed an aristocracy.
oxymoron
Himmler modeled the SS over historical knightly orders, aristocrats gained their titles and status in the same way the SS did, over time the SS would of been a new and far superior aristocracy
nigga is AH's number one fan im fucking dead im mirin
aristocracy is modeled when some barbarians conquer other people and become their masters, and see their subordinates as inferiors rather than some blonde blue eyed "ubermenschen". maybe he tried to reconstruct warrior class but thats not what aristocracy actually means. real aristocrats would not believe they should serve to some "superior" race, but they would despise them as their inferiors
Im a white south african nigga obv im going to be a devout hitlerite, even my family are sympathetic
The SS saw themselves as the best of the best, imperial german aristocrats also fought alongside their peasants and saw it fit to lead them into battle, aristocracies are naturally warrior classes and aristocrats dont look down on their people but love them and see themselves as the only people fit to lead them
very degenerate excuse of an aristocracy actually can see the nation as their equals rather than inferiors. self-aware aristocrats usually see people as the ones who should serve them since they aren't equal
if you want actual german aristocrats rahter than those soft degens then learn about friedrich 2 hohenstaufen
Where did I say that they saw them as equal, wanting to fight and lead their peasants into battle as well as seeing yourself the only on capable of leading them in governance is not seeing them as equals
well if you use peasants as cannon fodder then maybe you are actually an aristocrat although not necessary
Aristocrats were aristocrats precisely because they excelled in martial matters not because they hid behind the frontlines, ww1 aristocrats were overrepresented as officers on the frontline and knights were overwhelmingly connected to the aristocracy, medieval kings also fought on the frontline and lead their armies themselves
read 9th chapter of beyond good and evil to know whats aristocratic and whats not.
what i try to say is that aristocrats are individualists not some plebian low class slop blonde ideological slave cannon fodder monkeys
Not true whatsoever, nobles viewed themselves as a distinct collective class (the second estate) that had extra privileges and responsibilities to the state while also routinely sacrificing individual interests for collective house/lineage interests or even their nation's interests, Robert The Bruce sacraficied his wealth and comfort for scottish freedom, Jan Zizka fought for the hussite peasants out of loyalty to the cause, William of Orange sacraficed his vast fortunes to fund the dutch revolt and championed for his people, there are so many cases of aristocrats going against their individual interests for their nation and people
few examples wont rly change the nature of aristocracy bruh
I read in charge as in cage lol
Lool at thinking these retards actually give a fuck about people and the nation/state/civilization or whatever jfl
the clown that makes sure you sleep well at night
Youre making the claim that aristocracy is inherently indiviudalist when its not and i showed you with not only multiple examples but with how they operate as a class (they become far more collectivist even if they don't care for their nation as they are subdued to the name of their house and the interests of the house) idk what else to say man
oh yes they are collectivist as in ancestry-worshipping way since they got their genes
The SS were doing the exact same thing, they worshipped their ancestors and acted as a privileged estate, after the death of the nobility in europe they were the closest thing to it and if they had won they would of become far more entrenched as a political elite and estate
