
Cheek0
Chico123
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2022
- Posts
- 12,861
- Reputation
- 12,556
nordic
black
asian
everyone else is too ugly
black
asian
everyone else is too ugly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
jflblack
asian
most blacks still have good bone development from recently becomming civilized,
Cope. African americans have masculinity but nothing else unless very mixed with whites. "black" is too general to be a race and certain african ethnicities have it better than others, but the best looking races are of the Caucasoid ethnicitiesmost blacks still have good bone development from recently becomming civilized,
Those are the only unique non NPC races. All other races look alike and are just various versions of Black White and Asiannordic
black
asian
everyone else is too ugly
no curries are subhumanCope. African americans have masculinity but nothing else unless very mixed with whites. "black" is too general to be a race and certain african ethnicities have it better than others, but the best looking races are of the Caucasoid ethnicities
And yet blacks outslay “caucasoid” ethnicities excluding whites ofc clearly women disagree with you, I’d only say Arabs out lookx blacks in PSL out of caucasoid ethnic foes that are not whiteCope. African americans have masculinity but nothing else unless very mixed with whites. "black" is too general to be a race and certain african ethnicities have it better than others, but the best looking races are of the Caucasoid ethnicities
currys are the most npc race in existance, they either try to be hamza or are subhumanThose are the only unique non NPC races. All other races look alike and are just various versions of Black White and Asian
yes curries are. but I meant all of the top races would be caucasoid, not that all the causasoids are gl. blacks have objectively bad ratios and facial shape.no curries are subhuman
blacks have good bone structure
lightskins compete w whites and they are basically blacks 2.0 even darkskins canyes curries are. but I meant all of the top races would be caucasoid, not that all the causasoids are gl. blacks have objectively bad ratios and facial shape.
the american ones are the best looking the african ones are as ugly as currysDepends on the black pheno and origin tbh
East Africans blacks and Horners on top
Oh yea obviously I'm just saying certain african phenos are better than othersthe american ones are the best looking the african ones are as ugly as currys
All ethnics in there area look the sameOh yea obviously I'm just saying certain african phenos are better than others
Yes that is true. But when I am refering to a certain race, I am referring to pure specimens. Lightskins probably have more european ancestry than african ancestry therefore and would be classified as mixed race. People like to downplay the european genetic composition of african-americanslightskins compete w whites and they are basically blacks 2.0 even darkskins can
Tbh the best looking Africans have no white ancestry, the Nilotic people of Eastern and Central Africa are gigamoggers and 6'3+Cope. African americans have masculinity but nothing else unless very mixed with whites. "black" is too general to be a race and certain african ethnicities have it better than others, but the best looking races are of the Caucasoid ethnicities
jfl no dudeAll ethnics in there area look the same
Asians all look the same
Currys all look the same
Blacks all look the same
Mix races are a bit of a mixed bag but can be exotic and not look like every other Nigga
last 2 have 0 sex appealTbh the best looking Africans have no white ancestry, the Nilotic people of Eastern and Central Africa are gigamoggers and 6'3+
![]()
![]()
![]()
There aren't any African Americans with significant Nilotic ancestry
These the mfs chillin minding their own business in West EthiopiaTbh the best looking Africans have no white ancestry, the Nilotic people of Eastern and Central Africa are gigamoggers and 6'3+
![]()
![]()
![]()
There aren't any African Americans with significant Nilotic ancestry
Re read what I wrote, pat close attention to the first sentencejfl no dude
A Mongolian or Kazakh looks nothing like a Filipino or Cambodian, an ethiopian or somali looks nothing like a Nigerian or Ghanaian
those are just examples too
So false, look at my post above. American blacks look like absolute shit next to Nilotic tribesmen. Imagine if Nilotes were raised on western diets, they'd be gigamoggersthe american ones are the best looking the african ones are as ugly as currys
2nd one has good sex appeal and mascmogs the VAST majority of men I see on a day to day basis in the US. You're delusional if you think he isn't more masculine than average plus he's 6'+ with wide shoulders and small hips which means more sex appeal.last 2 have 0 sex appeal
Yes that's why its silly to generalize almost a whole continent as a single raceTbh the best looking Africans have no white ancestry, the Nilotic people of Eastern and Central Africa are gigamoggers and 6'3+
![]()
![]()
![]()
There aren't any African Americans with significant Nilotic ancestry
False black and asian mix looks insane.Cope. African americans have masculinity but nothing else unless very mixed with whites. "black" is too general to be a race and certain african ethnicities have it better than others, but the best looking races are of the Caucasoid ethnicities
If you see that bottom dude at a club walk out the door you will be getting his crumbs son.Muhh blacks only look good if mixed with white. Ok look at this View attachment 1902506View attachment 1902511View attachment 1902512View attachment 1902513all black and asian
maybe my arab side ruined my looks instead of my asian sideMuhh blacks only look good if mixed with white. Ok look at this View attachment 1902506View attachment 1902511View attachment 1902512View attachment 1902513all black and asian
This would have been you if you were a pure mixmaybe my arab side ruined my looks instead of my asian side
"all black and asian" If they were mixed with african-americans, then they have european DNA. African americans have an average od 24% european admixture. considering that you cherry picked the top-tier specimens, they probably have much more european dna than the average blasian tooMuhh blacks only look good if mixed with white. Ok look at this View attachment 1902506View attachment 1902511View attachment 1902512View attachment 1902513all black and asian
could've been 6 psl blasian moggerThis would have been you if you were a pure mix View attachment 1902515
You just pulled the 24% out of your ass show the studies."all black and asian" If they were mixed with african-americans, then they have european DNA. African americans have an average od 24% european admixture. considering that you cherry picked the top-tier specimens, they probably have much more european dna than the average blasian too
ur true potential is like 5.3 psl tbh u need to debloatcould've been 6 psl blasian mogger
Instead I'm 4.5 psl muslim super mutt
I'm trying it's very hardur true potential is like 5.3 psl tbh u need to debloat
Don't tell me u got the evidence from quora"all black and asian" If they were mixed with african-americans, then they have european DNA. African americans have an average od 24% european admixture. considering that you cherry picked the top-tier specimens, they probably have much more european dna than the average blasian too
No I didntYou just pulled the 24% out of your ass show the studies.
No I didnt
View attachment 1902519
![]()
The Genetic Ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States
Over the past 500 years, North America has been the site of ongoing mixing of Native Americans, European settlers, and Africans (brought largely by the trans-Atlantic slave trade), shaping the early history of what became the United States. We studied ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Don't you realize that you can't do genetic testing and on the whole african-american population? jfl. the point is that afircan americans have a considerable amount european ancestry, obviously not exactly 24%. and 5,269 is actually quite a good sample sizeView attachment 1902522View attachment 1902523
Muhh "self described africans"Just use 5k out of 50million theory jfl.
Il go with your logic for this use ur iq dumb nigger if u have a 80% african 20% european person and a full asian person they make a baby how much european would be in the child? OHH thats right ten percent.Don't you realize that you can't do genetic testing and on the whole african-american population? jfl. the point is that afircan americans have a considerable amount european ancestry, obviously not exactly 24%. and 5,269 is actually quite a good sample size
its an average of 24%. That means that many would have higher, and many lower. The parents of the gl blasians probably had higher than average european dna since I would think that more white dna correlates with looks. You tried to claim that "they were all black and asian", which is probably false and you have no way of proving that. It's quite possible they even have over 25% european dnaIl go with your logic for this use ur iq dumb nigger if u have a 80% african 20% european person and a full asian person they make a baby how much european would be in the child? OHH thats right ten percent.
Also duh no dip sherlock u can't test the entire pop but to say most african americans are this when you take 5k out of 50 mil is insane genetics is a tricky subject and 5k is not a big enough sample size something in the 100k mark would be big.
You also have no way of proving otherwise so what is your point?its an average of 24%. That means that many would have higher, and many lower. The parents of the gl blasians probably had higher than average european dna since I would think that more white dna correlates with looks. You tried to claim that "they were all black and asian", which is probably false and you have no way of proving that. It's quite possible they even have over 25% european dna
My point is that you can't make the claim that they have no white dna. also blasians are subhumanYou also have no way of proving otherwise so what is your point?
Ping me where i made that claim. Second i could say whites are subhuman whats the point?My point is that you can't make the claim that they have no white dna. also blasians are subhuman
What are horners?Depends on the black pheno and origin tbh
East Africans blacks and Horners on top
Ping me where i made that claim. Second i could say whites are subhuman whats the point?
youre an idiot if you think blasians are on average glMuhh blacks only look good if mixed with white. Ok look at this View attachment 1902506View attachment 1902511View attachment 1902512View attachment 1902513all black and asian
Ethiopians and SomalisWhat are horners?
Nah. Arabs look good tbh. U can’t just cherry pick examples from a given race. U have to look at the bigger picture.maybe my arab side ruined my looks instead of my asian side