Beyond the Mathematics - Appeal vs PSL Explained: The Ultimatum

D

Deleted member 274554

Iron
Joined
Nov 19, 2025
Posts
78
Reputation
46
You could be the most perfect shade of Blue, but it won't matter if her favourite colour is Red

The terms PSL and Appeal have been thrown around the .org community for long now, and it is quite disappointing to assume that people are using them interchangeably. But fear not boyos, I'm here to break down the differences and how they influence your Sexual Market Value (SMV). Expect to know the nits and the grits of the two, and how they are NOT the same.

Table of Contents:
1. What is PSL?
2. What is Appeal?
3. PSL vs Appeal
4. The Ultimatum
5. Summary and Takeaways
6. Conclusion
7. Bibliography


1. What Exactly is PSL?
PSL is a system used to objectively evaluate the perfection of somebody's face. The PSL Scale uses biological and mathematical markers to gauge ratios and proportions. The scale aims to show how your face aligns with geometric relationships. Unlike the Appeal Scale, PSL is objective, data-based, and rooted in biological and mathematical perceptions.

How does the scale work?

The PSL Scale is normally done by robots or programs, as they are more fluent in the ratios, and are less subjective than Humans. The scale gives a score after completing these steps:
1. Measure key facial features
Programs measure facial features with pixels or millimetres, depending on the method. These programs usually measure the eyes, nose, cheekbones, forehead, mouth, and overall face shape.
2. Calculate ratios
The measurements are then converted into ratios, relative to other surrounding facial features. Some examples could be: Eye width/face width, nose width/mouth width, jaw width/cheekbone width, etc. These ratios are then compared to theorised ranges based on previous studies on facial attractiveness.
3. Weighing of factors
Programs must also take into account that not all features contribute to Sexual Market Value (SMV) equally. Symmetry often carries a heavier weight than averageness for example.
4. Normalisation and Scoring
Each ratio is then given a 'sub-score' (e.g. 0-10). A perfect match to a ratio achieves the highest score, while deviations may reduce it proportionally, weighing of factors also takes a part in this step.
5. Final Score
All 'sub-scores' are averaged according to their weights to produce the final PSL score.

Example of the golden ratio in use in facial analysis:
Please Dispose

Facial Symmetry:
Please Dispose 2

Facial Ratio Chart:
Please dispose 3

Measurement of Face (to) Width (to) Height Ratio (fWHR):
Please disposee

TLDR; PSL is a scaling system that gauges ratios and proportions to produce a score of somebody's face.

2. What Exactly is Appeal?
While PSL measures objective facial structure, Appeal is more based on averageness and subjective preference. It is a reflection on real-world scenarios and sexual contexts. It also synergises from things beyond the geometrical puzzle fitting, such as personality, grooming, style, expressions, and fashion.

Facially, Appeal emphasises on how features harmonise dynamically, softness, and evolutionary cues that show if a person is healthy or not. Unlike PSL, Appeal
cannot be objectively gauged, rather, it relies on subconscious preferences and overall facial harmony.

How internal facial features are signals of personality and health:
Please dispose 4

Displays of averageness in a Caucasian face and a Japanese face:
Please Dispose NOW

TLDR; Normally, greys like me refer to Appeal as the Female Gaze, averageness, harmony, etc

3. PSL vs Appeal
Although I just gave you their definitions, it's still easy to mix them up, both of them deal with attractiveness. However they operate on entirely different principles. Understanding their uses and outcomes is pivotal for anyone serious about facial analysis.

Aspect PSL Appeal
Nature Objective, data-based Subjective, perception-based
Measured by Ratios, symmetry, proportions Subconscious preferences, perceived harmony, expression, health
Scope Purely facial geometry Facial dynamics, cues, softness, averageness
Consistency Repeatable, can be done with programs Varies by woman, culture, and context
Example Perfect Eye Width/Face Width? High PSL boost Slightly off Eye Width/Face Width with healthy skin? Slight deviations improve Appeal

Key Differences:
1. Objective vs Subjective
PSL measured how close a face is to an already idealised ratio. Every bone has a precise numerical weight. Appeal is about how humans perceive attractiveness, which compensates with subtle things that PSL would've otherwise disregarded.
2. Perfect PSL is NOT equal to High Appeal
In most cases, especially women, a person with perfect PSL would appear overly rigid, lifeless, uncharismatic, reducing perceived attraction. Ironically, a person with slight deviations in PSL usually score incredibly high in appeal, due to their natural expression, almost symmetrical symmetry, and feminine features.
3. Feature Harmony
PSL evaluates features relative to each other using fixed ratios, Appeal considers how features interact dynamically. Example: A slightly wider nose may suit the jawline better, increasing perceived attractiveness.
4. Use Cases
PSL is used for precise facial analyses, scientific study, or algorithmic ratings.
Appeal is more relevant to social interactions, dating perception, and general human attractiveness

TLDR; Bottomline, programs gauge PSL, Humans gauge Appeal. You fuck women not calculators and code.

4. The Ultimatum
It is important to acknowledge that high Appeal cannot come without high PSL, and in so, I would like to introduce probably the greyest thing you'll hear on this platform: The Ultimatum

There comes a time where someone is softmaxxing, and has only reached a point where they are only starting to uncover their potential. Atop this picket fence, a decision must be made; will you pursue Appeal or PSL?

Seems stupid, yeah, but the reality is that, although for the bottom stages of the rating system Appeal and PSL stick closely together. Changes in, well anything, contribute directly to facial attractiveness. But as one progresses along the rating system, they separate almost exponentially. This brings only one logical gate, for the rest of this journey, will you pursue Appeal or PSL?

1. Taking the PSL path, you'll most likely be greeted with exotic job opportunities, surgical interventions, peptides, and all the hardmaxx goodness. This path is perfection oriented.
2. Taking the Appeal path, you'll most likely be greeted with social acceptance, and possibly even social admiration. Skincare routines, haircuts, and all the soft feminine goodness. This path is improvement oriented.

This ultimatum is not about polarising the two, or saying which is 'better', it's more about knowing the point of divergence between bone and skin, math and soul, objective and subjective. High PSL does not guarantee Appeal, and high Appeal without a solid PSL base is unlikely. Recognising this is a key to mastering what you want to look like in the future.

TLDR; Appeal and PSL diverge at higher ratings, two paths, PSL and Appeal, choose one.

5. Summary and Takeaways
In summary:
1. PSL is the Mathematics of the Face
Objective, data-based, ratios and proportions
2. Appeal is the Art of the Face
Subjective, harmony, softness, averageness
3. Relationship
High Appeal is extremely unlikely without a solid PSL base, but the two separate as they go up the scale
4. The Ultimatum
The critical moment where you decide to either work on hardmaxx ratios or softmaxx perception.

TLDR; My brother this is the TLDR


6. Conclusion

Understanding the difference of PSL and Appeal and how they intertwine is about analysing the difference between the stage and the show. PSL gives you the objective foundation, the measurable ratios, and the symmetry. Appeal gives you the dynamic, living layer that determines how other truly perceive you.

The two are connected, but come apart as they progress. Knowing this allows you to work on flaws and where to concentrate your efforts.

At the end of the day, the mastery of facial attractiveness is about understanding the mathematics, appreciating the art, and choosing your path wisely.

7. Bibliographies
1. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/21991/1/Little_CogSci_FacialAttractiveness_STORRE.pdf
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Averageness?
3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19285521/
4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11430245/
5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17972486/
6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15500809/
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19394585/
8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19896961/
9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23477386/
10. https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/44/1/NP1/7269091?utm_source=chatgpt.com&login=false
11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_attractiveness#Symmetry -
"although one contrary report suggests that "absolute flawlessness" with perfect symmetry can be "disturbing"." (verbatim)
12. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02465?
13. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04282?P
14. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470211003770912
15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7644543/
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33933836/
17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35755137/ -
"the perception of aesthetically pleasing faces by laypersons do not accurately follow golden proportion but are close enough to it. " (verbatim)

P.S: Thanks for reading this, it's my first post, not sure how to feel about it. Please be nice and give feedback, thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 1763613961932.png
    1763613961932.png
    315.4 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Gearsy, Nerian, thecel and 9 others

Criypr

Iron​

Joined Nov 19, 2025
Posts1
Reputation0
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, average_larper, 50 Shades of Grey and 4 others
Never seeing the light of BOTB
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Jattdontcare, GoblinMaxxer and 1 other person
i NEED to get to botb bro
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel and Jattdontcare
dnrd but this is bs, what people mean by appeal is someone who is high psl but has slightly more androgynous features (like hernan drago vs chico)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Yemuk
dnrd but this is bs, what people mean by appeal is someone who is high psl but has slightly more androgynous features (like hernan drago vs chico)
literally just summed up everything i said, nice one brodie
 
  • +1
Reactions: somatropinpin
literally just summed up everything i said, nice one brodie
Your dumb quite litrully because most female eroticas still dont look that androgynouse , its like one feature snad thats probably clear skin . You havent made one on sex appeal, tbh this is proly cope bcz ur a feminine guy and u mfs are feminists who think being feminine is , (ALSO FACIAL DIMO IS PROVEN BY SCIENCE TO ATTRACTIVE IF BALANCED WITH AVERAGNESS AND IS MODERATE/NORMAL LOOKING) superior , by that logic chico would mog leon kennedy.
1763667739843
1763667758997
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Jeremy Meeks and Deleted member 274554
Your dumb quite litrully because most female eroticas still dont look that androgynouse , its like one feature snad thats probably clear skin . You havent made one on sex appeal, tbh this is proly cope bcz ur a feminine guy and u mfs are feminists who think being feminine is , (ALSO FACIAL DIMO IS PROVEN BY SCIENCE TO ATTRACTIVE IF BALANCED WITH AVERAGNESS AND IS MODERATE/NORMAL LOOKING) superior , by that logic chico would mog leon, kennedy.View attachment 4345665View attachment 4345668More feminine=appeal shutcho bitch ahhh up boyo
 
Your dumb quite litrully because most female eroticas still dont look that androgynouse , its like one feature snad thats probably clear skin . You havent made one on sex appeal, tbh this is proly cope bcz ur a feminine guy and u mfs are feminists who think being feminine is , (ALSO FACIAL DIMO IS PROVEN BY SCIENCE TO ATTRACTIVE IF BALANCED WITH AVERAGNESS AND IS MODERATE/NORMAL LOOKING) superior , by that logic chico would mog leon kennedy.View attachment 4345665View attachment 4345668
@cryper
literally just summed up everything i said, nice one brodie
mb bro im sorry for being too rough , we can work together on how to measure appeal if you want , bcz i also hate the emphasis on sharp features. Infact im making my own scale on it.
 
appeal is subjective beauty, psl is objective beauty
 
we were all greys once
thing is i dont get ur point. I can name 50000 masculine men with more than 1 million fangirls
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jeremy Meeks
You ever stopped to think that they probably have some sort of appeal😱😱
feminine features arent appeal , saying feminine>sharp or sharp>feminine is innacurate and stupid iv asked girls if they prefer pham or alex shlab and though slab has higher trust features some picked pham others picked alex , its very subjective as long as u dont look uncanny u can pull.
 
feminine features arent appeal , saying feminine>sharp or sharp>feminine is innacurate and stupid iv asked girls if they prefer pham or alex shlab and though slab has higher trust features some picked pham others picked alex , its very subjective as long as u dont look uncanny u can pull.
Yea sharp or feminine features appeal to females, its just a matter of to which demographic

People who think having feminine features=appeal cant seem to think outside the box of trying to attract young tiktok girls
 
Yea sharp or feminine features appeal to females, its just a matter of to which demographic

People who think having feminine features=appeal cant seem to think outside the box of trying to attract young tiktok girls
its not even feminine tho most of the "feminine" guys have bonemass , what they are talking ab anyways is damien karter , vinnie the hacker exc they still have dimo but some "feminine" features wch is realisticly youth indicators , like collagen , clear skin , even skin tone , contrast , eyelashes , fuller lips (acc dimorphic for men contrary to belief) , exc .
 
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser
Dnr
Water
What the fuck is that title
 
You could be the most perfect shade of Blue, but it won't matter if her favourite colour is Red

The terms PSL and Appeal have been thrown around the .org community for long now, and it is quite disappointing to assume that people are using them interchangeably. But fear not boyos, I'm here to break down the differences and how they influence your Sexual Market Value (SMV). Expect to know the nits and the grits of the two, and how they are NOT the same.

Table of Contents:
1. What is PSL?
2. What is Appeal?
3. PSL vs Appeal
4. The Ultimatum
5. Summary and Takeaways
6. Conclusion
7. Bibliography


1. What Exactly is PSL?
PSL is a system used to objectively evaluate the perfection of somebody's face. The PSL Scale uses biological and mathematical markers to gauge ratios and proportions. The scale aims to show how your face aligns with geometric relationships. Unlike the Appeal Scale, PSL is objective, data-based, and rooted in biological and mathematical perceptions.

How does the scale work?

The PSL Scale is normally done by robots or programs, as they are more fluent in the ratios, and are less subjective than Humans. The scale gives a score after completing these steps:
1. Measure key facial features
Programs measure facial features with pixels or millimetres, depending on the method. These programs usually measure the eyes, nose, cheekbones, forehead, mouth, and overall face shape.
2. Calculate ratios
The measurements are then converted into ratios, relative to other surrounding facial features. Some examples could be: Eye width/face width, nose width/mouth width, jaw width/cheekbone width, etc. These ratios are then compared to theorised ranges based on previous studies on facial attractiveness.
3. Weighing of factors
Programs must also take into account that not all features contribute to Sexual Market Value (SMV) equally. Symmetry often carries a heavier weight than averageness for example.
4. Normalisation and Scoring
Each ratio is then given a 'sub-score' (e.g. 0-10). A perfect match to a ratio achieves the highest score, while deviations may reduce it proportionally, weighing of factors also takes a part in this step.
5. Final Score
All 'sub-scores' are averaged according to their weights to produce the final PSL score.

Example of the golden ratio in use in facial analysis:
View attachment 4343983
Facial Symmetry:
View attachment 4343988
Facial Ratio Chart:
View attachment 4343992
Measurement of Face (to) Width (to) Height Ratio (fWHR):
View attachment 4344008
TLDR; PSL is a scaling system that gauges ratios and proportions to produce a score of somebody's face.

2. What Exactly is Appeal?
While PSL measures objective facial structure, Appeal is more based on averageness and subjective preference. It is a reflection on real-world scenarios and sexual contexts. It also synergises from things beyond the geometrical puzzle fitting, such as personality, grooming, style, expressions, and fashion.

Facially, Appeal emphasises on how features harmonise dynamically, softness, and evolutionary cues that show if a person is healthy or not. Unlike PSL, Appeal
cannot be objectively gauged, rather, it relies on subconscious preferences and overall facial harmony.

How internal facial features are signals of personality and health:
View attachment 4343995
Displays of averageness in a Caucasian face and a Japanese face:
View attachment 4344003
TLDR; Normally, greys like me refer to Appeal as the Female Gaze, averageness, harmony, etc

3. PSL vs Appeal
Although I just gave you their definitions, it's still easy to mix them up, both of them deal with attractiveness. However they operate on entirely different principles. Understanding their uses and outcomes is pivotal for anyone serious about facial analysis.

Aspect PSL Appeal
Nature Objective, data-based Subjective, perception-based
Measured by Ratios, symmetry, proportions Subconscious preferences, perceived harmony, expression, health
Scope Purely facial geometry Facial dynamics, cues, softness, averageness
Consistency Repeatable, can be done with programs Varies by woman, culture, and context
Example Perfect Eye Width/Face Width? High PSL boost Slightly off Eye Width/Face Width with healthy skin? Slight deviations improve Appeal

Key Differences:
1. Objective vs Subjective
PSL measured how close a face is to an already idealised ratio. Every bone has a precise numerical weight. Appeal is about how humans perceive attractiveness, which compensates with subtle things that PSL would've otherwise disregarded.
2. Perfect PSL is NOT equal to High Appeal
In most cases, especially women, a person with perfect PSL would appear overly rigid, lifeless, uncharismatic, reducing perceived attraction. Ironically, a person with slight deviations in PSL usually score incredibly high in appeal, due to their natural expression, almost symmetrical symmetry, and feminine features.
3. Feature Harmony
PSL evaluates features relative to each other using fixed ratios, Appeal considers how features interact dynamically. Example: A slightly wider nose may suit the jawline better, increasing perceived attractiveness.
4. Use Cases
PSL is used for precise facial analyses, scientific study, or algorithmic ratings.
Appeal is more relevant to social interactions, dating perception, and general human attractiveness

TLDR; Bottomline, programs gauge PSL, Humans gauge Appeal. You fuck women not calculators and code.

4. The Ultimatum
It is important to acknowledge that high Appeal cannot come without high PSL, and in so, I would like to introduce probably the greyest thing you'll hear on this platform: The Ultimatum

There comes a time where someone is softmaxxing, and has only reached a point where they are only starting to uncover their potential. Atop this picket fence, a decision must be made; will you pursue Appeal or PSL?

Seems stupid, yeah, but the reality is that, although for the bottom stages of the rating system Appeal and PSL stick closely together. Changes in, well anything, contribute directly to facial attractiveness. But as one progresses along the rating system, they separate almost exponentially. This brings only one logical gate, for the rest of this journey, will you pursue Appeal or PSL?

1. Taking the PSL path, you'll most likely be greeted with exotic job opportunities, surgical interventions, peptides, and all the hardmaxx goodness. This path is perfection oriented.
2. Taking the Appeal path, you'll most likely be greeted with social acceptance, and possibly even social admiration. Skincare routines, haircuts, and all the soft feminine goodness. This path is improvement oriented.

This ultimatum is not about polarising the two, or saying which is 'better', it's more about knowing the point of divergence between bone and skin, math and soul, objective and subjective. High PSL does not guarantee Appeal, and high Appeal without a solid PSL base is unlikely. Recognising this is a key to mastering what you want to look like in the future.

TLDR; Appeal and PSL diverge at higher ratings, two paths, PSL and Appeal, choose one.

5. Summary and Takeaways
In summary:
1. PSL is the Mathematics of the Face
Objective, data-based, ratios and proportions
2. Appeal is the Art of the Face
Subjective, harmony, softness, averageness
3. Relationship
High Appeal is extremely unlikely without a solid PSL base, but the two separate as they go up the scale
4. The Ultimatum
The critical moment where you decide to either work on hardmaxx ratios or softmaxx perception.

TLDR; My brother this is the TLDR

6. Conclusion
Understanding the difference of PSL and Appeal and how they intertwine is about analysing the difference between the stage and the show. PSL gives you the objective foundation, the measurable ratios, and the symmetry. Appeal gives you the dynamic, living layer that determines how other truly perceive you.

The two are connected, but come apart as they progress. Knowing this allows you to work on flaws and where to concentrate your efforts.

At the end of the day, the mastery of facial attractiveness is about understanding the mathematics, appreciating the art, and choosing your path wisely.

7. Bibliographies
1. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/21991/1/Little_CogSci_FacialAttractiveness_STORRE.pdf
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Averageness?
3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19285521/
4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11430245/
5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17972486/
6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15500809/
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19394585/
8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19896961/
9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23477386/
10. https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/44/1/NP1/7269091?utm_source=chatgpt.com&login=false
11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_attractiveness#Symmetry -
"although one contrary report suggests that "absolute flawlessness" with perfect symmetry can be "disturbing"." (verbatim)
12. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02465?
13. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04282?P
14. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470211003770912
15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7644543/
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33933836/
17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35755137/ -
"the perception of aesthetically pleasing faces by laypersons do not accurately follow golden proportion but are close enough to it. " (verbatim)

P.S: Thanks for reading this, it's my first post, not sure how to feel about it. Please be nice and give feedback, thanks.
amazing post i think im going to nut everywhere because of how cool and non-ai this is you might be the coolest larper
 
  • JFL
Reactions: TiktokUser
its not even feminine tho most of the "feminine" guys have bonemass , what they are talking ab anyways is damien karter , vinnie the hacker exc they still have dimo but some "feminine" features wch is realisticly youth indicators , like collagen , clear skin , even skin tone , contrast , eyelashes , fuller lips (acc dimorphic for men contrary to belief) , exc .
I mean in terms of feminine youve also got guys like young dicaprio and timothee chalamet, who actually dont have that much dimo and mainly have soft youth carrying their look

Its js ppl in the psl space think in terms of male gaze so theyre gonna always select guys with high dimo regardless. if they want to showcase a prettyboy they'll show a boarderline chad with more collegen and full hair instead of showing a true prettyboy (such as the ones I listed and many more)

And with the feminine thing as a whole: they'll show borderline chads with a few feminine features instead of guys who are genuinely feminine looking (but goodlooking at the same time)
 
I mean in terms of feminine youve also got guys like young dicaprio and timothee chalamet, who actually dont have that much dimo and mainly have soft youth carrying their look

Its js ppl in the psl space think in terms of male gaze so theyre gonna always select guys with high dimo regardless. if they want to showcase a prettyboy they'll show a boarderline chad with more collegen and full hair instead of showing a true prettyboy (such as the ones I listed and many more)

And with the feminine thing as a whole: they'll show borderline chads with a few feminine features instead of guys who are genuinely feminine looking (but goodlooking at the same time)
They age badly, and also not the product of what woman draw men like when they acc idolize features , most korean manhwas iv read its mostly masculine features disguised with those "feminine ashetics" even the k pop demon hunter movie they just made the pretty boys more dimorphic , i think its generally ideal bcz theres a lot of research to add up and also that those soft feminine features dont age well because these people rely on youth.
 
They age badly, and also not the product of what woman draw men like when they acc idolize features , most korean manhwas iv read its mostly masculine features disguised with those "feminine ashetics" even the k pop demon hunter movie they just made the pretty boys more dimorphic , i think its generally ideal bcz theres a lot of research to add up and also that those soft feminine features dont age well because these people rely on youth.
It doesnt rlly matter if they age badly (or if the research suggests girls like higher dimo), cause either way soft youthful prettyboys have peak prettyboy appeal, which is why they garner the most female attention esp in online spaces where its purely about asthetics

Prettyboys with higher dimo still do well too though
 
It doesnt rlly matter if they age badly (or if the research suggests girls like higher dimo), cause either way soft youthful prettyboys have peak prettyboy appeal, which is why they garner the most female attention esp in online spaces where its purely about asthetics

Prettyboys with higher dimo still do well too though
peak pretty boy appeal? i mean what im saying is read what woman make first, not saying they dont have good appeal they arent just better then the ones with higher dimo tho in terms of broad overall appeal, they also dont garner the most attention in online spaces , if u carefully check , veins , biceps , deep voice also garner attention in online spaces and wev seen charachters with higher dimo being preferred much more overall. Most fanfics woman tend to draw the man with good bone structure , but they have hhtn appeal tho. Thats about it.
 
peak pretty boy appeal? i mean what im saying is read what woman make first, not saying they dont have good appeal they arent just better then the ones with higher dimo tho in terms of broad overall appeal, they also dont garner the most attention in online spaces , if u carefully check , veins , biceps , deep voice also garner attention in online spaces and wev seen charachters with higher dimo being preferred much more overall. Most fanfics woman tend to draw the man with good bone structure , but they have hhtn appeal tho. Thats about it.
In terms of fictional characters i could see that, but when it comes to real dudes posting tiktoks, the softer prettyboys tend to be the ones who consistently get more free attention and validation from girls

I do agree that when girls draw guys they will make him higher dimo, but the fan fic and fictional romance niche is smaller compared to the general pool of girls on tiktok (and on social media in general for that matter) so though the smaller niche might value higher dimo prettyboys, the greater niche will gravitate more towards the lower dimo prettyboys
 
Last edited:
In terms of fictional characters i could see that, but when it comes to real dudes posting tiktoks, the softer prettyboys tend to be the ones who consistently get more free attention and validation from girls

I do agree that when girls draw guys they will make him higher dimo, but the fan fic and fictional romance niche is smaller compared to the general pool of girls on tiktok (and on social media in general for that matter) so though the smaller niche might value higher dimo prettyboys, the greater niche will gravitate more towards the lower dimo prettyboys
this also depends on demographic so its just bad , changdawg for an example got 1 million likes +Comments from girls basically near zarios highest amount of likes , and also other men and so , it shows clear precicion of what woman want asw. The greater broad appeal goes to higgher dimo therefor , ur focusuing on a specific cliche/niche thats not how looks work, marlon also gets comments from TONS of girls
 
this also depends on demographic so its just bad , changdawg for an example got 1 million likes +Comments from girls basically near zarios highest amount of likes , and also other men and so , it shows clear precicion of what woman want asw. The greater broad appeal goes to higgher dimo therefor , ur focusuing on a specific cliche/niche thats not how looks work, marlon also gets comments from TONS of girls
I mean yea the niche im focused on is the one most attracted to prettyboys specifically

Within that niche ive always seen specifically soft prettyboys consistently gain more attention than higher dimo ones on average. Outliers can exist, but I genuinely see the average soft prettyboy having more comments from girls on average than a higher dimo one

This could just be me tho tbh
 
I mean yea the niche im focused on is the one most attracted to prettyboys specifically

Within that niche ive always seen specifically soft prettyboys consistently gain more attention than higher dimo ones on average. Outliers can exist, but I genuinely see the average soft prettyboy having more comments from girls on average than a higher dimo one

This could just be me tho tbh
Its really the weirdest way to measure like that, k pop genuinly has a lot of low dimo men , but james from cortis gets showred with huge attention for having better dimo, this is very subjective to what u see the overall pic is whoever has the higher balance on the scale gets the higher attention , those softboys might get the better balance bcz they got very good scores such as zario who is lich chadlite. This tells us why girls are attracted to a lot of things , also in general girls love tall height , veins , body(seen in thirstraps) , this would somehwat correlate to face, so in general is just ab balance but dimo is one aspect of attractivness.
 
the absolute state of this forum

Looks is looks no need to treat it like it's 2 separate things. You can't be conventionally attractive but unappealing. That does not exist. There's PSL and SMV but smv is simply psl + other variables like height, frame, status etc.

And frankly people often overestimate prettyboy smv and underestimate the smv of masculine men. Yes a prettyboy may clear on tiktok or ig with 16 year olds or kpop fans or get more comments from discord "girls". But online spaces are often self-selecting.

At a big college/club/frat scene it's usually masculine/tall men that dominate. Just go look at a sorority becky/stacy's ig and 9 times out of 10 they are dating or cracking some tall, bulky masculine dude. Not a skinny lean prettyboy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Corpus Elliot

Similar threads

TheOsei
Replies
23
Views
1K
zertex
zertex
D
Replies
9
Views
665
abuse
abuse
new H150i
Replies
29
Views
1K
zertex
zertex
bop_hunter1488271
Replies
4
Views
625
infraorbidal
infraorbidal
T
Replies
26
Views
1K
MLGS0LD1ERB0Y
MLGS0LD1ERB0Y

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top