Bf is cope

[TsarTsar444]

Bloatmax or ldar, jfl looking like a meth addict

 

[DarknLost]

Gay title

 

[Deleted member 4563]

I've been rottmaxxing and lazymaxxing forever, you should try it sometime

 

[Ritalincell]

Bloatmax or ldar, jfl looking like a meth addict

Bloatmaxing is lifefuel for narrow skulls

 

[Achathin]

Get off my screen with that gay ass shit, faggot.

 

[chadtachi]

Bloatmaxing is lifefuel for narrow skulls

High IQ reply

 

[TsarTsar444]

High IQ reply
View attachment 264335

The left is clearly giga lens distortion lol, he is definitely not above 20% in the right pic

 

[Halotestin]

The worst thing of being low BF is the disrepect you get, it's like some kind of failo effect

 

[chadtachi]

The left is clearly giga lens distortion lol, he is definitely not above 20% in the right pic

Yes, true, definitely inflated though.

 

[Effortless]

While going too low and looking like a meth addict is bad, low BF is a major halo and probably even more important than sexual dimorphic traits if you're not a total feminine bitch.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02562/full

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02658/full

"A study by Foo et al. (2017) showed that facial adiposity was a better predictor of attractiveness compared to sexual dimorphism, averageness, and symmetry, for male faces. The researchers also found that, for females faces, facial adiposity squared and sexual dimorphism were the best predictors of female facial attractiveness, while facial adiposity was also the strongest predictor of perceived health for male faces, while sexual dimorphism was the strongest predictor of perceived health for female faces, with facial adiposity failing to reach statistical significance."

"Facial adiposity has consistently been linked to perceptions of attractiveness and health, with heavier faces being judged to be more unattractive and unhealthier. To date, facial adiposity has also been linked to a number of actual health outcomes including: cold and flu number, duration of colds and flu, frequency of antibiotic use, respiratory illness, blood pressure, cardiovascular illness, salivary progesterone, psychological well-being, arthritis, diabetes, circulating testosterone, immune function, and oxidative stress. While a strong relationship between facial adiposity, attractiveness, perceived health and actual health outcomes has been reported, there are a few limitations to the current evidence presented in favor of facial adiposity as an important contributor to health and attractiveness judgments"

Posted from @ugly nebula a while back.

 

[Deleted member 2846]

While going too low and looking like a meth addict is bad, low BF is a major halo and probably even more important than sexual dimorphic traits if you're not a total feminine bitch.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02562/full

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02658/full

"A study by Foo et al. (2017) showed that facial adiposity was a better predictor of attractiveness compared to sexual dimorphism, averageness, and symmetry, for male faces. The researchers also found that, for females faces, facial adiposity squared and sexual dimorphism were the best predictors of female facial attractiveness, while facial adiposity was also the strongest predictor of perceived health for male faces, while sexual dimorphism was the strongest predictor of perceived health for female faces, with facial adiposity failing to reach statistical significance."

"Facial adiposity has consistently been linked to perceptions of attractiveness and health, with heavier faces being judged to be more unattractive and unhealthier. To date, facial adiposity has also been linked to a number of actual health outcomes including: cold and flu number, duration of colds and flu, frequency of antibiotic use, respiratory illness, blood pressure, cardiovascular illness, salivary progesterone, psychological well-being, arthritis, diabetes, circulating testosterone, immune function, and oxidative stress. While a strong relationship between facial adiposity, attractiveness, perceived health and actual health outcomes has been reported, there are a few limitations to the current evidence presented in favor of facial adiposity as an important contributor to health and attractiveness judgments"

Posted from @ugly nebula a while back.

Looking good while at low BF= good undereyes, prominent cheekbones, visible lower third, no hyoid fat, facial angularity

 

[54UD4D3]

Just KyriakosGrizzlyMaxx bro!

 

[Deleted member 3593]

Look here's the thing. A lot of people who leanmaxx think theyre going to get meek's tier hollow cheeks. If you're not obese and are a respectable body fat (think athletic but not dick skin shredded -- 13-15%) you're in for a rude awakening. The truth is good projection will still show at these bodyfat levels. In the end prominent cheekbones that protrude is what makes a face hollow, it's literally pushing the skin out. If you do manage to successfully lose fat to auscwitz levels you will probably get hollow cheeks but it will look awful due to lack of bone projection.

As for "improving muh jawline" this just makes sense . Unless you're obese with fat rolls all over ur hyoid and neck ur jawline is literally all bone with barely any fat on it...if it's good it's gonna show.

 

[Ritalincel]