Idec
Autismmaxxed
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2023
- Posts
- 126
- Reputation
- 147
Epigenetics:
“The term has evolved to include any process that alters gene activity without changing the DNA sequence, and leads to modifications that can be transmitted to daughter cells (although experiments show that some epigenetic changes can be reversed).”[1]
[1] Epigenetics: The Science of Change
D. And in keeping with the Lamarckian tradition Geography is the biggest correlated variable.[7]
[4] https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h120/kjv/wlc/0-1/
[5] https://archive.org/details/cyclopediauniver1955ridp/page/108/mode/1up?view=theater
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitiligo
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18794486/
[7] Silverberg JI, Reja M, Silverberg NB, Regional variation of and association of US birthplace with vitiligo extent: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25006795/
E. The peoples in modern Georgia and Eastern Greece display the closest resemblance to primordial creation:
Smith. Pg. 111,
II. Darker skin is caused by different harsher climates than Northern Europe and the Mediterranean and is in summary a process of Freckling. Smith, pgs. 172-173:
This completely refutes the Polygenist complaints against a Monogenist literal reading of scripture.
Winchell’s objections:
“To summarize, then, Winchell emphasized the unity of the human species by tracing all human varieties back to an original pre-adamic stock. The descendants of this primitive group had dispersed from their point of origin across the face of the earth long before the adamic family had first appeared on the scene of history. Adam’s significance, in this schema, was that he was “the immediate progenitor of the nations which figure in biblical history, and hence must not be expected to answer the requirements of the primitive ancestor of all mankind.” By the time of his appearance human society was already far advanced. Racially, Adam was the descendant of black forebears. Indeed, rather like James Cowles Prichard and Dominick McCausland, Winchell interpreted the Hebrew ADâMâH—”redness or ruddiness of color”—to imply that Adam himself was, if not pure black, nonetheless “strongly colored.”[8]
III. My intermediate forms:
The Asiatic peoples, which have historically been the biggest problem for Monogenists can easily be explained as merely Mulattos from the Hamitic tribe of the Khoisan.
The Japanese Ainu Elders clearly appear to be of African or Hamitic Stock. (Link)
The Khoisan Africans show the origin of the slanted eyes of the Asiatic peoples.(Link1, Link2)
Darwin arbitrarily accepts Lamarckism as a function within the larger process of Natural Selection:
Darwin, Origin, pg. 154,
So Darwin must accept that both habit and random mutation plays a role in Evolution, which proves he cannot ever PROVE that his theory is necessarily true.
Darwin admits that reversion happens and even admits the existence of dormant structures:
He also points out how animals such as donkeys and pigeons revert back to characteristics that are completely foreign to its species but inclusive in the genus as a whole proving that all the modern species evolved (I would say devolved) from a primordial ancestor.
[8] David Livingstone, Adam’s Ancestors Race, Religion, and the Politics of Human Origins(The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, 2008), 151
Thank you for reading!
“The term has evolved to include any process that alters gene activity without changing the DNA sequence, and leads to modifications that can be transmitted to daughter cells (although experiments show that some epigenetic changes can be reversed).”[1]
[1] Epigenetics: The Science of Change
- My Biblical Epigenetics is the Reactivation and Deactivation of Primordial Genetic Structures through use and disuse. What others call Evolution is actually reactivation of primordial genetic structures established by Elohim through behavior congruent with the original intention of Elohim.
Devolution is either deactivation of primordial genetic structures established by Elohim through behavior not congruent with the original intention of Elohim due to either personal decision or the general results of the fall, the flood and the tower of babel or a result of artificial deformation. With the caveat that the loss is not absolute unless Elohim has specifically cursed a line of people irrevocable. The loss is that the primordial genetic characteristic becomes dormant or junk DNA that can be activated later on due to reformation.
The traits of a species are not all the products of genetics or heredity. Some are but of course many of them are acquired intellectually through study, experience and a willingness to be honest about the failure of certain ideas. The IQ scores of our people are fine. The problem is our people are dishonest about the failure of their Dark Age religious ideas and are unwilling to study the problems inherent in the Christian and Heliocentric ideologies that dominate the masses.
I see the most vital mechanisms of survival are 1. A willingness to work together. 2. Honesty about mistakes of the past and present. 3. A belief in the Resurrection of the Dead. People are generally not going to be honest about the lies of the past because of money and the fleeting pleasures of this life. We need a reason and a willingness to lay down our lives for the sake of others and future generations. Only one doctrinal platform makes that feasible and that is the biblical doctrine of resurrection and the biblical timeline.
Isa. 60:12“For the nation and the kingdom which will not serve you will perish, And the nations will be utterly ruined.
I see from science and scripture that the Lamarck theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics is impossible because it affirms the gaining of new information through use and disuse causing in space of time a new species which has never been observed. The Darwinian theory of a constant Evolution through Natural Selection is also impossible. I think the only theory possible from scripture is that speciation is caused by a loss of mutations or should we say a loss or deactivation of primordial perfection through moral degeneration or disuse.
Is there evidence that anything is ever gained through speciation?
The best evidence Darwin gave was that European thoroughbreds were more highly evolved than their Arab progenitors.
Yet I think we could reply that the European thoroughbreds had returned to primordial perfection through better breeding in selection of primordial characteristics, environment and diet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics
So the beneficial variations of Darwin which later came to be known as beneficial mutations are actually dormant primordial DNA becoming active again.
Some Not All Deformities Are Heritable!
On Airs, Waters, and Places by Hippocrates, Translated by Francis Adams Part 14,
“I will pass over the smaller differences among the nations, but will now treat of such as are great either from nature, or custom; and, first, concerning the Macrocephali. There is no other race of men which have heads in the least resembling theirs. At first, usage was the principal cause of the length of their head, but now nature cooperates with usage. They think those the most noble who have the longest heads. It is thus with regard to the usage: immediately after the child is born, and while its head is still tender, they fashion it with their hands, and constrain it to assume a lengthened shape by applying bandages and other suitable contrivances whereby the spherical form of the head is destroyed, and it is made to increase in length. Thus, at first, usage operated, so that this constitution was the result of force: but, in the course of time, it was formed naturally; so that usage had nothing to do with it;”[2]
The definition of Lamarckism is the inheritance of an acquired characteristic gained or lost through use or disuse. Artificial deformation is not an acquired characteristic of use. The giraffe and the longneck would be an example of an acquired characteristic through use. Weisman proved that the severed tails of mice were not heritable.[3] Then of course the foreskin of Jewish boys remains intact through the centuries as well as the hymen remaining in newborn females.
Now this leads us no doubt to the issue of the devolution of man and the many controversies involving Polygenism and Monogenism. To which we shall give attention to now.
For a general critique of historic Lamarckism see Blacher’s, The Problem of the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.
[2] http://classics.mit.edu/Hippocrates/airwatpl.14.14.html
[3] Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems by August Weismann, Sir Edward Bagnall Poulton, Selmar Schönland, Sir Arthur Everett Shipley, “The Supposed Transmission of Mutilations”
Polygenism and Monogenism
Based on David N. Livingstone’s Adam's Ancestors: Race, Religion, And the Politics of Human Origins and Samuel Smith’s, Essay on the Causes of Variety of Complexion and Figure in the Human Species.
I. The Original Man was white and the rest of the world has devolved from the original man.
A. In the Bible Adam and Edom are called red and ruddy.[4] Red and ruddy is just another way of referring to white people. Ridpath’s, Universal History, Vol. 9, pg. 108,[5]
B. In Smith’s work, pgs. 83-84, Smith uses the case of Vitiligo, that blacks can return to being white. Henry Moss reverted back to being entirely white.[6]
What Smith emphasizes is that the skin here is Caucasoid. It is not albino.
D. And in keeping with the Lamarckian tradition Geography is the biggest correlated variable.[7]
[4] https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h120/kjv/wlc/0-1/
[5] https://archive.org/details/cyclopediauniver1955ridp/page/108/mode/1up?view=theater
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitiligo
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18794486/
[7] Silverberg JI, Reja M, Silverberg NB, Regional variation of and association of US birthplace with vitiligo extent: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25006795/
E. The peoples in modern Georgia and Eastern Greece display the closest resemblance to primordial creation:
Smith. Pg. 111,
II. Darker skin is caused by different harsher climates than Northern Europe and the Mediterranean and is in summary a process of Freckling. Smith, pgs. 172-173:
This completely refutes the Polygenist complaints against a Monogenist literal reading of scripture.
Winchell’s objections:
“To summarize, then, Winchell emphasized the unity of the human species by tracing all human varieties back to an original pre-adamic stock. The descendants of this primitive group had dispersed from their point of origin across the face of the earth long before the adamic family had first appeared on the scene of history. Adam’s significance, in this schema, was that he was “the immediate progenitor of the nations which figure in biblical history, and hence must not be expected to answer the requirements of the primitive ancestor of all mankind.” By the time of his appearance human society was already far advanced. Racially, Adam was the descendant of black forebears. Indeed, rather like James Cowles Prichard and Dominick McCausland, Winchell interpreted the Hebrew ADâMâH—”redness or ruddiness of color”—to imply that Adam himself was, if not pure black, nonetheless “strongly colored.”[8]
III. My intermediate forms:
The Asiatic peoples, which have historically been the biggest problem for Monogenists can easily be explained as merely Mulattos from the Hamitic tribe of the Khoisan.
The Japanese Ainu Elders clearly appear to be of African or Hamitic Stock. (Link)
The Khoisan Africans show the origin of the slanted eyes of the Asiatic peoples.(Link1, Link2)
Darwin arbitrarily accepts Lamarckism as a function within the larger process of Natural Selection:
Darwin, Origin, pg. 154,
So Darwin must accept that both habit and random mutation plays a role in Evolution, which proves he cannot ever PROVE that his theory is necessarily true.
Darwin admits that reversion happens and even admits the existence of dormant structures:
He also points out how animals such as donkeys and pigeons revert back to characteristics that are completely foreign to its species but inclusive in the genus as a whole proving that all the modern species evolved (I would say devolved) from a primordial ancestor.
[8] David Livingstone, Adam’s Ancestors Race, Religion, and the Politics of Human Origins(The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, 2008), 151
Thank you for reading!
