black men do the worst in dating in the west

[lastofus123]

So many sub 80 iQs on this forum. You complain about sample size and generalizations

Because there true you stupid fuck your studies methodology sucks balls and the p values make the results insignificant, again address this instead of diverting you stupid nigger

regarding the study I linked and then then pull this one out of your ass. Read the study.

Look at the participants you fucking idiot: Australian Europeans: 20 males, 21 females
Australian East-Asians: 21 males, 21 females
Hong Kong East Asians: 17 males, 20 females

Do you think Australian white women and Australian born Asian women weren't exposed to blacks especially in 2014 when this study was taking place? There literally part of the anglosphere you stupid fuck @Former Shortcel these copers are now taking about muh "Australians weren't exposed to blacks and shieet" when the study literally mentions that they know blacks personally as shown here

where basically all the western people knew about 1 or 2 blacks personally and obviously seen moe blacks walking around the city and stuff like that, cant cope your way out of this bro

2/3 of these groups, you could argue even 3/3 have little to zero exposure to black people you fucking retard

Are you serious they see blacks on social media just like everyone else does in the West, and the study also mentions Hong Kong Asians arent exposed to Europeans and yet they still rated them as more attractive, keep coping

how does a fucking Chinese dude’s attractiveness rating in HK/Australia rating represent our SMV in the west in places where we actually have visibility like the US and Western Europe which the OP was referring to?

Explain to me how Australian white women are different from other whites in the West when they have the exact same exposure to blacks that western Europeans do aka through migrants and the media....

Explain how your study is representative on the entire Western European population when it was literally 20 women from liberal unis who probably rated blacks as more attractive because they didn't want to appear racist or white supremicist thats why i said your study is useless because it didn't control for social desurability

 

[lastofus123]

you got cooked in this whole thread now I’m cooking your backup dancer for not knowing how to read a study dw bro If I got zero pussy I would prolly tell myself “muh at least blacks do worse” too

Nigga stfu, your literally shitting out of your ass while all this was being typed by charred hands in the impoverished slums of nigeria

 

[lastofus123]

So many sub 80 iQs on this forum. You complain about sample size and generalizations regarding the study I linked and then then pull this one out of your ass. Read the study.

Look at the participants you fucking idiot: Australian Europeans: 20 males, 21 females
Australian East-Asians: 21 males, 21 females
Hong Kong East Asians: 17 males, 20 females

2/3 of these groups, you could argue even 3/3 have little to zero exposure to black people you fucking retard how does a fucking Chinese dude’s attractiveness rating in HK/Australia rating represent our SMV in the west in places where we actually have visibility like the US and Western Europe which the OP was referring to?

These results are context specific to fucking East Asians and certainly not generalizable to western countries with a significant black cultural presence. Imagine trying to prove that blacks have zero SMV in the west and then using a study where the participants are Chinese living in HK, Chinese living Australia and Australians living in Europe…LMAO.

Keep coping.

also for your muh exposure arguemnt, lets see when your study was released

so 2012, and what was the black population exactly back then

literal 3 percent of the population, so how could blacks have had exposure if they werent a significant amount of the population how could liberal women from uk universities have possibly known of blacks if they've most likely never seen them irl @Former Shortcel i really wonder how.....

 

[Taylors_Lil_Ethnic]

View attachment 4677549View attachment 4677550
View attachment 4677552View attachment 4677553View attachment 4677554View attachment 4677555View attachment 4677557

this should be pretty obvious yet dudes are so convinced and brainwashed by porn and the bbc myth and athletes and rappers in media believing they have the best smv out of ethnics when all studies and data shows the opposite

if we take it on a global scale not just the west it becomes worse

Charts completely ignore the fact mulattos and mixed races exist. When the chart says black men its mostly like true black men, but completely ignores lightskins,golden skins,mulattos. Either way none of us are getting play, chad defies race

 

[JUN0]

Because there true you stupid fuck your studies methodology sucks balls and the p values make the results insignificant, again address this instead of diverting you stupid nigger

Do you think Australian white women and Australian born Asian women weren't exposed to blacks especially in 2014 when this study was taking place? There literally part of the anglosphere you stupid fuck @Former Shortcel these copers are now taking about muh "Australians weren't exposed to blacks and shieet" when the study literally mentions that they know blacks personally as shown here

View attachment 4681460

where basically all the western people knew about 1 or 2 blacks personally and obviously seen moe blacks walking around the city and stuff like that, cant cope your way out of this bro

Are you serious they see blacks on social media just like everyone else does in the West, and the study also mentions Hong Kong Asians arent exposed to Europeans and yet they still rated them as more attractive, keep coping

Explain to me how Australian white women are different from other whites in the West when they have the exact same exposure to blacks that western Europeans do aka through migrants and the media....

Explain how your study is representative on the entire Western European population when it was literally 20 women from liberal unis who probably rated blacks as more attractive because they didn't want to appear racist or white supremicist thats why i said your study is useless because it didn't control for social desurability

This forum is hilarious. You’re literally quoting shit that you don’t have the comprehension to understand. The table you linked literally shows that African ancestry consistently shows the least exposure/familiarity in every group by a LARGE margin you fucking retard. You might be dumber than shortcel. Want me to spell the numbers out for you dumbfuck?

Dude is deadass a retard lmao. Imagine tryna prove that blacks have low SMV in the west and then using a study where 2/3 of the participants are Chinese with half of them living in fucking Hong Kong and the other half of them are living in Australia, a country where blacks are 1.3% of the population and have zero cultural relevance. Unlike the UK where where blacks are triple the population and have much more cultural relevance like the study I linked. OR the USA where blacks are 15% of the population

Just sign off bro

 

[lastofus123]

This forum is hilarious. You’re literally quoting shit that you don’t have the comprehension to understand. The table you linked literally shows that African ancestry consistently shows the least exposure/familiarity in every group by a LARGE margin you fucking retard. You might be dumber than shortcel. Want me to spell the numbers out for you dumbfuck?

Nigga did you even read the fucking table? its talking about how many blacks they know personally you stupid nigger obviously theyve had more exposure to blacks outside of the people they personally know including the internet and even when they walk outside the city, holy nigger iq

also explain this

and dont say muh media exposure because media even back then was promoting blacks like drake, beyonce, nicki minaj and chris brown like crazy

Dude is deadass a retard lmao. Imagine tryna prove that blacks have low SMV in the west and then using a study where 2/3 of the participants are Chinese with half of them living in fucking Hong Kong and the other half of them are living in Australia, a country where blacks are 1.3% of the population and have zero cultural relevance. Unlike the UK where where blacks are triple the population and have much more cultural relevance like the study I linked. OR the USA where blacks are 15% of the population

YOUR OWN STUDY WAS BASED ON 20 WOMEN IN A LIBERAL UNIVERSITY IN LITERAL CARDIFF WHICH IS IN WALES, THEY COULDNT EVEN DO THE FUCKING STUDY IN LONDON, YOU ARE ONE STUPID ASS NIGGER, also when you take into account the actual black population back then, its 1 percent vs 3 percent, so tell me how is it people from wales have more exposure to blacks in 2011 than australians do in 2014? explain that to me

also I noticed you ignored this

also for your muh exposure arguemnt, lets see when your study was released

View attachment 4681466

so 2012, and what was the black population exactly back then

View attachment 4681469

literal 3 percent of the population, so how could blacks have had exposure if they werent a significant amount of the population how could liberal women from uk universities have possibly known of blacks if they've most likely never seen them irl @Former Shortcel i really wonder how.....

your arguing to me about a literal 3 percent of the population you stupid fuck, literally proving the nigger iq holy shit and if you want to get even more technical, the people there are from cardiff uni and lets see the black population back then

meanwhile this was sdyney where the 2014 study was taking place

a whooping 2.4 percent vs 1.8 percent im crine @Former Shortcel this nigger is unironically telling me that 1 study from 2012 with 20 women done in a city in FUCKING WALES of all places is representative of the entire women population, im crine

 

[JUN0]

Nigga did you even read the fucking table? its talking about how many blacks they know personally you stupid nigger obviously theyve had more exposure to blacks outside of the people they personally know including the internet and even when they walk outside the city, holy nigger iq

Hahahahaa you’re actually fucking retarded bro genuinely

 

[lastofus123]

Hahahahaa you’re actually fucking retarded

niggers with zero reading comprehension, try again you stupid monkey.... my point is that they werent unfamiliar with blacks like you were saying as if they dont even see black people irl when they absolutely do

 

[JUN0]

View attachment 4681636

niggers with zero reading comprehension, try again you stupid monkey.... my point is that they werent unfamiliar with blacks like you were saying as if they dont even see black people irl when they absolutely do

How can that be your point and why would you use a table showing that blacks are the group with the least real world exposure and familiarity for all the participants in the study, by a LARGE margin like you’re genuinely too dumb to understand what the table is showing you

 

[lastofus123]

Hahahahaa you’re actually fucking retarded bro genuinely

Unlike the UK where where blacks are triple the population and have much more cultural relevance like the study I linked. OR the USA where blacks are 15% of the population

what cultural relevance did blacks have pre 2012 in wales where your entire study was taking place? do you even read your own study? also why should cultural relevance even matter in this case where its about purely attractiveness? are you admitting blacks have inflated smv because the media promotes them heavily and that none of it actually physically real?

also i can do an american one, lets do it

2021 dating app study btw

and heres a study showing PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND RACE were largest predictors of romantic attraction in the context of mobile-based dating apps

 

[lastofus123]

How can that be your point and why would you use a table showing that blacks are the group with the least real world exposure and familiarity for all the participants in the study, by a LARGE margin like you’re genuinely too dumb to understand what the table is showing you

are you literally fucking stupid?? its talking about personal exposure you fucking retard and of course they would have less exposure if they make up less of the population than other whites and asians which would be the same in cardiff where your study is literally based in @Former Shortcel

your literally picking hairs at this point, they only measured cultural exposure for hong kong asians you stupid fuck

also in your own study, it shows race has no correlation with ratings

so theres no significant difference in rating patterns between races IN YOUR OWN FUCKING STUDY so cut the crap of muh different races rate differently

 

[lastofus123]

another one from america and its 2021 this time

heres the color coding

more women rated black men as utterly chopped compared to white men and whites were rated as more attractive as seen where theres more whites rated higher based on the color coding

also majority of the population are whites on dating apps, so its white women doing these ratings as well @Former Shortcel

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

So many sub 80 iQs on this forum. You complain about sample size and generalizations regarding the study I linked and then then pull this one out of your ass. Read the study.

Look at the participants you fucking idiot: Australian Europeans: 20 males, 21 females
Australian East-Asians: 21 males, 21 females
Hong Kong East Asians: 17 males, 20 females

2/3 of these groups, you could argue even 3/3 have little to zero exposure to black people you fucking retard how does a fucking Chinese dude’s attractiveness rating in HK/Australia rating represent our SMV in the west in places where we actually have visibility like the US and Western Europe which the OP was referring to?

These results are context specific to fucking East Asians and certainly not generalizable to western countries with a significant black cultural presence. Imagine trying to prove that blacks have zero SMV in the west and then using a study where the participants are Chinese living in HK, Chinese living Australia and Australians living in Europe…LMAO.

Keep coping.

Plenty of abo exposure….

 

[JUN0]

what cultural relevance did blacks have pre 2012 in wales where your entire study was taking place? do you even read your own study? also why should cultural relevance even matter in this case where its about purely attractiveness? are you admitting blacks have inflated smv because the media promotes them heavily and that none of it actually physically real?

also i can do an american one, lets do it

2021 dating app study btw

View attachment 4681656

and heres a study showing PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND RACE were largest predictors of romantic attraction in the context of mobile-based dating apps

View attachment 4681649

You keep mentioning wales. The study was taken via a UNIVERSITY retard. I know you live in Sri Lanka, but university campuses especially in the USA/Western Europe are probably the most diverse institutions in the world. Blacks being only 2% of the population in Wales doesn’t mean they are only 2% of the population in the capital city (Cardiff) and certainly not only 2% of the total population of students at Cardiff university. You can almost gurantee it is much higher. That’s once again not getting into the cultural influence part.

As for the “2021 dating app study”, once again, you haven’t done your research. The data in that study comes from dating app data from 2003-2010 literally 15-22 years before the book was publicized LMAO. This is clearly stated in the book’s methods section and cross referenced in the author’s earlier papers. I’ve already debunked old dating app data before in this thread and why it serves little to zero relevance, but even that wasn’t old as the shit used in this LMAO


Keep coping you dirty curry muncher. Come back when you have an actual point

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

Hahahahaa you’re actually fucking retarded bro genuinely

Niggers are so fucking stupid.


Go be a smelly nigger with 0 smv somewhere else.

 

[Former Shortcel]

you got cooked in this whole thread now I’m cooking your backup dancer for not knowing how to read a study dw bro If I got zero pussy I would prolly tell myself “muh at least blacks do worse” too

Did i? Because practically everyone was on my side jfl, you rely on one study you linked that we both know sucked.

And then you started talking about “muh interracial marriage increase” and then didnt even link the sources, mind you interracial marriages with blacks is typically the highest in the south of the usa where theyre most populated. And they STILL have above average divorce rates

Also i find it funny that one moment youll cope with “muh blacks are least likely to be celibate and we arent made to be in a relationships / marriages”. But next moment you will change your mind when some percentages benefit you? Stick to a side

 

[JUN0]

Did i? Because practically everyone was on my side jfl, you rely on one study you linked that we both know sucked.

And then you started talking about “muh interracial marriage increase” and then didnt even link the sources, mind you interracial marriages with black is typically the highest in south of america where theyre most populated. And they STILL have above average divorce rates

Also i find it funny that one moment youll cope with “muh blacks are least likely to be celibate and we arent made to be in a relationships / marriages”. But next moment you will change your mind when some percentages benefit you? Stick to a side

This forum is full of coping wignats and curry munchers who can’t come to the terms with the fact blacks don’t do as bad as they wish. You sound like a Redditor who thinks he’s right because he got upvoted. Means nothing lmao

I didn’t link the sources because I can’t fucking be bothered to, it literally takes one second to search it up yourself. Black male interracial marriages have been increasing over the years and are now as high as 22%

And I know you’re retarded but multiple things can be true at the same time. I didn’t say that “we aren’t made to be in relationships” I said that we value relationships the least, which explains the lowest rates of celibacy but most likely to be “single”. All of those things that literally are true.

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

“muh blacks are least likely to be celibate and we arent made to be in a relationships / marriages”.

if you read what he posted it specifically says this is only true for non married population. Meaning it’s not true for general population, only the specific subgroup. Yet blacks are unable to get married or maintain a marriage. So the portion of the population that would comparatively be married if not for being dumb niggers is artificial pushing this number up.

He was too much of a dumb nigger to realize this thou

 

[Former Shortcel]

This forum is full of coping wignats and curry munchers who can’t come to the terms with the fact that our SMV has significantly increased.

Did i ever deny your SMV increase? Obviously it has but its not DRAMATICALLY increased at all

You sound like a Redditor who thinks he’s right because he got upvotes lmwo,

I didn’t link the sources because I can’t fucking be bothered to, it literally takes one second to search it up yourself.

Cope not gonna lie

Black male interracial marriages have been increasing over the years and are now as high as 22%

Im still waiting for the source, “you can look it up yourself” isnt an excuse or else im just going to think you found some ancient unreliable study awhile back, and you cant be bothered finding it

And I know you’re retarded but multiple things can be true at the same time. I didn’t say that “we aren’t made to be in relationships” I said that we value relationships the least, which explains the lowest rates of celibacy but most likely to be “single”. All of those things that literally are true.

Id believe this if you actually sent me the full source instead of that cherrypicked screenshot you sent, just looks like the actual full study will benefit my argument and youre too scared to send it

 

[lastofus123]

You keep mentioning wales. The study was taken via a UNIVERSITY retard. I know you live in Sri Lanka, but university campuses especially in the USA/Western Europe are probably the most diverse institutions in the world. Blacks being only 2% of the population in Wales doesn’t mean they are only 2% of the population in the capital city (Cardiff) and certainly not only 2% of the total population of students at Cardiff university. You can almost gurantee it is much higher.

burden of proof is on you to show me that cardiff uni, a random uni in wales had more black students somehow than the 2 percent population in 2012 because the study i mentioned was in a uni as well in sdyney and australian unis are also incredibly diverse as fuck you stupid retard

also

How Diverse is Cardiff Uni? - The Student Room

random thread in 2011 shows this

1000 international students and most of them are from muslim countries, so there goes your muh black students in cardiff in 2012 argument

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

which explains the lowest rates of celibacy but most likely to be “single”. All of those things that literally are true

Not sure if you just can’t read what you, yourself posted. Or your just to stupid to understand generality vs specificity is.


Either way all you proven is your a dumb nigger

 

[lastofus123]

As for the “2021 dating app study”, once again, you haven’t done your research. The data in that study comes from dating app data from 2003-2010 literally 15-22 years before the book was publicized LMAO. This is clearly stated in the book’s methods section and cross referenced in the author’s earlier papers. I’ve already debunked old dating app data before in this thread and why it serves little to zero relevance, but even that wasn’t old as the shit used in this LMAO

the data collected comes from 2009-2014 while your study is from 2012 but ill agree that ok fine its a bit old but there are literally newer studies that replicate it and come to the same conclusions jfl

 

[JUN0]

if you read what he posted it specifically says this is only true for non married population. Meaning it’s not true for general population, only the specific subgroup. Yet blacks are unable to get married or maintain a marriage. So the portion of the population that would comparatively be married if not for being dumb niggers is artificial pushing this number up.

He was too much of a dumb nigger to realize this thou

Another low iQ 5ft curry muncher has spawned in. Nothing is being pushed up.
If a group has lower marriage rates, that means more people are in the non-married pool. When a study compares non-married people, everyone in that pool is already non-married…The study compares unmarried people to unmarried people. The point is that if lower marriage meant lower desirability, you’d expect higher celibacy but the data shows the opposite. But once again, you’re too retarded to draw a simple conclusion like the rest of the stinking curry munchers/wignats in this thread

 

[KT-34]

How about we first try to even keep our own women from leaving us for BWC

@Former Shortcel

White ltn pumps and dumps what black htn+ has to fight for

View attachment 4677704

View attachment 4677703

Could've picked better options all these black girls are ugly asf even in their own community's standards

 

[lastofus123]

Did i ever deny your SMV increase? Obviously it has but its not DRAMATICALLY increased at all

Cope not gonna lie

Im still waiting for the source, “you can look it up yourself” isnt an excuse or else im just going to think you found some ancient unreliable study awhile back, and you cant be bothered finding it

Id believe this if you actually sent me the full source instead of that cherrypicked screenshot you sent, just looks like the actual full study will benefit my argument and youre too scared to send it

2015 study across europe

also for interracial marriage rates



its gone down and this was from 2023

also births

92 percent of white women had kids with white men in 2025

 

[JUN0]

burden of proof is on you to show me that cardiff uni, a random uni in wales had more black students somehow than the 2 percent population in 2012 because the study i mentioned was in a uni as well in sdyney and australian unis are also incredibly diverse as fuck you stupid retard

also

How Diverse is Cardiff Uni? - The Student Room

random thread in 2011 shows this

View attachment 4681762

1000 international students and most of them are from muslim countries, so there goes your muh black students in cardiff in 2012 argument

Simple google search tells you that most black people who go to university in the UK are black brits with a British passport not international students.

Regardless, you guys are gonna continue to cope up and down in this thread. I’ll be back when yall have a real argument

 

[lastofus123]

Simple google search tells you that most black people who go to university in the UK are black brits with a British passport not international students.

they literally arent

and cardiff data from 2021 btw

0.5 + 2.4 = 2.9 percent, son im crine ive seen more africans in my uni in australia than there is blacks in some random fucking uni in wales where his study took place and it was most likely even lower when his own study was taking place 14 years ago

@Former Shortcel

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

The point is that if lower marriage meant lower desirability, you’d expect higher celibacy but the data shows the opposite.

Okay now we’re retroactively making up theories to cope we were right all along. It has nothing to do with niggers being low iq, low inhib it’s now about desirablility

When a study compares non-married people, everyone in that pool is already non-married…

Okay so we can just make up subgroups, complete out of context of the general group. Then claim what happens to the sub group is Somehow applicable to the general group all while ignoring any kind of context that has directly effect it has on such a subgroup. Who cares the married people have more sex, what relevance could that possibly have

I actually would agree that niggers most likely have lowest celibacy rates, much like monkeys or other animals there’s a lack of standards, inhib, and ability to think logically about causality.

It’s just that your application of what you yourself posted is so hilariously retarded. I really couldn’t pass up a good laugh.

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

For his next feat of amazing low iq spectacular @JUN0 the dumb coon will conflate quantity with value.

Yes that’s right folks, the amazing coon of the Congo strikes agian. Don’t miss out, your gonna want to see this with your own !!!

 

[JUN0]

they literally arent

View attachment 4681801

and cardiff data from 2021 btw

View attachment 4681806

0.5 + 2.4 = 2.9 percent, son im crine ive seen more africans in my uni in australia than there is blacks in some random fucking uni in wales where his study took place and it was most likely even lower when his own study was taking place 14 years ago

@Former Shortcel

Bro nah deadass you can’t be this stupid genuinely bro. Once again you’re quoting data that you don’t have the brain power to comprehend. You don’t know what you’re showing bro. The first thing you’re showing is for INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS only, the second is for UK domeciled students only

 

[JUN0]

Okay now we’re retroactively making up theories to cope we were right all along. It has nothing to do with niggers being low iq, low inhib it’s now about desirablility

Okay so we can just make up subgroups, complete out of context of the general group. Then claim what happens to the sub group is Somehow applicable to the general group all while ignoring any kind of context that has directly effect it has on such a subgroup. Who cares the married people have more sex, what relevance could that possibly have

I actually would agree that niggers most likely have lowest celibacy rates, much like monkeys or other animals there’s a lack of standards, inhib, and ability to think logically about causality.

It’s just that your application of what you yourself posted is so hilariously retarded. I really couldn’t pass up a good laugh.

Who the fuck is making up a theory lmao. Dude gave me a study showing that blacks are the most likely to be “single.” All I did was prove that single ≠ lower desirability/lower sexual activity, hence the celibacy rates. If anything, the context would work in my favor LOL. You’re dancing around the facts and intellectually posturing in an attempt to debunk the cold hard facts but you can’t.

 

[lastofus123]

Bro nah deadass you can’t be this stupid genuinely bro. Once again you’re quoting data that you don’t have the brain power to comprehend. You don’t know what you’re showing bro. The first thing you’re showing is for INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS only,

That was just me covering up any loose ends you might miscontrue

the second is for UK domeciled students only

it literally says including internationals you retard reading comphrension is clearly not your strong suit and even if you want to go with that, i showed you blacks make up the 3rd least amount of internationals plus your own argument was that black brits attend uni more dont changr the argument now

 

[JUN0]

That was just me covering up any loose ends you might miscontrue

View attachment 4681883

it literally says including internationals you retard reading comphrension is clearly not your strong suit

What would the relevance be? My point remains the same. Most black students in the UK are UK citizens, not international students.

 

[lastofus123]

What would the relevance be? My point remains the same. Most black students in the UK are UK citizens, not international students.

The study includes everyone in the headcount, its just saying any comparisons in terms of attainment gap comparisons needs to include the domecile restrictions

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

Who the fuck is making up a theory lmao. Dude gave me a study showing that blacks are the most likely to be “single.” All I did was prove that single ≠ lower desirability/lower sexual activity, hence the celibacy rates.

The Coon of the Congo strikes agian

Your made up page 4 desirability thesis in lue of original posters less well/smv discussion. Is a totally inability to comprehend quantity of sex with quality of sexual parter (ie smv). Its completely retroactive back tracking that relies what I already pointed out, you can not break down a sub group out of context test it then apply its finding to the general group with a blind fold on.

What’s just as bad is your retroactive cope thesis rest on conflating quantity of sex with quality of partner. Even though I already twice pointed it out, you’re just unable to comprehend the difference so continue to insist upon your fallacy.

You’re too much of a dumb coon to understand. Stupid ass smelly nigger. Can’t even understand the difference between quantity of sex and quality of sexual partner.

 

[JUN0]

The Coon of the Congo strikes agian

Your made up page 4 desirability thesis in lue of original posters less well/smv discussion. Is a totally inability to comprehend quantity of sex with quality of sexual parter (ie smv). Its completely retroactive back tracking that relies what I already pointed out,.

What’s just as bad is your retroactive cope thesis rest on conflating quantity of sex with quality of partner. Even though I already twice pointed it out, you’re just unable to comprehend the difference so continue to insist upon your fallacy.

You’re too much of a dumb coon to understand. Stupid ass smelly nigger. Can’t even understand the difference between quantity of sex and quality of sexual partner.

Lmao.You’re an utter retard. That wasn’t what was being discussed. Some dude simply quoted a study stating that blacks are most likely to be single = do the worst in terms of dating in the west. I didn’t use this to back up MY point about SMV. I used it to show that the figure he used serves zero relevance in terms of desirability. And even then, SMV = access to DESIRED partners. Stop posturing and come back when you have a real argument you smelly jeet

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

Okay sambo
I understand you need to backtrack more.

 

[Deleted member 136057]

Could've picked better options all these black girls are ugly asf even in their own community's standards

That was all found in a single tiktoks comment section. I couldve taken 50 screenshots more if i wanted

 

[Firstname.Lastname]

That was all found in a single tiktoks comment section. I couldve taken 50 screenshots more if i wanted

Do good looking ones even exist?

I’ve never seen one, all rachty ass sheboons.

 

[Deleted member 136057]

Do good looking ones even exist?

Yes

 

[Giornoblaze]

dnr

Keep coping u indian.
Just because ur ltn indian and cooked doesn't mean that other ethnics are aIso cooked
BIacks outperform whites in florida example.
The stats u showed have been debunked and are useIess

 

[Giornoblaze]

People claim black men are good for hookups yet do the worst on dating apps aka a platform that promotes promiscuity and hookup culture

Stats show BIacks do the most for hookups. Just go to a club and see who sIays there

Dating apps are used by ppI for Itrs
What r u smoking?

 

[Dondraper75]

Keep coping u indian.
Just because ur ltn indian and cooked doesn't mean that other ethnics are aIso cooked
BIacks outperform whites in florida example.
The stats u showed have been debunked and are useIess

im the furthest thing from ltn and ive pulled and there isnt any proof that blacks slay at all whatsoever

even my irl experiences show the same thing that blacks generally do not do well

 

[Giornoblaze]

What else can they do honestly

Thanks to tiktok most black men already know deep down most women dont prefer them, atleast as 1st choice.

99% of women would rather take white mtn than black mtn. And there are way more black men than white men in the world

In the west, white men outnumber bIk mean like by a Iot lmfao
Even a small portion of yt foids being bIk onIy, is enough to satisfy a lot of bIks.

 

[Giornoblaze]

im the furthest thing from ltn and ive pulled and there isnt any proof that blacks slay at all whatsoever

even my irl experiences show the same thing that blacks generally do not do well

Tired of this type of ethnic cope.
Gang just because ur race (indian) is Cooked in the west, doesn't mean that aII other ethnic races are cooked.
----------
UK stats.
"
Surveys in Great Britain found that in lifetime number of partners, men identifying as Black Caribbean or Black African reported more sexual partners on average than some other groups, and Indian and Pakistani respondents reported fewer partners and later first sexual experience.
In more recent data from the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal), the median number of recent sexual partners over the past 5 years was higher among Black Caribbean and Black African men compared with other groups.
"

"

Who is more likely to be correct?
A multi billion dollar generated AI company, which can get any factual information across the net, or a ltn malding Indian on an InceI forum angry because yt foids are BBC / BWC ONLY.
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
@LiL 369
@Scarface756
@IronMike
@

 

[Giornoblaze]

im the furthest thing from ltn and ive pulled and there isnt any proof that blacks slay at all whatsoever

even my irl experiences show the same thing that blacks generally do not do well

In the US as well

Indians like u are are twice as likely to be incels than latinos or BIacks.
Indians and pakis are the actuaI inceIs.
AII other ethnic races are volcels. Lol

 

[Giornoblaze]

im the furthest thing from ltn and ive pulled and there isnt any proof that blacks slay at all whatsoever

even my irl experiences show the same thing that blacks generally do not do well

Now show ur stats now faggot.

 

[Dondraper75]

Tired of this type of ethnic cope.
Gang just because ur race (indian) is Cooked in the west, doesn't mean that aII other ethnic races are cooked.
----------
UK stats.
"
Surveys in Great Britain found that in lifetime number of partners, men identifying as Black Caribbean or Black African reported more sexual partners on average than some other groups, and Indian and Pakistani respondents reported fewer partners and later first sexual experience.
In more recent data from the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal), the median number of recent sexual partners over the past 5 years was higher among Black Caribbean and Black African men compared with other groups.
"

"
View attachment 4686729View attachment 4686730
Who is more likely to be correct?
A multi billion dollar generated AI company, which can get any factual information across the net, or a ltn malding Indian on an InceI forum angry because yt foids are BBC / BWC ONLY.
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
@LiL 369
@Scarface756
@IronMike
@

a more accurate in depth journal studying race relations and attractiveness in europe which showcases what people truly prefer rather than a survey of self reported data jfl which isnt as reliable


also notice how blacks always resort to trying to sex appeal max because it subconsciously clues to their aesthetics lacking? lol

also you dont even know what i look like

everyone here agrees im mhtn-hhtn whenever ive posted here

 

[Dondraper75]

In the US as well
View attachment 4686745
Indians like u are are twice as likely to be incels than latinos or BIacks.
Indians and pakis are the actuaI inceIs.
AII other ethnic races are volcels. Lol

objectively false since south asians have a culture of arranged marriage atleast which blacks do not

80% of gen z black men are single

 

[OldRooster]

But the low sentience of Blacks acts as a super power for dating purposes. Average sub chad white guy will approach women one day a month, maybe he will approach 3 women, then he will spend the rest of the month recovering from the brutal rejections. Low sentience blacks barely even register rejection, they can approach 50 women a month.