
betrayed by 5‘8
htn Manlet out of form gymcell
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2022
- Posts
- 3,602
- Reputation
- 4,691
I. The Core Problem: Mass Male Sexual and Emotional Exclusion
- Large numbers of men are not chosen – not for sex, not for love, not for intimacy.
- Sexual inequality has grown in liberal societies due to:
- Female hypergamy (preference for top-status men)
- Removal of social constraints (tradition, religion, economics)
- Technological amplification (Tinder, Instagram, global dating access)
- This creates a romantic/sexual market where:
- A small percentage of men (top ~20%) monopolize female attention
- A large percentage of men are effectively invisible
II. Psychological Effects on Men
- Loneliness, depression, loss of self-worth – many men internalize the rejection as proof of their inferiority.
- Rage, shame, and bitterness – often redirected as fake moralism or contempt toward women.
- Compulsive self-optimization – gym, money, fashion, “mindset” work – rarely changes the structural reality.
- Despair and resignation – once men realize they can’t “earn” visibility or desire, many emotionally check out.
III. Societal Consequences
- Demographic collapse – fewer marriages, fewer children, more isolation (seen in South Korea, Japan, Germany, etc.)
- Collapse of male investment – when men are cut off from intimacy and meaning, they disengage from work, society, and relationships.
- Rise of radical ideologies and extremism – disaffected men become vulnerable to political cults and online echo chambers.
- Emotional and sexual simulation replaces real connection:
- Porn, AI companions, sex dolls, OnlyFans, VR sex
- Cultural nihilism – the world becomes more sterile, transactional, and loveless.
IV. The Moral Confusion Around It
- Men often mask their pain as moral judgment – criticizing “sexually liberal women” as degenerates, when in truth it’s envy, humiliation, and grief.
- Modern society refuses to admit that romantic inequality is structural – blaming individuals ("he's a creep", "he's not confident enough") rather than acknowledging system-wide rejection.
- Female sexual freedom reveals brutal truths – about who gets chosen and who doesn’t. This shatters many men’s beliefs in fairness or reciprocity.
- The lie of “you just have to try harder” is cruel – it keeps men grinding in a system where most are designed to fail.
V. Historical and Evolutionary Context
- Tradition, religion, and arranged systems once suppressed hypergamy – often forcing women to “settle” for average men.
- Modern liberalism removed all constraints – and now pure evolutionary logic (status-based selection) dominates mate choice.
- There is no going back – and any attempt to revoke female rights or autonomy would be morally wrong and politically impossible.
VI. The Future if Nothing Changes (Within 50 Years)
- More men will live without sex or partnership – permanently.
- Birthrates will continue to collapse – leading to civilizational decline.
- Male identity will fragment – some will check out, others will radicalize.
- Societies may quietly collapse from within – not with violence, but with emptiness.
- The pain of unchosen men will remain unspoken, mocked, or criminalized – fueling further resentment and decay.
VII. What a Healthy Society Would Acknowledge
- Sexual and romantic inequality is real, growing, and dangerous.
- Men deserve dignity, not shaming, for expressing loneliness and frustration.
- Freedom without structure leads to chaos – we need new stabilizing cultural systems.
- We must build new meaning structures for men outside of sex and status:
- Brotherhood, craftsmanship, service, belonging
- We must tell the truth: not everyone will be chosen — and that fact is morally neutral, but emotionally devastating.