I'm not talking about disposability, I'm talking about attractiveness. Women are genuinely more attractive on average. When was the last time you saw a Chad in the wild? Months? Years? And when was the last time you saw a Stacy in the wild? Days? Hours?
Also makeup helps
They’re more attractive in their 15 year reproductive window for the same reasons
Wow that's crazy
average blackpill fyp
Yes makeup does help them fraud by about 1.5 psl points on average
FAGGOT
lmao… THIS MEANS WOMEN ARE MORE PICKY. Fantasizing over fictional men and celebrities wasnt a thing some 100 years ago, due to standards and the evolution of hypergamy {WHICH ISNT ALL ABOUT LOOKS}
No? Just looking objectively at the aesthetics say a girl who is more aesthetic than let's say Francisco Lachowski or Jorge Del Rio Romero.
Aesthetics is a very subjective category.
But that's EXACTLY THE APPEAL OF MEN.
This! So much this!
Women can protect themselves with guns nowadays
Average MTB has the bone structure and features of chad
Sry Bull, low IQ reasoning.
Not legit either way
Then why those smelly fat ogres get 0 likes on tinderSry Bull, low IQ reasoning.
You Guys literally spend your days protecting "muh Blackpill" here. But BLACKPILL IS ABOUT GENETICS. Genetics does NOT give a shit about women having guns.
Women see a fat large smelly hairy ogre man = SEXUAL ATTRACTION. Evolution and Blackpill does NOT give a shit about her having a gun and "muh she can defend herself". Nature does not work that way.
I am asking YOU this question. You are a defender of Blackpill. So tell me?
IT ALWAYS WORKED THAT WAY.
Hunters were never fat and bald. They had to run a lot and were Athletic and lean.I am asking YOU this question. You are a defender of Blackpill. So tell me?
SMELLY FAT OGRE is literally no different from "muh hunter eyed sharp jawed male model" in terms of nature
=
IT ALWAYS WORKED THAT WAY.
You are COPING.
THey were LEAN yes AND UGLY BY TODAY'S STANDARD.
You are a retarded coper. Hunters were strong asf and would break your wrists, they were like Olympic athletes with less performance for obvious reasons. They were ugly because they were unkept asf but so were women. Nature never wanted bald fat fucks to succeed, that's artificial, only Rich people After civilization could become fat.
Women don't have less bone than men
Bull, low IQ, we are arguing about looks. No shit they were strong. Some of them at least.
So, WHY DID BALD FAT FUCKS SUCCEEDED, huh?
LOW IQ.
When the fuck did they succeed?? Lol have you ever Heard some greek myths, Heroes weren't bald and fat, low iq nerdikBull, low IQ, we are arguing about looks. No shit they were strong. Some of them at least.
So, WHY DID BALD FAT FUCKS SUCCEEDED, huh?
NATURE NEVER GAVE SHIT ABOUT YOUR LOOKS. Most high T males dominated.
THIS IS IDEAL ACCORDING TO NATURE:
But you can cope whatever you like
uh yeah they do retard. Else how’d they be able to tell male and female skulls apart? Male jaw, ramus, brow and laterals sígnicantly bigger
LOW IQ.
WOMEN HAVE LESS BONE THAN MEN.
Read some anatomy book.
You've been on this website for 2 years, almost a Grandpa here, and still know nothing. What do you even do here? Read penis-enlargement threads?
Only with browridge.
Not everyone is a gracile cuck pheno. In the Same ethnic group men have bigger Jaws and chin
i literally proved you wrong retard. you don't have more bone mass than htb only your body is larger
