Blacks have no potential to look maxx (sad truth)

[Rhinomaxed]

Lmao completely disagree the race that is most subhuman and should scientifically altered are latino men (their women are hot) black people usually dominate with their bone structure but yeah besides that i can agree.

 

[Sirius★]

Dnr, anyone disagreeing with this thread can argue with a wall

 

[caleb555]

There’s a reason blacks are scientifically the most incel race

Explain?

 

[Deleted member 51358]

3D mesh rendering because in grayscale surface renders like this

It’s present even in the non gray scale averages of the East Africans

Also yes of course hollow cheeks are heavily lighting dependent but 99% of people won’t have hollow cheeks in any lighting

Also the lighting in the images is natural lighting from the research station the subjects were in.

These renders smooth soft tissue and remove color cues (like fat distribution and skin translucency), so the shape appears more skeletal like here for the asian one

No it doesn’t you clearly didn’t read the study. The images were created using a 3d photometry system(vectra 3d) which preserves the soft tissue structure. You can literally see the skin imperfections in the faces I posted vs the Asian one which is completely smooth

The imaging system used in the study is literally explicitly used by doctors for the purpose of preserving soft tissues details so doctors can analyze the face and recommend certain cosmetic procedures for example

its literally just lighting plus rendering that made it this way, the chnese one is the same

do asians naturally have hollow cheeks now as well

The methodology used to generate this image is completely unknown and it’s not even from a scientific source.

But it really wouldn’t surprise me there are a lot of Asian bone moggers tbh.

 

[Deleted member 51358]

they are, thanks for agreeing

I don’t agree it’s just that position is completely unfalsifiable and so it can’t be engaged with

 

[lastofus123]

It’s present even in the non gray scale averages of the East Africans

Also yes of course hollow cheeks are heavily lighting dependent but 99% of people won’t have hollow cheeks in any lighting

Also the lighting in the images is natural lighting from the research station the subjects were in.


No it doesn’t you clearly didn’t read the study. The images were created using a 3d photometry system(vectra 3d) which preserves the soft tissue structure. You can literally see the skin imperfections in the faces I posted vs the Asian one which is completely smooth

Reading through the study carefully, it does not state anywhere that the researchers meshed all participants together to create a composite or averaged 3D face. What they actually did was capture individual 3D facial scans, place 19 anatomical landmarks on each scan, extract straight-line inter-landmark measurements (such as facial height and width distances), and then calculate group averages for those numerical measurements. The faces shown in the figure are individual example scans with landmarks placed to demonstrate how measurements were taken, while the numbers underneath represent averaged distances across participants. The study averaged measurements, not facial meshes. In addition, the authors themselves acknowledge that restricting facial phenotypes to linear inter-landmark measurements is inadequate for fully representing complex 3D facial geometry. So using those example images to argue that they represent an “average Nigerian face” or to make claims about structural traits like cheek hollowness or skeletal morphology goes beyond what the study actually measured and presented.

your own thing said its not good enough to represent a facial phenotype.

 

[lastofus123]

Reading through the study carefully, it does not state anywhere that the researchers meshed all participants together to create a composite or averaged 3D face. What they actually did was capture individual 3D facial scans, place 19 anatomical landmarks on each scan, extract straight-line inter-landmark measurements (such as facial height and width distances), and then calculate group averages for those numerical measurements. The faces shown in the figure are individual example scans with landmarks placed to demonstrate how measurements were taken, while the numbers underneath represent averaged distances across participants. The study averaged measurements, not facial meshes. In addition, the authors themselves acknowledge that restricting facial phenotypes to linear inter-landmark measurements is inadequate for fully representing complex 3D facial geometry. So using those example images to argue that they represent an “average Nigerian face” or to make claims about structural traits like cheek hollowness or skeletal morphology goes beyond what the study actually measured and presented.

View attachment 4641795

your own thing said its not good enough to represent a facial phenotype.

so yeh i asked grok and it said this after reading the study

so this

was as valid as the ones you used

 

[dawooddX]

Then stop coping as a Mexican my self we also have native dna and I’ve acknowledged that they’re fucking ugly nothing to brag about that why I’ve been bleaching and looking into get surgical work done View attachment 4641249 being ethnic is never ideal end of discussion

not enough bleaching stack
add more pal

 

[dawooddX]

Reading through the study carefully, it does not state anywhere that the researchers meshed all participants together to create a composite or averaged 3D face. What they actually did was capture individual 3D facial scans, place 19 anatomical landmarks on each scan, extract straight-line inter-landmark measurements (such as facial height and width distances), and then calculate group averages for those numerical measurements. The faces shown in the figure are individual example scans with landmarks placed to demonstrate how measurements were taken, while the numbers underneath represent averaged distances across participants. The study averaged measurements, not facial meshes. In addition, the authors themselves acknowledge that restricting facial phenotypes to linear inter-landmark measurements is inadequate for fully representing complex 3D facial geometry. So using those example images to argue that they represent an “average Nigerian face” or to make claims about structural traits like cheek hollowness or skeletal morphology goes beyond what the study actually measured and presented.

View attachment 4641795

your own thing said its not good enough to represent a facial phenotype.

can u stop wasting ur time with such meaningless discussion towards niggas who will never change their mind. they cant comprehend it

genuienly binge eating goyslop wld be a better use of time

stop explaining shit that most known alrdy. their the ones coping

 

[lastofus123]

i also asked multiple ai and they said this for the image

so this might actually be the averaged out of 2000 caucasian people apparently from the study i sent before and they just pasted it there?

 

[lastofus123]

can u stop wasting ur time with such meaningless discussion towards niggas who will never change their mind. they cant comprehend it

genuienly binge eating goyslop wld be a better use of time

stop explaining shit that most known alrdy. their the ones coping

its just a compulsion for me to have the last word, dont mind me

 

[Deleted member 51358]

In addition, the authors themselves acknowledge that restricting facial phenotypes to linear inter-landmark measurements is inadequate for fully representing complex 3D facial geometry. So using those example images to argue that they represent an “average Nigerian face” or to make claims about structural traits like cheek hollowness or skeletal morphology goes beyond what the study actually measured and presented.

that doesn't go against my claim. It didn't say that the imaging used can't accurately represent faces but that the landmarks they measured can't fully describe a face which is pretty obvious. If I you just know someones bigonial width for example that obviously doesn't tell you all too much about the actual cheek bone structure of a person.

it's not saying that the images themselves are inaccurate.

Reading through the study carefully, it does not state anywhere that the researchers meshed all participants together to create a composite or averaged 3D face.

fair enough but the study on the east africans is an actual composite face, also even though they aren't averages those images were still chosen because they represent the general features of each ethnicity.

was as valid as the ones you used

no because those images are the faces of actual people.

so this might actually be the averaged out of 2000 caucasian people apparently from the study i sent before and they just pasted it there?

its not if you read the study its from you'd know that. There were only 3 participants and that image isn't even an average of those participants

the study its from is this

Evaluation of Anthropometric Facial Landmarks in Syndromic Individuals IADR Abstract Archives

 

[pfl]

because I’m autistic

And yet I jsut came off a call with a YT girl who called me handsome and she begged me to stay online with her until she falls asleep


Yeah ok buddy

Granted I look good but locationcel but even I can do well it doesn’t matter

Tales from the basement - known larper

 

[lastofus123]

no because those images are the faces of actual people.

its not if you read the study its from you'd know that. There were only 3 participants and that image isn't even an average of those participants

the study its from is this

Evaluation of Anthropometric Facial Landmarks in Syndromic Individuals IADR Abstract Archives

they got the image from 3d facial norm databese and its supposed to be the meshed out average caucasian man

3D Facial Norms Database

FaceBase is the primary data resource for craniofacial researchers worldwide.

www.facebase.org

but apparently to get the image, you need permission to enter their database and they only allow it if its for research or if your legit if it makes sense

 

[Deleted member 51358]

can u stop wasting ur time with such meaningless discussion towards niggas who will never change their mind.

bro you're genuinely retarded if you think this dude "understands" anything he doesn't even read the studies he's referenced.

For example he referenced a study and claimed it showed blacks are 20% archaic hominid on average but when you go to the study it says the average is 7%

then he said that this archaic admixture isn't found in non africans but the study once again literally says it is.

and then he posted multiple faces from humanphenotypes acting like its an composite of actual faces but if you go on the website it explicitly says that its algorithmically generated based on descriptions from the 1800s

Just a few examples of him not knowing anything he's talking about, but you're too brain dead to read too I guess

 

[Deleted member 51358]

they got the image from 3d facial norm databese and its supposed to be the meshed out average caucasian man

its not a composite nowhere in the study does it say that, you can literally read the source why are you blindly believing what a fucking bot is telling you

 

[Deleted member 51358]

3D Facial Norms Database

FaceBase is the primary data resource for craniofacial researchers worldwide.

www.facebase.org

but apparently to get the image, you need permission to enter their database and they only allow it if its for research or if your legit if it makes sense

you do know that the faces in the database are of individuals not composites right?

 

[mexican-]

not enough bleaching stack
add more pal

I do i only took a pic of hydro and tret cuz combine theyre main power sources the others are just extra

 

[lastofus123]

you do know that the faces in the database are of individuals not composites right?

3D Facial Norms Summary Statistics

FaceBase is the primary data resource for craniofacial researchers worldwide.

www.facebase.org

these are the values of caucasian faces and you can compare it to the ones in yours, but in terms of lateral zygos projection, caucasians are like 138mm so basically the same as the nigerian ones in yours though its data from the 1990s so take it with a grain of salt

 

[lastofus123]

you do know that the faces in the database are of individuals not composites right?

I got the same study and it shows me different people

Facial Anthropometry Measurements Using 3D Stereophotogrammetry Analysis Among Nigerians - PMC

This study aimed to determine the normative facial anthropometry measurement among Nigerians using 3D Stereophotogrammetry analysis. This study was carried out in Lagos, Nigeria over a period of three years. The sample population was Nigerians of ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Ig this is the average nigerian

Also says whites have more balanced thirds

 

[JUN0]

There’s a reason blacks are scientifically the most incel race

Care to explain? Last time I checked, black men have the lowest rates of past-year celibacy. Black men are quite literally the least likely demographic to be incel.

I do agree that in terms of hardmaxxing, black people’s potential is capped lower in comparison to the other races. But you guys fail to understand that black men are held to a different beauty standard.

Women’s preferences for facial attractiveness aren’t uniform across all races. Black men simply aren’t judged as harshly against the eurocentric perception of facial attractiveness in comparison to the other races. For one we have different facial structures, for two we are perceived in a completely different way that alters our physical attractiveness->, inherently more masculine than other races, more charismatic etc.