"Blank" (old puathate/lookism forum member)'s surmise of Pitt as a midwit test?

S

Sardo

Iron
Joined
May 6, 2022
Posts
32
Reputation
26
I don't know if anyone remembers an old forum poster who went under the name of “blank" who seem to only post his admiration or veneration of Brad Pitt (and lust maybe too, not that naïve..).
This is PRIME Pitt btw. Pitt has had a very good run, but like every male (and female believe it or not) hit the wall eventually. This is about pitt at his BEST.

He constantly rated Pitt above other big names in the PSL or incelosphere... that's all he droned on about. Usual suspects like prime Gandy before he hit the wall, those cherry picked Cruise photos, or whatever aspie male model was flavour of the month/year (Drago seems pretty in currently), as well as any typical maesthetic hunk you might be thinking of right now.. nope Pitt would top all of them.

At first, I dismissed it. Normalfaggtry, I can almost recall hissing under my breath while reading blank's thousandth thread or message on Pitt. I was getting ready to respond to the thread with a Tyler Maher shirtless pic from one of my desktop folders to answer Blank's 4000th Pitt message of the day.
Right? Pitt is 6/10 normalfag rated highly by plebs.

However, after some years, often late at night just before dreams took me, the question enter my subconsciousness. It arrived in contemplation over quiet evenings. I then eventually, painstakingly, came to the conclusion that blank was essentially correct. Now, I haven't fully warmed up to it, but every year I become closer. Maybe 75% at the moment. Maybe 80%.. Who knows, maybe in 10-15 years- if I live that long with the crushing burden of the BlackPill ™ - I might come to think he was 100% dead right.

It's a subtle argument believe it or not with different levels. A good surface level comparison might be the midwit meme. The "Pitt is barely a 6/10 looking normon" is unfortunately, I'm putting it out there, the midwit view. Versus the low and high general agreement on the conclusion.

A level above? Pitt's amazing “harmony” (that word that looksmaxxers like), his features are more the sum of their parts. Saying he has a gonal angle out a few arc-minutes or so... or his nose isn't ideally tipped are missing or his profile jawline is bruxxed is missing the woods for the trees.
These levels can be continued...

I brooded over some evenings over the questions, the claim. But it's interesting to see the strength of blank's argument with the benefit of hindsight and just how subtle and easy to miss it actually is until you start thinking about Pitt and all his physical or otherwise attributes... academically obviously


6456546577
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940
he's been rent free in your head since puahate? :lul:
10 years

fuckkkkk this is my future
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Pumanator
78888544



Another one:
Women sometimes say "he's not my type" (again referring to prime Pitt).
Consider that Pitt was perhaps known as the biggest sex symbol of the 90s and 00s. You know that certain types of women want to either cope or not seem ordinary or not seem basic. Women will often say they like someone like Michael Fassbender who is more ""approachable"" to their eyes after watching him on TV and maybe to down to earth.
Whereas in reality if Pitt walked in the room, Fassbender would be sat the at bar, with you and me, watching Pitt getting fawned over.
 
Last edited:
234234234


Another merely surface level observation based on blank's quite superb - and I make no apology again for saying subtle again - argument
maybe you can find more yourself


Pitt, like all Hollywood hunks (Brando, Depp, Walker, Swayze etc.. Elvis even), has a certain aesthetic edge, maybe even go as far as to say a "feminine" edge (but I won't go that far, it's open to in interpretation).
He shares some similarities with a non-aspie Elvis really. Unless you subscribed to a incels/braincel (braindead amirite)'s view of sex appeal - where Stallone or Schwarzenegger are 10/10 chads, you must have some idea of this, especially for younger women. Sure they (Stallone et al) could have sex ONS with bimbo hangers on if needed, but needless to say nearly all of Stallone or Schwarzenegger fans are male fans or male fans of action movies. Arnold admitted he """preferred"" uglier women when he was having an affair.

BUT. Pitt has great masculine energy, crucially also in motion. Whatever you throw at Pitt, he has something to answer with. Pitt is just too strong, it's just his allure is finally weakening because of age and those who (perhaps understandably) might get a little cynical over someone who is a sex symbol internationally for 20+ years
 
Pitts chad but not giga

did you read any of it 2bh bro

Unless you subscribed to a incels/braincel (braindead amirite)'s view of sex appeal - where Stallone or Schwarzenegger are 10/10 chads, you must have some idea of this, especially for younger women. Sure they (Stallone et al) could have sex ONS with bimbo hangers on if needed, but needless to say nearly all of Stallone or Schwarzenegger fans are male fans or male fans of action movies. Arnold admitted he """preferred"" uglier women when he was having an affair.
 
did you read any of it 2bh bro
:feelswhat:You really think I read that blob of text I’m bluepilling myself with “friends” rn toand other sitcoms
 
Nice try Blank, Pitt is a HTN
 
he's been rent free in your head since puahate? :lul:
10 years

fuckkkkk this is my future
what the actual fuck is this thread, this shit is giga old and super dumb
 
  • JFL
Reactions: incel194012940
sounds like a post for @ArvidGustavsson
 

Similar threads

forwardridge
Replies
82
Views
3K
unlawfulwaffle
unlawfulwaffle
Sloppyseconds
Replies
13
Views
1K
registerfasterusing
registerfasterusing
Сигма Бой
Replies
27
Views
1K
freedompanel
freedompanel
turneywest
Replies
231
Views
9K
PrinceofDarkness
PrinceofDarkness

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top