boneless ltn vs htn according to org raters

Overlord66

Overlord66

Iron
Joined
Nov 14, 2025
Posts
236
Reputation
210
boneless ltn
1000034659
1000034651

htn
1000034655
1000034657
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: GodDeityEyeBro, Aox Ofwar, Zagrosian. and 1 other person
How do you explain it?
these are ratings according to some org raters who rate jawline over all other features
its clear to anybody whose brain hasn't rotted away that bale looks better
 
Not a single fucking person says this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fridx, KT-34, Zagrosian. and 1 other person
You meant according to .gg raters
 
these are ratings according to some org raters who rate jawline over all other features
its clear to anybody whose brain hasn't rotted away that bale looks better
No I certainly agree, but could you explain it in PSL terms, bale does have flaws, but as you said it’s certainly more appealing, but why
 
its kind of a bad example
but guys hear rate jawline above all other features
its always the poopjeets that overrate jawline and side profile over front profile and eyes 🤣
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zagrosian. and Overlord66
Literally nobody here rates like that, everyone knows harmony over everything. Only newgens do ts.
 
i over exaggerated
better example would be chico/delon vs some Blockhead chad
Yes but what’s the exact way to measure it, for example you see the Delon has no under eye support, slightly downgrown overall, and the ramus bad, and you could take a perfect bone structure and not look as appealing. Delon had great coloring, and soft enough looking to be approachable, good ipd, mouth to nose ratio, although mouth could be wider by PSL standards, yet it works. That’s the case I’d say with most “classically handsome” faces, or faces of older actors that were considered good looking.
 
Yes but what’s the exact way to measure it, for example you see the Delon has no under eye support, slightly downgrown overall, and the ramus bad, and you could take a perfect bone structure and not look as appealing. Delon had great coloring, and soft enough looking to be approachable, good ipd, mouth to nose ratio, although mouth could be wider by PSL standards, yet it works. That’s the case I’d say with most “classically handsome” faces, or faces of older actors that were considered good looking.
here is better example
bale vs tiktok fraud
1000034801
1000034799

1000034795
1000034797

better jaw shouldn't mean better appeal or psl
if somebody has all other features better
jaw is law but not always
 
  • +1
Reactions: SomaliaSub5
here is better example
bale vs tiktok fraud
View attachment 4344452View attachment 4344453
View attachment 4344458View attachment 4344459
better jaw shouldn't mean better appeal or psl
if somebody has all other features better
jaw is law but not always
No I actually agree, but there’s something more to us seeing a face I think, that we miss, apart from way the opposite gender views they which maybe adds genuine attraction and lust, let’s say we have two faces, meaning their descriptions which are identical, but the faces after the descriptions are different, could we encapsulate and fully rage faces accurately without seeing them, but just based on the calculations. I think that upon seeing the face afterwards it would have an impact to the rating. And also which you kind of infered to, a higher PSL score could be less appealing then a lower onev
 
Agepill made his prime short

imagine if he was a modern actor

with advanced full make up and comsetic , skin care.
he would be bigger heartthrob than dicaprio Bieber bts and one direction combined if he was born in this day and age and was English
 

Similar threads

Klasik616
Replies
16
Views
273
pfl
pfl
Overlord66
Replies
18
Views
180
pfl
pfl
E
Replies
33
Views
250
eyecope
E
Regular Doomer
Replies
21
Views
286
Regular Doomer
Regular Doomer
Adoins
Replies
34
Views
590
gorgeous
gorgeous

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top