Bonesmashing is more complicated then you think

2 unknown slayer

2 unknown slayer

Silver
Joined
Apr 28, 2025
Posts
713
Reputation
534
So, I was studying and I learnt that there are 2 actual differant layers to normal bone in the face for eg. The mandible has a thick layer of cortical bone but under the layer is spongy bone

The spongy bone is packed with osteoblasts (bone building cells), osteoclasts (breaking down bone cells) and osteocytes (the truly complicated bone maturation, monitor differant mechanisms) osteocytes is what makes bone respondant to outside force like bonesmashing therefore proving wolfs law to be true but osteocytes are much more present in spongy bone meaning if you want to remodel your face with bonesmashing, the more force that you put to your spongy bones underneath the cortical bone layer is much more important for true remodeling

differant bones in the face have thicker/thinner cortical/spongy bone density and amounts

To start the bones like your forehead and mandible have a lot of cortical bone meaning the spongy bones are packed away deep meaning bonesmashing remodeling will be harder

Whereas places like the nose bridge have tiny amount of cortical bone layer, this is why it’s much more common to break your nose then any of the other bones in your face so theoretically bonesmashing would be more affective there which wiuld also lead to a more deep set eye appearance



This may be water to some of u but not to me, obviously this isn’t a super high quality thread and I don’t know everything like some of you iqcels
 
  • +1
Reactions: Abdullahm06, Hernan, acm and 6 others
Good thread, but your assuming thick cortical bone impedes remodeling, when it’s just less fragile.
 
So, I was studying and I learnt that there are 2 actual differant layers to normal bone in the face for eg. The mandible has a thick layer of cortical bone but under the layer is spongy bone

The spongy bone is packed with osteoblasts (bone building cells), osteoclasts (breaking down bone cells) and osteocytes (the truly complicated bone maturation, monitor differant mechanisms) osteocytes is what makes bone respondant to outside force like bonesmashing therefore proving wolfs law to be true but osteocytes are much more present in spongy bone meaning if you want to remodel your face with bonesmashing, the more force that you put to your spongy bones underneath the cortical bone layer is much more important for true remodeling

differant bones in the face have thicker/thinner cortical/spongy bone density and amounts

To start the bones like your forehead and mandible have a lot of cortical bone meaning the spongy bones are packed away deep meaning bonesmashing remodeling will be harder

Whereas places like the nose bridge have tiny amount of cortical bone layer, this is why it’s much more common to break your nose then any of the other bones in your face so theoretically bonesmashing would be more affective there which wiuld also lead to a more deep set eye appearance



This may be water to some of u but not to me, obviously this isn’t a super high quality thread and I don’t know everything like some of you iqcels
oh my god holy fucking grey thtas not wolfs law
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Hoax, SvtvnTr14d, LTNUser and 3 others
oh my god holy fucking grey thtas not wolfs law
Wolfs law is dependent on osteocytes just because it doesn’t mention it doesnt mean that’s not what makes it true
 
  • +1
Reactions: pentamogged9000
Good thread, but you’re assuming thick cortical bone impedes remodeling, when it’s just less fragile.
partly yes, the thicker the cortical bone around whatever place you wanna Bonesmash usually means less growth, doesnt mean no growth just less and u may have to do it harder
 
  • +1
Reactions: Finnishmogger
partly yes, the thicker the cortical bone around whatever place you wanna Bonesmash usually means less growth, doesnt mean no growth just less and u may have to do it harder
Thicker cortical bone doesn’t inherently mean less growth—it just requires different force magnitudes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2 unknown slayer
Does bonesmashing really work?
I've heard it's cope
 
Does bonesmashing really work?
I've heard it's cope
they want you to think it doesnt work lmao. ive been doing it every 3-4 days for 2 months on my cheekbones (i used to do it before on my chin) and without a doubt its working out for me, its hilarious
 
  • +1
Reactions: handelsman, Boyoshutup and acm
they want you to think it doesnt work lmao. ive been doing it every 3-4 days for 2 months on my cheekbones (i used to do it before on my chin) and without a doubt its working out for me, its hilarious
have you noticed an iq drop as some people say you get from it? :feelsuhh:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thepathsdontremembe, Shmyko and LegendaryKennen
have you noticed an iq drop as some people say you get from it? :feelsuhh:
thats mostly from idiots who bonesmash the browridge (the browridge is barely malleable compared to zygos/chin) and i never experienced headaches or brainfog after bonesmashing which some have done (typically browridge idiot smashers like ive said)
 
  • Woah
Reactions: acm
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor and Finnishmogger
they want you to think it doesnt work lmao. ive been doing it every 3-4 days for 2 months on my cheekbones (i used to do it before on my chin) and without a doubt its working out for me, its hilarious
Can u pm before and after and can u tell how u hit what object do u use
 
Can u pm before and after and can u tell how u hit what object do u use
I dont have before and afters because my phone was broken for a year (bought a new one very recently) and theres no pics in similar lighting/positioning
I just compared myself to the same mirrors and noticed change as have other people in my life

I bonesmash every 3-4 days

I target the most upper parts of the zygo contour (1. to not make the appearance of lowerset zygos. 2. Because there are fat pads near ur lower&middle zygos that u dont wanna hit)

I use knuckles and try to hit as hard as i can in a relatively fast pace, always hit harder than the previous session as the bone adapts

There are like "3 parts" of the zygos, i take about 1-2 min on each one, bonesmashing sessions shouldn't take that long


Im gonna experiment with putting dumbbells on my zygos right after bonesmash for semi-long duration, can let u know how it goes
 
Wolfs law is dependent on osteocytes just because it doesn’t mention it doesnt mean that’s not what makes it true
Dude wolf’s law is bones adapt to pressure over time
 
I dont have before and afters because my phone was broken for a year (bought a new one very recently) and theres no pics in similar lighting/positioning
I just compared myself to the same mirrors and noticed change as have other people in my life

I bonesmash every 3-4 days

I target the most upper parts of the zygo contour (1. to not make the appearance of lowerset zygos. 2. Because there are fat pads near ur lower&middle zygos that u dont wanna hit)

I use knuckles and try to hit as hard as i can in a relatively fast pace, always hit harder than the previous session as the bone adapts

There are like "3 parts" of the zygos, i take about 1-2 min on each one, bonesmashing sessions shouldn't take that long


Im gonna experiment with putting dumbbells on my zygos right after bonesmash for semi-long duration, can let u know how it goes
Interesting tag me for any updates regarding that
 
Dude wolf’s law is bones adapt to pressure over time
Yeah? U don’t think there’s more parts to that? Ever wonder why they do that?? Or does it just happen automatically?????
 
there's not a single proof of legitimate bone increase after bonesmashing

it's all about swelling
not actual changes in the bone
 
So, I was studying and I learnt that there are 2 actual differant layers to normal bone in the face for eg. The mandible has a thick layer of cortical bone but under the layer is spongy bone

The spongy bone is packed with osteoblasts (bone building cells), osteoclasts (breaking down bone cells) and osteocytes (the truly complicated bone maturation, monitor differant mechanisms) osteocytes is what makes bone respondant to outside force like bonesmashing therefore proving wolfs law to be true but osteocytes are much more present in spongy bone meaning if you want to remodel your face with bonesmashing, the more force that you put to your spongy bones underneath the cortical bone layer is much more important for true remodeling

differant bones in the face have thicker/thinner cortical/spongy bone density and amounts

To start the bones like your forehead and mandible have a lot of cortical bone meaning the spongy bones are packed away deep meaning bonesmashing remodeling will be harder

Whereas places like the nose bridge have tiny amount of cortical bone layer, this is why it’s much more common to break your nose then any of the other bones in your face so theoretically bonesmashing would be more affective there which wiuld also lead to a more deep set eye appearance



This may be water to some of u but not to me, obviously this isn’t a super high quality thread and I don’t know everything like some of you iqcels
How can I get rid of asymmetry by bonesmashing caused me asymmetry the right side has more prominence in the zygomatic arxus and the left not so prominent and undefined did not give me bone results they came out like calluses and not the same on both sides so there is asymmetry
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2 unknown slayer
How can I get rid of asymmetry by bonesmashing caused me asymmetry the right side has more prominence in the zygomatic arxus and the left not so prominent and undefined did not give me bone results they came out like calluses and not the same on both sides so there is asymmetry
Only do it on the non prominent side
 
apparently this is an estimated density of the corticol bone in the face
Estimated cortical bone density per square millimeter (g/cm³)
  1. Anterior mandible (body and chin): ~0.91–1.53 g/cm³
    • The front part of the lower jaw, which includes the chin, typically contains the densest cortical bone in the face.
  2. Mandibular ramus: ~0.91–1.53 g/cm³
    • The vertical part of the mandible also has thick and dense cortical bone.
  3. Supraorbital: ~0.8–1.0 g/cm³
    • The orbital rim is composed of dense cortical bone for protection, although there is less direct research available compared to jawbone density.
  4. Zygomatic arch: ~0.65–0.9 g/cm³
    • The density of the cheekbone can be variable. Studies examining infrazygomatic bone density, though not directly measuring the arch, have found values in this approximate range.
  5. Anterior maxilla: ~0.52–0.87 g/cm³
    • The front of the upper jaw is less dense than the mandible.
  6. Posterior maxilla: ~0.3–0.5 g/cm³
    • The back of the upper jaw is significantly less dense and features a much thinner cortical layer, partly due to the large maxillary sinuses.
  7. Radix (nasal bone): ~0.2–0.4 g/cm³
    • This is an approximation for the thin nasal bones, which are denser toward the top (radix) and thinner toward the tip.
  8. Orbitals (orbital walls): ~0.2–0.4 g/cm³
    • The orbital walls, particularly the medial walls and floor, are extremely thin and delicate.
 
they want you to think it doesnt work lmao. ive been doing it every 3-4 days for 2 months on my cheekbones (i used to do it before on my chin) and without a doubt its working out for me, its hilarious
how long do you hit, how hard, how often?
 
how long do you hit, how hard, how often?
About as hard as i can and i always try to one up the last time as the bone adapts

3-5min, I hit the front and lateral parts of zygo

Every friday and tuesday

Hit the upper parts only, there are fat pads on the lower/middle zygo,and hitting them creates the appearance of midset cheekbones

I keep a good diet as well (animal based high in minerals)

Took me 1.5~ months to see change
 
  • +1
Reactions: 3dwardcullen and 2 unknown slayer
About as hard as i can and i always try to one up the last time as the bone adapts

3-5min, I hit the front and lateral parts of zygo

Every friday and tuesday

Hit the upper parts only, there are fat pads on the lower/middle zygo,and hitting them creates the appearance of midset cheekbones

I keep a good diet as well (animal based high in minerals)

Took me 1.5~ months to see change
Would u say real growth or just swelling?
 
  • +1
Reactions: LegendaryKennen
  • +1
Reactions: 2 unknown slayer

Similar threads

W
Replies
4
Views
340
hej1377
hej1377
hopelessromanticc
Replies
21
Views
1K
sellatine
sellatine
Imogincels
Replies
4
Views
544
chudltn
chudltn
pentamogged9000
Replies
31
Views
1K
Wider9
Wider9

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top