
stamaster21
Apricot
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2019
- Posts
- 4,453
- Reputation
- 4,714
I see what you did, your trying to explain this myth that chads/brads just look like shit as they age and then go down to the level of average men. Not realizing most attractive men and women, look better then most of their peers, because most lookmax to some degree because they have the most to lose from aging. The avg person and below avg even if they looksmax they never had much looks to begin with. Meaning a person can looks max and be 50 but look like a average 37 year old, a looks maxed 50 year old who looks like a attractive 40 year old would do better in the mating market.Natural selection and aging does not work like this though. To a certain extent, your not protecting yourself from aging. You can only really delay it, or steer it in a graceful course.
But its time for people to admit. When it comes to good vs bad looks and aging, its like rice water vs grape juice. Yea the grape juice can spoil, just like the rice water. But the difference is ones potential ages to vinegar and the other a fine cognac. Also, most people prefer to drink grape juice over rice water, and wine is seen as a preference over vinegar. Most people don't drink or use rice water but may use vinegar.
What I'm saying is, "chad" looks good (to women) during his younger years, and while he could age like shit, him having "good looks", and the lack of preventative measures against aging does not mean that he will age like shit. You also cannot assume that the majority of good looking men are not using preventative measures against aging (most are, and care about their looks actually). But on the other hand, someone who does not look good (to women), still probably wont look good just because he looks like how he did in his 30s,- when he's 50.
Though, I have to emphasize "looking good (to woman)". Because its still beneficial to want to keep yourself healthy and age well, no matter if you look good to women (preselection), or not.