Both Sub Saharan Africans and North Europeans/Euroasians have historically low iq culture

[TsarTsar444]

Its either some black american roasting whites for "bland culture" or a conservative white doing the opposite for blacks, and both getting defensive after and saying how thats ridiculous.

In reality the only advanced cultures like rich food, customs, cities and all that happened around the Mediterranean, Middle East, India and China for very obvious historical reasons. Everything under the Sahara and above the Black Sea and Alps was disconnected too much from the advanced world and those parts were stuck with tribes, houses made of mud, straw or stone, and low population density, also low iq. Especially food. In Europe food is culturaly bland because of it being a baren cold continent with very low diversity of spices if at all, except some herbs. Same for the shithole deserts and jungles in large parts of africa where people just directly ate meat or some herbs.

The funniest thing is when Germans or Slavs show pics of Romans and Greeks to insult Africans, while these germans lived in those same shit tribes like the Africans did. Or when Blacks use Ancient Egypt for the same purpose JFL. Meme people tbh. Hope the US gets nuked inshallah

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Cope we blacks had the Mali empire Axum and the Songhai which were all significant empires cope harder

 

[TsarTsar444]

Cope we blacks had the Mali empire Axum and the Songhai which were all significant empires cope harder

Mogged to oblivion by Roman and Greeks empires/kingdoms

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Mogged to oblivion by Roman and Greeks empires/kingdoms

Not kush or Axum no it didn’t. The Romans and Greeks couldn’t even conquered kush or Axum

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

Italians have the best food in Europe. No one else can compete

 

[TsarTsar444]

Italians have the best food in Europe. No one else can compete

They are Med so water, North Europe is a frozen shithole so the cultures there couldn't develop good food

 

[TsarTsar444]

Not kush or Axum no it didn’t. The Romans and Greeks couldn’t even conquered kush or Axum

Thats not true, Romans didn't want to do conquering anymore cause they overextended themselves, Augustus beat the shit of off the Kush kingdoms

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Thats not true, Romans didn't want to do conquering anymore cause they overextended themselves, Augustus beat the shit of off the Kush kingdoms

No he didn’t we wasn’t able to conquer kush. Nigga kush was lower Egypt how could they conquer upper Egypt but not lower Egypt cope harder

 

[Deleted member 14455]

Not kush or Axum no it didn’t. The Romans and Greeks couldn’t even conquered kush or Axum

Cope. no one mogged the romans. the only 2 that had the chance were (1) greek/persian (Mithridates) and (2) north african (hannibal) no actual nigga could compete against Rome.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Cope. no one mogged the romans. the only 2 that had the chance were (1) greek/persian (Mithridates) and (2) north african (hannibal) no actual nigger could compete against Rome.

But they couldn’t conquer our nigger nations like Axum and kush. In fact those faggots had to sign a peace treaty with the kush people

 

[TsarTsar444]

No he didn’t we wasn’t able to conquer kush. Nigga kush was lower Egypt how could they conquer upper Egypt but not lower Egypt cope harder

U do realize they made them client kingdoms during the wars for a short while right? They defeated them in the wars, they just didn't want to expand anymore. Romans conquered Mesopotamia and returned it back cause they were overstretched. Jfl if u think they couldn't conquer them if they wanted to. Nobody defeated Rome at its prime

 

[Deleted member 5802]

U do realize they made them client kingdoms during the wars for a short while right? They defeated them in the wars, they just didn't want to expand anymore. Romans conquered Mesopotamia and returned it back cause they were overstretched. Jfl if u think they couldn't conquer them if they wanted to. Nobody defeated Rome at its prime

They didn’t control them though kush freed itself from being a client state. Why couldn’t rome just completely control Nubia? Your coping really hard bro.

rome tried many times to conquer Nubia they even employed some of their solders in their armies. BLACK NUBAINS WERE BETTER SOLDERS THAN THE ROMANS

 

[Haven]

View attachment 1262634
Its either some black american roasting whites for "bland culture" or a conservative white doing the opposite for blacks, and both getting defensive after and saying how thats ridiculous.

In reality the only advanced cultures like rich food, customs, cities and all that happened around the Mediterranean, Middle East, India and China for very obvious historical reasons. Everything under the Sahara and above the Black Sea and Alps was disconnected too much from the advanced world and those parts were stuck with tribes, houses made of mud, straw or stone, and low population density, also low iq. Especially food. In Europe food is culturaly bland because of it being a baren cold continent with very low diversity of spices if at all, except some herbs. Same for the shithole deserts and jungles in large parts of africa where people just directly ate meat or some herbs.

The funniest thing is when Germans or Slavs show pics of Romans and Greeks to insult Africans, while these germans lived in those same shit tribes like the Africans did. Or when Blacks use Ancient Egypt for the same purpose JFL. Meme people tbh. Hope the US gets nuked inshallah

Cope harder high iturkics ruled the world more than 3 times

 

[Deleted member 6403]

I'm so lucky I'm med and part nafri

 

[TsarTsar444]

They didn’t control them though kush freed itself from being a client state. Why couldn’t rome just completely control Nubia? Your coping really hard bro.

rome tried many times to conquer Nubia they even employed some of their solders in their armies. BLACK NUBAINS WERE BETTER SOLDERS THAN THE ROMANS

Thats not even slightly true jfl, what a dumb statement, Empires can't stretch far to long, they couldn't just conquer the whole world. Why couldn't Romans conquer Persia bro?!1 Or China, or Siberia. They didn't bother anymore cause they controlled the wealthiest region on earth, why would they conquer Sudan which is mostly sparse and a desert? They defeated them in the wars you can search it up anywhere

By this logic Germans are the supreme rave because Romans couldn't conquer them too right? Jfl

Also Nubians weren't better soldiers jfl, black romans were very rare, even the Emperor Severus who was from North Africa was shocked when he saw a black roman soldier in England. Best soldiers were loyal Italians

 

[TsarTsar444]

Cope harder high iturkics ruled the world more than 3 times

What does this thread have to do with Turkic people?

 

[DesperadoRatado]

They didn’t control them though kush freed itself from being a client state. Why couldn’t rome just completely control Nubia? Your coping really hard bro.

rome tried many times to conquer Nubia they even employed some of their solders in their armies. BLACK NUBAINS WERE BETTER SOLDERS THAN THE ROMANS

@TsarTsar444 YUP MAYO MONKI, ´DIS THE TRUTH RITE HERE!!!

THE BEST WARRIARS N SHIEET. Wuz only conqurad cus THE WYT MAN HAD wyt PRIVILEGE

AFRICA OR AKEBULANS LAND WAS COLONIZED 97% BUT ISSS CUS THE NEANDERTHALS HAZZ GUNZ N SHIEET BUT I SWEAR WE WUZZ HAVIN MORE TEHCNOLOGHY

 

[Haven]

What does this thread have to do with Turkic people?

Euroasians=turkic Uralic people

 

[TsarTsar444]

Euroasians=turkic Uralic people

This is about culture, Turkic people lived in Tents and ate bland meat and diary stuff because they lived on shithole steppes like Europeans

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Thats not even slightly true jfl, what a dumb statement, Empires can't stretch far to long, they couldn't just conquer the whole world. Why couldn't Romans conquer Persia bro?!1 Or China, or Siberia. They didn't bother anymore cause they controlled the wealthiest region on earth, why would they conquer Sudan which is mostly sparse and a desert? They defeated them in the wars you can search it up anywhere

By this logic Germans are the supreme rave because Romans couldn't conquer them too right? Jfl

Also Nubians weren't better soldiers jfl, black romans were very rare, even the Emperor Severus who was from North Africa was shocked when he saw a black roman soldier in England. Best soldiers were loyal Italians

Are you serious bro?

Roman relations with Nubia - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Military of ancient Nubia - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Nigga can’t read

“Nubia was not fully dominated by the Romans, but in Augustan times it was possibly a "client state" of Rome.[citation needed]”

Your Eurocentric view is so comedic it should be parody




“It would really not make sense for Alexander to not attempt to take Nubia from imperialistic stand point. The West does a great job playing Alexander up as this great conqueror, even though he only won against the already beaten down nations of the Near East, he overtook Kemet renaming the "black land" as "Egypt" which was on it's last leg. The Greeks unlike any situation in recorded history knew that the Africans of Kemet were their teachers of EVERYTHING, and as such they yielded their natural imposing of Greek culture on the land in favor of integrating into a conquered African nation's culture. That is a testament to how inferior to Greeks knew that they were to their African predecessors. The debt that Greece owes ancient Kemet is so profound that it has been demonstrated that over 50% of ancient Greek words are of "unknown" (to those too stubborn to concede to the obvious facts) and or ancient African origin.

Most of the black natives of ancient Kemet migrated south into Nubia directly following the raising of Thebes by the Persians. Those same Persian king who was feeling himself attempted to run up on Nubia, but that resulted in an absolute slaughter of those Persians that ancient Greek scholar Herodotus noted as "Cambyses lost Army". The remaining natives of Kemet then on their own ousted the Persians from the land.

The entire ancient World knew of and worshiped the Nubians as a home base for many of their civilizations (Kemet, Sumer, Indus Valley, Elam etc etc). It was very much known that Nubia was where the best of the best of the goods were located. Alexander is therefore a failure if he did not even consider taking the home base for most Africans at the time knowing the shear amount of gold was coming from there. What would be his possible reasoning if he was really on that kind of a war path? To any logical person however we all knew what happened. Alexander took Kemet, and thought he may try his luck with the Queen of Nubia. When he tried his luck by heading that way, he saw that the Africans were already prepared for him with iron weaponry and war elephants to boot. That European did not want those problems with the Nubians who were regarded as the most deadly warriors of the ancient World. The divide and conquer tactics that Alexander's father mastered would never work with the Nubians in the way that it worked for them in Kemet and the near East. The Nubians were ready to lay the smackdown like they did on everyone else (including the Kemites even during early dynastic times), and Alexander therefore said forget all of the gold and other goods he would rather retain his life and reputation. “

 

[TsarTsar444]

Are you serious bro?

Roman relations with Nubia - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Military of ancient Nubia - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Nigga can’t read

“Nubia was not fully dominated by the Romans, but in Augustan times it was possibly a "client state" of Rome.[citation needed]”

Your Eurocentric view is so comedic it should be parody




“It would really not make sense for Alexander to not attempt to take Nubia from imperialistic stand point. The West does a great job playing Alexander up as this great conqueror, even though he only won against the already beaten down nations of the Near East, he overtook Kemet renaming the "black land" as "Egypt" which was on it's last leg. The Greeks unlike any situation in recorded history knew that the Africans of Kemet were their teachers of EVERYTHING, and as such they yielded their natural imposing of Greek culture on the land in favor of integrating into a conquered African nation's culture. That is a testament to how inferior to Greeks knew that they were to their African predecessors. The debt that Greece owes ancient Kemet is so profound that it has been demonstrated that over 50% of ancient Greek words are of "unknown" (to those too stubborn to concede to the obvious facts) and or ancient African origin.

Most of the black natives of ancient Kemet migrated south into Nubia directly following the raising of Thebes by the Persians. Those same Persian king who was feeling himself attempted to run up on Nubia, but that resulted in an absolute slaughter of those Persians that ancient Greek scholar Herodotus noted as "Cambyses lost Army". The remaining natives of Kemet then on their own ousted the Persians from the land.

The entire ancient World knew of and worshiped the Nubians as a home base for many of their civilizations (Kemet, Sumer, Indus Valley, Elam etc etc). It was very much known that Nubia was where the best of the best of the goods were located. Alexander is therefore a failure if he did not even consider taking the home base for most Africans at the time knowing the shear amount of gold was coming from there. What would be his possible reasoning if he was really on that kind of a war path? To any logical person however we all knew what happened. Alexander took Kemet, and thought he may try his luck with the Queen of Nubia. When he tried his luck by heading that way, he saw that the Africans were already prepared for him with iron weaponry and war elephants to boot. That European did not want those problems with the Nubians who were regarded as the most deadly warriors of the ancient World. The divide and conquer tactics that Alexander's father mastered would never work with the Nubians in the way that it worked for them in Kemet and the near East. The Nubians were ready to lay the smackdown like they did on everyone else (including the Kemites even during early dynastic times), and Alexander therefore said forget all of the gold and other goods he would rather retain his life and reputation. “

Stop sending me paragraphs from afro supremacist pseudo history jfl.
The Romans beat the Nubians in the wars and made them a client kingdom during Augustus, you just quoted what i said

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Stop sending me paragraphs from afro supremacist pseudo history jfl.
The Romans beat the Nubians in the wars and made them a client kingdom during Augustus, you just quoted what i said

Your sending me a Eurocentric view I’m giving actual sources and evidence. My guy are you unable to read

Nubia was not fully dominated by the Romans, but in Augustan times it was possibly a "client state" of Rome.[citation needed]”

 

[TsarTsar444]

Your sending me a Eurocentric view I’m giving actual sources and evidence. My guy are you unable to read

Nubia was not fully dominated by the Romans, but in Augustan times it was possibly a "client state" of Rome.[citation needed]”

It literally says they were a client state, and doesn't matter, they beat them in the wars, same like they did to germans and persians, they were overstretched and couldn't conquer anymore. Imagine unironically comparing the superpower of the day to a desert shithole

 

[rockndogs]

 

[Deleted member 5802]

It literally says they were a client state, and doesn't matter, they beat them in the wars, same like they did to germans and persians, they were overstretched and couldn't conquer anymore. Imagine unironically comparing the superpower of the day to a desert shithole

“Possibly” nigga read.

Nubia was equally if not more powerful than Egypt the Ancient world considered them one of the strongest empires to exists. You Europeans only had 2 good kingdoms

 

[gamma]

I'm so lucky I'm med and part nafri

Fuckkk your avi is

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Fuckkk your avi is

I'm tryna tell y'all, latina mulattas fog so hard

 

[Carbon Copy]

 

[cracka]

The funniest thing is when Germans or Slavs show pics of Romans and Greeks to insult Africans, while these germans lived in those same shit tribes like the Africans did. Or when Blacks use Ancient Egypt for the same purpose JFL. Meme people tbh. Hope the US gets nuked inshallah

except that's untrue, the advancement of Christianity sent pagan tribes into success culturally and politcally. this med cope of "you showed muh roman statue" is retarded, Rome conquered most of Europe jfl. And nords, germanic tribes and anglos outpaced post-roman greeks and italic peoples. Also, the Italian admixture is 5 - 20% germanic because of the Germanic conquest. also, comparing small tribal groups in 300 A.D to sub Saharan Africa in 1500 AD is retarded. italic people can cope about tribes all they want until we talk about Europe in post-roman times. Also, look at the studies on innovation in europe, you'll see that vast majority are germanic peoples & north europeans.

 

[cracka]

It literally says they were a client state, and doesn't matter, they beat them in the wars, same like they did to germans and persians, they were overstretched and couldn't conquer anymore. Imagine unironically comparing the superpower of the day to a desert shithole

they beat germans? who do you think took rome and it's empire?

 

[Beetlejuice]

Lol

 

[Prettyboy]

View attachment 1262634
Its either some black american roasting whites for "bland culture" or a conservative white doing the opposite for blacks, and both getting defensive after and saying how thats ridiculous.

In reality the only advanced cultures like rich food, customs, cities and all that happened around the Mediterranean, Middle East, India and China for very obvious historical reasons. Everything under the Sahara and above the Black Sea and Alps was disconnected too much from the advanced world and those parts were stuck with tribes, houses made of mud, straw or stone, and low population density, also low iq. Especially food. In Europe food is culturaly bland because of it being a baren cold continent with very low diversity of spices if at all, except some herbs. Same for the shithole deserts and jungles in large parts of africa where people just directly ate meat or some herbs.

The funniest thing is when Germans or Slavs show pics of Romans and Greeks to insult Africans, while these germans lived in those same shit tribes like the Africans did. Or when Blacks use Ancient Egypt for the same purpose JFL. Meme people tbh. Hope the US gets nuked inshallah

Based. Meanwhile IQ mogger ancient Balkan people built advanced pyramids :

Bosnian pyramid claims - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[TsarTsar444]

except that's untrue, the advancement of Christianity sent pagan tribes into success culturally and politcally. this med cope of "you showed muh roman statue" is retarded, Rome conquered most of Europe jfl. And nords, germanic tribes and anglos outpaced post-roman greeks and italic peoples. Also, the Italian admixture is 5 - 20% germanic because of the Germanic conquest. also, comparing small tribal groups in 300 A.D to sub Saharan Africa in 1500 AD is retarded. italic people can cope about tribes all they want until we talk about Europe in post-roman times. Also, look at the studies on innovation in europe, you'll see that vast majority are germanic peoples & north europeans.

Not true completely, Christianity did make Germanics more civilised but so did Islam were the most advanced African kingdoms like Mali and Songhai, while the pagans were subhumans. So it goes both ways

Nords, Germanics, nad anglos didn't surpase Italians until the 18th century, and Greeks until the 16th century but thats cause they were conquered by the Ottomans. Byzantines were more advanced then Germans and Anglos in the 14th century.

Whats your point on the admixture? Why does that matter? It happened after the empire fell

Time is relative, just because low iq Germans got civilised by greeks and romans much earlier doesn't mean africans are subhuman, they had a huge barrier from the Sahara and Africa today is getting developed

Who cares if they made the most advancements? Anglos could cause they were Isolated on their island and didn't need to worry about continental wars like the rest. Germans were under the protection of the HRE. And again if it wasn't were greeks and romans , Germans would still be like Africans today

So what if majority of discoveries are from Nords? Africa in 100 years will become very prosperous and will have advanced scientific research as well, does that mean africans will mog nords?

 

[TsarTsar444]

they beat germans? who do you think took rome and it's empire?

Read on Germanicus and his expedition. Thousands of germans slaughtered and raped for revenge

 

[cracka]

Read on Germanicus and his expedition. Thousands of germans slaughtered and raped for revenge

what type of cope is that jfl? a couple of thousands killed for a fall of an empire?

 

[TsarTsar444]

what type of cope is that jfl? a couple of thousands killed for a fall of an empire?

The Romans genocided more then 100 thousand germans and burned down half of their towns and left. It took 400 years after this for Germans to carve up the Romans, but that happened cause of different reasons and not military ones

 

[cracka]

Not true completely, Christianity did make Germanics more civilised but so did Islam were the most advanced African kingdoms like Mali and Songhai, while the pagans were subhumans. So it goes both ways

Nords, Germanics, nad anglos didn't surpase Italians until the 18th century, and Greeks until the 16th century but thats cause they were conquered by the Ottomans. Byzantines were more advanced then Germans and Anglos in the 14th century.

Whats your point on the admixture? Why does that matter? It happened after the empire fell

Time is relative, just because low iq Germans got civilised by greeks and romans much earlier doesn't mean africans are subhuman, they had a huge barrier from the Sahara and Africa today is getting developed

Who cares if they made the most advancements? Anglos could cause they were Isolated on their island and didn't need to worry about continental wars like the rest. Germans were under the protection of the HRE. And again if it wasn't were greeks and romans , Germans would still be like Africans today

So what if majority of discoveries are from Nords? Africa in 100 years will become very prosperous and will have advanced scientific research as well, does that mean africans will mog nords?

yeah i agree, but the whole making fun of africans is about a non written language, larping as egyptian, still low iq and eq, being unconnected to the modern world and still living in tribes after colonialism.

northern Europeans were ahead of Italians circa 1300 AD

i thought this was coming from an italians standpoint so i was making the point that if you were italian you too are germanic in dna (to an extent)

germans and northern europeans have higher IQs than meds jfl

cope.

no, africa still has a low iq, eq and impulse control.

 

[cracka]

The Romans genocided more then 100 thousand germans and burned down half of their towns and left. It took 400 years after this for Germans to carve up the Romans, but that happened cause of different reasons and not military ones

more romans died, and the whole of rome was burnt to the ground

 

[Uglybrazilian]

yeah i agree, but the whole making fun of africans is about a non written language, larping as egyptian, still low iq and eq, being unconnected to the modern world and still living in tribes after colonialism.

northern Europeans were ahead of Italians circa 1300 AD

i thought this was coming from an italians standpoint so i was making the point that if you were italian you too are germanic in dna (to an extent)

germans and northern europeans have higher IQs than meds jfl

cope.

no, africa still has a low iq, eq and impulse control.

Why do u think IQ is so important when it comes to human development tho

For example the aztec people were able to build huge buildings and had advanced engineering that they developed by themselves(they had no contact with other empires etc) while nordics were living in mudhuts by the same time, even tho nordics have an average IQ of 100 and the native americans of 80 or something

This is a 20 point IQ difference and still the low IQ people showed more advancement than the high IQ one, what could explain that?

 

[TsarTsar444]

Why do u think IQ is so important when it comes to human development tho

For example the aztec people were able to build huge buildings and had advanced engineering that they developed by themselves(they had no contact with other empires etc) while nordics were living in mudhuts by the same time, even tho nordics have an average IQ of 100 and the native americans of 80 or something

This is a 20 point IQ difference and still the low IQ people showed more advancement than the high IQ one, what could explain that?

Its very complex but the important thing is nordics lived on shit soil and climate, aztecs lived on very good soil and climate, rivers etc. All major civilizations started from these things

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Its very complex but the important thing is nordics lived on shit soil and climate, aztecs lived on very good soil and climate, rivers etc. All major civilizations started from these things

Yeah I get it, I wouldnt say the aztecs lived on a very good environment but I do agree that their environment was at least better than scandinavia

The point is just to show that IQ may not be as important as people tend to think, meds may have a lower IQ than nordics or vice-versa but that is not really a dealbreaker

 

[TsarTsar444]

Yeah I get it, I wouldnt say the aztecs lived on a very good environment but I do agree that their environment was at least better than scandinavia

The point is just to show that IQ may not be as important as people tend to think, meds may have a lower IQ than nordics or vice-versa but that is not really a dealbreaker

But this is false, back then astecs had high iq. If africans were high iq they would beat Europeans in the 1880, so iq is important

 

[Uglybrazilian]

But this is false, back then astecs had high iq. If africans were high iq they would beat Europeans in the 1880, so iq is important

We do not know
There is no IQ measurements of the Aztec people. The best that can be done is to measure the IQ of their closest descendants.

 

[cracka]

Why do u think IQ is so important when it comes to human development tho

For example the aztec people were able to build huge buildings and had advanced engineering that they developed by themselves(they had no contact with other empires etc) while nordics were living in mudhuts by the same time, even tho nordics have an average IQ of 100 and the native americans of 80 or something

This is a 20 point IQ difference and still the low IQ people showed more advancement than the high IQ one, what could explain that?

IQ is important for intellectual and human development, Aztecs were not intellectually as advanced as the Nordic peoples. This is undoubtedly true, nords didn't live in prime climate to build great cities like Rome so instead small villages (that btw were way more architecturally advanced than Africans) were built. Inventions of the time were far greater in northern europe, however, aztecs had good materials, conditions and soil for some pyramids. but don't get it confused, northern Europeans had greater living conditions, a temple doesn't make my statement untrue. When europeans conquered incas and aztecs they thought that europeans were from the heavens because they were talking to white cloth, they were actually just reading a book jfl.

 

[cracka]

Yeah I get it, I wouldnt say the aztecs lived on a very good environment but I do agree that their environment was at least better than scandinavia

The point is just to show that IQ may not be as important as people tend to think, meds may have a lower IQ than nordics or vice-versa but that is not really a dealbreaker

a few iq points of course isn't a dealbreaker. IQ is proven to correlate the most with income and levels of education.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

But this is false, back then astecs had high iq. If africans were high iq they would beat Europeans in the 1880, so iq is important

Not how it works buddy boyo nubians built pyramids and conquered Egypt for a brief period but the contemporary IQ tests put them at near retarded level IQ.

 

[TsarTsar444]

Not how it works buddy boyo nubians built pyramids and conquered Egypt for a brief period but the contemporary IQ tests put them at near retarded level IQ.

The Nubian pyramids are very small tho, and conquering doesn't necessarily require high iq. They conquered Egypt cause they were in a crisis and were too prosperous and that softened them. Vikings and Mongols were low iq but they mogged everyone cause they were high T

 

[Uglybrazilian]

IQ is important for intellectual and human development, Aztecs were not intellectually as advanced as the Nordic peoples. This is undoubtedly true, nords didn't live in prime climate to build great cities like Rome so instead small villages (that btw were way more architecturally advanced than Africans) were built. Inventions of the time were far greater in northern europe, however, aztecs had good materials, conditions and soil for some pyramids. but don't get it confused, northern Europeans had greater living conditions, a temple doesn't make my statement untrue. When europeans conquered incas and aztecs they thought that europeans were from the heavens because they were talking to white cloth, they were actually just reading a book jfl.

The aztecs were at least as advanced as the nordic people, their engineering achievements were so great that even the europeans were shocked at the majesty of their capital. They had a huge developed bureaucracy and more than this; they were completely isolated from any other great civilizations(unlike the nordics) and they developed their empire in around 100 years. 100 years. Their history is by far much more impressive, there is no doubt about that. Plus, the idea that aztecs believed that whites were Gods is not really legit jfl, that was invented by the spanish years after the conquest.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

But this is false, back then astecs had high iq. If africans were high iq they would beat Europeans in the 1880, so iq is important

So was most of the world dumb besides the BLACK Ethiopians who was the only nation on earth to preserve their Independence

 

[Deleted member 5802]

The Nubian pyramids are very small tho, and conquering doesn't necessarily require high iq. They conquered Egypt cause they were in a crisis and were too prosperous and that softened them. Vikings and Mongols were low iq but they mogged everyone cause they were high T

Those pyramids served a different purpose nubains built a lot of structures that were Roman level. Plus there was black Egypt rulers