Deleted member 14160
12 PSL
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2021
- Posts
- 7,264
- Reputation
- 22,086
It's brutal, but reality. Should be my doctoral thesis ngl.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Thank you. This dunce's arguments are so challenged I just stopped replying.High iq writing
It's brutal, but reality. Should be my doctoral thesis ngl.
SameUpdooted and commented
The study accounts for this too by looking at abrupt stoppages.You're falling for the typical fallacy that almost everyone seems to fall for. It's not only 5.9% (or whichever number these self proclaimed scientists are pulling out of their asses) of men that reproduced, it's just that their lines eventually died out and were replaced by those of more powerful men. This of course happened over an extremely long period of time and not in a single era, as they like to portray it.
The study accounts for this too by looking at abrupt stoppages.
Nigga, you think only 1/17 men lived after their teens or some shit? Obviiously there can be some variance. but stillSo? My point still stands. If men wouldn't have been exposed to so many extremely life threating hazards, genetic variety in the Y-lines would be much larger as well nowadays. On the flipside women were almost always guaranteed to reproduce by their gynocentric environment. This doesn't mean that women went "Chad only" as people like to portray it.
Nigga, you think only 1/17 men lived after their teens or some shit? Obviiously there can be some variance. but still
The article you linked misrepresents the study. IIRC, the assertion was that 40% of men reproduced.The study accounts for this too by looking at abrupt stoppages.
Oh I see what you mean, that could have influence too sorry I was juggling a LoL match while reading this. Remember though, that original guy you mentioned wouldn't just have a single great great great etc carrying on his legacy, he could have hundreds, it's exponential the more you go down in generations.You still don't get it. If they lived long enough they reproduced, but their great-great-great-great-grandson (or even way further) might have died in a war and that's the end of the line. Now the king with hundreds of descendants will pass on his line with the woman that the dead man would have impregnated.
Oh I see what you mean, that could have influence too sorry I was juggling a LoL match while reading this. Remember though, that original guy you mentioned wouldn't just have a single great great great etc carrying on his legacy, he could have hundreds, it's exponential the more you go down in generations.
Dn Rd article or study jflThe article you linked misrepresents the study. IIRC, the assertion was that 40% of men reproduced.
I would recommend just stop arguing with normies, their prefrontal cortex is damaged, according to them it's always a men fault.Thank you. This dunce's arguments are so challenged I just stopped replying.
View attachment 1375008
Yes I do believe this will force selective pressures on us, (depending on how long this stays the norm for dating), honestly we'll get selected for people who are good at taking photos and texting.
if the boiz don't have my back, then who will?I can't decide who's more soy. You coming here and begging for upvotes or the normies calling you incel.