Brahmin Indians are the only true aryans.

[Deleted member 15827]

 

[Deleted member 15827]

daily bump

 

[Deleted member 23558]

@inferiorpispot234 remember this

 

[Deleted member 16275]

@inferiorpispot234 remember this

Brahmin Boss wylad had sfcels in chains

 

[Deleted member 13787]

extreme cope thread
aryan = blonde, blue eyes, nordic, extremely pale complexion

 

[dimorphism]

Aryan = light brown skin, brown eyes, dark hair.
Non-aryan = pink skinned cuckolds
Only us brahmins are aryans all whites are pink skinned cuckolds.
View attachment 1738803
View attachment 1738808

Fake charts
Blondism dn exist in farmers
And the aryans were not WHOLLY blond.

 

[Deleted member 16371]

There’s a good thread on SF basically all whites are aryans punjabis are not aryan they just retained the name but got aryan genes bread out by Indians.

Ireland literally means land of aryans

That makes a lot of sense why Irish have green eyes and red hair (aryan colouring) they might actually be aryans same as me @TRUE_CEL

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Fake charts
Blondism dn exist in farmers
And the aryans were not WHOLLY blond.

theres a widespread movement of very manevolent people spreading fake charts like OP's, produced by unreliable sources such as genetiker.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Ireland literally means land of aryans

Jfl no. Stop spreading fake news

The names Ireland and Éire derive from Old Irish Ériu, a goddess in Irish mythology first recorded in the ninth century. The etymology of Ériu is disputed but may derive from the Proto-Indo-European root *h2uer, referring to flowing water.

 

[loksr]

A few things
1. Hitler and those guys never actually gave a shit about these ideas, they were just gassing up (no pun intended) the german population to make them easier to control. (Convince someone they’re special and they’ll do whatever you want. Cults and conmen use that strat every day, even in modern times.)

2. The original guy to come up with the idea of germans and shit being “aryans” was never actually talking about real aryans. He had just read some neat little stories about a bunch of arabs who called themselves “aryans,” thought they were pretty cool, and decided to self-instert as them in his little fanfiction to feel like a badass.

None of it ever meant anything. Stop obsessing over this shit you’re still an incel regardless

 

[Deleted member 23558]

A few things
1. Hitler and those guys never actually gave a shit about these ideas, they were just gassing up (no pun intended) the german population to make them easier to control. (Convince someone they’re special and they’ll do whatever you want. Cults and conmen use that strat every day, even in modern times.)

2. The original guy to come up with the idea of germans and shit being “aryans” was never actually talking about real aryans. He had just read some neat little stories about a bunch of arabs who called themselves “aryans,” thought they were pretty cool, and decided to self-instert as them in his little fanfiction to feel like a badass.

None of it ever meant anything. Stop obsessing over this shit you’re still an incel regardless

Nah the use of the term Aryan to denote racial superiority and fanciful romanticism has been in play since the 18 th century. It’s just that it became popularised when hitler used it to control the masses. The first time it was historically used was when Sanskrit was thought to be the progenitor of Latin ,greek and other modern IE languages and India was thus thought to be the land of the Aryans ( a la Brahmins). This then led to Europe becoming the crucible for the famous Indophilia of the 19 th century and many out of india theories of Aryan dominance ( as Europe was recovering from the conflict between Hebrew chronology and modern science leading to a crisis in identity which could be resolved by the Upanishads and other Indo Aryan texts which were much more in line with the rational science of the era) before scholars discovered many discrepancies in the original PIE and Sanskrit and realised Sanskrit wasn’t the linguistic heir of PIE as once thought( the history behind this is also a very interesting lesson in semantics and phonology ). Nevertheless the original Indo Aryan speakers settled in northwest Punjab and slowly intermixed with the rest of the subcontinent with Brahmins being the least intermixed; or atleast that’s the current historical version.

@inferiorpispot234

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Nah the use of the term Aryan to denote racial superiority and fanciful romanticism has been in play since the 18 th century. It’s just that it became popularised when hitler used it to control the masses. The first time it was historically used was when Sanskrit was thought to be the progenitor of Latin ,greek and other modern IE languages and India was thus thought to be the land of the Aryans ( a la Brahmins). This then led to Europe becoming the crucible for the famous Indophilia of the 19 th century and many out of india theories of Aryan dominance ( as Europe was recovering from the conflict between Hebrew chronology and modern science leading to a crisis in identity which could be resolved by the Upanishads and other Indo Aryan texts which were much more in line with the rational science of the era) before scholars discovered many discrepancies in the original PIE and Sanskrit and realised Sanskrit wasn’t the linguistic heir of PIE as once thought( the history behind this is also a very interesting lesson in semantics and phonology ). Nevertheless the original Indo Aryan speakers settled in northwest Punjab and slowly intermixed with the rest of the subcontinent with Brahmins being the least intermixed; or atleast that’s the current historical version.

@inferiorpispot234

Nietzsche was against caste system imo

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Brahmins being the least intermixed; or atleast that’s the current historical version

for south brahmins this is somewhat cope imo, we're noticeably more dravidian than north brahmins and jats
i think im perfectly 50/50 bw dravidian and aryan

 

[Deleted member 23558]

for south brahmins this is somewhat cope imo, we're noticeably more dravidian than north brahmins and jats
i think im perfectly 50/50 bw dravidian and aryan

doesnt explain why southern brahmin women are as white/whiter than punjabi women in some cases and southern brahmin men are the highest ethnic group in IQ in the world on par with ashkenazi jews. Former is probably selection pressure and latter is due to steppe admixture not being that different from northern brahms , only the nose is a dead giveaway of onge in south brahmins imo and ofc the part iranian neolithic plays is different even amongst gotras.

 

[Deleted member 16275]

doesnt explain why southern brahmin women are as white/whiter than punjabi women in some cases and southern brahmin men are the highest ethnic group in IQ in the world on par with ashkenazi jews. Former is probably selection pressure and latter is due to steppe admixture not being that different from northern brahms , only the nose is a dead giveaway of onge in south brahmins imo and ofc the part iranian neolithic plays is different even amongst gotras.

its just skin color, features are all dead giveaways

south brahmins are all raised to be khhv studycels

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Nietzsche was against caste system imo

@BrahminBoss thots nigga?

 

[Deleted member 23558]

@BrahminBoss thots nigga?

no he admired it

Nietzsche claimed that the Hindu caste system is the warranting of an order of nature (Nietzsche, 2003a: p. 189) and it can be argued that the caste system is linked to humanity’s biological structure. This is particularly so because the word varna translates to ‘colour’, which has subsequently led many to speculate that the division of classes was originally due to the distinction between skin complexions (Rodrigues, 2006). The brahmins, the kshatriyas and the vaishyas are known as ‘twice-born’ (or dvija) and are able to enjoy privileges not accessible to the shudras and the chandalas. This is purely based on the lightness of their skin complexion. The theory that the Hindu caste system is based on skin colour suggests that the brahmins viewed themselves as sharing a common descent with the Aryan race, who were descendants of the Caucasians and the original speakers of Indo-European languages (Jha, 2015). Additionally, this theory also proposes that the upper three varnas were the light-skinned Aryan colonisers of the Indian subcontinent who subordinated the darker-skinned (also known as the ‘Dravidians’) and downgraded them into a servant class (Rodrigues, 2006). Moreover, the Laws of Manu strictly promote marriage within one’s own varna, which suggests an effort to prevent a mixture of race. For example, “for all husbands, a woman of his own (class), and never a woman of another caste, should care for his body and perform the obligatory daily duties” (Manu 9.86). This explains, perhaps, the existence of the ‘untouchables’ because people have mixed with a varna other than their own. As the Hindu caste system was originally based on the lightness of skin complexion, it can be argued that the castes are based on race. In other words, the Hindu caste system is a racist social construct and, consequently, it is arguably a justification for racism. One cannot say for certain that Nietzsche knew that varna translates as ‘colour’; however, one can assume that if he did know, he simply overlooked it to fit his own agenda.

 

[Deleted member 16275]

no he admired it

Nietzsche claimed that the Hindu caste system is the warranting of an order of nature (Nietzsche, 2003a: p. 189) and it can be argued that the caste system is linked to humanity’s biological structure. This is particularly so because the word varna translates to ‘colour’, which has subsequently led many to speculate that the division of classes was originally due to the distinction between skin complexions (Rodrigues, 2006). The brahmins, the kshatriyas and the vaishyas are known as ‘twice-born’ (or dvija) and are able to enjoy privileges not accessible to the shudras and the chandalas. This is purely based on the lightness of their skin complexion. The theory that the Hindu caste system is based on skin colour suggests that the brahmins viewed themselves as sharing a common descent with the Aryan race, who were descendants of the Caucasians and the original speakers of Indo-European languages (Jha, 2015). Additionally, this theory also proposes that the upper three varnas were the light-skinned Aryan colonisers of the Indian subcontinent who subordinated the darker-skinned (also known as the ‘Dravidians’) and downgraded them into a servant class (Rodrigues, 2006). Moreover, the Laws of Manu strictly promote marriage within one’s own varna, which suggests an effort to prevent a mixture of race. For example, “for all husbands, a woman of his own (class), and never a woman of another caste, should care for his body and perform the obligatory daily duties” (Manu 9.86). This explains, perhaps, the existence of the ‘untouchables’ because people have mixed with a varna other than their own. As the Hindu caste system was originally based on the lightness of skin complexion, it can be argued that the castes are based on race. In other words, the Hindu caste system is a racist social construct and, consequently, it is arguably a justification for racism. One cannot say for certain that Nietzsche knew that varna translates as ‘colour’; however, one can assume that if he did know, he simply overlooked it to fit his own agenda.

No he mockingly called the advocates of the caste system "improooovers of mankind" in HOTH. He's using it as an example to critique master morality. He says it proves the concept pure blood is the reverse of harmless. I think that's in the anti christ. Why would someone who's all for individuality advocate for oppression? he believed that individuals should be evaluated based on their abilities and potential, rather than their social status or background. In his view, society should recognize and cultivate the potential for greatness in each individual, rather than imposing rigid social hierarchies that limit human potential.

thots

 

[loksr]

Nah the use of the term Aryan to denote racial superiority and fanciful romanticism has been in play since the 18 th century. It’s just that it became popularised when hitler used it to control the masses. The first time it was historically used was when Sanskrit was thought to be the progenitor of Latin ,greek and other modern IE languages and India was thus thought to be the land of the Aryans ( a la Brahmins). This then led to Europe becoming the crucible for the famous Indophilia of the 19 th century and many out of india theories of Aryan dominance ( as Europe was recovering from the conflict between Hebrew chronology and modern science leading to a crisis in identity which could be resolved by the Upanishads and other Indo Aryan texts which were much more in line with the rational science of the era) before scholars discovered many discrepancies in the original PIE and Sanskrit and realised Sanskrit wasn’t the linguistic heir of PIE as once thought( the history behind this is also a very interesting lesson in semantics and phonology ). Nevertheless the original Indo Aryan speakers settled in northwest Punjab and slowly intermixed with the rest of the subcontinent with Brahmins being the least intermixed; or atleast that’s the current historical version.

@inferiorpispot234

Arthur de Gobineau - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

I was referring to this guy when I was talking about self insert fan fiction, not to hitler

“Gobineau's primary thesis was that European civilization flowed from Greece to Rome, and then to Germanic and contemporary civilization. He thought this corresponded to the ancient Indo-Europeanculture, which earlier anthropologists had misconceived as "Aryan"—a term that only Indo-Iranians are known to have used in ancient times.[57]This included groups classified by language like the Celts, Slavs and the Germans.[58][59] Gobineau later came to use and reserve the term Aryan only for the "Germanic race", and described the Aryans as la race germanique.[60] By doing so, he presented a racist theory in which Aryans—that is Germanic people—were all that was positive.[61]”

“Gobineau loved Oriental tales by the French translator Antoine Galland, often saying he wanted to become an Orientalist. He read Arab, Turkish and Persian tales ...”

 

[currylightskin]

doesnt explain why southern brahmin women are as white/whiter than punjabi women in some cases and southern brahmin men are the highest ethnic group in IQ in the world on par with ashkenazi jews. Former is probably selection pressure and latter is due to steppe admixture not being that different from northern brahms , only the nose is a dead giveaway of onge in south brahmins imo and ofc the part iranian neolithic plays is different even amongst gotras.

Dravidians mog dnrd yakhi

 

[RecessedChinCel]

Bump

 

[horizontallytall]

Why normal brahmins look so different compared to sikhs and jatts ? @BrahminBoss