ICXCLuvr
Luminary
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2023
- Posts
- 8,655
- Reputation
- 12,043
- OP
- #51
Her eye shape isn't even high for a woman there btw. That's easily a 1:2 width to heigh


Looks like a Drag queen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Her eye shape isn't even high for a woman there btw. That's easily a 1:2 width to heigh


Notice how the question is if she's above average. So we can just move to another argument.
She’s a white woman, so juggernaut law was applied heavily for her. Same thing happens for average looking female celebrities TODAYIs it more likely that an above person or an average to below average person in looks a famous actor / actress and a sex symbol?
Evb agrees she’s masculine looking besides you my guy.Also that was a HUGE blunder it's crazy. A lower height to width is more masculine, a higher height to width is more feminine. This whole time you've been arguing the latter which would be more feminizing.
Well (a) that wouldn't work because it's a probabilistic argument and (b) I don't agree she's average either. And you certainly haven't proven that.She’s a white woman, so juggernaut law was applied heavily for her. Same thing happens for average looking female celebrities TODAY
Inde narvarttte or whatever is a great example. Objectively a woman can be average but can still be treated like a Stacy by millions of men. So it’s not a good argument

Where do you rank her. What percentile and what label because I have to hear this.I don't agree she's average either. And you certainly haven't proven that.
HTB, probably 95th percentileWhere do you rank her. What percentile and what label because I have to hear this.