Brunettes fog blondes (whores) PROOF

SecularIslamist

SecularIslamist

𝕯𝖝𝕯 intersectional feminist and Islamist jihadi
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Posts
27,838
Reputation
55,755
Gwen Stefani (blonde version):

1688670100618

1688670116518

1688670160917


Looks like a used skank. Trashy. High tier LTB butter face. Fucks multiple men every week.

Gwen Stefani (Brunette):
1688670226254

1688670451341

1688670274634


Looks HQNP. High class. Staceylite. Commits to one man unconditionally.

I've seen LTBs turn into HTBs countless times.

Decisive Brunette victory!

Music video (exposing my age here a bit):
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7926, forevermirin, Nectar and 5 others
Excited Water Sports GIF
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer, ascension, Nectar and 6 others
looks same
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
I aint no holla back girl.
 
Blondes look like escorts. Brunettes are more ltr material
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PolisCommov, Trilogy, Roquefort and 4 others
Blondes look like escorts. Brunettes are more ltr material
That's like girls coping and saying they don't like chad because he just cheats while they prefer cuck who stays with them.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ascension and the BULL
That's like girls coping and saying they don't like chad because he just cheats while they prefer cuck who stays with them.
I Just said they have a different type of appeal
I love every colour of european girl but they have a different feeling. Gingers are like sexy witches, blondes are the High sex appeal sluts, and brunettes are the sweet angels
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21898
In pictures brunettes/black hair look better but irl an attractive blonde with long hair always catches my attention more. I guess cause it's less common?
 
This. Girls need dark looks especially on light skin as it is striking. Big brown doe eyes are such a halo for women. Nordic phenos look trashy tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: forevermirin and SecularIslamist
I guess cause it's less common?
Lighter eyes and hair are definitely halo.
Having rarer features is just better even if they don't confer any direct advantage.
 
  • +1
Reactions: popped
Lighter eyes and hair are definitely halo.
Having rarer features is just better even if they don't confer any direct advantage.
🥘 logic
 
  • +1
Reactions: forevermirin
Blondes just seem a tad boring to me.
 
In pictures brunettes/black hair look better but irl an attractive blonde with long hair always catches my attention more. I guess cause it's less common?
Depends on the country. Here in the Netherlands, a random blonde chick isn't catching more attention than a brunette by default.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Trilogy and the BULL
Ethnik cope. Blondes have trillion times more smv
 
Blue-eyed natural blondes > brunettes
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascension and TheTakeoverHasBegun
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PolisCommov, Deleted member 25198 and standardcel
Depends on the country. Here in the Netherlands, a random blonde chick isn't catching more attention than a brunette by default.

Blonde hair isn't super rare where I live either, but attractive brunettes are more common, so seeing an attractive blonde stands out more.

He's right though. The more ethnic and brown everyone gets, the more light features will unironically be put on a pedestal more. For both men and women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wallenberg
The ones from Italy France and germany though. Nordic blondes look like pigs
Natural blondes from Italy etc are rare. Nordic blondes are way more common and fog.
 
Ethnik cope. Blondes have trillion times more smv
because of stupid incels like you who tf cares about female smv anyway just fuck what looks good
 

Similar threads

catboy09
Replies
41
Views
238
Brava
Brava
catboy09
Replies
10
Views
102
bentley1045
bentley1045
bonemaxer
Replies
20
Views
121
HardStuckLTN;
HardStuckLTN;
catboy09
Replies
30
Views
155
rik
rik
pslturi
Replies
3
Views
67
iwannasleeponurlap
iwannasleeponurlap

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top