Brutal agepill

Im against guys going to jail for many years and going on the sex offenders list for just fucking a 14 yearold that clearly was not against it. Should be legal but discouraged by society.
you are basically just restating your core position: you think it should be legal. i know this, and disagree.
But they do it anyway. Teens are fucking like rabbits.
i was responding to the fact that you think kids shouldn’t be allowed to sign contracts even though they can read and write. you argued that 14 year olds should be able to fuck adults because their bodies are ready, so i could hypothetically argue that a kid should be allowed to sign a contract because they can read and write. explain how one of these should be allowed and the other shouldn’t, because i am just applying the exact same logic you used to a younger group.
Listen my main argument is that teens are doing it anyways.
“murder shouldn’t be illegal because people are gonna get killed anyways.”
“coercing people into signing contracts unlawfully should be legal because it would happen anyways.”
Its perfectly normal to be attracted to teens and want to fuck them.
just because a human has a desire to do something doesn’t mean they should be allowed to do it. i don’t know if you can tell, but you’re bouncing to many different arguments when one no longer benefits your position, and this should probably make you realize your reasons aren’t very good.
Also teen are going have sex with other teens if age of consent is 18. That means that all parties are irresponsible as fuck.
you are advocating for more irresponsibility and the possible manipulation of very young teens who aren’t good as decision making.
Would you rather A both parties are responsible Or B One party is responsible?
we are simply debating if teens under 18 should be able to fuck adults. i say no due to the fact they can be manipulated very easily and have their life fucked before it starts. i don’t think teens under 18 should even be fucking each other, but making it illegal would get into prosecuting minors, which i am heavily against due to cognitive-developmental reasons.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 11053
Were they called creeps just for hitting on them normally without acting like pervs or anything ?
Yeah just for hitting on them, flirting and trying to strike up conversation. They didn't get touched by them or them making dirty comments etc.

One time those 2 girls came to me in the club when I was on the other side and told me they were 'hiding from a creepy asian guy'. I asked what did he do? 'He keeps standing and dancing close to us and trying to talk'. I just caged tbh.

One of these sluts had a boyfriend she was cheating on. Cagefuel interacting with NT, social Beckies and their degen lives.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Growth Plate, Deleted member 2403 and Deleted member 7580
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 4430
Eh. I don't see the other guy. Clickbait. Ugh. All an act. Like most of that shit from China's communist app, tiktok. All acts.

But remember, girls are very passionate. This means, if a guy had done her wrong, includes daddy issues, she'll do whatever it takes to hurt other guys. It's just a girl thing. So today, it's mocking older guys that flirt with her. Tomorrow, perhaps she'll go with the BBC. "Black boys only" clickbait. Next week, she might be a lesbian. "Girls only." Ugh. Don't believe all that bullshit that comes from those apps. Those people are trying to make money. And whatever works, (drama, triggering, controversial, "look at me, I'm crying" etc), that's what they'll do.
 
I wish @personalityinkwell was here
 
Im totally okay with this.. It would be weird dating immature girl.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8576, Deleted member 2403, Deleted member 275 and 1 other person
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Growth Plate, Deleted member 2403 and Deleted member 6217
  • +1
Reactions: Growth Plate, Deleted member 2403 and Deleted member 275
  • JFL
Reactions: Growth Plate and Albeacho
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6217 and Deleted member 2403
you are basically just restating your core position: you think it should be legal. i know this, and disagree.

i was responding to the fact that you think kids shouldn’t be allowed to sign contracts even though they can read and write. you argued that 14 year olds should be able to fuck adults because their bodies are ready, so i could hypothetically argue that a kid should be allowed to sign a contract because they can read and write. explain how one of these should be allowed and the other shouldn’t, because i am just applying the exact same logic you used to a younger group.

“murder shouldn’t be illegal because people are gonna get killed anyways.”
“coercing people into signing contracts unlawfully should be legal because it would happen anyways.”

just because a human has a desire to do something doesn’t mean they should be allowed to do it. i don’t know if you can tell, but you’re bouncing to many different arguments when one no longer benefits your position, and this should probably make you realize your reasons aren’t very good.

you are advocating for more irresponsibility and the possible manipulation of very young teens who aren’t good as decision making.

we are simply debating if teens under 18 should be able to fuck adults. i say no due to the fact they can be manipulated very easily and have their life fucked before it starts. i don’t think teens under 18 should even be fucking each other, but making it illegal would get into prosecuting minors, which i am heavily against due to cognitive-developmental reasons.
Wait why teens shouldn't fuck each others?
 
Wait why teens shouldn't fuck each others?
because they’re insanely stupid and could end up fucking their lives over by fucking each other. it’s like asking “why can’t teens draft contacts and make each other sign them?”
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2403 and Deleted member 11053
tell you what, go try to find a guy who can wrinkle your brain a bit more so you can develop more neural connections, THEN respond.
dont be angry just because someone use your medicine on you
 
I don’t support any of the people in this thread saying age of consent should be raised

Im just saying agepill is brutal, not that older men shouldn’t be allowed to fuck young women
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6217
suicidefuel for @personalityinkwell
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Growth Plate and Deleted member 2403
Wait why teens shouldn't fuck each others?
because if the alleged reason for a guy in his mid 20s to not be able to have anything with a 18 year old is that "shes not able to consent/shes immature for those kind of things", but then the under mid 20s guy has a pass to do all of those mature things to her, then its not about protecting innocence or morality, but plain male ageism.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2403 and Deleted member 11053
dont be angry just because someone use your medicine on you
i’m not mad i’m just saying you don’t have the cognitive ability to understand what we are debating or what my post was about, because if you had you wouldn’t have made that post. i’m just recommending that you find someone who can put a few more wrinkles in your brain.
 
you are basically just restating your core position: you think it should be legal. i know this, and disagree.
Yes
i was responding to the fact that you think kids shouldn’t be allowed to sign contracts even though they can read and write. you argued that 14 year olds should be able to fuck adults because their bodies are ready, so i could hypothetically argue that a kid should be allowed to sign a contract because they can read and write. explain how one of these should be allowed and the other shouldn’t, because i am just applying the exact same logic you used to a younger group.
But sex is different to contracts. Sex is just a action we do to because of our sexual urges. Furthermore I don't what to say to change your mind.
“murder shouldn’t be illegal because people are gonna get killed anyways.”
“coercing people into signing contracts unlawfully should be legal because it would happen anyways.”
Again your comparing these with sex. Sex is so simple and a basic but is exaugurated in society Like hell.
just because a human has a desire to do something doesn’t mean they should be allowed to do it. i don’t know if you can tell, but you’re bouncing to many different arguments when one no longer benefits your position, and this should probably make you realize your reasons aren’t very good.
Not sex its different, its a basic need after all. Have you had any debates with @personalityinkwell btw and how did it go?
we are simply debating if teens under 18 should be able to fuck adults. i say no due to the fact they can be manipulated very easily and have their life fucked before it starts. i don’t think teens under 18 should even be fucking each other, but making it illegal would get into prosecuting minors, which i am heavily against due to cognitive-developmental reasons.
It doesn't matter what you think, just look at the facts, They are indeed fucking. Law is not going to stop anyone, its just gonna make life harder for everyone. You also keep brining up manipulation. Nigga Its gonna happen anyway if law exists or not. I hope you understand where I am coming from.
 
Dunno, maybe cuz she resembles a child when she's caked up due to her tiny size.
She doesn’t even look young to me, looks petite but not youthful
 
because they’re insanely stupid and could end up fucking their lives over by fucking each other. it’s like asking “why can’t teens draft contacts and make each other sign them?”
At what age do you think you should be allowed to have sex?
 
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: Growth Plate, Deleted member 11053, Deleted member 2403 and 1 other person
not an agepill,dude probably was just unattractive to her and thats it.if the 30yo was this man she wouldnt care about his age
1615492072907
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Growth Plate, datboijj and Albeacho
The bases for this is the Jewish idea of age appropriate relationship and the idea that a men's dating preference changes with age IT DOESN'T
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2403 and Albeacho
The bases for this is the Jewish idea of age appropriate relationship and the idea that a men's dating preference changes with age IT DOESN'T
Any mf that says he is not attracted to teens is lying like a nigger got caught after selling crack
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3512, Zyros and Deleted member 2403
Just marry a russian jb from siberia jfl u autists
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2403 and Albeacho
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Growth Plate, Deleted member 5746, Albeacho and 1 other person
i’m not mad i’m just saying you don’t have the cognitive ability to understand what we are debating or what my post was about, because if you had you wouldn’t have made that post. i’m just recommending that you find someone who can put a few more wrinkles in your brain.
but I did not respond to your debate nor did not I read any of his or your contribution. I just pointed out the irony, which you took personally. dont play a other character, when you played different one until now.
 
Brb moving to Siberia and getting that Russian pussy. But I would perfer 14, maybe I can negotiate a deal with the parents or something.
It's 14 in Serbia, Macedonia, Italy, Hungary
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 3512 and Albeacho
AOC should be 21
I low-key think we would have a better society if that happened but how people are going to do to not fuck for this long bro ?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Growth Plate
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Growth Plate and Albeacho
Think of it like alcohol, why should teens be allowed to drink alcohol with each other, but not with adults

Imagine if alcohol consumption laws functioned like age of consent laws

Its illegal for ANYONE 18 AND UP to drink alcohol WITH ANYONE UNDER 18, but ANYONE UNDER 18 can drink alcohol with ANYONE UNDER 18 legally. Also ANYONE UNDER 18 who drinks alcohol with SOMEONE 18 AND UP cannot be punished, ONLY THE INDIVIDUAL WHO IS OF THE "LEGAL AGE" CAN BE PUNISHED

There should be a line drawn somewhere, i'd say somewhere from 13 to 16, where you are considered allowed to have sex with ANYONE. Romeo and Juliet laws are stupid as shit.

Also, "manipulation", is cope. All social interaction is manipulation, and a teenager can actually manipulate an adult. Think of the Nordic Model of prostitution, its illegal to buy the sex but not illegal to sell it. That's similar to how age of consent works. Young teens are actually allowed to pursue adults who have an urge to fuck teens, and there is no law against the teen doing this.
message from pinkchad @Original @Syobevoli
 
  • Woah
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Growth Plate, Deleted member 2403, Deleted member 8576 and 2 others
message from pinkchad @Original @Syobevoli
Also, "manipulation", is cope. All social interaction is manipulation, and a teenager can actually manipulate an adult. Think of the Nordic Model of prostitution, its illegal to buy the sex but not illegal to sell it. That's similar to how age of consent works. Young teens are actually allowed to pursue adults who have an urge to fuck teens, and there is no law against the teen doing this.

This is based as fuck and destroys anti jb law cucks
 
But sex is different to contracts. Sex is just a action we do to because of our sexual urges.
by having sex you are essentially agreeing that you could possibly impregnate or become pregnant. just like by signing a contract you are agreeing, most likely, that there are possible negative ramifications for your actions. you need to be able to know if you’re possibly going to get fucked over and have major parts of your life ruined (or maybe your entire life ruined). why not do what you can to protect young children/teens?
Again your comparing these with sex.
you were arguing that because something happens regardless of the law, it should be legal. i showed you how you were wrong with those examples.
Sex is so simple and a basic but is exaugurated in society Like hell.
i can easily argue that murder is simple and basic because humans have been doing it for like 300,000 years. as human beings killing is a natural desire, so let us kill people. your argument seems to be that sex is a super simple basic thing, which is very different from your previous arguments, but sex could possibly create an entire new person. it could mean a 14 year old has to become a mom. it could mean an adult coerces someone who is mentally deficient into having kids with them or some crazy shit.
Not sex its different, its a basic need after all.
i could use the “basic need” argument against you in many different ways.
Have you had any debates with @personalityinkwell btw and how did it go?
never debated him or ran into him ngl but when he comes back (if he does) i’ll get to him like i’ve gotten to many others.
Law is not going to stop anyone, its just gonna make life harder for everyone. You also keep brining up manipulation. Nigga Its gonna happen anyway if law exists or not.
once again, you are arguing for the non-existence of laws. laws exist to try to curb behavior. even though we can’t stop something putting a law in place means we can protect people from all kinds of things better than having no law at all. to no offense, this is the worst possible argument you could use and i think you see why.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 11053 and Albeacho

Similar threads

tomfromthesnow
Replies
42
Views
1K
tomfromthesnow
tomfromthesnow
ethnical
Replies
61
Views
2K
Part-Time Chad
Part-Time Chad
TrueNateJacobs
Replies
41
Views
2K
daiseee
daiseee
InanimatePragmatist
Replies
9
Views
513
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top