
wellthatsucks
asshole
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
- Posts
- 1,779
- Reputation
- 1,787
- OP
- #51
ah i see a decent amount of those. but theyre often not like actuall super wide just their ratio is good
Page 2 you get ratios
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
ah i see a decent amount of those. but theyre often not like actuall super wide just their ratio is good
hmm strange tbh. havent seen anyone except from a shoah i see a decent amount of those. but theyre often not like actuall super wide just their ratio is good
seriously? even ratios like 2.0?ah i see a decent amount of those. but theyre often not like actuall super wide just their ratio is good
uhmmmWith muscle his shoulders are already too wide for his hips. Ideal ratio is around 1.7 (1.6 is fine too), anything above 1.8 isn’t attractive to women anymore from what I read
he prob means fucking old 35+ roasties who sits on the forums like that all day long and boost their egoPrime you mean 16-18 yo?
What da fuck is so hard to understand women want menhe prob means fucking old 35+ roasties who sits on the forums like that all day long and boost their ego
keep coping with ur ogre faceWhat da fuck is so hard to understand women want men
. it just STARTS to look wide at 1.8.With muscle his shoulders are already too wide for his hips. Ideal ratio is around 1.7 (1.6 is fine too), anything above 1.8 isn’t attractive to women anymore from what I read
so what? you’re such a height coper.178 cm
No way? What have they said about himCope. I know jb girls that think he looks cute.
What? His frame is good it's just not top 1/10000 shoulder width like the other guy. I've never seen someone like that in real life ever.
uhmmm
idk about that bro
I’ll try to find a study on this but apparently the ideal is around 1.62. it just STARTS to look wide at 1.8.
there is no limit the wider the better shoulders compared to hips.
One thread doesn't mean shit.I linked the thread. No cherry picking, far from half
it isnt. thats copeI’ll try to find a study on this but apparently the ideal is around 1.62
this is like you telling me 5'10" is more ideal than 6'4"I’ll try to find a study on this but apparently the ideal is around 1.62
Ofc you will have women lust for him. Low e girls who still haven't mentally passed.puberty will lust for twinks but the whole point of this thread is to show Chico isn't all of what this place jerks off tooOne thread doesn't mean shit.
He was the god of wattpad for all of the early 2010s. Also all the females on youtube are lusting after him. Jfl at this autistic cherrypick.
Harmony > dimoprhic traits
But he is? Any women on an online forum is likely an old roastie. And why do you say women on youtube are low EOfc you will have women lust for him. Low e girls who still haven't mentally passed.puberty will lust for twinks but the whole point of this thread is to show Chico isn't all of what this place jerks off too
Idk about you but in the Balkans but high fwhrs with hooded eyes with wide frames slay the mostNever listen to what women SAY, this is redpill 101 guys
BUT
Also it's hard for PSLers to understand that real women with real circulating estrogen and emotions flowing through their body determine what is sexually appealing, not basement posters on an obscure looks theory site in the corners of the net. (Or homosexual deviant modeling scouts)
You are cherrypicking because you ignored the several smash responses. Good looking men are posted there all the time and none of them get a unanimous "smash " response unless the thread has like 3 replies. Women are picky as fuck especially on that site you linked.I linked the thread. No cherry picking, far from half
There were like 4 positive responsesYou are cherrypicking because you ignored the several smash responses. Good looking men are posted there all the time and none of them get a unanimous "smash " response unless the thread has like 3 replies. Women are picky as fuck especially on that site you linked.
Calls me 0 IQ but doesn't even understand sexual selectionBut he is? Any women on an online forum is likely an old roastie. And why do you say women on youtube are low E
0 IQ fag. Rope asap.
I counted way more than 4 that said "smash".There were like 4 positive responses
The idea was to show why they passed
OP's point isnt that chico isnt extremely attractive, its just how much this website worships him, its funny seeing how women arent going crazy about him and pointing out flaws etc. not like any of them will say "no" in real life scenario obviouslyI counted way more than 4 that said "smash".
Faggot, you are low IQ for thinking 10 foids opinions that are not of prime agea matter more than literally thousands of prime females.Calls me 0 IQ but doesn't even understand sexual selection
Let me ask you do this. Are you attracted to 6'3 females with a 21 inch bideltoid?
It's like people think I'm calling Chico an incelOP's point isnt that chico isnt extremely attractive, its just how much this website worships him, its funny seeing how women arent going crazy about him and pointing out flaws etc. not like any of them will say "no" in real life scenario obviously
its just a perspective
Isn’t this site full of black women?
Faggot, you are low IQ for thinking 10 foids opinions that are not of prime agea matter more than literally thousands of prime females.
Just lol at your pitifully autitic coping. Rope right now faggot.
Case closed. He is considered very attractive.
this website just always think in extremes with every subjectIt's like people think I'm calling Chico an incel
I've asked girls in real life. They all say he is attractiveNever listen to what women SAY, this is redpill 101 guys
BUT
Also it's hard for PSLers to understand that real women with real circulating estrogen and emotions flowing through their body determine what is sexually appealing, not basement posters on an obscure looks theory site in the corners of the net. (Or homosexual deviant modeling scouts)
thing about chico is.But he is? Any women on an online forum is likely an old roastie. And why do you say women on youtube are low E
0 IQ fag. Rope asap.
Giga cope. E levels have no relationship with atttraction to T levels.thing about chico is.
if a girl prefers chico over some maesthetic chad they are probably low e
I'll ask you again. Are you attracted to tall and wde framed women? Why not?Giga cope
Not really, that’s like saying that the wider the jaw is compared to the bizygomatic width the better even though this obviously isn’t the casethis is like you telling me 5'10" is more ideal than 6'4"
Chico is not low testosterone. Jfl at your autism. Harmony > dimoprhic traits.jfl .
low testosterone cope
it slays the most everywhere. fags dont realise ltr is different from fucking hard no condomIdk about you but in the Balkans but high fwhrs with hooded eyes with wide frames slay the most
Lol how are you so sure? You’re just certain of it by “knowing” that it’s how you think it is with no evidence?it isnt. thats cope
they say that because its close to the cope ratio
cope with harmony all you fucking want chico is atractive to these women because they are functionning normally.Chico is not low testosterone. Jfl at your autism. Harmony > dimoprhic traits.
@cocainecowboy basically just said it.Lol how are you so sure? You’re just certain of it by “knowing” that it’s how you think it is with no evidence?
You're coping extremely hard faggot. All that matters is PSL rating. He's already maxxed out on it. He will get just as far as someone with more dimorphic features.cope with harmony all you fucking want chico is atractive to these women because they are functionning normally.
but they are nowhere near gonna place him on the same point as some maesthetic chad
David laid is 2.0. This is idealI’ll try to find a study on this but apparently the ideal is around 1.62
How do you know he wouldn’t be more attractive with a lower ratio?David laid is 2.0. This is ideal
Guess what... Dimoprhism is what makes the brain differentiate male from female.Chico is not low testosterone. Jfl at your autism. Harmony > dimoprhic traits.
Cocainecowboy is high IQ but he made an error with that analogy. You’re basically saying that as long as it’s better to generally have a higher ratio of something, there is no upper limit to itcope with harmony all you fucking want chico is atractive to these women because they are functionning normally.
but they are nowhere near gonna place him on the same point as some maesthetic chad
@cocainecowboy basically just said it.
its like you telling me 5 foot 11 is better than 6 foot 4