BRUTAL, the ultimate and first (baby) blackpill

[PsychoH]

A fact: babies can die of lack of touch.

Spoiler

i feel the same.

If the kids born ugly he can basically die of not getting touched enough.
The first blackpill you experience the second you're born already.
@lestoa @Debetro @Numb The Pain @DR. NICKGA @BigJimsWornOutTires

 

[PsychoH]

Touch for the human baby serves both physical and emotional functions. Somatic stimulation begins in labor when uterine contractions activate principal organ systems of the fetus. Human babies actually die from lack of touch.

Insane shit.

 

[fashioncel]

That only happens to soy Babies

 

[alurmo]

 

[PsychoH]

whats this mean bud?

 

[Qhrack]

what if I dont want any jits

 

[brownmutt42]

I wish none touched me as a baby

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

nice try diddy

 

[PsychoH]

what if I dont want any jits

shouldnt have nutted then in the first place.

I wish none touched me as a baby

amen.

 

[REGULUS]

whats this mean bud?

former bird member has some secrets to tell you frfr, you should dive deeper into such messages~

 

[PsychoH]

nice try diddy

babies can suffer severe consequences—even death—from a lack of touch. This is sometimes referred to as "failure to thrive" or hospitalism in extreme cases.

 

[PsychoH]

former bird member has some secrets to tell you frfr, you should dive deeper into such messages~

quit yapping.

 

[PsychoH]

How Lack of Touch Can Be Fatal:​

1. Failure to Thrive (FTT) – Babies who are not held, cuddled, or physically comforted may stop eating, lose weight, and fail to develop properly.
2. Weakened Immune System – Physical touch helps regulate stress hormones like cortisol. Chronic stress from lack of affection can weaken the immune system, making babies more susceptible to infections.
3. Emotional and Neurological Damage – Studies on orphanages (e.g., in Romania) showed that babies deprived of touch and affection had smaller brains, cognitive delays, and higher mortality rates.
4. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) Risk – While not directly caused by lack of touch, babies who don’t receive responsive caregiving may have disrupted sleep patterns or irregular physiological responses.

nahh that shit is made by the devil.

 

[PsychoH]

@NumbThePain @org3cel.RR @gymcel64 en @NorwoodAscender en we zijn er weer.

 

[PsychoH]

@asdvek

 

[DR. NICKGA]

Brutal

former bird member has some secrets to tell you frfr, you should dive deeper into such messages~

I think he is just autistic

 

[Gengar]

It’s less about a lack of touch and more about a lack of affection. It could and has been used as an argument against inceldom; that people require affection, and that inceldom is morally reprehensible and ought to be tackled by the state (government-sponsored girlfriends). But eh, I don’t necessarily agree. I think adults can live without affection (just look at me!!!), and that is only an argument for those who haven’t reached adulthood or even adolescence.