Buddhism=submission

why are you so retarded piece of disgusting shit, you literally have sub-animal iq if you think that being inspired means something in this context. Nietzsche was inspired by Plato but what does it mean here? are they the same? JUST FUCKIGN LOL
scientism is low iq, this shit can't even prove it's self
nigga inspiration is a spectrum and epicurus borrowed heavily from democritus his entire theory of free will is copy of democritus unlike nietzsche.
ans scientism is the best thing ever.
 
no, because i dont research it because it is a waste of time, i dont need to read books to realize i should want well being
you don't want it because desire leads you to something else, desire owns you, slave
 
  • JFL
Reactions: unstable
you don't want it because desire leads you to something else, desire owns you, slave
desire owns u too, u r just delusional and think it doesnt, desire leads u to philosophy because philosophy brings u pleasure
 
desire owns u too, u r just delusional and think it doesnt, desire leads u to philosophy because philosophy brings u pleasure
do you have access to my consciousness to make such claims?
 
i understand how a brain works and u dont
why do you think that brain and consciousness are the same substance? couldn't they be independent?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: unstable
why do you think that brain and consciousness are the same substance? couldn't they be independent?
do you believe in science
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Edelweiss
why do you think that brain and consciousness are the same substance? couldn't they be independent?
consciousness is controlled by brain activity
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bars, unstable and theRetard
50/50.
science doesn't disprove dualism nor panpsychism btw, not even idealistic monism
lets leave the other stuff out but doesn't science posit that human reasoning and rationality arise from brain, this is why we are rational and others are not?
 
  • +1
Reactions: theRetard
lets leave the other stuff out but doesn't science posit that human reasoning and rationality arise from brain, this is why we are rational and others are not?
science can't even explain what reason is, it is beyond empirical things
no, i hit u super hard in the head, ur brain stops working and u go unconscious
it's my conscious stops working and after that brain stops too
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: unstable
science can't even explain what reason is, it is beyond empirical things

it's my conscious stops working and after that brain stops too
reason is ability to make conclusions from given information right?
 
  • +1
Reactions: theRetard
Buddhism isn't bad if you have nothing else in life.

Imagine you are some poor midget, ugly, no skills and dire future prospects. What do you do? You could practice Buddhism, it's the only logical way to lead your life.
its pretty hard to imagine a succesful, tall, attractive, rich guy who's a buddhist
aside from steve jobs i guess
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars and SplashJuice
science can't even explain what reason is, it is beyond empirical things

it's my conscious stops working and after that brain stops too
no nigga, because conscious isnt physical, so the injury has to be caused to the brain
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
its pretty hard to imagine a succesful, tall, attractive, rich guy who's a buddhist
aside from steve jobs i guess
Yup, they don't need it. Why detach from the world if it meets most of your needs
 
  • +1
Reactions: gunrenaissance
reason is ability to make conclusions from given information right?
more like it's an ability to abstract thought
no nigga, because conscious isnt physical, so the injury has to be caused to the brain
not necessary:what:
maybe it's by injury conscious stops and then brain activity stops
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: unstable
more like it's an ability to abstract thought

not necessary:what:
maybe it's by injury conscious stops and then brain activity stops
what is abstract
science hasn't found consciousness yet, we only know brain activity so consciousness could very well not exist imo.

can you disprove science.
 
what is abstract
science hasn't found consciousness yet, we only know brain activity so consciousness could very well not exist imo.

can you disprove science.
how are you able to think something if consciousness doesn't exist:lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
how are you able to think something if consciousness doesn't exist:lul::lul::lul:
i think as i have brain acitvity which makes conclusions on previous information.
 
how does brain activity become though
brain activity becomes when brain uses energy to fire some neurons who based use previous information to influence these signals and produce a coherent result.
 
brain activity becomes when brain uses energy to fire some neurons who based use previous information to influence these signals and produce a coherent result.
so how do you explain qualia? and thought cannot exist according to this view because it has conscious predicate
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
so how do you explain qualia? and thought cannot exist according to this view because it has conscious predicate
hmm, psychoanalysis:hnghn:
qualia result of sensory perceptions adding more information to brain and its neurons.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: theRetard
hmm, psychoanalysis:hnghn:
qualia result of sensory perceptions adding more information to brain and its neurons.
so if qualia exists then consciousness exists
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
I think you have a very weird understating of what Buddhism is
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
Buddhism is law - you just need to combine it with martial arts and fighting techniques.
 
how i just proved qualia is brain activity.
qualia is inner feeling rather than sensory perception. your physicalist view doesn't explain perception as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
qualia is inner feeling rather than sensory perception. your physicalist view doesn't explain perception as well
yeah inner feeling when brain processes sensory data and releases chemicals.
humans have been given serotonin and which made them happier, so this proves that inner feelings are made by brain activity too.
 
yeah inner feeling when brain processes sensory data and releases chemicals.
humans have been given serotonin and which made them happier, so this proves that inner feelings are made by brain activity too.
how chemicals become inner feeling?
 
This thread if you give it enough time and effort
1000156723
 
so you can't explain how they turn into inner feeling
there are no feeling it is the result of interaction between chemicals and neurons which proven by the fact that we can manipulate feelings by injecting chemicals.
 
if it was like this then there wouldn't be weak and unattractive beings, learn how evolution works
Yes nigga they only exist because everyone is subhuman next to me and ninja and ig you
 
  • +1
Reactions: NinjaRG9
there are no feeling it is the result of interaction between chemicals and neurons which proven by the fact that we can manipulate feelings by injecting chemicals.
even if they are connected, it doesn't explain how chemicals turn into qualia
Yes nigga they only exist because everyone is subhuman next to me and ninja and ig you
"i'm so edgy"
 
even if they are connected, it doesn't explain how chemicals turn into qualia

"i'm so edgy"
chemicals don't turn into qualia, their interaction gives an illusion of qualia.
 
not possible since we can prove one causes other and not the other way around.
but if qualia is an interaction of chemicals then it turns into determinism, and in determinism you can't make truth claims cuz what you said is determined by chemicals so it's not aimed at truth.
and you still didn't explain how chemicals turn into qualia and conscious btw (it's impossible btw because physicalism is wrong)
 
but if qualia is an interaction of chemicals then it turns into determinism, and in determinism you can't make truth claims cuz what you said is determined by chemicals so it's not aimed at truth.
and you still didn't explain how chemicals turn into qualia and conscious btw (it's impossible btw because physicalism is wrong)
explain how you can't make truth claims on determinism, humans use physics to develop our sciences which posits that universe is deterministic.
chemicals are not qualia their interactions result in a illusion of it both of them are illusions caused by brain activity.
physicalism is right.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top