Butterfly, Spider, or both?

[greycel]

Should your actions be motivated by what is feasible or your good will?​

Spoiler: If you picked: Both

You’re an idealist.
You want to survive, because you value good will.

But is it worth to prioritise your good will, knowing you’re contributing more to suffering?
If he tried to save everything in the world, every entity would end up dying.
So is prioritising your good will selfish?
You’ll feel you did the right thing at everybody’s loss

Spoiler: If you picked: 🦋

You’re a realist.
You want the to live, because you understand the importance of feasibility.

Only one gets to live.
But why should the get to live, and the must die. A is equally as innocent as the .
Both didn’t get to choose how they started in life, but the deserves punishment because us “judges” decided it was worse. Why is it worse?
Because it was born a predator?

Spoiler: If you picked: 🕷️

You’re an observer.
You might want to save both, but you end up doing nothing, so the lives.

You don’t fight the equilibrium of nature. Although it does come with the hefty guilt.
But at what point do you switch from your role of being an observer?

Most normies would pick the
Could it have to do with being the prey in a predator-prey dynamic, or is the idea of beauty involved ( ):

Well, to test this we’ll have to see examples where the predator is more beautiful than the prey.
I’m going to be making a thread on this with many examples, let me know if you’d like to be tagged

 

[NorwoodAscender]

idk but a spider crawled on me last night in bed and i screamed like a little girl tbh

 

[PeakIncels]

amazing thread

 

[halo500]

The lion

 

[coolio]

idk but a spider crawled on me last night in bed and i screamed like a little girl tbh

i think its important to let you know that i reacted to this while eating spoonfuls of peanut butter

 

[NorwoodAscender]

i think its important to let you know that i reacted to this while eating spoonfuls of peanut butter

hell yeah.

 

[emeraldglass]

Should your actions be motivated by what is feasible or your good will?​

Spoiler: If you picked: Both

You’re an idealist.
You want to survive, because you value good will.

But is it worth to prioritise your good will, knowing you’re contributing more to suffering?
If he tried to save everything in the world, every entity would end up dying.
So is prioritising your good will selfish?
You’ll feel you did the right thing at everybody’s loss

Spoiler: If you picked: 🦋

You’re a realist.
You want the to live, because you understand the importance of feasibility.

Only one gets to live.
But why should the get to live, and the must die. A is equally as innocent as the .
Both didn’t get to choose how they started in life, but the deserves punishment because us “judges” decided it was worse. Why is it worse?
Because it was born a predator?

Spoiler: If you picked: 🕷️

You’re an observer.
You might want to save both, but you end up doing nothing, so the lives.

You don’t fight the equilibrium of nature. Although it does come with the hefty guilt.
But at what point do you switch from your role of being an observer?

Most normies would pick the
Could it have to do with being the prey in a predator-prey dynamic, or is the idea of beauty involved ( ):
View attachment 3755298
View attachment 3755302

Well, to test this we’ll have to see examples where the predator is more beautiful than the prey.
I’m going to be making a thread on this with many examples, let me know if you’d like to be tagged

Spider needs to die, because lookism and spider is ugly.

 

[Gs.]

Fuck butterflies, they do nothing except bum around

spiders are the superior hard workers of nature, they kill bugs and pests on our houses and dont ask anything

If you chose the butterfly:
youre a pussy
KYS

 

[greycel]

Spider needs to die, because lookism and spider is ugly.

Can you put your vote in
It’s interesting the split is pretty equal

 

[emeraldglass]

Fuck butterflies, they do nothing except bum around

spiders are the superior hard workers of nature, they kill bugs and pests on our houses and dont ask anything

If you chose the butterfly:
youre a pussy
KYS

Butterflies looksmax since birth and go from ugly to beautiful. Spider builds a home and gets eaten and cucked by his wife after pregnancy.

 

[TheLightOfMyLife]

Instinctively, I want to protect the butterfly. I care more about things that are soft and more feminine. Violence and competition scares me. I empathize deeply with those who can’t fight for themselves because I often feel weak and helpless myself.

 

[Gs.]

Butterflies looksmax since birth and go from ugly to beautiful. Spider builds a home and gets eaten and cucked by his wife after pregnancy.

The spider will never give up

 

[TheLightOfMyLife]

Should your actions be motivated by what is feasible or your good will?​

Spoiler: If you picked: Both

You’re an idealist.
You want to survive, because you value good will.

But is it worth to prioritise your good will, knowing you’re contributing more to suffering?
If he tried to save everything in the world, every entity would end up dying.
So is prioritising your good will selfish?
You’ll feel you did the right thing at everybody’s loss

Spoiler: If you picked: 🦋

You’re a realist.
You want the to live, because you understand the importance of feasibility.

Only one gets to live.
But why should the get to live, and the must die. A is equally as innocent as the .
Both didn’t get to choose how they started in life, but the deserves punishment because us “judges” decided it was worse. Why is it worse?
Because it was born a predator?

Spoiler: If you picked: 🕷️

You’re an observer.
You might want to save both, but you end up doing nothing, so the lives.

You don’t fight the equilibrium of nature. Although it does come with the hefty guilt.
But at what point do you switch from your role of being an observer?

Most normies would pick the
Could it have to do with being the prey in a predator-prey dynamic, or is the idea of beauty involved ( ):
View attachment 3755298
View attachment 3755302

Well, to test this we’ll have to see examples where the predator is more beautiful than the prey.
I’m going to be making a thread on this with many examples, let me know if you’d like to be tagged

btw tag me

 

[greycel]

Instinctively, I want to protect the butterfly. I care more about things that are soft and more feminine. Violence and competition scares me. I empathize deeply with those who can’t fight for themselves because I often feel weak and helpless myself.

I’m planning on making that thread that’ll explore when the soft and delicate looking creature is in fact the predator. The prey being a malicious looking, but inferior being
Do you feel you’ll hold the same view?

 

[emeraldglass]

The spider will never give up

Bird (government) fucks both

 

[greycel]

Spoiler: Tags

@pfl @Chadeep @ThisCat @Jason Voorhees @chrishell @fuckthesepills

 

[chrishell]

Spoiler: Tags

@pfl @Chadeep @ThisCat @Jason Voorhees @chrishell @fuckthesepills

butterfly

its pretty

 

[TheLightOfMyLife]

I’m planning on making that thread that’ll explore when the soft and delicate looking creature is in fact the predator. The prey being a malicious looking, but inferior being
Do you feel you’ll hold the same view?

I’m a little torn. Because I look like a freak, yet I am soft and weak, so I understand what it’s like to be on the other side of that. Yet I still feel compelled to protect/be good to cute and innocent appearing things, which has gotten me burned by evil women before.

 

[greycel]

Spoiler: Tags

@HarrierDuBois @neurosis @FastBananaCEO @6ft4 @faustianspirit @imontheloose

 

[emeraldglass]

I’m a little torn. Because I look like a freak, yet I am soft and weak, so I understand what it’s like to be on the other side of that. Yet I still feel compelled to protect/be good to cute and innocent appearing things, which has gotten me burned by evil women before.

Hunchback of notre dame life

 

[ThisCat]

I’m a little torn. Because I look like a freak, yet I am soft and weak, so I understand what it’s like to be on the other side of that. Yet I still f

Should your actions be motivated by what is feasible or your good will?​

Spoiler: If you picked: Both

You’re an idealist.
You want to survive, because you value good will.

But is it worth to prioritise your good will, knowing you’re contributing more to suffering?
If he tried to save everything in the world, every entity would end up dying.
So is prioritising your good will selfish?
You’ll feel you did the right thing at everybody’s loss

Spoiler: If you picked: 🦋

You’re a realist.
You want the to live, because you understand the importance of feasibility.

Only one gets to live.
But why should the get to live, and the must die. A is equally as innocent as the .
Both didn’t get to choose how they started in life, but the deserves punishment because us “judges” decided it was worse. Why is it worse?
Because it was born a predator?

Spoiler: If you picked: 🕷️

You’re an observer.
You might want to save both, but you end up doing nothing, so the lives.

You don’t fight the equilibrium of nature. Although it does come with the hefty guilt.
But at what point do you switch from your role of being an observer?

Most normies would pick the
Could it have to do with being the prey in a predator-prey dynamic, or is the idea of beauty involved ( ):
View attachment 3755298
View attachment 3755302

Well, to test this we’ll have to see examples where the predator is more beautiful than the prey.
I’m going to be making a thread on this with many examples, let me know if you’d like to be tagged

Good thread

 

[greycel]

Spoiler: Major Tag

@Tai Lung

 

[ThisCat]

bump

 

[greycel]

Bump