Bzz/Funkyflamingo facial analysis

smallman

smallman

Solstice
Joined
Nov 24, 2023
Posts
2,443
Reputation
2,796
Neck width
Neckwidth1 1

Not within ideal. Neck could be thicker

Bigonial width
Jawwidth2

Not within ideal. Jaw could be wider

Chin to philtrum
Chintophiltrum3

Not within ideal range

Bitemporal width
Bitemporal4

Within ideal range

Total face height to width
Totalfwhr5

Not within ideal range (adjusted to lens distortion)

FWHR
Fwhr6

Not within ideal range. Should be a bit higher

Cheekbone height
Cheekboneheight7

Low set - should be higher

Mouth to nose
Nosetomouth8

Not within ideal. Too low

Facial thirds
Facialthirds9

Not within ideal. Upper third is slightly too short

Lower third proportions
Lowerthird10

Within ideal range

Lip proportions
Lipproportions11

Not within ideal range. Lower lip should be bigger

ESR
Esr12

Within ideal range

Eye spacing
Eyespacing13

Within ideal range

Canthal tilt
Canthaltilt14

Within ideal range

PFL to PFH
Eyeaspectratio15

Within ideal range

Eyebrow tilt
Eyebrowtilt16

Not within ideal. Should be higher

Eyebrow height
Eyebrowlowsetness17

Not within ideal. Should be lower

Jaw frontal angle
Jawfrontalangle18

Not within ideal. Should be higher

Ipsilateral alar angle
Alarangle19

Within ideal range

Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle
Alarangledevi20

Not within ideal. Too high

Medial canthal angle
Medialangle21

Within ideal range

Harmony score:
62.7%
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 39838, Pollorex, bluderbra and 12 others
@Bzz @st.hamudi but 6‘5
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 39838 and st.hamudi but 6‘5
congrats
ur the first person to ever analyze funky flamingos face
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 62931, zyzzbrah1234, st.hamudi but 6‘5 and 2 others
pretty brutal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 62931 and smallman
Facial Harmony: 6.2/10
Facial Dimorphism: 5/10
Bodyfat Factors: 5/10
Misc Features: 5/10

Final rating: 5.5
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 39838, Deleted member 62931, RealFunkyFlamingo and 1 other person
smallman said:
Neck width
View attachment 2898609
Not within ideal. Neck could be thicker

Bigonial width
View attachment 2898611
Not within ideal. Jaw could be wider

Chin to philtrum
View attachment 2898612
Not within ideal range

Bitemporal width
View attachment 2898614
Within ideal range

Total face height to width
View attachment 2898615
Not within ideal range (adjusted to lens distortion)

FWHR
View attachment 2898621
Not within ideal range. Should be a bit higher

Cheekbone height
View attachment 2898626
Low set - should be higher

Mouth to nose
View attachment 2898629
Not within ideal. Too low

Facial thirds
View attachment 2898630
Not within ideal. Upper third is slightly too short

Lower third proportions
View attachment 2898633
Within ideal range

Lip proportions
View attachment 2898634
Not within ideal range. Lower lip should be bigger

ESR
View attachment 2898639
Within ideal range

Eye spacing
View attachment 2898643
Within ideal range

Canthal tilt
View attachment 2898648
Within ideal range

PFL to PFH
View attachment 2898647
Within ideal range

Eyebrow tilt
View attachment 2898652
Not within ideal. Should be higher

Eyebrow height
View attachment 2898653
Not within ideal. Should be lower

Jaw frontal angle
View attachment 2898654
Not within ideal. Should be higher

Ipsilateral alar angle
View attachment 2898656
Within ideal range

Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle
View attachment 2898661
Not within ideal. Too high

Medial canthal angle
View attachment 2898664
Within ideal range

Harmony score:
62.7%
Click to expand...
Whats the app and chart u use to calculate all this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 62931
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Aero, Deleted member 64942, Sixdaysinfallujah66 and 1 other person
next do @Snake.0359 pls
 
  • JFL
Reactions: i_love_roosters, Deleted member 64942 and smallman
he's perfect bro
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 67581, RealFunkyFlamingo and smallman
  • +1
Reactions: smallman
Snake.0359 said:
Your chin is unchangable, no fillers gonna make it longer. Low T trait. Pretty sure it 's recessed too
Click to expand...
I think u can use filler to make chin longer. Look at bgms before and after for his chin
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 39838
smallman said:
I think u can use filler to make chin longer. Look at bgms before and after for his chin
Click to expand...
His chin is the same size as philtrum jfl. No amount of fillers will cahnge that. He need to inject tons of fillers, after that it will go down to his throat lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: smallman
smallman said:
Neck width
View attachment 2898609
Not within ideal. Neck could be thicker

Bigonial width
View attachment 2898611
Not within ideal. Jaw could be wider

Chin to philtrum
View attachment 2898612
Not within ideal range

Bitemporal width
View attachment 2898614
Within ideal range

Total face height to width
View attachment 2898615
Not within ideal range (adjusted to lens distortion)

FWHR
View attachment 2898621
Not within ideal range. Should be a bit higher

Cheekbone height
View attachment 2898626
Low set - should be higher

Mouth to nose
View attachment 2898629
Not within ideal. Too low

Facial thirds
View attachment 2898630
Not within ideal. Upper third is slightly too short

Lower third proportions
View attachment 2898633
Within ideal range

Lip proportions
View attachment 2898634
Not within ideal range. Lower lip should be bigger

ESR
View attachment 2898639
Within ideal range

Eye spacing
View attachment 2898643
Within ideal range

Canthal tilt
View attachment 2898648
Within ideal range

PFL to PFH
View attachment 2898647
Within ideal range

Eyebrow tilt
View attachment 2898652
Not within ideal. Should be higher

Eyebrow height
View attachment 2898653
Not within ideal. Should be lower

Jaw frontal angle
View attachment 2898654
Not within ideal. Should be higher

Ipsilateral alar angle
View attachment 2898656
Within ideal range

Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle
View attachment 2898661
Not within ideal. Too high

Medial canthal angle
View attachment 2898664
Within ideal range

Harmony score:
62.7%
Click to expand...
Why are you measuring ratios from selfies:cautious:
 
Nice analysis
 
  • +1
Reactions: smallman
@Allornothing
 
  • +1
Reactions: cornerd nerd
Bad pics were used imo. My eyebrows are very low set but according to ur analysis they aren't. Jfl. I'd say my harmony is around 6.5 to 7 in my most neutral pics. U used a pic where. I raised eyebrows
 
  • +1
Reactions: cornerd nerd and smallman
Unfortunately the analysis is heavily flawed because you can't account for his jutting of the jaw (which adds height+projection) and the lens distortion added facial height, his face would be shorter in candid pictures.

So the facial thirds are flawed.

On top of that facial thirds are a heavily flawed standard on their own. The average white male has a taller lower facial third than his middle facial third, so according to the theory of attractiveness = averageness the mid and lower facial thirds should NOT be equal (although that also depends on the middle facial third length). In other words, the equal facial thirds are probably more suited for women

Basically, ratios are not developed to a sufficient extent to truly analyze faces on their own, you should do the analysis yourself and then use ratios to justify your perception. + It's probably more over for funkyflamingo aka bzz than you made it seem

@Bzz
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: RealFunkyFlamingo, i_love_roosters and smallman
4082780 80798590 19FD 4C9A BE7C E44336E35FEB
 
  • JFL
Reactions: coispet, i_love_roosters, smallman and 1 other person
smallman said:
Neck width
View attachment 2898609
Not within ideal. Neck could be thicker

Bigonial width
View attachment 2898611
Not within ideal. Jaw could be wider

Chin to philtrum
View attachment 2898612
Not within ideal range

Bitemporal width
View attachment 2898614
Within ideal range

Total face height to width
View attachment 2898615
Not within ideal range (adjusted to lens distortion)

FWHR
View attachment 2898621
Not within ideal range. Should be a bit higher

Cheekbone height
View attachment 2898626
Low set - should be higher

Mouth to nose
View attachment 2898629
Not within ideal. Too low

Facial thirds
View attachment 2898630
Not within ideal. Upper third is slightly too short

Lower third proportions
View attachment 2898633
Within ideal range

Lip proportions
View attachment 2898634
Not within ideal range. Lower lip should be bigger

ESR
View attachment 2898639
Within ideal range

Eye spacing
View attachment 2898643
Within ideal range

Canthal tilt
View attachment 2898648
Within ideal range

PFL to PFH
View attachment 2898647
Within ideal range

Eyebrow tilt
View attachment 2898652
Not within ideal. Should be higher

Eyebrow height
View attachment 2898653
Not within ideal. Should be lower

Jaw frontal angle
View attachment 2898654
Not within ideal. Should be higher

Ipsilateral alar angle
View attachment 2898656
Within ideal range

Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle
View attachment 2898661
Not within ideal. Too high

Medial canthal angle
View attachment 2898664
Within ideal range

Harmony score:
62.7%
Click to expand...
Do my right nutsack
 
  • +1
Reactions: 4lt.Real
WHY, GOD WHY WOULD YOU GIVE THAT SCHIZO FUEL FFS. Enjoy the next 2154 posts about his face in the rating section.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: smallman
  • JFL
Reactions: smallman
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

iblamenarrowface
What the real best ratios and features are
Replies
24
Views
280
iblamenarrowface
iblamenarrowface
maxlooksmax
Guide looksmax based your ratios (FIXING YOUR FAILOS)
Replies
30
Views
1K
maxlooksmax
maxlooksmax
pfl
Mogs Hernan drago facial analysis
Replies
35
Views
1K
psychomandible
psychomandible
lavv
Guide Blackpill Facial Aesthetics Terminology Guide
Replies
4
Views
251
CD34
CD34
CorinthianLOX
Looksmax AI attractivness score (Looksmaxxing GPT)
Replies
47
Views
326
It'snotover
It'snotover

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 4)
Back
Top