Calisthenics vs Gym (Which is better and Why)

HereToGetBetter

HereToGetBetter

Bronze
Joined
Jul 9, 2023
Posts
401
Reputation
295
The title explains it pretty well

Go on then I am sure there will be a lot of different opinions.
Also we are obviously referring to an aesthetic body not a mass monster open physique ogre type body.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lelouch
The title explains it pretty well

Go on then I am sure there will be a lot of different opinions.
Also we are obviously referring to an aesthetic body not a mass monster open physique ogre type body.
Calisthenics for upper

Squats for lower if you care about it at all.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Roquefort and lelouch
weighted calisthenics at home mogs:
  • time efficient
  • aesthetic low bf physique
  • cheaper
  • easier to stick to since you train at home
  • no need to wait for a subhuman using your machine
  • you can train skills to impress jbs
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: AngryShortMale, Deleted member 8758, Roquefort and 3 others
The title explains it pretty well

Go on then I am sure there will be a lot of different opinions.
Also we are obviously referring to an aesthetic body not a mass monster open physique ogre type body.
both, dips and pullups are amazing exercises that most bodybuilders use as well, also calisthenics has cool movements like planche and plance pushups and all that
 
  • +1
Reactions: malicieusss
weighted calisthenics at home mogs:
  • time efficient
  • aesthetic low bf physique
  • cheaper
  • easier to stick to since you train at home
  • no need to wait for a subhuman using your machine
  • you can train skills to impress jbs
pull up to jbs walking on your hands
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 31445
weighted calisthenics at home mogs:
  • time efficient
  • aesthetic low bf physique
  • cheaper
  • easier to stick to since you train at home
  • no need to wait for a subhuman using your machine
  • you can train skills to impress jbs
Give me the exercises you do I am very interested since calisthenics is way more diverse in some ways. other people reading this too. and your split of course.
 
I prefer regular weightlifting, because the route of progression is so much easier (and more enjoyable imo).
Although I still do pull-ups and chin-ups (weighted though), but in general calistenics is just too finnicky for my taste.
Honestly, a combination of both while having a home gym mogs everything else.
 
callisthenics and weight lifting is the same thing ur just using body weight for weight resistance against your muscles. your muscles wont perceive callisthenics as a new way of training since muscles only care about resistance
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27836 and Roquefort
Give me the exercises you do I am very interested since calisthenics is way more diverse in some ways. other people reading this too. and your split of course.
Can't really give my split since it's still evolving,(and honestly i cba) you should have your own split depending on your level and equipment.
I can say that I train 1-1h and a half hour every day full body really similarly to brian johnson's split (not 100% since I don't have his equipment and I want to customize to my preferences).
1689454014903

+ evening stretching

(I also add upper chest and side delts exercises)


I took inspiration mainly from:


I'd say you shouldn't start 1h everyday but slowly build the habit.
 
Last edited:
callisthenics and weight lifting is the same thing ur just using body weight for weight resistance against your muscles. your muscles wont perceive callisthenics as a new way of training since muscles only care about resistance
Agreed
 
The only issue I am having is that I can’t imagine being able to stimulate the side delts enough with calisthenics otherwise I would switch 100%.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28774
The only issue I am having is that I can’t imagine being able to stimulate the side delts enough with calisthenics otherwise I would switch 100%.
buy dumbells and do lateral raises

also I forgot neck training before, really important
 
Calisthenics + dumbells and a pull up bar are all you need.

Gym is probably better for low body and lower back but you don’t want those muscles to be overdeveloped if you want an aesthetic V-Taper physique
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31445
I do calisthenics but obviously the gym is better its pretty hard to train to the lower body shoulders biceps triceps at home .
 
once you’re doing things like handstand push ups, one arm push ups, and high volume pull ups and one leg squats you’ll definitely be aesthetic
 
Going to a gym will always be better than calisthenics alone. Even if you don’t want to be gymmaxxed and just want to be aesthetic/lean, you want to gain muscle mass as fast as possible so you can get out of a calorie surplus and then leanmax. The ability to bring the target muscle to failure with proper form and also progressively overload more meticulously, with more effective loading for 99% of movements, makes the gym far more effective than calisthenics alone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Armand and JovenCansao
callisthenics and weight lifting is the same thing ur just using body weight for weight resistance against your muscles. your muscles wont perceive callisthenics as a new way of training since muscles only care about resistance
The second part of this is true, but the resistance from certain machine and free weight exercises for most muscle groups is superior to bodyweight alone. Your muscles only care about resistance yes, but weights and calisthenics don’t provide the same resistance. Lift weights to achieve your physique goals asap.
 
Calisthenics will always be better than the gym.

I think people that say the opposite are subconsciously motivated by the aesthetic of going to the gym and being seen more than its actual utility
 
The second part of this is true, but the resistance from certain machine and free weight exercises for most muscle groups is superior to bodyweight alone. Your muscles only care about resistance yes, but weights and calisthenics don’t provide the same resistance. Lift weights to achieve your physique goals asap.
calisthenics builds healty femalegaze pyshiques, gyms doesn't
 
calisthenics builds healty femalegaze pyshiques, gyms doesn't
This isn’t really true. Your physique in terms of aesthetics is mostly genetic. You can build muscle mass through training, but your insertions and structure will determine your aesthetics. If you’re deliberate and intelligent with how you lift weights, you can achieve the physique that you would achieve in years of calisthenics alone, in half that time by lifting weights. If you don’t want to be bulky and want to be “healthy femalegaze”, eat less, leanmaxx and target the muscle groups you associate with that specific look. Lifting weights is more efficient.
 
This isn’t really true. Your physique in terms of aesthetics is mostly genetic. You can build muscle mass through training, but your insertions and structure will determine your aesthetics. If you’re deliberate and intelligent with how you lift weights, you can achieve the physique that you would achieve in years of calisthenics alone, in half that time by lifting weights. If you don’t want to be bulky and want to be “healthy femalegaze”, eat less, leanmaxx and target the muscle groups you associate with that specific look. Lifting weights is more efficient.
just go on youtube, type gym advice, and then type calisthenics advice (or whatever you wanna search), and see for yourself which group has more aesthetic pyshiques
 
Tryed both for years and gym mogs to oblivion

Anyone who claim calisthenic is just insane coping

Gym is actually more efficient , both for lean muscle mass, strenght and aesthetics

Calisthenic is great too much better than nothing, one advantage is you can do it anywhere and save a lot of time and money
 
  • +1
Reactions: colbycovington
just go on youtube, type gym advice, and then type calisthenics advice (or whatever you wanna search), and see for yourself which group has more aesthetic pyshiques
This is called the swimmers body illusion. When you see swimmers physiques, you think damn they look good I should swim to look like them. You swim for 5 years and look nothing like them. Why? They swim because of how they look, they dont look how they do because they swim. The same applies for calisthenics. The leaner guys with longer levers excel, and the shorter, heavier guys are doomed to fail. If you’re talking about bodybuilders being unaesthetic, that is the result of mass overconsumption and anabolic usage. The most aesthetic physiques are actually achieved through lifting weights usually (Laid etc). This is because it allows the individuals with the best insertions & structure to gain the muscle mass most efficiently.

TLDR: while a lot of people who do calisthenics have aesthetic physiques, but due to their genetics. They could achieve the same physique in half the time through lifting weights optimally, and if you want to look your best asap, lift weights.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HTNcutecel and oldcell
This is called the swimmers body illusion. When you see swimmers physiques, you think damn they look good I should swim to look like them. You swim for 5 years and look nothing like them. Why? They swim because of how they look, they dont look how they do because they swim. The same applies for calisthenics. The leaner guys with longer levers excel, and the shorter, heavier guys are doomed to fail. If you’re talking about bodybuilders being unaesthetic, that is the result of mass overconsumption and anabolic usage. The most aesthetic physiques are actually achieved through lifting weights usually (Laid etc). This is because it allows the individuals with the best insertions & structure to gain the muscle mass most efficiently.

TLDR: while a lot of people who do calisthenics have aesthetic physiques, but due to their genetics. They could achieve the same physique in half the time through lifting weights optimally, and if you want to look your best asap, lift weights.
are doomed to fail in what sense? lmao 99% of fitness youtubers don't compete so theres no swimmer body illussion, it's about the quality of the content, the looks matter but in a smaller percentage (unlike sports where the pyshiques you are born with determine if you can compete or not)
The training is what makes the difference: take the average of the sum of the "x" bodybuilder and compare it with the average sum of "y" calisthenics and the calisthenic body will be leaner and femalegaze maxxed (and probably healtier)
 
Last edited:
are doomed to fail in what sense? lmao 99% of fitness youtubers don't compete so theres no swimmer body illussion, it's about the quality of the content, the looks matter but in a smaller percentage (unlike sports where the pyshiques you are born with determine if you can compete or not)
The training is what makes the difference: that the average of sum of the "x" bodybuilder and then do the same of "y" calisthenics and the calisthenics body will be leaner and femalegaze maxxed (and probably healtier)
gym is cringe and unhealthy as fuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31445
20230616 230705 5
depends on how u consider my body
 
are doomed to fail in what sense? lmao 99% of fitness youtubers don't compete so theres no swimmer body illussion, it's about the quality of the content, the looks matter but in a smaller percentage (unlike sports where the pyshiques you are born with determine if you can compete or not)
The training is what makes the difference: take the average of the sum of the "x" bodybuilder and compare it with the average sum of "y" calisthenics and the calisthenic body will be leaner and femalegaze maxxed (and probably healtier)
The goals of the bodybuilder make them unappealing to the female gaze. Not the act of lifting weights. Its difficult for you to separate you opinion of the activity from its effect but the truth is, you can’t actually explain why calisthenics has these female gaze physique developing properties. Because it doesn’t, its simply a training method to produce hypertrophy, that is less effective than lifting free weights or machines in most movements.

(doomed to fail in that they will never be good enough at calisthenics to make it their main training style, or produce content online about calisthenics)
 
Last edited:
Lifting weights is extremely healthy if done correctly, bodybuilding is unhealthy. The two aren’t the same.
doing the former is comparable to calistheniques
 
doing the former is comparable to calistheniques
I think we both agree that physical training shouldn’t be extreme, I actually have no issue with calisthenics and whatever gets people training is great, 99% of users here would see huge improvements in their appearance using calisthenics. I’m only saying that for physique improvement, the gym can be the most efficient method when used correctly. I don’t advocate for extreme bulking or anything. Gaining muscle mass fast through optimal lifting, and then leanmaxxing.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: oldcell and Deleted member 18582
I think we both agree that physical training shouldn’t be extreme, I actually have no issue with calisthenics and whatever gets people training is great, 99% of users here would see huge improvements in their appearance using calisthenics. I’m only saying that for physique improvement, the gym can be the most efficient method when used correctly. I don’t advocate for extreme bulking or anything. Gaining muscle mass fast through optimal lifting, and then leanmaxxing.
You are correct again
 
The goals of the bodybuilder make them unappealing to the female gaze. Not the act of lifting weights. Its difficult for you to separate you opinion of the activity from its effect but the truth is, you can’t actually explain why calisthenics has these female gaze physique developing properties. Because it doesn’t, its simply a training method to produce hypertrophy, that is less effective than lifting free weights or machines in most movements.

(doomed to fail in that they will never be good enough at calisthenics to make it their main training style, or produce content online about calisthenics)
yeah maybe for targeting a muscle in your ass it maybe better but calisthenics gives better: posture, flexibility, p4p strength and muscle definition

and since calisthenics burns more calories it also makes it easier to mantain a low bf even with a few cheat meals

PS
cba debating anymore, going to squat 300kgs
 
Calisthenics will always be better than the gym.

I think people that say the opposite are subconsciously motivated by the aesthetic of going to the gym and being seen more than its actual utility
Interesting, I know some people like that but they are just morons who say going to the gym is alpha and ect but I haven't thought about people subconsciously being like that.
 
The title explains it pretty well

Go on then I am sure there will be a lot of different opinions.
Also we are obviously referring to an aesthetic body not a mass monster open physique ogre type body.
Most stupid thread ever.

"hey I fail to gather information and think straight, pls do it for me"

This is pathetic.
 
So still the answer is :
It depends on what your goals are.
For building a "beautiful" physique, bodybuilding in a gym is best because you have lots of machine which makes targeting muscles easy, and weight incremental progressive.

Calisthenics doesn't offer that. You will have to think about how to target each muscles with what you have at hand. And sometime it is not possible.

Plus you have to think about the winter if you don't have the material inside your home.

However if your goal is not to build a big and selected physique, calisthenics is enough and sufficient to build a good physique that most people will be jealous of. Combine that with sessions of cycling or running and you will look athletic, which is utterly sexy to women's (buff dudes look like idiots).

Financially, calisthenics is better than gym maxing: to help scale the weights, you will need a few elastics and that's mostly all. No paying fees each month.



My conclusion is that for most people who have no specific physical condition (isolating to solve a problem), the best overall is basic calisthenics. Don't try those fancy and useless figure, unless it is your goal. If you want to build physique, understand the principles of biomecanics and apply them to bodyweight exercises. The exercise is no magic, only a mean.
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcell
Most stupid thread ever.

"hey I fail to gather information and think straight, pls do it for me"

This is pathetic.
Nope, I have been training mostly in the gym but I incorporate calisthenics too and sometimes I workout at home with my pull up bar and on my parallel stand. Doing this for the past 9 months and I have seen amazing progress and I was trying to see what others do/think of the calisthenics vs gym argument. But hey you moronic ego maniacs will always think the way you do so goodbye.
 

Similar threads

anorexicel88
Replies
70
Views
1K
shiezen
shiezen
CalulArgintiu59
Replies
11
Views
259
CalulArgintiu59
CalulArgintiu59
Driler
Replies
14
Views
346
UltimateCoper.
UltimateCoper.
pahadi mogger
Replies
15
Views
407
Healthymaxxer
Healthymaxxer
TheBlackpilledOne
Replies
2
Views
68
Bars
Bars

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top