Calling all white HTNs and low-end Chadlites in England: are you happy to accept your fate or not?

[Britmaxxer]

Do you view relationships as a constant source of sex?

women these days are so trash that the only reason to get into a relationship is for reliable access to sex.


show vulnerability to a woman > she leaves
try to grow together (expect a woman to be accountable and motivated) > she leaves
life hardship arises > she leaves

their is no reason to pursue a meaningful connection with a woman, a relationship will be more successful if you understand sex is the only incentive. go into a relationship hoping for more and you will get burned.


if I want companionship, I will just spend time with friends and family.

 

[Wallenberg]

It's not about route distance, you autistic dipshit. Finnair doesn't fly you from Japan to Thailand. Another airline does this. Please stop replying until you have spent 2-3 weeks reading about what a connecting flight is.

I'm going to type this in big letters for you:


CONNECTING FLIGHT



But no connecting flight so much more expensive.

You are embarrassing yourself. "Flights to SEA from Finland go through the Arctic!" "Oh well, I meant connecting flights obviously!"

 

[Detona]

You are embarrassing yourself. "Flights to SEA from Finland go through the Arctic!" "Oh well, I meant connecting flights obviously!"

^ Is this faggot supposed to be on fire or something? Why is he so red?

 

[Wallenberg]

^ Is this faggot supposed to be on fire or something? Why is he so red?

I'm sure you can get a Thai ladyboy as your "wife" if you stop embarrassing yourself!

 

[Xangsane]

women these days are so trash that the only reason to get into a relationship is for reliable access to sex.


show vulnerability to a woman > she leaves
try to grow together (expect a woman to be accountable and motivated) > she leaves
life hardship arises > she leaves

their is no reason to pursue a meaningful connection with a woman, a relationship will be more successful if you understand sex is the only incentive. go into a relationship hoping for more and you will get burned.


if I want companionship, I will just spend time with friends and family.

I wouldn't do this to be fair. You need to be a whole unit and work together.

 

[Detona]

I'm sure you can get a Thai ladyboy as your "wife" if you stop embarrassing yourself!

Daily reminder what to spend the next 3 weeks reading about:


CONNECTING FLIGHTS

 

[Wallenberg]

Flights to SEA from Finland take the Arctic route.

Finnair uses the arctic route to get to SEA.

It's obvious that you googled the Arctic route without realizing that it's used on flights to East Asia, not Southeast Asia.

And the cheapest flights have connections in Doha (in the middle east) or Europe, not in Tokyo...

 

[Detona]

It's obvious that you googled the Arctic route without realizing that it's used on flights to East Asia, not Southeast Asia.

It's obvious you've never flewn before because you have an NPC-like inability to understand the concept of a connecting flight.

And the cheapest flights have connections in Doha (in the middle east) or Europe, not in Tokyo...

Random screenshot from a random schedule =/= reality of flight prices.

Also those aren't connecting flights but STOPS you idiot. I would imagine all of these "southern route" flights involve re-fueling stops.

 

[Detona]

I still can't believe this dumbass still hasn't learned what a connecting flight is. I'm legitimately starting to believe it is a bot.

 

[Wallenberg]

Random screenshot from a random schedule =/= reality of flight prices

You made up the whole thing about changing flights in Tokyo. It's nonsense.

The cheapest flights have connections in the Middle East (Doha) or Europe. Not in Japan.

Show me even one day when it's cheaper to fly to Thailand via Japan compared to a connection in Doha or Europe.

Here's another day. The cheapest flights from Finland to Thailand have connections in Europe.

 

[Detona]

You made up the whole thing about changing flights in Tokyo. It's nonsense.

The cheapest flights have connections in the Middle East (Doha) or Europe. Not in Japan

Not a connection, idiot. Re-fueling stop. A stop is not the same thing as a connecting flight.

Show me even one day when it's cheaper to fly to Thailand via Japan compared to a connection in Doha or Europe.

Here's another day. The cheapest flights from Finland to Thailand have connections in Europe.

View attachment 1741270

Not cheapest + just a random day.

 

[Wallenberg]

Not a connection, idiot. Re-fueling stop.




Not cheapest + just a random day.

Retard. There aren't refueling stops on flights from Helsinki to Bangkok.

You make up nonsense. Why? First with passport prices, then with the Arctic route, and now the embarrassing excuse "but I meant connecting flights!"

 

[Wallenberg]

Not cheapest + just a random day.

Check it yourself: https://www.momondo.com/flight-search/HEL-BKK/2022-11-13/2022-11-19?sort=price_a

You don't find a single day when it's cheaper to fly to Thailand via Japan compared to Europe or the Middle East.

 

[Detona]

Retard. There aren't refueling stops on flights from Helsinki to Bangkok.

It's literally on your screenshot. That's not a connecting flight but a fuel stop.

You make up nonsense. Why? First with passport prices, then with the Arctic route, and now the embarrassing excuse "but I meant connecting flights!"

Only embarrassment here is you. You still don't comprehend what a connecting flight is and you got pwned badly about the arctic route.

 

[Detona]

Check it yourself: https://www.momondo.com/flight-search/HEL-BKK/2022-11-13/2022-11-19?sort=price_a

You don't find a single day when it's cheaper to fly to Thailand via Japan compared to Europe or the Middle East.

Your link is one day + you're searching for direct flights. So unintelligent.

 

[Wallenberg]

Your link is one day + you're searching for direct flights. So unintelligent.

Nope. The stops are connections. Have you ever been in an airplane?

 

[Wallenberg]

It's literally on your screenshot. That's not a connecting flight but a fuel stop.

Nope. Those "stops" are connecting flights. Seriously, are you so dumb naturally or do you have to act?

 

[Detona]

Nope. The stops are connections. Have you ever been in an airplane?

View attachment 1741276

Not a connecting flight, dummy. It's the same airline.

 

[Detona]

This idiot still struggles to understand what a connecting flight is. That's a direct flight from Amsterdam to Bangkok.

 

[Detona]

Nope. Those "stops" are connecting flights. Seriously, are you so dumb naturally or do you have to act?

Not connecting flights. Plane changes/fuel stops + same airline.

 

[Wallenberg]

Not a connecting flight, dummy. It's the same airline.

Retard. Connecting flight means changing planes. Whether it's the same airline or not doesn't matter.

Anyway, you haven't ever flown.

 

[Detona]

Retard. Connecting flight means changing planes. Whether it's the same airline or not doesn't matter.

Anyway, you haven't ever flown.

Nope. In this context it means changing airlines.

 

[Wallenberg]

Not connecting flights. Plane changes/fuel stops + same airline.

There aren't any fuel stops. We don't live in the 1950s anymore. Whether the airline is the same or not doesn't matter.

Pathetic excuses.

 

[Detona]

There aren't any fuel stops. We don't live in the 1950s anymore. Whether the airline is the same or not doesn't matter.

Pathetic excuses.

Look dummy, the airline matters.

How to book the best connecting flights for your next trip - momondo Discover

Don't be so quick to rule out a layover. We share our best tips for booking connections and how to get the most out of your time at the airport

www.momondo.com

"Traditionally speaking, a connecting flight is any flight which requires passengers to change from one plane or airline to another at an intermediate stop on way to the final destination"

Technically speaking any change of planes is a connecting flight; but in reality this does not matter. What matters is if you are changing airlines, because the other airline is the one paying for that flight.

And your flight from Amsterdam to Bangkok is still direct. Not connecting. That's what matters. You're not taking a connecting flight to Bangkok. Just stopping for fuel.

 

[Wallenberg]

Look dummy, the airline matters.

How to book the best connecting flights for your next trip - momondo Discover

Don't be so quick to rule out a layover. We share our best tips for booking connections and how to get the most out of your time at the airport

www.momondo.com

"Traditionally speaking, a connecting flight is any flight which requires passengers to change from one plane or airline to another at an intermediate stop on way to the final destination"

Technically speaking any change of planes is a connecting flight; but in reality this does not matter. What matters is if you are changing airlines, because the other airline is the one paying for that flight.

And your flight from Amsterdam to Bangkok is still direct. Not connecting. That's what matters. You're not taking a connecting flight to Bangkok. Just stopping for fuel.

It says "or". Did you see that word? Change from one plane or airline to another. Not "and", but "or".

And no, fuel stops aren't needed nowadays. Besides didn't you even see that the plane changes?

Like I said, go ahead and show me one single day when flying to Thailand is cheaper via Japan instead of Europe or the Middle East. You cant' do that because you don't find a single day when that would be the case.

 

[Detona]

It says "or". Did you see that word? Change from one plane or airline to another. Not "and", but "or".

Moron. What that means is there are two definitions of a connecting flight. A literal one, and an important one.

And no, fuel stops aren't needed nowadays. Besides didn't you even see that the plane changes

Wrong + the plane didn't change at Doha.

Like I said, go ahead and show me one single day when flying to Thailand is cheaper via Japan instead of Europe or the Middle East. You cant' do that because you don't find a single day when that would be the case.

Wrong + you're not finding them because your query is direct flights. Dumbass.

 

[Wallenberg]

Wrong + you're not finding them because your query is direct flights. Dumbass.

Direct flight is a flight without changing planes. If you stop at Doha to change the plane then the flight isn't a direct flight.

You are an idiot.

 

[traveler]

 

[Detona]

Direct flight is a flight without changing planes. If you stop at Doha to change the plane then the flight isn't a direct flight.

Cope. There was no plane change in Doha. The only example of a plane chanfe you gave was in Amsterdam. Doha was a fuel stop.

You are an idiot.

Major cope from our resident NPC.

 

[Wallenberg]

Cope. There was no plane change in Doha. The only example of a plane chanfe you gave was in Amsterdam. Doha was a fuel stop.

There isn't any need for fuel stops. Finnair flies non-stop from Helsinki to Bangkok...

 

[Detona]

There isn't any need for fuel stops. Finnair flies non-stop from Helsinki to Bangkok...

Wrong. They stop in multiple locstions such as Doha to refuel. Why the fuck does this idiot think they are stopping if they aren't running out of fuel.

 

[Wallenberg]

Wrong. They stop in multiple locstions such as Doha to refuel. Why the fuck does this idiot think they are stopping if they aren't running out of fuel.

Nope. Do you know what "nonstop" means? Besides Finnair flies much further than Thailand nonstop... We arent living in the 1950s anymore.

 

[Detona]

Nope. Do you know what "nonstop" means? Besides Finnair flies much further than Thailand nonstop... We arent living in the 1950s anymore.

View attachment 1741292

Cope + all flights you showed previously involved stops + this is for economy LIGHT.


Planes do make fuel stops + also pilot changes and checkups.

Why Do Aircraft Make Technical Stops?

simpleflying.com

 

[Wallenberg]

Cope + all flights you showed previously involved stops + this is for economy LIGHT.

The flights that I showed were connecting flights. Do you know what connecting flight means?

Finnair uses A359 to fly to Thailand. It has a range of 15 000 km. The flight to Thailand is much shorter than that, even when using the longer southern route. 8300 km to be exact.

A350-900

The uncompromised clean sheet design of the A350-900 delivers capacity, range, and economics, while providing the best cabin environment.

aircraft.airbus.com

Range

15 000 km

 

[Detona]

The flights that I showed were connecting flights. Do you know what connecting flight means?

Nope. Not connecting in the important way (intermediate distance + different airline)


You showed direct flights from Europe to Bangkok.

Finnair uses A359 to fly to Thailand. It has a range of 15 000 km.

Only when fully fueled which most flights aren't.

This Wallenberg is a real simple minded idiot.

The flight to Thailand is much shorter than that, even when using the longer southern route. 8300 km to be exact.

A350-900

The uncompromised clean sheet design of the A350-900 delivers capacity, range, and economics, while providing the best cabin environment.

aircraft.airbus.com

Range

15 000 km

Dumbass. Now find me one that's fully fueled for that kind of journey. Not very common.

 

[Wallenberg]

Dumbass. Now find me one that's fully fueled for that kind of journey. Not very common.

Do you think that Finnair fuels its planes in the Arctic because the distance to Japan is similar to the distance from Finland to Thailand? No, they don't do that... They fly nonstop. Direct flight.

The fact that you didn't even know about direct flights from Finland to Thailand means that you are ignorant. Nowadays planes don't have to stop for "fuel stops" for such short flights.

 

[Detona]

Do you think that Finnair fuels its planes in the Arctic because the distance to Japan is similar to the distance from Finland to Thailand?

Not even close, moron. You're forgetting trajectory.

No, they don't do that... They fly nonstop. Direct flight.

In a straight line for 75% of the journey.

The fact that you didn't even know about direct flights from Finland to Thailand means that you are ignorant. Nowadays planes don't have to stop for "fuel stops" for such short flights.

I did know about them. I informed you of cheaper more monetarily efficient flight plans. Keep coping with your mistaken belief that fuel stops aren't necessary on intercontinental flights. Somebody was raised by a single mom.

 

[Wallenberg]

Not even close, moron. You're forgetting trajectory.




In a straight line.



I did know about them. I informed you of cheaper more efficient flight plans. Keep coping with your mistaken belief that fuel stops aren't necessary on 12 hour flights.

Fuel stops arent necessary on 12-hour flights. Singapore Airlines flies from NYC to Singapore and it takes 19 hours - no fuel stop required.

Finnair flies to Los Angeles without a fuel stop. It's a longer flight than to Thailand. 9005 km vs 8300 km.

And you still haven't shown a single date when flying via Japan would be cheaper. There isn't such a date.

Get out of your basement. Travel a bit. Anyone who has flown knows that you are spewing nonsense. I bet you have never been in an airplane.

 

[Detona]

Fuel stops arent necessary on 12-hour flights. Singapore Airlines flies from NYC to Singapore and it takes 19 hours - no fuel stop required.

Because they fly enouth people to justify fueling the plane to near max capacity. Finland to Bangkok doesn't, and also doesn't use a direct trans-pacific trajectory.

This is why Finland never produced anything significant. Extreme simple mindedness.

Finnair flies to Los Angeles without a fuel stop. It's a longer flight than to Thailand. 9005 km vs 8300 km.

Straight transatlantic route.
Learn what trajectory means.
Most flights involve stops.

And you still haven't shown a single date when flying via Japan would be cheaper. There isn't such a date.

Wrong + not wasting my time for you.

Get out of your basement. Travel a bit. Anyone who has flown knows that you are spewing nonsense. I bet you have never been in an airplane.

Keep coping. You didn't understand the concept of a connecting flight.

 

[Wallenberg]

Most flights involve stops.

This shows your total ignorance about modern aviation. Fuel stops are very rare nowadays. They definitely aren't required on typical routes like Helsinki - to Bangkok. It's obvious that you have never been on a plane. Typical basement-dweller.

Like I said, get out of your basement. Travel a bit. You will then realize how ignorant you are. Flying is fun.

Let's see what you have claimed:

1. Passports in developed countries cost at least 180 dollars. Nonsense.
2. Finnair uses the Arctic route on flights to SEA. Nonsense: Arctic route is used on flights to East Asia. East Asia is not Southeast Asia (SEA). Learn some geography.
3. Then you claimed that Helsinki - Japan - Thailand is the cheapest route to Thailand. Nope. You can't find a single day when that route is the most affordable route to Thailand. The cheapest flights to Thailand from Finland have connections in the Middle East or Europe.
4. Then you claim that connecting flights aren't connecting flights if you don't change the airline. Nonsense. Connecting flight means that you have to change the plane instead of flying directly to the destination.
5. You realized that the cheapest way to get to Thailand from Finland is via the Middle East or Europe instead of Japan. So you start spewing out nonsense about how those stops are fuel stops. Fuel stops aren't needed: there are nonstop flights from Helsinki to further destinations than Thailand.
6. You started to spew out nonsense about fuel stops without realizing that nowadays, planes can fly to another side of the globe without fuel stops. Anyone who knows anything about modern aviation knows this.

I have proved every single of your claims to be nonsense.

There are two possibilities. Either you are a troll or mentally retarded. If you are a troll, I will stop feeding the troll. If you are mentally retarded, I hope you can get rid of mental retardation and wish you the best. Maybe your caretaker will take you on a plane trip someday!

 

[Detona]

This shows your total ignorance about modern aviation. Fuel stops are very rare nowadays. They definitely aren't required on typical routes like Helsinki - to Bangkok. It's obvious that you have never been on a plane. Typical basement-dweller.

100% wrong. Majority of these flights involve fuel stops.
Fuel stops very common today. Read about them:

Why are aircrafts never fully fueled? - airucate.com

Who often drives long distances by car, you normally fully refueling the car before the trip. By contrast, aircraft are almost never fully fulled. Only in very rare cases is the tank full. Why is that? Aircraft have the tank in the wings and some additionally installed in the fuselage. If it...

airucate.com

Like I said, get out of your basement. Travel a bit. You will then realize how ignorant you are. Flying is fun.

So is humiliating you.

Let's see what you have claimed:

1. Passports in developed countries cost at least 180 dollars. Nonsense.

Wrong. US psssport is $165 and that doesn't include passport photo cost or expedited process. Expedited process is an additional $60, and that's necessary to get your passport in any reasonable amount of time. That's over $200.

Passport Fees

Learn how much it will cost to apply for a U.S. passport, and what forms of payment to use when you apply or renew.

travel.state.gov

Product	Form	Application Fee	Execution (Acceptance) Fee
Passport Book	DS-11	$130	$35

1. Finnair uses the Arctic route on flights to SEA. Nonsense: Arctic route is used on flights to East Asia. East Asia is not Southeast Asia (SEA). Learn some geography.

This dumbass still doesn't understsnd connecting flights and the massive economic benefit therein.

1. Then you claimed that Helsinki - Japan - Thailand is the cheapest route to Thailand. Nope. You can't find a single day when that route is the most affordable route to Thailand. The cheapest flights to Thailand from Finland have connections in the Middle East or Europe.

Except I can, but am not doing it because don't care.

1. Then you claim that connecting flights aren't connecting flights if you don't change the airline. Nonsense. Connecting flight means that you have to change the plane instead of flying directly to the destination.

It has two definitons as I showed you with source. The definiton that matters is changing airlines.

1. You realized that the cheapest way to get to Thailand from Finland is via the Middle East or Europe instead of Japan. So you start spewing out nonsense about how those stops are fuel stops. Fuel stops aren't needed: there are nonstop flights from Helsinki to further destinations than Thailand.

Wrong. Most flights to Thailand involve fuel stops. Exception is not the norm + your nonstop flights were economy light.

1. You started to spew out nonsense about fuel stops without realizing that nowadays, planes can fly to another side of the globe without fuel stops. Anyone who knows anything about modern aviation knows this.

Except this never happens because planes are never fully fueled.

Why are aircrafts never fully fueled? - airucate.com

Who often drives long distances by car, you normally fully refueling the car before the trip. By contrast, aircraft are almost never fully fulled. Only in very rare cases is the tank full. Why is that? Aircraft have the tank in the wings and some additionally installed in the fuselage. If it...

airucate.com

I have proved every single of your claims to be nonsense.

Not a single one + pwned yourself in every attempt.

There are two possibilities. Either you are a troll or mentally retarded. If you are a troll, I will stop feeding the troll. If you are mentally retarded, I hope you can get rid of mental retardation and wish you the best. Maybe your caretaker will take you on a plane trip someday!

Thank you for conceding defeat, I acknowledge your submission.

 

[Wallenberg]

Except I can, but am not doing it because don't care.

You have been googling hastily during the whole discussion, so you do clearly care. You simply don't find any examples of flights to Thailand via Japan being the cheapest.

Economy light doesn't have anything to do with a plane flying direct or not. The same planes have different classes: business class, economy, etc. You can fly in business class for the same flights if you want to. The class you are flying has nothing to do with the flight being direct or not. Again an example that proves that you have never been in an airplane.

And planes don't have to be fully fueled because they don't fly so far that they would need to be fully fueled. For example, the A359 has a range of 15000 km. You don't have to fully fuel it for a flight that is only 8300 km. Do you think a car needs to have a tank full of gas for a 5 miles trip? lol.

Get out of your basement. Go on a trip. Maybe your caretaker will allow you do to that someday. You need desperately need some real-life experience. The fact that you think flying 8300 km (from Finland to Thailand) requires a fuel stop is a clear indication that you don't have any experience of intercontinental traveling. By far most intercontinental flights nowadays are done without fuel stops. Go ask on airliners.net what aviation experts there think about your claim of fuel stops being required for most intercontinental flights, lol. But be warned: you will probably be banned as a troll there.

 

[Detona]

AH, I see this little bitch has rescinded her submission and is back for another ass whooping. Some women die hard.

You have been googling hastily during the whole discussion, so you do clearly care. You simply don't find any examples of flights to Thailand via Japan being the cheapest.

Cope. Googling is easy, searching for flights is boring.

Economy light doesn't have anything to do with a plane flying direct or not.

It's cheaper than standard economy which is what your other flights were.

The same planes have different classes: business class, economy, etc. You can fly in business class for the same flights if you want to. The class you are flying has nothing to do with the flight being direct or not. Again an example that proves that you have never been in an airplane.

And planes don't have to be fully fueled because they don't fly so far that they would need to be fully fueled. For example, the A359 has a range of 15000 km. You don't have to fully fuel it for a flight that is only 8300 km. Do you think a car needs to have a tank full of gas for a 5 miles trip? lol.

They are rarely fueled enough for a flight to Thailand from Europe.

Get out of your basement. Go on a trip. Maybe your caretaker will allow you do to that someday. You need desperately need some real-life experience. The fact that you think flying 8300 km (from Finland to Thailand) requires a fuel stop is a clear indication that you don't have any experience of intercontinental traveling.

Literally 90% of the flights this faggot posted involved stops for fuel.

By far most intercontinental flights nowadays are done without fuel stops.

Wrong. Provide a single source that says that

Go ask on airliners.net what aviation experts there think about your claim of fuel stops being required for most intercontinental flights, lol. But be warned: you will probably be banned as a troll there.

How about you go do it for me? Put your money where your mouth is.

 

[ScoobyCurry420]

@Detona
View attachment 1741034View attachment 1741035View attachment 1741036View attachment 1741037View attachment 1741038

Im curious who white women are with.

 

[Wallenberg]

They are rarely fueled enough for a flight to Thailand from Europe.

Literally 90% of the flights this faggot posted involved stops for fuel.

Wrong. Provide a single source that says that

Anyone who has traveled a bit knows that nowadays fuel stops are extremely rare. You don't know this because you haven't ever been on an airplane.

Every flight from Europe to Thailand is fueled enough to fly without fuel stops.

Go ask airliners.net what they think.

Maybe you provide a source for once? And I mean source that proves your claim, not something that doesn't prove your claim but what you want to interpret creatively.

 

[Detona]

Anyone who has traveled a bit knows that nowadays fuel stops are extremely rare. You don't know this because you haven't ever been on an airplane.

Cope. Both links I showed you said common. Your precious airliners.net says common:

https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1469203

Every flight from Europe to Thailand is fueled enough to fly without fuel stops.

Obviously wrong, 90% of your flights are stopped.

Go ask airliners.net what they think.

Can someone explain this stop? - Airliners.net

Maybe you provide a source for once? And I mean source that proves your claim, not something that doesn't prove your claim but what you want to interpret creatively.

Can someone explain this stop? - Airliners.net

 

[Wallenberg]

Cope. Both links I showed you said common. Your precious airliners.net says common:

https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1469203






Obviously wrong, 90% of your flights are stopped.

Yeah, they are stopped because they are connecting flights. Connecting flight isn't the same as a fuel stop.

And no, a single fuel stop doesn't mean that it's common for planes to do fuel stops... Besides they say it's common in some SJU place. Not everywhere. And the reason is that the runway isn't long enough to fuel a plane with the required fuel so they have to do a fuel stop. This is not the case in 99% of airports. Learn to read.

What are you trying to achieve with this nonsense?

 

[Wallenberg]

Btw, you continued googling. Good. Now show me when Finland - Japan - Thailand is cheaper than a direct flight or connecting flight through Europe or the Middle East. Oh you won't do that, because it's not true. Again, what motivates you to spew nonsense?

 

[Detona]

Yeah, they are stopped because they are connecting flights. Connecting flight isn't the same as a fuel stop.

And no, a single fuel stop doesn't mean that it's common for planes to do fuel stops... Besides they say it's common in some SJU place. Not everywhere. And the reason is that the runway isn't long enough to fuel a plane with the required fuel so they have to do fuel stop. This is not the case in 99% of airports.

What are you trying to achieve with this nonsense?

Literal fucking quotes including one from an air traffic controller who works there



It's very common to have flights making fuel stops here at SJU either on their way to STT or returning to the mainland. Back in the day, United even had scheduled flights between SJU and STT (with an A319, I believe). Last year, United took advantage of the current situation and briefly brought that leg back. The runway at STT isn't that long for a full payload, so airlines either make scheduled stops for fuel or divert.

I would guess fuel. STT's runway is only 7,000ft long, which can't be used at MTOW on the 737-800. With flights nearing six hours to a vacation destination, I'm sure they'd be getting up there in weight


You cannot cope any harder tonight. I've given your anus a shotgun-type wound.

 

[Wallenberg]

Literal fucking quotes including one from an air traffic controller who works there



It's very common to have flights making fuel stops here at SJU either on their way to STT or returning to the mainland. Back in the day, United even had scheduled flights between SJU and STT (with an A319, I believe). Last year, United took advantage of the current situation and briefly brought that leg back. The runway at STT isn't that long for a full payload, so airlines either make scheduled stops for fuel or divert.

I would guess fuel. STT's runway is only 7,000ft long, which can't be used at MTOW on the 737-800. With flights nearing six hours to a vacation destination, I'm sure they'd be getting up there in weight


You cannot cope any harder tonight. I've given your anus a shotgun-type wound.

Learn to read.

He says it's common in SJU. That's a single airport. They explained the reason: the runway is so short (an airport on a small island) that they can't fuel the plane with all the required fuel because the plane can't take off with such weight on such a short runway. So they have to do a fuel stop at an airport with a longer runway.

This is not the case in 99% of airports.

So no. Fuel stops being common on a single small airport, located on a small island, doesn't mean that they are common everywhere.

You are not only retarded but also illiterate.