Can any of you fags solve this I have no clue

[FrameMogger]

 

[traveler]

go with 5 always 5

 

[Deleted member 4362]

its 1

 

[Deleted member 4362]

They are all divided into equal parts

 

[FrameMogger]

They are all divided into equal parts

High iq it took me 10 min to solve

 

[Deleted member 17791]

what iq test is this?

 

[Darkthrone]

 

[Darkthrone]

 

[FrameMogger]

what iq test is this?

idk I think someone stole a question from raven advanced matrices and posted it online

 

[Deleted member 17791]

idk I think someone stole a question from raven advanced matrices and posted it online

It's good. Too bad Getshrekt ruined it for me by saying the answer.

 

[Deleted member 18603]

the only iq test is how big your skull is

 

[FrameMogger]

the only iq test is how big your skull is

Brain size maybe but some fags out there have hollow skulls

 

[Deleted member 4362]

High iq it took me 10 min to solve

Post another ones

 

[Deleted member 18603]

Brain size maybe but some fags out there have hollow skulls

thots on this majestic skull of behemoth proportions?

 

[FrameMogger]

Post another ones

Give me a min I'll spam a bunch of iq shit

 

[FrameMogger]

@GetShrekt

https://wais-iv-general-knowledge-a61995.netlify.app GEN knowledge iq test
https://wais-iv-vocabulary-c443c8.netlify.app VOCAB (most accurate iq test you can take besides old sat verbal on the web)
https://wais-iv-symbol-search-f568d4.netlify.app Processing speed, decent approximate but not that accurate for iq


Here are more, I could only do 36 and I tested 130+ at 8 years old on the WISC.

 

[Deleted member 18603]

39. f
38. e
37. h
36. d

 

[Deleted member 4362]

@GetShrekt

https://wais-iv-general-knowledge-a61995.netlify.app GEN knowledge iq test
https://wais-iv-vocabulary-c443c8.netlify.app VOCAB (most accurate iq test you can take besides old sat verbal on the web)
https://wais-iv-symbol-search-f568d4.netlify.app Processing speed, decent approximate but not that accurate for iq


Here are more, I could only do 36 and I tested 130+ at 8 years old on the WISC.

View attachment 1646849View attachment 1646850View attachment 1646851View attachment 1646853

Idk the first one is G maybe?

 

[Deleted member 17791]

thots on this majestic skull of behemoth proportions?

Sloped horehead faggot who thinks he can prove god. Gets mogged by this jewish titan of a physicist.

 

[FrameMogger]

39. f
38. e
37. h
36. d

idk but 36 is wrong its F

 

[FrameMogger]

Idk the first one is G maybe?

Can you do the vocal test its super short and more accurate than any of the matrix tests

 

[Deleted member 18603]

idk but 36 is wrong its F

brootal

being brainlet is suffering

 

[FrameMogger]

brootal

being brainlet is suffering

do the vocab test matrix tests are not as predictive

 

[Deleted member 18603]

Sloped horehead faggot who thinks he can prove god. Gets mogged by this jewish titan of a physicist.

he scares me alot, his thirds are disproportionately tall, he looks like a giant creature that will haunt you at night

 

[Deleted member 17791]

he scares me alot, his thirds are disproportionately tall, he looks like a giant creature that will haunt you at night

He's annunaki.

 

[metagross]

Can you do the vocal test its super short and more accurate than any of the matrix tests

They are better for predicting EA, if I remember correctly. But it has it's flaws.
While rare, it can lead to situations such as the Stephen J. Gould fiasco.

 

[FrameMogger]

They are better for predicting EA, if I remember correctly. But it has it's flaws.
While rare, it can lead to situations such as the Stephen J. Gould fiasco.

Explain more please

 

[metagross]

Explain more please

Stephen J. Gould had high verbal IQ but was terrible at math. Leading people to think that he was smarter than he actually was.

"And so the very aversion to mathematics that makes Gould so appealing to his audience means that his books, while they may seem to his readers to contain deep ideas, seem to people who actually know the field to be mere literary confections with little serious intellectual content, and much of that simply wrong." - https://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm

 

[chaddyboi66]

 

[darkness97]

@GetShrekt

https://wais-iv-general-knowledge-a61995.netlify.app GEN knowledge iq test
https://wais-iv-vocabulary-c443c8.netlify.app VOCAB (most accurate iq test you can take besides old sat verbal on the web)
https://wais-iv-symbol-search-f568d4.netlify.app Processing speed, decent approximate but not that accurate for iq


Here are more, I could only do 36 and I tested 130+ at 8 years old on the WISC.

View attachment 1646849View attachment 1646850View attachment 1646851View attachment 1646853

norms for vocab?

 

[Deleted member 15827]

They are all divided into equal parts

My reasoning was no of parts in each in order comes to be 4 2 9 4 6 and 4 recurs after two numbers so following same logic 2 would recur after two numbers and the only one that fits that option is 1.