Can high T men be left wing?

He supports Biden, he's a neo lib and a pedophile
I think most far leftists support Biden because he was the “lesser of two evils”

He calls himself a libertarian socialist, so he’s along the line of a anarchist. I’ve always seen Anarchists as the most weird/subhuman of all leftists tbh especially when compared to stalinists etc who can be based at times
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl
ayixw7vbe4481.png
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: TsarTsar444, Richard_Hungwell and fjor2096
I think most far leftists support Biden because he was the “lesser of two evils”
Captain America Lol GIF by mtv

He calls himself a libertarian socialist, so he’s along the line of a anarchist. I’ve always seen Anarchists as the most weird/subhuman of all leftists tbh especially when compared to stalinists etc who can be based at times
He's not a true anarchist though because he still supports NATO.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
how the fuck is this cuckolded bullshit based, do you like to be held in a cage and be mentally fondled by faggot ass queer old nerds who are about to die, so they take it out on the youth generation? Fuck these faggots and fuck everything left wing.
You just described right wing politics in the US
 
Left wingers live in the real world. Your freedoms are already constrained by your employer, creditors, physical and mental limits, and how expensive essential services/commodities are
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 18522, Deleted member 17311, Richard_Hungwell and 2 others
I like some traditional things, but that doesn't mean I want to impose them on everyone. The reason I abandoned the right wing was her gynocentrism - the policy of banning men from leaving the country during the war while women can flee, higher retirement age for men, and putting women on a pedestal. Conservatism is no alternative to feminism. Misandry speaks for both of these options. That is why we need the pro-male left wing.
Pro-male left wing? Welfare and other supports will be male-only while the women are forced to go out and work? I'd be cool with being a househusband tbh. I think men have worked hard enough throughout history. I think it's time for men to finally kick back and relax while the women go out and work to keep society running.
 
You just described right wing politics in the US
LOL, Right wingers are about freedom, cheap gas, cheap guns, gun freedom, and freedom of speech. You are fucking brainwashed. Probably thinks that right wingers are fascists when left wing free speech censoring is pure fascism at in its truest sense
 
LOL, Right wingers are about freedom, cheap gas, cheap guns, gun freedom, and freedom of speech. You are fucking brainwashed. Probably thinks that right wingers are fascists when left wing free speech censoring is pure fascism at in its truest sense

-your so called freedom is worthless if you’re broke, unhealthy and drowning in school/medical debt

-I want guns out of the hands of psycho incels and anyone who can’t pass a rigorous background check/psych evaluation
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18522 and Deleted member 17311
I want guns out of the hands of psycho incel
vote for better background checks then. Because criminals can get a gun easily from mexico, imported straight from iraq, so many peaceful people need access to guns.

The US is not like europe, its not even close to the same. You are thinking of two different worlds. You can't implement socialist values into a country that is as far evolved with these freedoms such as the US. You will take the guns form the good people and give them to the bad people, thats it. It won't work, it will never work. If you are scared of this situation(active shooter situation) then you must move to a different country or train well with firearms and be ready to defend yourself and others if need be.

There is no other solution, and no other solution will be accepted by the American People.
 
i support guns so communist revolutionaries can obtain more of them
 
No. Right wing views are a product of testosterone. That’s why the vast majority of men vote right and women vote left.
 
Oh, have you read the bellcurve? It tells you all about race and IQ!
62C12CA0 CBBC 40EB 967B C25849021ACF

Oh man, did you know that half of all wealth is owned by only one percent of the population?
DADE1BC3 A991 4643 8148 DAE617C262C4

Hmm, interesting. Well I have to go, we can talk some other time.
7156ADF0 9E7B 4F3B 8654 417A3603282F
 
i support guns so communist revolutionaries can obtain more of them
1654892843443


No. Right wing views are a product of testosterone. That’s why the vast majority of men vote right and women vote left.
Men vote for the right wing because most of the modern left is feminist. Identity politics shattered the class war. In the old days, it was primarily men who pushed the world forward with a revolutionary act - the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, the Cuban Revolution, the Chinese Revolution, etc. Therefore, we need a pro-male left that will solve the problems created by capitalism that serves the interests of bankers and elites. We also need to fight identity politics that discourage men from joining the labor movement.

LOL, Right wingers are about freedom, cheap gas, cheap guns, gun freedom, and freedom of speech. You are fucking brainwashed. Probably thinks that right wingers are fascists when left wing free speech censoring is pure fascism at in its truest sense
The freedom you write about is for the chosen ones. Right-wingers support the forced conscription of young men into the army, a lower retirement age for women, a ban on leaving the country for men during the war, policies serving banks and corporations. I don't know how fucked up you have to be to love it.

I also remind you that the fact that a corporation sets up a rainbow logo does not mean that it becomes leftist. These are liberals, rainbow capitalists. Their goal is to attract morally progressive customers. The right wing, on the other hand, uses it to distract from the interests of the working class.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and alriodai
No one on the far right supports Bankers. I don’t know where you got that idea. Free markets yes but usury is a hard no. We also hate Jews
 
View attachment 1727656


Men vote for the right wing because most of the modern left is feminist. Identity politics shattered the class war. In the old days, it was primarily men who pushed the world forward with a revolutionary act - the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, the Cuban Revolution, the Chinese Revolution, etc. Therefore, we need a pro-male left that will solve the problems created by capitalism that serves the interests of bankers and elites. We also need to fight identity politics that discourage men from joining the labor movement.


The freedom you write about is for the chosen ones. Right-wingers support the forced conscription of young men into the army, a lower retirement age for women, a ban on leaving the country for men during the war, policies serving banks and corporations. I don't know how fucked up you have to be to love it.

I also remind you that the fact that a corporation sets up a rainbow logo does not mean that it becomes leftist. These are liberals, rainbow capitalists. Their goal is to attract morally progressive customers. The right wing, on the other hand, uses it to distract from the interests of the working class.
liberals support 50% higher gas prices, electric vehicles which run out of charge in hours, untested vaccines, teaching bullshit propaganda to kids, and force this all down your throat. Right wing is basic freedoms without big brother spying on you, there is no draft in the millitary and hasn't been for 50 years. Mute point, all garbage, all forced bullshit that will do nothing but destroy the human mind. But I know that smallcock brainless fags love it because it makes everyone else miserable so not only they have to be.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: alriodai
liberals support 50% higher gas prices, electric vehicles which run out of charge in hours, untested vaccines, teaching bullshit propaganda to kids, and force this all down your throat. Right wing is basic freedoms without big brother spying on you, there is no draft in the millitary and hasn't been for 50 years. Mute point, all garbage, all forced bullshit that will do nothing but destroy the human mind. But I know that smallcock brainless fags love it because it makes everyone else miserable so not only they have to be.
both are capitalistic faggots
fuck them
 
No one on the far right supports Bankers. I don’t know where you got that idea. Free markets yes but usury is a hard no. We also hate Jews
A free market inevitably leads to monopolization. Capitalism puts profit above man. This is why the planned obsolescence of the product is made. It is not good for a society that is burdened with a lot of rubbish and expenses to buy, for example, a new refrigerator every few years.

capitalism is the system that rewards hard working man, communism is the system which opresses all.
And what did a rich man do to inherit flats and live off people who rent flats? Masses of young people often work overtime and are so-called "working poor". These people are underestimated. Without their work, the country could do nothing. As for inheritance, if people are not responsible for the sins of their ancestors, then they should not profit from their ancestors.

liberals support 50% higher gas prices, electric vehicles which run out of charge in hours, untested vaccines, teaching bullshit propaganda to kids, and force this all down your throat. Right wing is basic freedoms without big brother spying on you, there is no draft in the millitary and hasn't been for 50 years. Mute point, all garbage, all forced bullshit that will do nothing but destroy the human mind. But I know that smallcock brainless fags love it because it makes everyone else miserable so not only they have to be.
It is difficult for me to imagine what “personal liberty” is enjoyed by an unemployed hungry person. True freedom can only be where there is no exploitation and oppression of one person by another; where there is not unemployment, and where a person is not living in fear of losing his job, his home and his bread. Only in such a society personal and any other freedom can exist for real and not on paper.
 
A free market inevitably leads to monopolization. Capitalism puts profit above man. This is why the planned obsolescence of the product is made. It is not good for a society that is burdened with a lot of rubbish and expenses to buy, for example, a new refrigerator every few years.


And what did a rich man do to inherit flats and live off people who rent flats? Masses of young people often work overtime and are so-called "working poor". These people are underestimated. Without their work, the country could do nothing. As for inheritance, if people are not responsible for the sins of their ancestors, then they should not profit from their ancestors.


It is difficult for me to imagine what “personal liberty” is enjoyed by an unemployed hungry person. True freedom can only be where there is no exploitation and oppression of one person by another; where there is not unemployment, and where a person is not living in fear of losing his job, his home and his bread. Only in such a society personal and any other freedom can exist for real and not on paper.
dont tell me this unless you work 40 to 60 hours a week, because thats what I have to do. Do I still like capitalism? yes because it gives me hope for the future. There are plenty who have regular families who rise up and make hundreds of thousands a year. All in call capitalism has it's flaws, rich families can stay in power and have immunity from the law pretty much, this is something very bad, but all in all, socialism is the same thing except regular peoples cannot get rich at all, so now its just the rich families.

See where the flaw in the argument is?
 
rich families can stay in power and have immunity from the law pretty much, this is something very bad
What is the cure for this? I would like to know what solution you propose for this. This is definitely not fair.

Do I still like capitalism? yes because it gives me hope for the future.
And what will be the future if it serves the interests of the owners of corporations, banks and concerns? They don't care about the future of the next generations. This can be seen, for example, by how much money from their pockets goes to the propaganda of the negation of climate change. At the same time, they are shifting the costs of fighting climate change onto poor people. This hope you are talking about is false class consciousness.

socialism is the same thing except regular peoples cannot get rich at all, so now its just the rich families.
Do you know what socialism is? How do you define it? Think seriously about whether if you were rich, would you try to present the alternative to capitalism as something terrible. Everything you know is controlled by certain groups of influence - the biggest media serve the rich.

There are plenty who have regular families who rise up and make hundreds of thousands a year.
Where do you live? I would like to get to know a country where life is so good. Anyway, let me tell you that there is an alternative to this system in which we live. I will use the example of the Polish People's Republic during the reign of Bolesław Bierut:

1) Nationalization of industry and banks. It was during the Bierut administration that large enterprises were taken over for the benefit of the Polish state. This ended the robbery of Poland by foreign capital and the local oligarchy. Thanks to this, it was possible to stop the outflow of funds from the Polish economy. We managed to redirect funds to priority development goals and to achieve growth thanks to an unprecedented rate of investment in the national income. The current elite has privatized the national wealth, handing it over to global corporations, banks and the comprador oligarchy. Bierut's nationalization was the acquisition of economic sovereignty by Poland.
2) Agricultural reform and the pursuit of collectivization. In Bierut's time, it was possible to implement an agrarian reform, which was not implemented by any government of the interwar period. Bierut actively supported and promoted cooperative movement in the countryside. Today, seeing the low efficiency of Polish farms resulting from their fragmentation, you can see that he was right. The direction of Bolesław Bierut's agricultural policy still remains the only sensible path for Polish agriculture.
3) Post-war reconstruction. Thanks to the 3-year plan, the Polish industry achieved productivity before the outbreak of the war. Sixth Bierut's economic development plan made it possible to increase industrial production by another 250%. With the current capitalist economy, we can only dream of such a pace of growth. The industry was based on Polish raw materials. Currently, Poland is only an assembly plant for intermediate products for Western concerns.
4) The reconstruction of Bierut took place without Poland becoming indebted. Bolesław Bierut as president and then prime minister defended Poland against the attempts of the financiers. Currently, billions of zlotys that could be spent on the development of the Polish economy are lost on interest payments for the class of parasite-usury-banking pests parasitizing on public money.

What do you think - do people want to be slaves to banks, live in a colony country, be wagecucks? These problems have been overcome at some point, so it is possible to do it again. Under capitalism only the owners of the means of production get richer, and under socialism the whole of society benefits. There is no solution to the cyclical crises of capitalism as they are an integral part of it.

1655053383380
 
What is the cure for this? I would like to know what solution you propose for this. This is definitely not fair.


And what will be the future if it serves the interests of the owners of corporations, banks and concerns? They don't care about the future of the next generations. This can be seen, for example, by how much money from their pockets goes to the propaganda of the negation of climate change. At the same time, they are shifting the costs of fighting climate change onto poor people. This hope you are talking about is false class consciousness.


Do you know what socialism is? How do you define it? Think seriously about whether if you were rich, would you try to present the alternative to capitalism as something terrible. Everything you know is controlled by certain groups of influence - the biggest media serve the rich.


Where do you live? I would like to get to know a country where life is so good. Anyway, let me tell you that there is an alternative to this system in which we live. I will use the example of the Polish People's Republic during the reign of Bolesław Bierut:






What do you think - do people want to be slaves to banks, live in a colony country, be wagecucks? These problems have been overcome at some point, so it is possible to do it again. Under capitalism only the owners of the means of production get richer, and under socialism the whole of society benefits. There is no solution to the cyclical crises of capitalism as they are an integral part of it.

View attachment 1730104
Under US capitalism, those who cant work get disability, those who work hard get paid good, those who build their company get rich, and those who come from rich families stay rich.

There is not a flaw I see with this system other then immunity from the law which those rich people get. This is a problem with law enforcement/government bribery, not capitalism. The US system is very fair and fool-proof, and attempting to change it will create nothing but problems.
 
Yeah Stalin, Mao and Tito
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl
I like some traditional things, but that doesn't mean I want to impose them on everyone. The reason I abandoned the right wing was her gynocentrism - the policy of banning men from leaving the country during the war while women can flee, higher retirement age for men, and putting women on a pedestal. Conservatism is no alternative to feminism. Misandry speaks for both of these options. That is why we need the pro-male left wing.
I understand ur view, but urss was also cucked af, u were a cuck of the state
 
I dont think anyone that lives in the US, that was born in the US understands how LUCK they are
JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL JFL

people born in the US are LUCK AS FUCK in economic terms aka almost everything
I live in BRAZIL and you fuckers have no idea how fucked is here in terms of money, and tbh i think its like this in almost everycountry that is not the USA

everything is so HARD
you work work work work work work work work work work work work and you cant buy shit, you work for months to save money to buy a cell phone
 
if you were born in the us and is a communist you should go live in a 3rd world country for 3 years working on a regular job to see how "real life" works
 
you're basically a slave here
people are retarded, things dont work how they should, everything is hard and tiresome
 
I understand ur view, but urss was also cucked af, u were a cuck of the state
After 1956? I will agree. Nevertheless, we received a lot of support from the USSR in expelling the Germans from Poland. The USSR was the fastest developing country in the world - the same was with the Polish People's Republic. The pre-war Poland did not achieve as much as the post-war Poland. I have described it below in points.

1655130916380


if you were born in the us and is a communist you should go live in a 3rd world country for 3 years working on a regular job to see how "real life" works
US is a 3rd world country.

Under US capitalism, those who cant work get disability, those who work hard get paid good, those who build their company get rich, and those who come from rich families stay rich.

There is not a flaw I see with this system other then immunity from the law which those rich people get. This is a problem with law enforcement/government bribery, not capitalism. The US system is very fair and fool-proof, and attempting to change it will create nothing but problems.
I would not like to be born in the USA, I prefer my country. Why? We have no shootings, healthcare and education are public, we have a reasonable immigration policy (we don't let just anyone in). Of course it could be better. And it was better (during the reign of Bierut):

1) Nationalization of industry and banks. It was during the Bierut administration that large enterprises were taken over for the benefit of the Polish state. This ended the robbery of Poland by foreign capital and the local oligarchy. Thanks to this, it was possible to stop the outflow of funds from the Polish economy. We managed to redirect funds to priority development goals and to achieve growth thanks to an unprecedented rate of investment in the national income. The current elite has privatized the national wealth, handing it over to global corporations, banks and the comprador oligarchy. Bierut's nationalization was the acquisition of economic sovereignty by Poland.
2) Agricultural reform and the pursuit of collectivization. In Bierut's time, it was possible to implement an agrarian reform, which was not implemented by any government of the interwar period. Bierut actively supported and promoted cooperative movement in the countryside. Today, seeing the low efficiency of Polish farms resulting from their fragmentation, you can see that he was right. The direction of Bolesław Bierut's agricultural policy still remains the only sensible path for Polish agriculture.
3) Post-war reconstruction. Thanks to the 3-year plan, the Polish industry achieved productivity before the outbreak of the war. Sixth Bierut's economic development plan made it possible to increase industrial production by another 250%. With the current capitalist economy, we can only dream of such a pace of growth. The industry was based on Polish raw materials. Currently, Poland is only an assembly plant for intermediate products for Western concerns.
4) It was in Bierut's time that homelessness and vagrancy were eliminated immediately, thanks to the taking over of vacant buildings by the public sector and the division of large houses and flats into smaller ones. It is this redistribution of living space that saved many of the poorest families from homelessness. In addition, new housing construction was started, equipped with the necessary utilities, which simply did not exist in the pre-war mud huts and basements.
5) The reconstruction of Bierut took place without Poland becoming indebted. Bolesław Bierut as president and then prime minister defended Poland against the attempts of the financiers. Currently, billions of zlotys that could be spent on the development of the Polish economy are lost on interest payments for the class of parasite-usury-banking pests parasitizing on public money.



1655131574628
 
>US is a 3rd world country.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
bro I live in BRAZIL, you dont know what us is like, where do you live?
 
>The USSR was the fastest developing country in the world

so what ? men were still cucks of the state
 
>US is a 3rd world country.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
bro I live in BRAZIL, you dont know what us is like, where do you live?
You idealize the US too much, and your country is ruled by right-wing Bolsonaro.

>The USSR was the fastest developing country in the world

so what ? men were still cucks of the state
Better to be a cuck for a capitalist? The state cared for people, as I have already shown. Capitalism means enslavement by banks, corporations, senseless wars for raw materials in the interests of the elite - we don't want this. Point out what was wrong with what Bolesław Bierut did:

1655135541160


REFER TO WHAT I WROTE
 
Last edited:
You idealize the US too much, and your country is ruled by right-wing Bolsonaro.


Better to be a cuck for a capitalist? The state cared for people, as I have already shown. Capitalism means enslavement by banks, corporations, senseless wars for raw materials in the interests of the elite - we don't want this. Point out what was wrong with what Bolesław Bierut did:

View attachment 1731463

REFER TO WHAT I WROTE
"your country is ruled by right wing"
:feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha::feelshaha:

bolsonaro rules shit, you say like he is a king who makes the rules of the country :ROFLMAO:
 
i idealize shit
the problems americans say are problems are ridiculous when compared to the life of an average third world country
all an American has to do to have a decent life is work, in a third world country you work, work, work and have nothing, we are true slaves

an uncle of mine who was poor fucked up in brazil, went to the united states and now has a decent life there, he works with civil construction, meanwhile his brothers and sisters here are slaves with pathetic purchasing power in this brazil shithole
 
an American thinks it's normal for a wall-drilling machine to be something super affordable for the average person, for example, JFL.

everything is expensive and difficult to buy outside the united states, these retards who complain about life and were born in the united states have to be slapped in the face a lot
 
You still haven't answered the question. You don't make sense to bid on who has a worse life. There are countries much better than the US.
 
 
Theodore


And of course I'm waiting for someone to show me what's wrong with it. Many skip this and are afraid to answer. Is there anything to be afraid of? I challenge all of you who are anti-communists.

1655321099693

I will be glad to know what evil is hidden in the actions of Bolesław Bierut mentioned above...
 
The far right, of which I consider myself to be part of, is also extremely anti-corporation. We believe in small government, small business, and small community. Only the magatards suck love big business because of Trump. No serious right winger supports anything that infringes on individual sovereignty.
 
The far right, of which I consider myself to be part of, is also extremely anti-corporation.
“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” — Benito Mussolini

We believe in small government, small business, and small community.
How can a small government stop business from monopolizing? This would require regulation, hence the restriction of the free market.

No serious right winger supports anything that infringes on individual sovereignty.
Looking at the actions of the right wing, I have serious doubts about it.
 

Similar threads

romanstock
Replies
2
Views
73
romanstock
romanstock
caleb555
Replies
4
Views
68
caleb555
caleb555
LaytonC
Replies
12
Views
166
centq001
centq001
asdvek
Replies
5
Views
80
joan
joan

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top