Can someone describe 3 tiers of women in detail?

Parminder Singh

Parminder Singh

Iron
Joined
Oct 15, 2025
Posts
7
Reputation
9
In looksmaxxing and BP circles, the concept of men being either Sub-5, Normie, or Chad, exists. I have heard similars terms used for women like Stacy, Becky, etc. Are there any offical "Tiers of Women"? If yes, I'd appreciate it if anyone can link to the information or explain first hand.

My goal is to collect information on the topic and use it as a reference in the future.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable and gigacumster3000
lmafaoooo you actually think there are "official tiers of women"? get rekt normie
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Kieito, takethewhitepill and unstable
In looksmaxxing and BP circles, the concept of men being either Sub-5, Normie, or Chad, exists. I have heard similars terms used for women like Stacy, Becky, etc. Are there any offical "Tiers of Women"? If yes, I'd appreciate it if anyone can link to the information or explain first hand.

My goal is to collect information on the topic and use it as a reference in the future.
pay
 
In looksmaxxing and BP circles, the concept of men being either Sub-5, Normie, or Chad, exists. I have heard similars terms used for women like Stacy, Becky, etc. Are there any offical "Tiers of Women"? If yes, I'd appreciate it if anyone can link to the information or explain first hand.

My goal is to collect information on the topic and use it as a reference in the future.
They are all infinite SMV. Stop using wheatwaffles tiers
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Qbot9000 and Eärendil
Ltb mtb htb there is no such thing as an smv match for subhuman or chad
 
  • +1
Reactions: Qbot9000
I don't know what "Ltb mtb htb" means 😅. Can ya explain?
Low mid high teir becky, really we should use a different qualifier imo using becky is actually part of what leads to overrating I dont think normie fits exactly either but something like that
 
Low mid high teir becky, really we should use a different qualifier imo using becky is actually part of what leads to overrating I dont think normie fits exactly either but something like that
So basically as of yet, there is no clear identification system for rating women's attractiveness? If that is the case, thats pretty bad because how are we even going to evaluate whether a woman's opinion is worth considering if we dont even know if the woman is question is date worthy or not?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: unstable
So basically as of yet, there is no clear identification system for rating women's attractiveness? If that is the case, thats pretty bad because how are we even going to evaluate whether a woman's opinion is worth considering if we dont even know if the woman is question is date worthy or not?
100% foid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Qbot9000 and takethewhitepill
So basically as of yet, there is no clear identification system for rating women's attractiveness? If that is the case, thats pretty bad because how are we even going to evaluate whether a woman's opinion is worth considering if we dont even know if the woman is question is date worthy or not?
Why would their attractiveness have anything to do with opinion? This system is just shorthand to find smv match, its like if we dont know the constatn for gravity things still attract each other
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top