Can someone explain to me this new rating scale y'all retards be using?

Pendejo

Pendejo

Fire
Joined
Apr 15, 2019
Posts
18,792
Reputation
29,573
Why the fuck did you guys decide to come up with a whole lot of new unnecesary subcategories for rating people, like wtf is a 'hltn' or a 'lhtn' even supposed to mean :lul:? Bunch of coping faggots, y'all will really do anything to avoid coming to terms with the fact that you are less attractive than what you believe yourself to be, and are nothing but some subhumans in the eyes of attractive women.

Like at this point you might as well just use the decile scale like fucking redditors, because the purpose of the PSL scale, which was to be a blunt scale that differentiated clearly the actual tiers that matter when it comes to attractiveness and didn't leave room for coping, has clearly been defeated with these stupid modifications.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Skbidi Amogus, MoggingLater, Be_ConfidentBro and 2 others
If you can't figure out what lhtn and hmtn means whilst already knowing what htn and mtn means, you shouldn't be allowed to vote
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Topkra, Decha, GoErOnFoids and 12 others
yes PSL is too objective for the objective raters
 
  • +1
Reactions: aidenltn17
Whatever bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: GoErOnFoids, rraymond and aidenltn17
It's not unnecessary or complex, you just have shit working memory. Not all HTNs are equal, etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Topkra, Decha and .πππ„π”πŒπ€π“.
No hate tho buddy
 
  • +1
Reactions: aidenltn17
Wheres the respect for our elders?
 
  • +1
Reactions: aidenltn17
because of how debated the number scale is, people like to say lhtn instead of 6.25 or whatever
 
Yeah but lltn and ltn

Just say your subhuman
I think lltn would be the tier where you're barely able to have friends and participate in social gatherings and have people who like you despite being ugly asf [knew many people like this durin gmy time in college] whilst subhuman is incel no friends tier
 
  • +1
Reactions: GonorrhoeaGobbler
The forum is filled with brain fried retards chads now brother. It's over for uncs like us
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MoggingLater
Why the fuck did you guys decide to come up with a whole lot of new unnecesary subcategories for rating people, like wtf is a 'hltn' or a 'lhtn' even supposed to mean :lul:? Bunch of coping faggots, y'all will really do anything to avoid coming to terms with the fact that you are less attractive than what you believe yourself to be, and are nothing but some subhumans in the eyes of attractive women.

Like at this point you might as well just use the decile scale like fucking redditors, because the purpose of the PSL scale, which was to be a blunt scale that differentiated clearly the actual tiers that matter when it comes to attractiveness and didn't leave room for coping, has clearly been defeated with these stupid modifications.
eh I think it has its uses
its a higher resolution way to measure ones looks and how close they are to ascending to the next level
I think going back to using the numerical PSL scale would make more sense but it confuses half of the users here for some reason
 
It's still funny as shit to me saying mhtn instead of 4.25 psl tho jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: luuk
It's still funny as shit to me saying mhtn instead of 4.25 psl tho jfl
I think the out of 8 PSL system is a meme I can't lie
Even back in early 2023 learning about it I found it retarded, arguing against 2021cels who were telling me "brooo just use PSL intead of /10"
Glad people have defaulted to /10
The most I use PSL for is for designating people as 6 PSL and 7.5 PSL since they carry more aura than "7.5-8/10" and "9-9.5/10"
 
  • +1
Reactions: Be_ConfidentBro
mhtn would be like 5psl+ no?
Shit bro don't ask me. But back in my day 5 psl was high tier normier to low chadlite theritory
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seeyenar
I think the out of 8 PSL system is a meme I can't lie
Even back in early 2023 learning about it I found it retarded, arguing against 2021cels who were telling me "brooo just use PSL intead of /10"
Glad people have defaulted to /10
The most I use PSL for is for designating people as 6 PSL and 7.5 PSL since they carry more aura than "7.5-8/10" and "9-9.5/10"
Oh shit wait so the new system is based on 1 through 10? That would explain a lot actually
 
  • +1
Reactions: mcmentalonthemic
Oh shit wait so the new system is based on 1 through 10? That would explain a lot actually
Subhuman: 0-3
Ltn: 4
Mtn: 5
Htn: 6
Chadlite: 7
Chad: 8
High chad: 9
"PSL God" tier: 9.5
And just change to "becky" and "stacy" for women

Though some people designate mtn as 4.5/10, htn as 5.5 and chadlite back to 7 which i find stupid, though it's technically more statistically accurate
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fridx and Be_ConfidentBro
Subhuman: 0-3
Ltn: 4
Mtn: 5
Htn: 6
Chadlite: 7
Chad: 8
High chad: 9
"PSL God" tier: 9.5
And just change to "becky" and "stacy" for women
Well come on now becky and stacy was a thing when I was active too hahahaha. But thanks bro, appreciate the break down
 
  • +1
Reactions: mcmentalonthemic
Why the fuck did you guys decide to come up with a whole lot of new unnecesary subcategories for rating people, like wtf is a 'hltn' or a 'lhtn' even supposed to mean :lul:? Bunch of coping faggots, y'all will really do anything to avoid coming to terms with the fact that you are less attractive than what you believe yourself to be, and are nothing but some subhumans in the eyes of attractive women.

Like at this point you might as well just use the decile scale like fucking redditors, because the purpose of the PSL scale, which was to be a blunt scale that differentiated clearly the actual tiers that matter when it comes to attractiveness and didn't leave room for coping, has clearly been defeated with these stupid modifications.
Tales faggot
 
Not all HTNs are equal, etc
its a higher resolution way to measure ones looks and how close they are to ascending to the next level
Real life is not a videogame where a couple of xp points separate you from being able to get girls or not, you are either ugly, mid, or hot, and whatever differences there may be between two people within each of these ranges are negligible in the eyes of women. All these subdivisions do is enable coping and make people become delusional.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Seeyenar
Real life is not a videogame where a couple of xp points separate you from being able to get girls or not, you are either ugly, mid, or hot, and whatever differences there may be between two people within each of these ranges are negligible in the eyes of women. All these subdivisions do is enable coping and make people become delusional.
more resolution is rarely a bad thing unless its entirely redundant
if a LMTN and HMTN experience different treatment and levels of sexual success then the labels are vaid
 
Ngl the fact that you ratioed me with that stupid comment goes to show how this forum is filled with autistic retards that take everything at face value πŸ’”
Hhahaha I love playing the crowd
This forum really does run on mob rule
 
Real life is not a videogame where a couple of xp points separate you from being able to get girls or not, you are either ugly, mid, or hot, and whatever differences there may be between two people within each of these ranges are negligible in the eyes of women. All these subdivisions do is enable coping and make people become delusional.
I know this isn't true because I as a straight man can easily rank women who are both hot, and every other man here can as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: Seeyenar
I know this isn't true because I as a straight man can easily rank women who are both hot, and every other man here can as well
yeah that was mega cope tbh, a man can easily be good looking enough for some women but not others
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres
I know this isn't true because I as a straight man can easily rank women who are both hot, and every other man here can as well
So what? There won't be a substantial difference in how much attention both these girls receive.

if a LMTN and HMTN experience different treatment and levels of sexual success then the labels are vaid
Big if, I don't believe that to be the case, like for such a small looks increase any other variable outside of looks could have a more noticeable impact.
 
not that deep unk
 
So what? There won't be a substantial difference in how much attention both these girls receive.


Big if, I don't belive that to be the case, like for such a small looks increase any other variable outside of looks could have a more noticeable impact.
Arguable. But no one uses this shit beyond trying to specify exactly where someone's looks level is. If you believe in lookism then being better looking will improve your life in some way
 

Similar threads

solis.bp
Replies
10
Views
1K
personalitymax
personalitymax
Abdou
Replies
64
Views
6K
R3nd4nqzar
R3nd4nqzar
D
Replies
42
Views
5K
Deleted member 59162
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top