Can someone give me a genuine rating

Aight hit me
LIke js know that evryone here rated u lmtn at best , àd u got tone of failo and serious lack of dimo and ang. Lmtn is even a lil overrate , stop complaining , u also said that nasoliabial fold were normal jflll:lul::lul::lul:
 
LIke js know that evryone here rated u lmtn at best , àd u got tone of failo and serious lack of dimo and ang. Lmtn is even a lil overrate , stop complaining , u also said that nasoliabial fold were normal jflll:lul::lul::lul:
Like since when they are normal
We're normalizing bad habits nowadays💔
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anakin_10k
LIke js know that evryone here rated u lmtn at best , àd u got tone of failo and serious lack of dimo and ang. Lmtn is even a lil overrate , stop complaining , u also said that nasoliabial fold were normal jflll:lul::lul::lul:
Oh really? care to describe my "ton of falio?" a serious lack of dimo and angularity? can u back that up as well?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-06-04 at 6.59.31 pm.png
    Screenshot 2026-06-04 at 6.59.31 pm.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 0
Oh really? care to describe my "ton of falio?" a serious lack of dimo and angularity? can u back that up as well?
Extremely Inward gonion , rounded chin , feminine nose shape , shit zygo , high buccal fat , no gonion tapering , shit lips fullness , shit masseter tapering bad soft tissue volume distribution , and this only for jfl no more than 5 , and I dont even need to do angularity just look at ur face bro
 
Extremely Inward gonion , rounded chin , feminine nose shape , shit zygo , high buccal fat , no gonion tapering , shit lips fullness , shit masseter tapering bad soft tissue volume distribution , and this only for jfl no more than 5 , and I dont even need to do angularity just look at ur face bro
Shit zygo?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-05-28 at 4.51.56 pm.png
    Screenshot 2026-05-28 at 4.51.56 pm.png
    191 KB · Views: 0
Extremely Inward gonion , rounded chin , feminine nose shape , shit zygo , high buccal fat , no gonion tapering , shit lips fullness , shit masseter tapering bad soft tissue volume distribution , and this only for jfl no more than 5 , and I dont even need to do angularity just look at ur face bro
You're right about the nose and chin.
 
You truly believe I have shit zygos
Screenshot 20260604 113818 Chrome
shit projection and the angle u show are literally normal zygo jfl , every human have zygo bro even the most zygolet nga cant get pic like this stop the cope
 
Show me yours then? do it also how do they have shit projection? My FWHR is above 2 buddy
FWhr ≠ zygo projection are u rlly this retarded?
Screenshot 20260604 114339 TikTok
lower fwhr than u , u are so fucking dumb , and also hpw showing my zygo will make urs more projected:lul:holy shit I cannot beleive we make ppl this retarded , hope they launch some eugenic campaing so dumbass like u arent on earth anymore
 
View attachment 5167366shit projection and the angle u show are literally normal zygo jfl , every human have zygo bro even the most zygolet nga cant get pic like this stop the cope
So you pick the photo with flat lighting and say it’s completely normal and then I send a photo with better lighting and say every human has this while not showing your own if every human has it then you should have it too.
 
FWhr ≠ zygo projection are u rlly this retarded?View attachment 5167384 lower fwhr than u , u are so fucking dumb , and also hpw showing my zygo will make urs more projected:lul:holy shit I cannot beleive we make ppl this retarded , hope they launch some eugenic campaing so dumbass like u arent on earth anymore
So you seriously think that the zygomatic archers don’t provide the horizontal width to allow for a higher FWHR?
 
Im talking about skin nigga, you're retarded if you think you're htn+
So you're saying skins more impotent than bones? dont even have active acne anymore lol just pie
 
So you seriously think that the zygomatic archers don’t provide the horizontal width to allow for a higher FWHR?
Uuuh proved it rn , its just if u have a short face or no , like how can u be this retarded seriously?
 
Uuuuh I took the photo u sent retard?
So you pick the photo with flat lighting and say it’s completely normal and then I send a photo with better lighting and say every human has this while not showing your own if every human has it then you should have it too.
 
Uuuh proved it rn , its just if u have a short face or no , like how can u be this retarded seriously?
You claimed my gonions are 'extremely inward' compared to the model you posted.

Here are the exact bigonial-to-facial width ratios calculated directly from the front-facing profile shots:

  • Model's ratio: 0.8719
  • My ratio: 0.8723
The structural proportions are mathematically identical. Furthermore, my midface ratio is exactly 1:1 (compact), meaning the high FWHR is physically driven by the lateral expansion of the zygomatic arches, not vertical shortening. You can't call the same exact geometric ratios 'ideal' on one person and 'shit' on another just because of flat lighting or acne


👨‍⚖️👨‍⚖️
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 3.47.53 pm.png
    Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 3.47.53 pm.png
    838.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 3.47.29 pm.png
    Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 3.47.29 pm.png
    623.1 KB · Views: 0
You claimed my gonions are 'extremely inward' compared to the model you posted.

Here are the exact bigonial-to-facial width ratios calculated directly from the front-facing profile shots:

  • Model's ratio: 0.8719
  • My ratio: 0.8723
The structural proportions are mathematically identical. Furthermore, my midface ratio is exactly 1:1 (compact), meaning the high FWHR is physically driven by the lateral expansion of the zygomatic arches, not vertical shortening. You can't call the same exact geometric ratios 'ideal' on one person and 'shit' on another just because of flat lighting or acne


👨‍⚖️👨‍⚖️
Bigonial width ≠ gonion shape:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: holy ducking shit why do u even dare to quote me saying shi this dumb lol , gonion shapeisnt mezsured w ratio retard
Screenshot 20260605 084512 Brave
either zygomatic projection , amdn how midface even include zygos? Like why its always the 60iq niggas who come and quote me
 
You claimed my gonions are 'extremely inward' compared to the model you posted.

Here are the exact bigonial-to-facial width ratios calculated directly from the front-facing profile shots:

  • Model's ratio: 0.8719
  • My ratio: 0.8723
The structural proportions are mathematically identical. Furthermore, my midface ratio is exactly 1:1 (compact), meaning the high FWHR is physically driven by the lateral expansion of the zygomatic arches, not vertical shortening. You can't call the same exact geometric ratios 'ideal' on one person and 'shit' on another just because of flat lighting or acne


👨‍⚖️👨‍⚖️
Àd who say ur fwhr is shit:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:im talking abt zygomatic projection retarrrrrrddddd:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
You literally had to post a photoshopped morph of the most famous male supermodel on earth to try and argue against my real-world data. Think about how badly you just lost the plot.

  1. You altered the actual ratio: You claim 'shape isn't measured with ratio,' yet your own morph literally widens Sean’s actual bigonial width. You physically changed the horizontal bone metrics because you couldn't disprove the math. The ratio increased from 0.91 to 0.94 which is significant.
  2. Sean o pry: If real, un-morphed Sean O'Pry is the literal gold standard of bone structure, and my both him and my gonial regions are both "subpar" you've completely defeated your own argument. You can't claim a structure makes someone a 'normie' when your only counter-example is a fake photoshop of the most successful supermodel ever. Meaning, by your own definition my "shit gonials" aren't a problem.
  3. Anatomy: You asked how the midface includes the zygos. FWHR is literally calculated using the bi-zygomatic width as the horizontal axis. My midface ratio is a perfectly balanced 1:1, meaning my high FWHR is driven by real lateral bone development, not a short face.

    You realized you couldn't beat the actual horizontal ratios, so now you're moving the goalposts to 'zygomatic projection' and 'bigonial shape" to keep the cope alive

    My age, photo conditions, and skin quality are the only reason I don't possess these "angularity metrics" you are shifting towards.
Imagine losing an argument so badly you have to post fake, imaginary morphs of another man to cope. We're done here. 👨‍⚖️👨‍⚖️
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.34.50 pm.png
    Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.34.50 pm.png
    652.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.36.03 pm.png
    Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.36.03 pm.png
    704 KB · Views: 0
Bigonial width ≠ gonion shape:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: holy ducking shit why do u even dare to quote me saying shi this dumb lol , gonion shapeisnt mezsured w ratio retardView attachment 5173036either zygomatic projection , amdn how midface even include zygos? Like why its always the 60iq niggas who come and quote me
^^
 

Similar threads

felix902100
Replies
30
Views
119
fynn
fynn
V
Replies
1
Views
26
Stanof_34
Stanof_34
linphm3667
Replies
36
Views
272
FoidSlayer001
FoidSlayer001
P
Replies
13
Views
77
jagenlkoft
jagenlkoft
GRIFFITH.0
Replies
14
Views
78
Yosri360
Yosri360

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top