lebesgue
FUTURE ALT CHAD
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2023
- Posts
- 2,899
- Reputation
- 2,041
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
nearcel cuz im 5'7Mfs will look like this and claim to be incel.
Damn, if you were 6'0-6'2 you wouldn't even be here.nearcel cuz im 5'7
I would cuz I used to look a LOT worseDamn, if you were 6'0-6'2 you wouldn't even be here.
bro doesnt need it
I wont get LL as my torso is already short. I will get a canthoplasty, lip lift, and rhinoplasty for my next surgeriesbro doesnt need it
get LL and get to 5'10-5'11 then fraud to 6'1-6'2 and you will slay everyone
Your current ESR (~0.45) is within the ideal range.I wont get LL as my torso is already short. I will get a canthoplasty, lip lift, and rhinoplasty for my next surgeries
holy shit im showing this to my surgeon im mirin ty chadYour current ESR (~0.45) is within the ideal range.
The issue with your eyes is the low palpebral fissure length (pfl), compared with the intercanthal distance (space between the two medial canthus).
In the first morph below, I have lifted the lateral canthus and expanded the pfl laterally to match the intercanthal distance.
View attachment 4533560
In the next morph, I have added the effect of a rhinoplasty. It would harmonize with the mouth, resulting in an ideal mouth-to-nose width ratio (~1.46).
View attachment 4533563
In the third morph, I have tried to simulate a lip lift. As your original upper lip is quite flat on top (no pronounced cupid bow), I have kept the same outline.
View attachment 4533568
Final morph (gif) showing a before / after all 3 procedures :
View attachment 4533590
View attachment 4533592
dont need you jester check repliesfuck no
kill yourselfdont need you jester check replies
it only works if the dude looks like that but is brown, then yes, he is indeed incelMfs will look like this and claim to be incel.
the pfl does look a little bit too alien especially with the nose sizeYour current ESR (~0.45) is within the ideal range.
The issue with your eyes is the low palpebral fissure length (pfl), compared with the intercanthal distance (space between the two medial canthus).
In the first morph below, I have lifted the lateral canthus and expanded the pfl laterally to match the intercanthal distance.
View attachment 4533560
In the next morph, I have added the effect of a rhinoplasty. It would harmonize with the mouth, resulting in an ideal mouth-to-nose width ratio (~1.46).
View attachment 4533563
In the third morph, I have tried to simulate a lip lift. As your original upper lip is quite flat on top (no pronounced cupid bow), I have kept the same outline.
View attachment 4533568
Final morph (gif) showing a before / after all 3 procedures :
View attachment 4533590
View attachment 4533592
what would you rate the morph btwYour current ESR (~0.45) is within the ideal range.
The issue with your eyes is the low palpebral fissure length (pfl), compared with the intercanthal distance (space between the two medial canthus).
In the first morph below, I have lifted the lateral canthus and expanded the pfl laterally to match the intercanthal distance.
View attachment 4533560
In the next morph, I have added the effect of a rhinoplasty. It would harmonize with the mouth, resulting in an ideal mouth-to-nose width ratio (~1.46).
View attachment 4533563
In the third morph, I have tried to simulate a lip lift. As your original upper lip is quite flat on top (no pronounced cupid bow), I have kept the same outline.
View attachment 4533568
Final morph (gif) showing a before / after all 3 procedures :
View attachment 4533590
View attachment 4533592
manlet brothernearcel cuz im 5'7
Hey,I was 5'7 but now I'm 5'8manlet brother
@thecel @greycel @Tigermoggerlol thots ?Your current ESR (~0.45) is within the ideal range.
The issue with your eyes is the low palpebral fissure length (pfl), compared with the intercanthal distance (space between the two medial canthus).
In the first morph below, I have lifted the lateral canthus and expanded the pfl laterally to match the intercanthal distance.
View attachment 4533560
In the next morph, I have added the effect of a rhinoplasty. It would harmonize with the mouth, resulting in an ideal mouth-to-nose width ratio (~1.46).
View attachment 4533563
In the third morph, I have tried to simulate a lip lift. As your original upper lip is quite flat on top (no pronounced cupid bow), I have kept the same outline.
View attachment 4533568
Final morph (gif) showing a before / after all 3 procedures :
View attachment 4533590
View attachment 4533592
lucky bastardHey,I was 5'7 but now I'm 5'8![]()
rather pay for an alleyway whore in bogotaill do it for 50$
to be fair im 5'7.5 night height measured by my wrestling coach I might scratch 5'8lucky bastard
ill do it for 50$
Just want to see the genetics I missed out onYour IPD looks fine, nothing u can do about it anyway
honestly even when I was uglier some tall girls didnt mind talking to me meanwhile the short ones ignored mesome small softmax you could do:
plug a little more hair between your 2 eyebrows, theyre a tiny bit too close together
other than that you look really good. good enough for some short girls to look past your height
yea the classic lmaohonestly even when I was uglier some tall girls didnt mind talking to me meanwhile the short ones ignored me
You can tweak it to your liking. Maybe I overexpanded the eyes a little bit, maybe not.the pfl does look a little bit too alien especially with the nose size
I don't do ratings.what would you rate the morph btw
i olweyz see on morph threads and u explain alot alotYou can tweak it to your liking. Maybe I overexpanded the eyes a little bit, maybe not.
Note that it often takes a little while to get used to changes on our own face. The initial reaction is often a mix of perplexity, awkwardness, and rejection. Be it with a morph or a first post-op self-examination.
I don't do ratings.
Your original face is roughly average, or very slightly above average.
Its get positive reactions here (in this thread) because the framing components are above average : straight hairline, strong low set eyebrows, prominent cheekbones, square wide chin.
However, upon closer inspection, your eye shape & proportions, nose, jaw frontal angle (too acute), ipsilateral angle (too acute as well), degrade your facial attractiveness and result in an overall average face.
The morphed face is noticeably above average, because it addresses at least 2 of your main flaws (eyes & nose).
What else would be left to improve (realistically) ?
As said above, the jaw frontal angle is too acute (~82°), but it harmonizes with the ipsilateral angle (~80°), and the chin's step-off mitigates it.
Lighter colored eyes would definitely make a big difference. But colored contacts are try-hard, and probably a pain in the ass on a daily basis. And laser treatments are not really safe yet.
Your hair covers your gonial angles and cheekbones, so it's impossible to precisely evaluate and comment your facial width ratios & angularity.
If we leave the realm of realistic improvements and fine-tune your face to match ideal aesthetics, I ended up with this :
View attachment 4534796
View attachment 4534787
View attachment 4534799
View attachment 4534788
(original face on the left ; "realistic" morph in the middle ; "ideal" morph on the right)
The ideal morph includes a lower hairline, symmetric eyebrow shape and low settedness, symmetric eye shape and position, widened nasion and nose bridge, improved cupid bow, higher cheekbone, improved jaw frontal angle. Basically. Just fine-tuning the original base.
To me, this is a top 1 % face and above, a statistical outlier, chadlite, chad, whatever you like to call it.
mirin iq and autism. tho I think my JFA is ideal in a less distorted pic tbh but it would holistically make perfect sense for my ipsilateral angle to be unideal without any examination at all. also the lower hairline would mess up my facial thirds and the nasion thickening would not be harmonious for the appearance of my close set eyes. mirin that you spotted my eye and eyebrow asymmetries and lack of cupids boy def.You can tweak it to your liking. Maybe I overexpanded the eyes a little bit, maybe not.
Note that it often takes a little while to get used to changes on our own face. The initial reaction is often a mix of perplexity, awkwardness, and rejection. Be it with a morph or a first post-op self-examination.
I don't do ratings.
Your original face is roughly average, or very slightly above average.
Its get positive reactions here (in this thread) because the framing components are above average : straight hairline, strong low set eyebrows, prominent cheekbones, square wide chin.
However, upon closer inspection, your eye shape & proportions, nose, jaw frontal angle (too acute), ipsilateral angle (too acute as well), degrade your facial attractiveness and result in an overall average face.
The morphed face is noticeably above average, because it addresses at least 2 of your main flaws (eyes & nose).
What else would be left to improve (realistically) ?
As said above, the jaw frontal angle is too acute (~82°), but it harmonizes with the ipsilateral angle (~80°), and the chin's step-off mitigates it.
Lighter colored eyes would definitely make a big difference. But colored contacts are try-hard, and probably a pain in the ass on a daily basis. And laser treatments are not really safe yet.
Your hair covers your gonial angles and cheekbones, so it's impossible to precisely evaluate and comment your facial width ratios & angularity.
If we leave the realm of realistic improvements and fine-tune your face to match ideal aesthetics, I ended up with this :
View attachment 4534796
View attachment 4534787
View attachment 4534799
View attachment 4534788
(original face on the left ; "realistic" morph in the middle ; "ideal" morph on the right)
The ideal morph includes a lower hairline, symmetric eyebrow shape and low settedness, symmetric eye shape and position, widened nasion and nose bridge, improved cupid bow, higher cheekbone, improved jaw frontal angle. Basically. Just fine-tuning the original base.
To me, this is a top 1 % face and above, a statistical outlier, chadlite, chad, whatever you like to call it.
need to see cuz im highkey mirin this dudei olweyz see on morph threads and u explain alot alot![]()
damn this morph genuinely dumbfounded me by how mogger it was good shit
Well, I can only judge based on the pic you have provided, and my assessment may be valid only within this limited (and distorted) frame. I take it as a playful exercise on facial aesthetics, that's it.in a less distorted pic
Based on the pic you have provided, and without any further indication on your location, you have a roughly average face. That's my perception as a western European, in a country with a large variety of phenotypes, including some similar to yours. Maybe you would be perceived differently else where, benefitting from an exotic halo (e.g. your pheno in Scandinavia), or from a jbw halo (e.g. your pheno in Mexico).I have to disagree with what you said about my attractiveness
what would you say is my pheno?Well, I can only judge based on the pic you have provided, and my assessment may be valid only within this limited (and distorted) frame. I take it as a playful exercise on facial aesthetics, that's it.
Based on the pic you have provided, and without any further indication on your location, you have a roughly average face. That's my perception as a western European, in a country with a large variety of phenotypes, including some similar to yours. Maybe you would be perceived differently else where, benefitting from an exotic halo (e.g. your pheno in Scandinavia), or from a jbw halo (e.g. your pheno in Mexico).
Note that there is nothing wrong with being average-looking. It simply means that you have an ordinary face. Although I'm obviously BP'd to some extent — or else I wouldn't be here — , I think an ordinary face won't prevent anyone to succeed in life, in every field that truly matters.
Also, if you disagree with my assessment because of irl female interactions, we would have to keep in mind that said females, if sincere, are sensitive to many details and social clues besides rationalized facial aesthetics. Maybe you give off a friendly and confident vibe, maybe you have a great smile (not shown in that pic) and a deep voice, maybe you have a niche style (long hair + piercing + goatee = metal, hardrock, electro, or other typically White interests & tastes), maybe you hang out with the right people, etc.
and yea im nichemaxxed rn trying to get a sleeve design im tatted, pierced, with long hair and in the metal scene ig I also bought sum green contacts before you even mentioned that so thats gonna be moggerWell, I can only judge based on the pic you have provided, and my assessment may be valid only within this limited (and distorted) frame. I take it as a playful exercise on facial aesthetics, that's it.
Based on the pic you have provided, and without any further indication on your location, you have a roughly average face. That's my perception as a western European, in a country with a large variety of phenotypes, including some similar to yours. Maybe you would be perceived differently else where, benefitting from an exotic halo (e.g. your pheno in Scandinavia), or from a jbw halo (e.g. your pheno in Mexico).
Note that there is nothing wrong with being average-looking. It simply means having an ordinary face. Although I'm obviously BP'd to some extent — or else I wouldn't be here — , I think an ordinary face won't prevent anyone from succeeding in life, in every field that truly matters.
Also, if you disagree with my assessment because of irl female interactions, we would have to keep in mind that said females, if sincere, are sensitive to many details and social clues besides rationalized facial aesthetics. Maybe you give off a friendly and confident vibe, maybe you have a great smile (not shown in that pic) and a deep voice, maybe you have a niche style (long hair + piercing + goatee = metal, hardrock, electro, or other typically White interests & tastes), maybe you hang out with the right people, etc.
Based on this blurry pic, you could be North-African (Berber), southern French, or a mix. You could also have roots in the Caucasus and in the Middle East. You are quite racially ambiguous, but (based on this pic, once again) I'd say White from an anthropological perspective (White ≠ European).what would you say is my pheno?
I dunno I don't exactly think phenos are too applicable a lot of the time. im from venezuela where there is a lot of mixture I dont know of my ancestry much more than my last name being catalan and having italian great grandparentsBased on this blurry pic, you could be North-African (Berber), southern French, or a mix. You could also have roots in the Caucasus and in the Middle East. You are quite racially ambiguous, but (based on this pic, once again) I'd say White from an anthropological perspective (White ≠ European).
How wrong am I ?![]()
and ive hardmaxxed with fillers already affecting how my phenotypic admixture is perceived. self injected at 17 jaw chin cheekbones undereyes even suprasBased on this blurry pic, you could be North-African (Berber), southern French, or a mix. You could also have roots in the Caucasus and in the Middle East. You are quite racially ambiguous, but (based on this pic, once again) I'd say White from an anthropological perspective (White ≠ European).
How wrong am I ?![]()
im from venezuela