Can't believe the ruskiee are such pathetic loser

[JBcollector]

1 year and couldn't take Ukraine
1 whole year
30k troops 2000 tanks 4000 truck apcs 400 special vehicles destroyed

4 ships destroyed
20 small s
80 helicopters
20 jets
1 trillion damage to the economy
10 Ukraine cities destroy even though the aim was to take Ukraine without much damage

Putin has destroyed Russia
He need the angle punishment from vikings

 

[Bashan]

America (Tranny land) would've nuke Ukraine on day third. Slavic people take so much shit in wars it's insane. Anglos would never let that happen.

 

[Deleted member 24940]

Cope Russia is winning

 

[Wallenberg]

Russia has spent tens of billions of dollars on its armed forces, yet they have managed to conquer only a small part of Ukraine. Meanwhile, Ukraine built its military from scratch in the last 9 years. Lol.

 

[BrendioEEE]

 

[STAMPEDE]

America (Tranny land) would've nuke Ukraine on day third. Slavic people take so much shit in wars it's insane. Anglos would never let that happen.

“Slavic” “Anglo” nigga what drungs are you on, why are you making this about race wtf this is so autistic

 

[JBcollector]

America (Tranny land) would've nuke Ukraine on day third. Slavic people take so much shit in wars it's insane. Anglos would never let that happen.

America would first have a workin fleet of aircraft ships and precision missile and use good intelligence to take out key targets for over 2 month also help from other allied

Take our anit air batteries with ship launch missiles
Destroyed critical infrastructure for troop trans port
Comman and communications
And blocked the sea ports
Then send local Units and militias for intelligence gathering assisted by jets drones and ac130 choppers and specialist from all parts of the world


Moscow would fall in a few months

 

[JBcollector]

Slavics are subhumans who don't value human life pathetic hitler was right

 

[Artemis]

Russia has spent tens of billions of dollars on its armed forces, yet they have managed to conquer only a small part of Ukraine. Meanwhile, Ukraine built its military from scratch in the last 9 years. Lol.

Without NATO weapons, in particular AMERICAN NEWEST weapons, like HIMARS, there would have been no Ukraine by August this year already.

So Cope by Wallenberg.

Any country would struggle against a 40-million foe funded by a huge military block like NATO.

This is who Muricans lost to BTW:

And the bearded guys did NOT get any weapons from russia...

PS. Also, Stop coping with "small part". Russia annexed the territory size of britain already.

Russia readies annexation of territory as big as Portugal

Russian-installed officials in four occupied regions of Ukraine reported huge majorities of votes in favour of joining Russia as the United States planned a UN resolution condemning the referendums as shams and Russia remained defiant.

www.euractiv.com

 

[Bashan]

“Slavic” “Anglo” nigga what drungs are you on, why are you making this about race wtf this is so autistic

I pity the little jelly you call your brain

 

[JBcollector]

Without NATO weapons, in particular AMERICAN NEWEST weapons, like HIMARS, there would have been no Ukraine by August this year already.

So Cope by Wallenberg.

Any country would struggle against a 40-million foe funded by a huge military block like NATO.

This is who Muricans lost to BTW:

And the bearded guys did NOT get any weapons from russia...

Hurr durr nato they should've have done something to stop the weapons


Btw based Taliban

 

[Wallenberg]

Without NATO weapons, in particular AMERICAN NEWEST weapons, like HIMARS, there would have been no Ukraine by August this year already.

So Cope by Wallenberg.

HIMARS is just an MLRS. Russia has similar albeit worse systems. Ukraine doesn't have NATO fighter jets, doesn't have NATO tanks, NATO training etc.
The Ukrainian army is poorly trained.

 

[JBcollector]

HIMARS is just an MLRS. Russia has similar albeit worse systems. Ukraine doesn't have NATO fighter jets, doesn't have NATO tanks, NATO training etc.
The Ukrainian army is poorly trained.

Ukraine got training for 8 years
Ukraine does have better intelligence and now it's getting America light tanks

 

[Artemis]

HIMARS is just an MLRS.

Another Copenberg for you... HIMARS was developed in 2000s it is an EXTREMELY advanced artillery system, which ALONE allowed the Ukraine to turn the war around.

Russia has similar albeit worse systems.

Yes, thankfully for russia, they have more systems overall. they can press with quantity. whats the point of your argument.

Ukraine doesn't have NATO fighter jets, doesn't have NATO tanks, NATO training etc.

This is useless cope, unless they send F22 which i doubt. NATO tanks are not better than the ones russia has.

The Ukrainian army is poorly trained.

Lol, 8 years of training (Merkel said), NATO instructors, insane motivation unlike russians, and you call this "poorly trained"

Another COPE by Wallenberg. The US would struggle the SAME with the UKRAINE, if it ever attacked it.

OVerall, no matter how you cope, WORLD ARMY RANKS (incl. nuclear):

1) US
2) Russia
3) Chinese-cels
....
100500) EU and everyone else

 

[Wallenberg]

Another Copenberg for you... HIMARS was developed in 2000s it is an EXTREMELY advanced artillery system, which ALONE allowed the Ukraine to turn the war around.

Yes, thankfully for russia, they have more systems overall. they can press with quantity. whats the point of your argument.

This is useless cope, unless they send F22 which i doubt. NATO tanks are not better than the ones russia has.

Lol, 8 years of training (Merkel said), NATO instructors, insane motivation unlike russians, and you call this "poorly trained"

Another COPE by Wallenberg. The US would struggle the SAME with the UKRAINE, if it ever attacked it.

Lol western tanks are better than Russian tanks. Finland has experience with both Russian and western tanks and western tanks are better. Also seen in Iraq where American tanks annihilated Soviet made tanks.
F-35, F16, F18 etc are better than Russian planes.

Ukrainians aren't well trained. This is well-known fact. This is the reason why western countries are training them now.

 

[Artemis]

Lol western tanks are better than Russian tanks.

BULLSHIT.

Finland has experience with both Russian and western tanks and western tanks are better.

And that said... who? Pekka from local grocery store?

Also seen in Iraq where American tanks annihilated Soviet made tanks.

BULLSHIT lol.

F-35, F16, F18 etc are better than Russian planes.

BULLSHIT. Only newest generation planes are better than russian ones. THe ones you listed will be downed the first hour by S400.

Ukrainians aren't well trained.

BULLSHIT by Copenberg

This is well-known fact. This is the reason why western countries are training them now.

No it is not a well known fact, it is your fantasy.

 

[Wallenberg]

BULLSHIT.

And that said... who? Pekka from local grocery store?

BULLSHIT lol.

BULLSHIT. Only newest generation planes are better than russian ones. THe ones you listed will be downed the first hour by S400.

BULLSHIT by Copenberg

No it is not a well known fact, it is your fantasy.

Russia still hasn't managed to destroy the Ukrainian air force, despite Ukrainian air force flying with old Soviet-made planes. So no, S400 wouldn't show down western planes in an hour - it hasn't managed to shoot down old soviet-made planes used by Ukraine despite war going on for a year soon..
F-35 is a new-generation plane.
American tanks annihilated soviet made tanks in the Gulf war.
Read what military experts say instead of Russia strong bs.
This war has showed that Russian military is even worse than what many thought.

 

[STAMPEDE]

America would first have a workin fleet of aircraft ships and precision missile and use good intelligence to take out key targets for over 2 month also help from other allied

Take our anit air batteries with ship launch missiles
Destroyed critical infrastructure for troop trans port
Comman and communications
And blocked the sea ports
Then send local Units and militias for intelligence gathering assisted by jets drones and ac130 choppers and specialist from all parts of the world


Moscow would fall in a few months

nigga america couldn’t beat vietnam in 15 years what makes you think they can beat russia or take ukraine

 

[Deleted member 17578]

Russia has spent tens of billions of dollars on its armed forces, yet they have managed to conquer only a small part of Ukraine. Meanwhile, Ukraine built its military from scratch in the last 9 years. Lol.

With the support that Ukraine is getting, it has a bigger military budget than Russia lol

Russia fucked up in the beginning, and now they are fighting NATO till the last ukranian. Brutal shit innit.

 

[STAMPEDE]

I pity the little jelly you call your brain

honestly man you are so retarded “anglo” “slav” who says this shit lmao

 

[SubSigma]

View attachment 2037922

Cope Russia is winning

Rush b

 

[the BULL]

because they're fighting against whole ukraine's population + whole world's investments. their military expense is HUGE

 

[Bashan]

honestly man you are so retarded “anglo” “slav” who says this shit lmao

What's your ethnicity

 

[ihatereddit]

Reminder that before the war russophiles shilled the Russian Army as so strong they could take over the whole of Europe
That narrative is completely dead now, haven't seen it in a year
even if Russia wins this has been objectively pathethic, Russia is more washed up than cristiano ronaldo. It's over.

 

[BoneDensity]

“Slavic” “Anglo” nigga what drungs are you on, why are you making this about race wtf this is so autistic

He's an indian , everything is about race to him

 

[BoneDensity]

Another Copenberg for you... HIMARS was developed in 2000s it is an EXTREMELY advanced artillery system, which ALONE allowed the Ukraine to turn the war around.

Yes, thankfully for russia, they have more systems overall. they can press with quantity. whats the point of your argument.

This is useless cope, unless they send F22 which i doubt. NATO tanks are not better than the ones russia has.

Lol, 8 years of training (Merkel said), NATO instructors, insane motivation unlike russians, and you call this "poorly trained"

Another COPE by Wallenberg. The US would struggle the SAME with the UKRAINE, if it ever attacked it.

OVerall, no matter how you cope, WORLD ARMY RANKS (incl. nuclear):

1) US
2) Russia
3) Chinese-cels
....
100500) EU and everyone else

Don't bother
Russia bad , Ukraine good.

 

[Artemis]

Russia still hasn't managed to destroy the Ukrainian air force, despite Ukrainian air force flying with old Soviet-made planes. So no, S400 wouldn't show down western planes in an hour - it hasn't managed to shoot down old soviet-made planes used by Ukraine despite war going on for a year soon..
F-35 is a new-generation plane.
American tanks annihilated soviet made tanks in the Gulf war.
Read what military experts say instead of Russia strong bs.

So, what's your argument?

You were arguing hell knows what about... just for the sake of?

I WAS ARGUING RUSSIA IS STILL NUMBER 2 ARMY IN THE WORLD AFTER the USA

This war has showed that Russian military is even worse than what many thought.

ENOUGH to fucking erase all its neighbours, if not for the US.

If russia so weak, why finland trying to get into NATO, under the wing of Uncle Sam? Use your brain for once.

 

[Wallenberg]

So, what's your argument?

You were arguing hell knows what about... just for the sake of?

I WAS ARGUING RUSSIA IS STILL NUMBER 2 ARMY IN THE WORLD AFTER US

ENOUGH to fucking erase all its neighbours, if not for the US.

If russia so weak, why finland trying to get into NATO, under the wing of Uncle Sam? Use your brain for once.

Lol no. They can't even erase Ukraine.

Because NATO makes risk of Russia attacking Finland even lower. The risk is already quite low, not the least because Russian military is getting beaten in Ukraine.

Russian army is number 2... in Ukraine.

 

[Artemis]

Lol no. They can't even erase Ukraine.

Ukraine is 40+ million people with the huge supply of US weapons. You are just brain dead if you think russia cannot erase any of its other neighbours.

Because NATO makes risk of Russia attacking Finland even lower. The risk is already quite low, not the least because Russian military is getting beaten in Ukraine.

LOL at your reasoning. if russia army so weak, why even bother? However, all i c from YLE is politicians, crying how big bad russia comes kills everyone. So dude, stop this coping.

NATO isneeded EXACTLY because NO COUNTRY IN EUROPE can do SHIT to russia without alliances.

Russian army is number 2... in Ukraine.

Russian army is number 2 in the WORLS. And it clearly beats Finnish army if anything.

 

[St.TikTokcel]

Soyberg chimping out as per usual

 

[Wallenberg]

Ukraine is 40+ million people with the huge supply of US weapons. You are just brain dead if you think russia cannot erase any of its other neighbours.

LOL at your reasoning. if russia army so weak, why even bother? However, all i c from YLE is politicians, crying how big bad russia comes kills everyone. So dude, stop this coping.

NATO isneeded EXACTLY because NO COUNTRY IN EUROPE can do SHIT to russia without alliances.

Russian army is number 2 in the WORLS. And it clearly beats Finnish army if anything.

The Finnish army is better than Ukrainian and Finnish territory is harder to capture than Ukraine. You know Russians tried to capture and they failed. The difference is that nowadays Finnish military is way better than it was back then.
I haven't seen a single politician crying about how "russia comes and kills everyone". Russians are killing themselves in Ukraine.

 

[Deleted member 2130]

NATO tanks are not better than the ones russia has.

Of course they are. German tanks were always better. Russian tanks still have the same shitty armor they had in the 70s
Leopard2s would destroy them

 

[Artemis]

The Finnish army is better than Ukrainian and Finnish territory is harder to capture than Ukraine.

Cope more. Territory does NOT matter. Most russian casualties in Ukraine are literally in the city. If you think a dude with the skies can hide in the forest in 2022, like in 1939, you are retarded. This forest will be fucking burnt by TOS-1 leaving no one alive.

TOS-1 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

What matters, is that Ukraine CAN RECRUIT 1 MILLION PEOPLE to fight, and Finland CANNOT.

You know Russians tried to capture and they failed. The difference is that nowadays Finnish military is way better than it was back then.
I haven't seen a single politician crying about how "russia comes and kills everyone".

Oh and why is there a NATO struggles now if "oh we can defend ourself". You know that YOU ARE SAYING BULLSHIT. It does not pass even the first set of logic. To join NATO for WHAT?

Ill tell you. Because Finland CANNOT DEFEND against Russia in a full scale war. That is that. Because russia is still #2 WORLD Military power.

Russians are killing themselves in Ukraine.

Good for Finland, they are not coming here any time soon. Does not make them any less than a #2 military World power.

 

[Artemis]

Of course they are. German tanks were always better. Russian tanks still have the same shitty armor they had in the 70s
Leopard2s would destroy them

It is a fairy tale. The older Russian tanks (the ones with the towers which flow off the tank, yes), are direct competitors of ANY NATO tanks. lol at thinking that Abrams which can be destroyed by grenade launcher is anything better than russian tanks.

 

[Wallenberg]

Cope more. Territory does NOT matter. Most russian casualties in Ukraine are literally in the city. If you think a dude with the skies can hide in the forest in 2022, like in 1939, you are retarded. This forest will be fucking burnt by TOS-1 leaving no one alive.

TOS-1 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

What matters, is that Ukraine CAN RECRUIT 1 MILLION PEOPLE to fight, and Finland CANNOT.

Oh and why is there a NATO struggles now if "oh we can defend ourself". You know that YOU ARE SAYING BULLSHIT. It does not pass even the first set of logic. To join NATO for WHAT?

Ill tell you. Because Finland CANNOT DEFEND against Russia in a full scale war. That is that. Because russia is still #2 WORLD Military power.

Territory matters, lol. Forests are easier to defend than open fields. You literally don't know anything about military matters... Tell any military expert that territory doesn't matter and they will laugh at you. Finland can easily defend itself, just like Ukraine can. However, NATO makes it even easier.

Another thing is water. Finland has a lot of lakes and rivers. Russia lost an entire battalion trying to cross a single river.

Russia tried to conquer Finland. It failed. Nowadays it would be even worse for them because nowadays Finland has a better army than back then. This guy is an actual military expert btw.

 

[Wallenberg]

Of course they are. German tanks were always better. Russian tanks still have the same shitty armor they had in the 70s
Leopard2s would destroy them

Leopard 2 is more accurate and has better mobility and armor. It doesn't blow off its turret like Russian tanks.

 

[Deleted member 2130]

It is a fairy tale. The older Russian tanks (the ones with the towers which flow off the tank, yes), are direct competitors of ANY NATO tanks. lol at thinking that Abrams which can be destroyed by grenade launcher is anything better than russian tanks.

Not even close, L2s can destroy all Russian armor, even the most advanced T-72 in Ukraine, the T-90M.
You will see the difference when Ukies will get Leos and put them in use

Leopard 2 is more accurate and has better mobility and armor. It doesn't blow off its turret like Russian tanks.

Leos are superior at pretty much everything

 

[Artemis]

Territory matters, lol. Forests are easier to defend than open fields. You literally don't know anything about military matters... Tell any military expert that territory doesn't matter and they will laugh at you. Finland can easily defend itself, just like Ukraine can. However, NATO makes it even easier.

Stop COPING.

Are you a military expert my ass?

The only territory that matters is fucking CITY. Because of buildings. Or mountains. Because made of rock. Forest burns well, so your shit DOES NOT MATTER.

Another thing is water. Finland has a lot of lakes and rivers. Russia lost an entire battalion trying to cross a single river.

LOL, dont tell me our army gonna waht? Pretend FISH? or sth

Russia tried to conquer Finland. It failed. Nowadays it would be even worse for them because nowadays Finland has a better army than back then. This guy is an actual military expert btw.

Russia ALSO HAS a WAY BETTER ARMY than in 1939. In fact, russia has SECOND BEST ARMY IN THE WORLD.

Lol. some John Spencer must be a great general... OH NO its just another cope by Copenberg...

Russia simply was retreating and lost men. The SAME way, it could be finnish soldiers running from russian artillery and drowning in cold lakes. LOL if you think this is not easily reversible. The one losing IS DROWNING.

 

[Deleted member 16970]

View attachment 2037923

share more pls.

 

[Artemis]

Leopard 2 is more accurate and has better mobility and armor.

It is said by WHO? Who exactly measured this?

All i know is Abrams can be destroyed by a fucking grenade launcher.

It doesn't blow off its turret like Russian tanks.

Who gives a shit about the crew (russians dont) and the turret. If Javelin gets the tank, LEOPARD IS DEAD. Who gives a shit about the turret. Your crew will be fucking dead anyways, and tank destroyed. But ofc you COPE by saying "look how high the turret flies". Lol.

 

[Wallenberg]

Stop COPING.

Are you a military expert my ass?

The only territory that matters is fucking CITY. Because of buildings. Or mountains. Because made of rock. Forest burns well, so your shit DOES NOT MATTER.

LOL, dont tell me our army gonna waht? Pretend FISH? or sth

Russia ALSO HAS a WAY BETTER ARMY than in 1939. In fact, russia has SECOND BEST ARMY IN THE WORLD.

Lol. some John Spencer must be a great general... OH NO its just another cope by Copenberg...

Russia simply was retreating and lost men. The SAME way, it could be finnish soldiers running from russian artillery and drowning in cold lakes. LOL if you think this is not easily reversible. The one losing IS DROWNING.

Russian army is shit. Your coping won't help your fellow countrymen dying in masse trying to conquer a country who built its military from scratch in the last few years.
Russia can't even cross rivers without losing huge amount of men and equipment.

Russia has second best army in Ukraine.

 

[Artemis]

Not even close, L2s can destroy all Russian armor, even the most advanced T-72 in Ukraine, the T-90M.
You will see the difference when Ukies will get Leos and put them in use


Leos are superior at pretty much everything

Th. y will not do shit. lets see what happens to the first delivery. How many poland promised?

 

[Wallenberg]

It is said by WHO? Who exactly measured this?

All i know is Abrams can be destroyed by a fucking grenade launcher.

Who gives a shit about the crew (russians dont) and the turret. If Javelin gets the tank, LEOPARD IS DEAD. Who gives a shit about the turret. Your crew will be fucking dead anyways, and tank destroyed. But ofc you COPE by saying "look how high the turret flies". Lol.

Expect that the crew won't necessarily die the tank is well designed like western tanks are...
Finnish military experts have told that. They have history with both Russian tanks and western tanks. Finland has used both.

 

[Artemis]

Russian army is shit. Your coping won't help your fellow countrymen dying in masse trying to conquer a country who built its military from scratch in the last few years.
Russia can't even cross rivers without losing huge amount of men and equipment.

RUSSIA would DESTROY FINLAND.

THere is that.

YOU COPE.

Russia has second best army in Ukraine.

Russia has SECOND BEST ARMY IN THE WORLD. Otherwise, finland would not need NATO.

Typical Copenberg

 

[Wallenberg]

RUSSIA would DESTROY FINLAND.

THere is that.

YOU COPE.

Russia has SECOND BEST ARMY IN THE WORLD. Otherwise, finland would not need NATO.

Typical Copenberg

Russia can't even destroy Ukraine, which is fighting with old soviet tanks and planes. Finland has good new western tanks and planes, lol.

 

[Artemis]

Expect that the crew won't necessarily die the tank is well designed like western tanks are...

KEEP dreaming like your Leopard and especially Abrasm would survive a Javelin lol.

Finnish military experts have told that. They have history with both Russian tanks and western tanks. Finland has used both.

Oh and your experts are... oh wait, like those experts that said russia will run out of missiles in 2 weeks lol.

Finland has T90M? T14?

T14 >> Leopard.

 

[Artemis]

Russia can't even destroy Ukraine,

Ukraine >> FInland FYI.

Russia is successfully destorying Ukraine so far, so it would easily destroy FInland. Cope more.

which is fighting with old soviet tanks and planes.

Lol, ar eyou DUMB? HIMARS is SOVIET?

Finland has good new western tanks and planes, lol.

Ok, which are USELESS. wihtout a large supply AND large army. Russia will destroy with quantity.

 

[Wallenberg]

KEEP dreaming like your Leopard and especially Abrasm would survive a Javelin lol.

Oh and your experts are... oh wait, like those experts that said russia will run out of missiles in 2 weeks lol.

Finland has T90M? T14?

T14 >> Leopard.

Russia has only a minimal amount of T14, because Russia isn't capable of producing them fast. T90 is rebranded T-72. Russia doesn't have Javelins lol. Javelin is a US missile.
Go read what actual military experts say.

 

[Wallenberg]

Ukraine >> FInland FYI.

Russia is successfully destorying Ukraine so far, so it would easily destroy FInland. Cope more.

Lol, ar eyou DUMB? HIMARS is SOVIET?

Ok, which are USELESS. wihtout a large supply AND large army. Russia will destroy with quantity.

Himars is a MLRS, not a main battle tank. Things like these make it obvious that you don't know anything.
Besides, Finland has M270 MLRS, which is better suited to Finland. So no, HIMARS isn't a miracle weapon. It's just an MLRS.

 

[Artemis]

Russia has only a minimal amount of T14, because Russia isn't capable of producing them fast. T90 is rebranded T-72. Russia doesn't have Javelins lol. Javelin is a US missile.
Go read what actual military experts say.

Dumbass, we were comparing tanks.

So, either show how Leopard survives Javelin, or shut up about "muh russian tanks are inferior to Abrams" shit.