China's economy is collapsing. Check it's soldier median age. Before it fully collapses. They'll do an attack on america like the japanese did in WW2 after USA emborgoed them. 2026 has the best weather for china to attack. 2028 there's gonna be political instability in america.
but they cant because if they did they'd get crushed and rather quickly, nearly every piece of Chinese military technology is a copy of either Soviet or American tech. Their 5th gen fighters were based off 22 billion dollars worth of intellectual property theft (btw, the J20 was picked up on radar by India on multiple occasions, very stealthy). Their jet engine technology is at least a decade behind the US. Also, NATO has the 1st, 6th, 8th, 10th, 11th, 19th, 20th, 21st, 27th, 29th, 32nd, 38th, 41st, 46th, 47, 48th, and 50th strongest militaries. The 5th, 7th, 16th, 24th, 25th, and 34th are also US allies. How many treaty allies does China have? North Korea, thats it, and it isn't bilateral. Even their economic partners, BRICS is in shambles. The Russian invasion of a third world country has stalled, India is moving towards the west, Egypt and Saudi Arabia are US partners, Iran is fighting the Taliban, Isis, and skirmishing with Pakistan, Ethiopia is a joke, and Brazil would never risk intervention because they're in the Rio Pact. China might have help from Russia, Pakistan, Iran, NKorea, and a couple African shitholes, but none of them are contractually obligated to fight with China. The PLA hasn't seen combat since what, Vietnam? Korea? The US has been waging war almost non-stop for 70 years, and doing it effectively. Even Vietnam, a loss, saw 70k casualties to over 1 million. We've been fighting counter insurgency wars for 20 years and we spearheaded Desert Storm. We've been field testing tons of new tactics in Ukraine and getting a near first hand perspective on the conventional 21st century battlefield.
Europe isn't ready for a war. It's bureaucracy is killing it's production, besides even russia outproduces them, and i already addressed that in one of my replies concerning world war 3. China knows that population mean a better economy, which essentially means having a stronger military. Check the median age of soldiers when russia attacked ukraine, and also check china's median age of soldiers in 2030.
Population alone doesn't win wars logistics, alliances, technology, combat experience, and industrial resilience matter way more and on all those fronts, China and Russia are outmatched by NATO and its allies.
It’s gonna be mass genocide and depopulation via wars or bio weapons
By nato you mean the usa only? Europe (without nukes) is just a speed bump for russia. Ukraine single handedly is stopping russia to sperg out over europe. And even then, it is losing, because no one's can win a war of attrition against russia. If nato had actual power, they would have started mobilising when russia breakthroughed ukraine's defensive lines. Nato is america. Without it, it would be nothing. Also speaking of logistics, taiwain is near china, while america would have to stretch it's navy across the world. Assuming it would defend europe.
Army size is irrelevant in the era of nuclear bombs. But I think the east will rape the west in conflict. Look how cooked it already is since fuel is no longer supplied by Russia and Chinese tariffs have halted exportation of goods. Done to try hinder Chinas growth it’s actually had the opposite effect, crippling western economies
If NATO were "just America" then Russia would've steamrolled Ukraine already, yet it's Western (mostly European) weapons, training, and intel keeping Ukraine in the fight and as for Taiwan, China still can't even guarantee air superiority over the strait, let alone conduct a full scale amphibious invasion against the world's most advanced naval power.
Yeah, the West is so 'crippled' that it still leads the world in GDP, tech, military power, and global alliances meanwhile Russia’s selling gas in buckets and China’s economy is held together with ghost cities and censorship
lol if u think it’s Russia vs. Ukraine, it’s really Russia vs. NATO otherwise it would have been a 3 day operation no doubt
Western propaganda, china has automated factories and dystopian technology. They’re miles ahead, everything is made in china. The chinks are taking over bhai
CCP propaganda, If China’s so advanced why were they still importing western chips and stealing IP?
You think ukraine is a weak ass country. Lol no, it's not. It's literally the biggest country in europe (excluding russia), it has war economy, while russia still in partial mobilising. Ukraine's holding on for dear life currently, and i already said it, it's a war of attrition. Russia's officers are getting experience from this war. Of course it's gonna be slow, russia outproduces europe as a whole. Europe can't even mobilise with it's bureaucracy going along. And your last sentences remind me of something. Germany in ww2 had one of the best military tech, right? They still couldn't invade moscow. While russia outproduces them by 10x. Europe will be coping about ''Muhh our equipment is superior''. Face it, europe's stockpilled ammunition will run out in the first weeks of the war. Russia will literally throw it's population if it MEANT winning a war. Ukraine's taking people out of the streets while russians fighting in the war are volunter only. Mind you also, great britain has 40 tanks, which more than half of them don't work. Remind you Europe's economy is going down, and russia's economy going up.
if Russia’s so dominant, why has it taken them over two years and hundreds of thousands of casualties to make marginal gains against a smaller, outgunned country backed by "bureaucratic" Europe? Outproducing doesn’t mean outlasting when your soldiers are using 1960s gear and your economy survives on oil and propaganda.
It’s all over once they take Taiwan, then they’ll have a steady supply of chips
They’re manufactured wars to make weapons companies rich
Already answered your first question, read the whole paragraph, and you'll understand. Also ukraine has more casualties. Outproducing, and logistics are the first steps to winning a war. Russia also produces more than 300 tanks every year.
>ignores my question and all information presented
Ukraine having more casualties doesn’t mean Russia’s winning, wars aren’t won just by bleeding slower and if outproducing and logistics were enough, Russia would’ve steamrolled Ukraine by now instead of getting bogged down for years with no clear victory in sight.
I think i have to answer your question again clearly. Read it.
there will come a “great collapse” and we will return to the pre-industrial revolutional life style (INSHALLAH)Absolutely nothing is going to keep this piece of shit system functioning for much longer. I've aware that "It's gonna collapze soooooon!" is a meme but unironically it's going to. There's just too much bullshit going against it. Even Roman slaves had more free hours than we do jfl (not kidding btw; they worked 6-7 hours a day and got days off during the weekends).
nah bro fuck the left side (right aswell but less)Communism is our last hope
Dude you’re missing the point, Ukraine’s holding on because of support from NATO not just manpower. Russia’s "outproducing" Europe is irrelevant when its logistics and morale are failing, and even with drones Russia hasn’t gained decisive ground. Attrition works both ways and Ukraine’s not giving up anytime soon.
Russia's not using it's actual power on ukraine. If it does, ukraine would be dead next week. When you got equipment, but no manpower. Who's gonna use it?
So if Russia’s not using its full power, why hasn’t it already crushed Ukraine in over two years? If they have all this equipment and firepower yet are still stuck in a grind, maybe the real issue is that Russia’s manpower and strategy are the bigger problems, not just the gear.
Because it's not really a ''war''. Russia's still on ''volunter only'' military. Drone warfare is what made it hard to crush ukraine, and even so. Russia's actually been advancing since ukraine's failed kursk offensive. Russia's just using this war to lean more about warfare for their upcoming wars.
so it’s not a "real war" and Russia’s just using it as a training exercise, yet it has taken so long and cost so many lives and resources for.......? Drone warfare might be slowing them down, but Russia’s not advancing anywhere fast enough to justify calling it a victory. And if they’re using this to "learn" for future wars then thats it’s a pretty expensive lesson with no clear win in sight lol
Yup, that's right. You think after world war one, russia learned it's lesson in world war two? Nope, it's still going. Russia will continue to throw down lives in the frontline until the end of times. Russia isn't gonna suffer a huge blow, and what they wanted will be achieved. They're already advancing quick.
if Russia’s still "learning lessons" after two world wars and decades of failed strategies then that’s a serious problem. The fact they’re "advancing quick" doesn’t mean they’re winning just look at how much ground they’ve lost in the past year and how many casualties they’re taking. Throwing lives away might get them results, but it doesn’t guarantee victory in the long run.
Advancing does mean winning. they're also taking less casualties by a lot.
No it doesn't, ask the US in Vietnam or Germany in WWII. And as for casualties, independent estimates show Russia’s losses are massive they’ve just gotten better at hiding them.
It does, you list exceptions, and germany lost the war when they started getting pushed back. Also, answer me this. How can russia have massive losses, when they have more artilery?
More artillery doesn’t automatically mean fewer casualties when Russia’s using outdated tactics, often sending waves of solders into meat grinders just to hold ground. And also yes, Germany started losing when pushed back that's exactly the point, territorial gain doesn’t equal long-term victory especially if it bleeds your forces dry.
It's not a myth, human wave tactics have been reported by Ukraine, western intel, and even Russian soldiers themselves. And territory matters yes, but only if you can hold it without collapsing your economy or burning through your army which Russia’s already struggling with both.
Proof of human wave tactics? Also russia's economy is doing fine, not good, but it's alright.
here and if Russia’s economy is “alright” it’s only because it's been restructured into a war economy propped up by oil and repression
They're not into a war economy, it's partial mobilising.
