Caucasian muslims are the most mogging muslims out of all islamic races.

Then what ?
I am not sure on the period but i am referring to 1900s-2000s (it is a wide period but you get it) western clothing not that boring housewife one btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987
I am not sure on the period but i am reerring to 1900s-2000s (it is a wide period but you get it) western clothing not that boring housewife one btw
Post pic exemple
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12344
Post pic exemple
Like this jfl standard clothing of a human tbh

Images 24
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987
Muslims from the caucasus are literally what every other muslim race wish they could be.

-Basically white with dark hair and light eyes.

-good hair genes both facial and on top of the head.

- high T

- stands alone against one of the most powerful countries in the world.

-beautiful women who DO cover up modestly as islamically prescribed, but don't look like retarded ninjas in trashbags like arabs.

This is literally what every other muslim race in the world wishes their nation was like. Anyone born caucasian is literally one of luckiest mofos ever born.
these whores don't wear their hijab properly. burn them alive
how can ""muslim"" women be this stupid? they are not supposed to show their damn hair. whatever they do, they try to be bitches
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10913, Deleted member 12344 and Deleted member 10987
View attachment 1176259

burkhamaxxed

eyecolormax.org
Bark louder

The non-Muslim Turks worship of Tengri was mocked and insulted by the Muslim Turk Mahmud al-Kashgari, who wrote a verse referring to them - The Infidels - May God destroy them!
Muslims used to call the Uyghur Buddhists as "Tats", which referred to the "Uighur infidels
he expressed towards Buddhism a hatred in his Diwan where he wrote the verse cycle on the war against Uighur Buddhists. Buddhist origin words like toyin (a cleric or priest) and Burxān or Furxan (meaning Buddha, acquiring the generic meaning of "idol" in the Turkic language of Kashgari) had negative connotations to Muslim Turk
Sultan Satuq Bughra Khan was the first of the khans to convert. After conversion, he obtained a fatwa which permitted him in effect to kill his presumably-still-pagan father, after which he conquered Kashgar
1623525983734
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 12344 and Deleted member 10987
@SayHeyHey
If you alone with your wife at home
She can even walk half naked
The thing is about privacy from others
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 12344
I dunno
Its because you not muslim
I would be jihadi if were born 100 years ago jfl but today believing in religion isnt reasonable at all ngl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10987
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913
  • +1
Reactions: ThatDjangoWalk, Deleted member 12344 and Deleted member 10913
@SayHeyHey
If you alone with your wife at home
She can even walk half naked
The thing is about privacy from others
Indeed the peçe is for outside, the public sphere. People need to understand it was for this purpose and used in most of history by women until obviously the 20th century where huge amounts of feminist and egalitarian propaganda was pushed by socialists and like
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThatDjangoWalk and Deleted member 10987
Indeed the peçe is for outside, the public sphere. People need to understand it was for this purpose and used in most of history by women until obviously the 20th century where huge amounts of feminist and egalitarian propaganda was pushed by socialists and like
Atatürk was feminist tho ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913
Trust me
It is now that its most reasonable
Yeah it kinda shows why religions are right about societies order whatsover but water is wet tbh religious systems that ruled society was best for their period and writer of that books (Mohammed Jesus etc.) understood human nature very well they even fixed us. When atheist retard understand religion is fraud they think all of its content is wrong like a low iq retard and this is how western liberalism born. And i am not talking about how atheism is a different sect of semitic/abrahamic religion.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 10987
I care about what some whore wears in my neighbourhood not in Germany
More then what a Whore wears I care what my wife will wear. If she clothed half naked I wouldn't have married her in the first place. Her being clothed like that only means that she is out there searching and not be thankfull to God and her husband. You might not like it that my wife wears this full garment in the neighborhood which is fine but I like it. I am also not a liberal so if one pushes my wife to wear something that I don't like the proper response from my part will be followed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987
Atatürk was feminist tho ?
Feminism is part of egalitarian view but there are doctrines outside of it. Atatürk was just an egalitarian, he believed in the social changes that happend in France. He has many quotes about women, glorifying them.


1623527530660
1623527588308


As for Islam I have only seen atatürk praise Islam but from a positivist mind, seeing Allah's Resül only as some Arab reformer and these quotes are a minority. More then that there are quotes in which he resents Islam in general. In my opinion he was like a Robespierre in attitudes.

Most leftist also look at him this way or as a 'Revolutionary' in which I take offense at tbh. Copes like 'Islam is like socialism' is not scarce here.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12344 and Deleted member 10987
Yeah it kinda shows why religions are right about societies order whatsover but water is wet tbh religious systems that ruled society was best for their period and writer of that books (Mohammed Jesus etc.) understood human nature very well they even fixed us. When atheist retard understand religion is fraud they think all of its content is wrong like a low iq retard and this is how western liberalism born. And i am not talking about how atheism is a different sect of semitic/abrahamic religion.
Those were script from god tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913
Those were script from god tho
Evolution singlehandly destroys all religions. Love, respect, fear etc. came from evolution of human species therefore these highly emotional scripts cant be from god.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: CFW432, Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 10987
Evolution singlehandly destroys all religions. Love, respect, fear etc. came from evolution of human species therefore these highly emotional scripts cant be from god.
Thats a cope
Evolution for humans is retarded
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bernanddrago, Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 12344
Thats a cope
Evolution for humans is retarded
You can just understand it by just looking it for 5 minutes tbh. Also you know i am right you just dont want to get associated with atheists in my opinion.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987
You can just understand it by just looking it for 5 minutes tbh. Also you know i am right you just dont want to get associated with atheists in my opinion.
Nah im serious
I think evolution is only viable for animals
Not for humans
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 12344
Nah im serious
I think evolution is only viable for animals
Not for humans
I think it is not a debatable topic tbh it is what it is
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 10987
Thats a cope
Evolution for humans is retarded
Funny enough Stalin was on his way to become a priest until he was persuaded by naturalism. The strongest argument for him was evolution. Looking at evolution it's just a theory. Naturalism itself is like paganism, taking nature as your god is not something new but the arguments in it's support are.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12344 and Deleted member 10987
Funny enough Stalin was on his way to become a priest until he was persuaded by naturalism. The strongest argument for him was evolution. Looking at evolution it's just a theory. Naturalism itself is like paganism, taking nature as your god is not something new but the arguments in it's support are.
Naturalism ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913
Funny enough Stalin was on his way to become a priest until he was persuaded by naturalism. The strongest argument for him was evolution. Looking at evolution it's just a theory. Naturalism itself is like paganism, taking nature as your god is not something new but the arguments in it's support are.
Yeah i took nature as my god if i am thinking like this i am aware of that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987 and Deleted member 10913
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 10987
Funny enough Stalin was on his way to become a priest until he was persuaded by naturalism. The strongest argument for him was evolution. Looking at evolution it's just a theory. Naturalism itself is like paganism, taking nature as your god is not something new but the arguments in it's support are.
And i always found stalin based tbh and i agree with him here evolution is strongest arguement againist religion
 
Nah im serious
I think evolution is only viable for animals
Not for humans
Darwinizm itself has already many flaws. There are many theories on evolution but to say Darwin's view is the right one is a big claim. Things like abiogenesis, meaning life coming from non living matter can never be proven or does it make any sense. Having common ancestors with chimps has also many questionable claims.. The whole '99 percentile DNA share with apes' is a April's fool lol. What has been measured is only 2% of the human genome from there it's at best 95% commonality. Let me repeat only 2% of the human genome has been compared with chimps. Nothing more then that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12344, Deleted member 10987 and ThatDjangoWalk
Its TOO much
Think how much we changed in only 2000 year
We didnt change at all in 2000 years human nature and intelligence stayed the same only society developed
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10913, bernanddrago and Deleted member 10987
Darwinizm itself has already many flaws. There are many theories on evolution but to say Darwin's view is the right one is a big claim. Things like abiogenesis, meaning life coming from non living matter can never be proven or does it make any sense. Having common ancestors with chimps has also many questionable claims.. The whole '99 percentile DNA share with apes' is a April's fool lol. What has been measured is only 2% of the human genome from there it's at best 95% commonality. Let me repeat only 2% of the human genome has been compared with chimps. Nothing more then that.
Just have apes as your ancestors theory (which is most likely true)
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 12344
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12344 and bernanddrago
Just have apes as your ancestors theory (which is most likely true)
Saing this is retarded jfl i took humans as my ancestors if we are taking apes as "ancestors" we should take organisms that lived in sea as ancestors too jfl
 
We didnt change at all in 2000 years human nature and intelligence stayed the same only society developed
what an idiot does someone has to be to be able to think like this lol

how the fuck would the human intelligence stay the same while this much of change happened so far
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10913 and Deleted member 12344
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987 and Deleted member 10913
Yeah i took nature as my god if i am thinking like this i am aware of that
What view do you actually hold? Sometime ago I think you associate with hedonism with some deistic views but is this true?
 
what an idiot does someone has to be to be able to think like this lol

how the fuck would the human intelligence stayed the same while this much of change
It is what it is retard lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10913
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bernanddrago and Deleted member 10913
Just have apes as your ancestors theory (which is most likely true)
Meant chimps but the argument still stands. Only 2 percent has ever been compared. That's it. When asked about the other 98% atheists claimed this does nothing until 2010 where this idiot claim was disproven. Go figure 98% of genome does actually does something.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987
I really dont have to explain this to you google it if you wonder that much or just fuck off tbh
typical turkroach behaviour lol

"The ‘Flynn Effect’ describes the phenomenon that over time average IQ scores have been increasing. The change in IQ scores has been approximately three IQ points per decade. One major implications of this trend is that an average individual alive today would have an IQ of 130 by the standards of 1910, placing them higher than 98% of the population at that time. Equivalently, an individual alive in 1910 would have an IQ of 70 by today’s standards."
1623529918356


And yet you're talking about 2000 years ffs
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987, Deleted member 12344, Deleted member 10913 and 1 other person
I think it is not a debatable topic tbh it is what it is
Islam does not deny evolution, it just says that Adam (alayhi a salam) was made in a special manner and in a special place, created with privilege and without parents, being the first human being created by Al Khaaliq (The Creator). And yes, Al Insan (The human being) is indeed special since it is the only being capable of asking himself "What am i doing here?" and those kind of philosophical questions. I don't see ant tiger or fish going around trying to solve a mathematical problem when he has his needs covered.

Allah says that both human beings and animals are made from water (interpretation of the meaning): 'And We created from water every living thing. Would they still not believe?'

He also said (interpretation of the meaning): 'And of His Signs is that He created you from dust'- Approximately 90% of the human body comes from stardust.

Here, my clear interpretation and others says that Allah confirms that there is no problem with relating the DNA of Al Insan with other living beings, since we are made with similar elements and traits, but confirms that we are a step more special.

Evolution probably denies other religions, i agree with that. The only way to deny Al Islam by it on the other hand is to bring the first Homo Sapiens fossil (or whatever it may be, they are still lost in that regard) and demonstrate to us somehow that it is not Adam (alayhi a salam). Allah ommits the errors of others.

If you are more interested in this subject i recommend you this channel of this man, who has debated many specialists and elites on the subject: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCRkKHyivwGmz36qGgXnZHjQ
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987 and Deleted member 10913
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10987 and Deleted member 12344
typical turkroach behaviour lol

"The ‘Flynn Effect’ describes the phenomenon that over time average IQ scores have been increasing. The change in IQ scores has been approximately three IQ points per decade. One major implications of this trend is that an average individual alive today would have an IQ of 130 by the standards of 1910, placing them higher than 98% of the population at that time. Equivalently, an individual alive in 1910 would have an IQ of 70 by today’s standards."
View attachment 1176352

And yet you're talking about 2000 years ffs
it will drop in the next decades in europe and usa

not just through immigration this has nothing to do w your post just saying
 
  • +1
Reactions: bernanddrago

Similar threads

RICEascension
Replies
9
Views
61
TrueAfghan
TrueAfghan
halabi
Replies
36
Views
200
ØUROBOROS
ØUROBOROS
.Orbital
Replies
14
Views
133
.Orbital
.Orbital
mlglocalfatkid
Replies
40
Views
288
Alton
Alton

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →