Chad = Chang = Chaddam = Chadpreet = Tyrone

[thecel]

So many people here have the concepts of Chang, Chadpreet, Chaddam, Tyrone, and Chad wrong.

If you say stuff like—

• “Changs can never mog Chads”
• “He's a Chang but he's still mogged to oblivion by White Chad, brutal”
• “Chang can be mogged by even White Chadlites at times”
• “Chadpreets and Chaddams mog the hardest”

—then your understanding of basic looks knowledge is shaky.

Chang, Chadpreet, Chaddam, and Tyrone are only race-specific terms for Chad. They're subsets of the broader category of Chad. Changs are Chads, Tyrones are Chads, etc.

The looks level range that defines Chads, Changs, etc. are all the same. Chad is ≥ 8/10, and so is Chang, Tyrone, and all other Chad subtypes.

People who believe that Chads and Changs don't have the same standard make one of 2 errors in their thinking:

1. believing the definition of Chad is based on percentile within ethnicities, e.g. top 1% of men per ethnicity, not absolute attractiveness
2. believing the PSL and decile scales adapt to different geographic locations, like the standard for 8/10 is lower in places with less hot men

Both of these beliefs are incorrect.

Chad, Tyrone, Chang, Chaddam, and Chadpreet all correspond to the exact same 8–10/10 range on the universal decile scale.

Saying Chang gets mogged, facially, by Chadlite, is a logical impossibility.

It's utterly idiotic to say—

“Broootal! Gigachang doesn't even mog Indian Chadlite!”

—and post these pictures:

Bro, if a man you call "Gigachang" gets mogged by a Chadlite, maybe you should reconsider your rating of the Asian man. He probably isn't a Gigachang at all.

Think about it, dude—does it make sense to say a Gigachad gets mogged by a Chadlite? No. Why is it any different for Gigachang? Gigachangs are Gigachads too.

Now, whether Gigachangs actually exist is another argument. I believe Gigachangs don't exist. To refute this, show me ONE EXAMPLE of a FULL ASIAN, NOT MIXED, guy who mogs Gandy, O’Pry, and other PSL gods FACIALLY.

 

[NarcyChadlite]

Chad = Chang*in the west = Chaddam*in the west = Chadpreet​

*in the west = Tyrone*in the west​

 

[Deleted member 11053]

Nah wtf go back arguing in my thread don't make your own

 

[Gonthar]

Naaah, many girls would avoid a Chang or Chadpreet and prefer a white normie instead, there are many Tinder experiments with Changs & shit and they did much worse than white Chads...

 

[Deleted member 11748]

cope.

women would rather date a white normie than a changlite, sometimes even a chang

 

[Wallenberg]

Naaah, many girls would avoid a Chang or Chadpreet and prefer a white normie instead, there are many Tinder experiments with Changs & shit and they did much worse than white Chads...

Aesthetics vs SMV?

 

[thecel]

Naaah, many girls would avoid a Chang or Chadpreet and prefer a white normie instead, there are many Tinder experiments with Changs & shit and they did much worse than white Chads...

Are they really Changs if women don't find them attractive? Didn't think so.

 

[SeiGun]

 

[Beetlejuice]

SMV and looks are not necessarily the same thing

 

[thecel]

View attachment 1075220

6/10

 

[Chadeep]

Naaah, many girls would avoid a Chang or Chadpreet and prefer a white normie instead, there are many Tinder experiments with Changs & shit and they did much worse than white Chads...

Why do Asian Chad's do the worst among other races? A Curry and Middle Eastern Chad was only a few matches away from White Chad in many experiments.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

SMV and looks are not necessarily the same thing

Yeah, this whole thread is basically answered by this.

 

[Gonthar]

Why do Asian Chad's do the worst among other races? A Curry and Middle Eastern Chad was only a few matches away from White Chad in many experiments.

They simply don't feel familiar to most people, they can look very different like they are another race, another species, people are more comfortable with what's familiar and known.

 

[thecel]

Yeah, this whole thread is basically answered by this.

Facemogging is based on looks.

A true Chang in the West might have less SMV than a Chadlite, but the Chang definitely mogs the Chadlite facially.

It makes no sense to say a Chadlite mogs a Chang PSL-wise. PSL is based on looks only, not SMV.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Facemogging is based on looks.

A true Chang in the West might have less SMV than a Chadlite, but the Chang definitely mogs the Chadlite facially.

It makes no sense to say a Chadlite mogs a Chang PSL-wise. PSL is based on looks only, not SMV.

Yeah exactly why did you huh me? The reason there is contention is because people are using SMV and PSL interchangeably. I agree chang always mogs chadlite based on PSL and aesthetics but SMV wise it's different.

 

[thecel]

SMV and looks are not necessarily the same thing

I agree, but terms like "Chad" are purely looks-based. It doesn't factor in money, status, or women's opinions about dating foreigners or races other than their own. Chad, Tyrone, Chang, etc. are simply defined as 8/10 or higher, and that's all there is to it.

Saying Chang gets mogged, facially, by Chadlite, is a logical impossibility.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Chang’s Chads Tyrones and Chadpreets almost always look the same in some degree only differing factor is skin colour

 

[Chadeep]

They simply don't feel familiar to most people, they can look very different like they are another race, another species, people are more comfortable with what's familiar and known.

But Blacks do well despite not having Caucasoid skull. I think media plays a important role in how people perceive attractive people.

 

[thecel]

Yeah exactly why did you huh me? The reason there is contention is because people are using SMV and PSL interchangeably. I agree chang always mogs chadlite based on PSL and aesthetics but SMV wise it's different.

Yeah SMV is different. I made this thread cus I come across people posting dumb shit like calling Daniel Dae Kim a "Chang" and saying he's not even as good-looking as some White Chadlites. The keyword is good-looking; they aren't talking about SMV, they're talking about pure looks.

 

[Gonthar]

But Blacks do well despite not having Caucasoid skull. I think media plays a important role in how people perceive attractive people.

Yes, they do a little better, they have been in the media and popular culture for decades, so again - familiarity.

 

[thecel]

But Blacks do well despite not having Caucasoid skull.

Their skulls are better than Caucasoids (except for chin, nasal bridge, and nasal aperture) jfl

 

[court monarch777]

mulato chad mogs all

 

[Deleted member 756]

Chang’s Chads Tyrones and Chadpreets almost always look the same in some degree only differing factor is skin colour

basically yes but some chads are rarer than others

 

[fogdart]

mulato chad mogs all

Exactly. Mulatos like this guy have the highest SMV

 

[Jason Voorhees]

With this logic changs, chadpreets, chaddams do not exist

 

[Deleted member 6531]

Chaddams Chadpreets are caucasian and are good looking versions of their sub category

Chang's don't fit caucasian beauty standards as they're not caucausoid so ofc they won't do as well as the chaddams and Chadpreets who are still caucasian

Chang's can be good looking but they're unlikely to fit caucasian beauty standards . Very unlikely for a chang to have hunter eyes and shit. Can still have a thick brow ridge and good eyes but it won't be the classic hunter eyes like you see on caucasian guys.

 

[Deleted member 6531]

Show experiments pls

Why do Asian Chad's do the worst among other races? A Curry and Middle Eastern Chad was only a few matches away from White Chad in many experiments.

 

[Deleted member 6531]

Chaddams Chadpreets are caucasian and are good looking versions of their sub category

Chang's don't fit caucasian beauty standards as they're not caucausoid so ofc they won't do as well as the chaddams and Chadpreets who are still caucasian

Chang's can be good looking but they're unlikely to fit caucasian beauty standards . Very unlikely for a chang to have hunter eyes and shit. Can still have a thick brow ridge and good eyes but it won't be the classic hunter eyes like you see on caucasian guys.

Basically My point is good looking indians and brown middle easterners are still caucasian so women look at them as if like theyre just a brown version of a white guy, because essentially they look the same as hot white guys just the Chadpreets and chaddams may have slightly different shaped noses/ and no coloured eyes.

However with good looking east asians because theyre not caucasoid at all, they'll never look white in any way if they're full east asian, so they'll never compete in the same domain as Chadpreets, chads, chaddams. They're still attractive it's just that their nit attractive to caucasian beauty standards and therefore women find it hard to find them attractive cuz they look so vastly different

 

[Deleted member 12344]

Why do Asian Chad's do the worst among other races? A Curry and Middle Eastern Chad was only a few matches away from White Chad in many experiments.

Because curry and middle eastern chads generally either look so exotic or they look white

 

[Deleted member 12344]

Yeah, this whole thread is basically answered by this.

You dont get the what op is trying to say tbh

 

[Deleted member 6273]

You dont get the what op is trying to say tbh

Yeah exactly why did you huh me? The reason there is contention is because people are using SMV and PSL interchangeably. I agree chang always mogs chadlite based on PSL and aesthetics but SMV wise it's different.

 

[Deleted member 12344]

I havent read that part yet @africancel

 

[one job away]

So many people here have the concepts of Chang, Chadpreet, Chaddam, Tyrone, and Chad wrong.

If you say stuff like—

• “Changs can never mog Chads”
• “He's a Chang but he's still mogged to oblivion by White Chad, brutal”
• “Chang can be mogged by even White Chadlites at times”
• “Chadpreets and Chaddams mog the hardest”

—then your understanding of basic looks knowledge is shaky.

Chang, Chadpreet, Chaddam, and Tyrone are only race-specific terms for Chad. They're subsets of the broader category of Chad. Changs are Chads, Tyrones are Chads, etc.

The looks level range that defines Chads, Changs, etc. are all the same. Chad is ≥ 8/10, and so is Chang, Tyrone, and all other Chad subtypes.

People who believe that Chads and Changs don't have the same standard make one of 2 errors in their thinking:

1. believing the definition of Chad is based on percentile within ethnicities, e.g. top 1% of men per ethnicity, not absolute attractiveness
2. believing the PSL and decile scales adapt to different geographic locations, like the standard for 8/10 is lower in places with less hot men

Both of these beliefs are incorrect.

Chad, Tyrone, Chang, Chaddam, and Chadpreet all correspond to the exact same 8–10/10 range on the universal decile scale.

Saying Chang gets mogged, facially, by Chadlite, is a logical impossibility.

It's utterly idiotic to say—

“Broootal! Gigachang doesn't even mog Indian Chadlite!”

—and post these pictures:

View attachment 1075210View attachment 1075208

Bro, if a man you call "Gigachang" gets mogged by a Chadlite, maybe you should reconsider your rating of the Asian man. He probably isn't a Gigachang at all.

Think about it, dude—does it make sense to say a Gigachad gets mogged by a Chadlite? No. Why is it any different for Gigachang? Gigachangs are Gigachads too.

Now, whether Gigachangs actually exist is another argument. I believe Gigachangs don't exist. To refute this, show me ONE EXAMPLE of a FULL ASIAN, NOT MIXED, guy who mogs Gandy, O’Pry, and other PSL gods FACIALLY.

shit thread and just wrong

 

[thecel]

With this logic changs, chadpreets, chaddams do not exist

Chadpreets and Chaddams exist. Changs don’t.

 

[volcelfatcel]

Chadpreets and Chaddams exist. Changs don’t.

One of the unicorn changs but mostly agree they're the rarest by far. Fact he is managing to hold his own against God himself is impressive.

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

negroid and mongoloid skulls are very different from caucasoid skulls, so their beauty standards are different.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Chadpreets and Chaddams exist. Changs don’t.

Would you consider polynesian or amerindian chads as changs?

 

[thecel]

One of the unicorn changs but mostly agree they're the rarest by far. Fact he is managing to hold his own against God himself is impressive.
View attachment 1105868

He isn't a Chang. Facially he's just HTN.

 

[thecel]

negroid and mongoloid skulls are very different from caucasoid skulls, so their beauty standards are different.

Some minor differences in beauty standards, but there're lots of UNIVERSALLY attractive traits.

Like a high, projected nose bridge. Asians want this, but it's a Caucasoid trait.

Forward growth. Caucasoids have more of it than Mongoloids. However Mongoloid populations like forward-grown faces just like Caucasoids.

Big eyes. Double eyelids. Prominent brow ridge (males). Low-set eyebrows (males). Light eyes. Asians find these attractive in Asians. Caucasoids just happen to have more of the traits that're universally attractive. The only thing they lack is plump lips.

 

[Deleted member 13591]

One of the unicorn changs but mostly agree they're the rarest by far. Fact he is managing to hold his own against God himself is impressive.
View attachment 1105868

isnt he half white?

 

[Deleted member 13591]

He isn't a Chang. Facially he's just HTN.

haloed by height
hes like 6'4

 

[volcelfatcel]

isnt he half white?

No he isn't happa hu bing is full Asian

 

[Deleted member 4310]

You forgot Chadriguez and Chav (latino and slavic)

And what are native american Chads called? Chadkekouwiaa?

 

[Deleted member 13591]

No he isn't happa hu bing is full Asian

thought he was godfrey my bad

 

[thecel]

You forgot Chadriguez and Chav (latino and slavic)

And what are native american Chads called? Chadkekouwiaa?

Chladimir

 

[Sanguinius]

Chad logic

 

[Lolcel]

Why do Asian Chad's do the worst among other races? A Curry and Middle Eastern Chad was only a few matches away from White Chad in many experiments.

What i think is that the Chang most guys select here is maesthetic most , having which doesn't make Asian men much desired
Meanwhile a prettyboy chang like Jimin or someone from BTS has really high appeal to many girls
I'd say Asian pretty boy = white pretty boy

 

[WadlowMaxxing]

View attachment 1075220

lmao what a fucking cope

only mentally unstable white girls and 4/10 gooks like these frauded tranny abominations

source: I had art class for 2 years

 

[Lolcel]

lmao what a fucking cope

only mentally unstable white girls and 4/10 gooks like these frauded tranny abominations

source: I had art class for 2 years

Cope they have a very high appeal among most JBs

 

[thecel]

If you say stuff like—

• “Changs can never mog Chads”
• “He's a Chang but he's still mogged to oblivion by White Chad, brutal”
• “Chang can be mogged by even White Chadlites at times”
• “Chadpreets and Chaddams mog the hardest”

—then your understanding of basic looks knowledge is shaky.

Thus a chad Indian is equal to a chadlite white and an HTN Indian is equal to a white normie and so forth.

this quote too